The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 77
GARNISHMENT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 77.17

77.17 Compensation to garnishee.—The garnishee shall be allowed the pay of a witness for the garnishee’s attendance out of the debt owed to defendant or the property in the garnishee’s possession. If there is no debt or property in the garnishee’s possession, the allowance shall be against plaintiff.

History.—s. 7, ch. 43, 1845; RS 1678; GS 2142; RGS 3444; CGL 5297; s. 27, ch. 67-254; s. 396, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 77.17 on Google Scholar

F.S. 77.17 on Casetext

Amendments to 77.17

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 77.17

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 77.17.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

TOWN OF BARNSTABLE, MASSACHUSETTS, v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, LLC,, 740 F.3d 681 (D.C. Cir. 2014)

. . . . § 77.17. . . . . § 77.17(a)(2), but regardless of its location a structure higher than 499 feet above ground level will . . . Id. § 77.17(a)(1). . . . “Therefore, even if the proposed wind turbines exceeded an obstruction standard in 14 CFR § 77.17, they . . . turbines, individually and as a group, would neither exceed the obstruction standards in 14 C.F.R. § 77.17 . . .

BFI WASTE SYSTEMS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION,, 293 F.3d 527 (D.C. Cir. 2002)

. . . . § 77.17(a). . . .

OF AMERICA BANK, MID- MICHIGAN, N. A. a E. W. v. UNITED STATES, 752 F. Supp. 764 (E.D. Mich. 1990)

. . . 56.48 29.07 1999 59.49 28.03 2000 62.67 27.06 2001 66.02 26.16 2002 69.54 25.32 2003 73.26 24.52 2004 77.17 . . .

MAIN STREET PUBLISHERS, INC. v. LANDMARK COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 701 F. Supp. 1289 (N.D. Miss. 1988)

. . . of $73.30 before July 1, 1987 for producing a page of advertising and an average variable cost of $77.17 . . .

CALIFORNIA v. ARIZONA, 452 U.S. 431 (U.S. 1981)

. . . S 18°48'55" W 77.17 feet; 755. S 10°42'08// E 162.73 feet; 756. S 22°47'29// E 164.14 feet; 757. . . .

In PILLOW, Jr. L. PILLOW, Jr. v. AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, In W. GEIGLE, W. GEIGLE, v. AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, In W. HORTON J. W. HORTON, v. AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, In J. REVELLO O. J. REVELLO O. v. AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES,, 8 B.R. 404 (Bankr. D. Utah 1981)

. . . See, e. g., 5 Collier on Bankruptcy, rr 77.17 and 77.19 (14th ed. 1978); 6A Id., •' 10.16; 3 D. . . .

ITT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a v. BARTON, a k a A. R. R. P. A., 569 F.2d 1351 (5th Cir. 1978)

. . . Finally, if the garnishee prevailed at trial, § 77.17 provided that “[t]he garnishee shall be allowed . . .

F. GONSOULIN, Sr. v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, 321 F. Supp. 900 (W.D. La. 1971)

. . . drawn up in connection with the unitization agreement showed that the Gonsoulins had been allocated 77.17 . . .

H. MINVIELLE v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, 321 F. Supp. 884 (W.D. La. 1971)

. . . declared a 160-acre unit by pooling with the Minvielle land an adjacent tract owned by the Gonsoulins 77.17 . . .

W. WIRTZ, v. MILLER,, 226 F. Supp. 15 (E.D.N.C. 1964)

. . . McDuffie 63.71 Sidney Raper 77.17 William J. Ray 348.33 G. S. Saunders 686.04 Thomas S. . . .

v., 24 C.C.P.A. 248 (C.C.P.A. 1936)

. . . Spice, RM. 5.... 85.71 85.71 76.79 76.95 77.05 77.42 77.17 76.67 77.17 76.85 54.15 82.27 79.00 79.33 . . . 78.83 77.37 75.70 77.17 78.19 78.67 77.36 52.15 The United States Customs Court overruled tbe protests . . .

CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STURM, 174 U.S. 710 (U.S. 1899)

. . . plaintiff in error, and at that time plaintiff in error was indebted to defendant in error in the sum of $77.17 . . .

WOOD v. UNITED STATES, 72 F. 254 (2d Cir. 1896)

. . . pursuance of the statute of Marcli 3, 1873, estimated the value of the rouble for the year 1874, at 77.17 . . . all imported merchandise expressed in such currency, to wit, Russian roubles, of 100 copecks, silver, 77.17 . . . the effect of the act of 1873 was to repeal the act of 3843, and that the rouble must be computed at 77.17 . . .

HEINEMANN v. ARTHUR S EXECUTORS, 120 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1887)

. . . The collector computed the rouble at 77.17 cents, under the authority of a proclamation to that effect . . . Computing it at 77.17 cents raised such invoice value above twelve cents per pound. . . . than the invoice or entered value; (3) the collector was, therefore, required to compute the rouble at 77.17 . . . The collector reduced -the amount into United States money at 77.17 cents to the rouble. . . . this statute the director of the mint estimated the value of the Bussian rouble for the year 1874 at 77.17 . . . all imported merchandise expressed in such currency, to wit,' Bussian roubles of 100 copecks, silver, 77.17 . . . of the entry, according to that value as determined in accordance Avith the act of 1873, Avhich was 77.17 . . .