Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 78.12 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 78.12 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 78.12

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 78
REPLEVIN
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 78.12
78.12 Writ; execution on property removed from jurisdiction.At the time of service of the writ if the property to be replevied is located outside the county of the court issuing the writ, the party having had the writ issued shall deliver it to the sheriff of the county where the property is located and to whom the writ is directed, and the sheriff shall execute the writ and shall, unless the writ directs otherwise, deliver the property to the plaintiff.
History.RS 1718; GS 2182; RGS 3487; CGL 5340; s. 28, ch. 67-254; s. 1, ch. 73-20; s. 8, ch. 87-405.

F.S. 78.12 on Google Scholar

F.S. 78.12 on Casetext

Amendments to 78.12


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 78.12
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 78.12.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 78.12

Total Results: 15

Kelley v. Kelley

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-08-15

Citation: 987 So. 2d 1246, 2008 WL 3539514

Snippet: This in turn results in the husband having a $78.12% obligation and the wife having a 21.68% obligation

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2004-03-24

Snippet: in that chapter. 15 And see Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 78-12 (1978) stating that the payment of the costs of

Huri Enterprises, Inc. v. Spectacular Midways, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-07-28

Citation: 530 So. 2d 956, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1783, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3403, 1988 WL 76422

Snippet: the county). The appellant’s reliance on section 78.12, Florida Statutes (1987) for its contention that

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-05-15

Snippet: officers and employees. Attorney General Opinion 78-12. See, AGO 78-76, noting that payment of the costs

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1985-01-10

Snippet: expenditure. See, e.g., AGO's 77-8, 75-120, 68-12, 71-28, 78-12, 73-148, 67-20, 74-299. See also, Florida Development

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-08-19

Snippet: provision authorizing him to do so. Thus in AGO 078-12 this office concluded that the board of trustees

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-08-17

Snippet: compensation is being received have been rendered; AGO 078-12 which opined that since no statute or rule of the

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-05-02

Snippet: duty. See, e.g., AGO's 078-68, 078-67, 078-56, and 078-12. See also AGO 072-319 in which this office stated

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-11-28

Snippet: cert. dismissed,300 So.2d 900 (Fla. 1974); cf. AGO 078-12. I find no express provision in the statutes governing

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-09-19

Snippet: be exercised. Attorney General Opinions 072-319, 078-12, 078-56, 078-67, and 078-68; see also State ex

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-09-12

Snippet: with authority to bear arms and make arrests); and 078-12 (no statute or valid rule of the State Board of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1978-05-16

Snippet: . . ` have upon the conclusion reached in AGO 078-12? SUMMARY: A provision of a collective bargaining

Smith Bros. Inc. v. Williams

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1930-02-18

Citation: 126 So. 367, 100 Fla. 642

Snippet: corporations. Cooley on Taxation, 4th Ed., Secs. 74, 75, 78; 12 C. J. 842; State ex rel. v. Green, 116 So. R. 66

Williams v. Pringle

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1911-01-15

Citation: 61 Fla. 485

Snippet: complete, $750.00; one 54" inserted tooth saw, $80.00; 78' 12" 6 ply Gandy belt; $65.00; one three saw edger

Johnson v. Pensacola & Perdido Railroad

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1878-06-15

Citation: 16 Fla. 623

Snippet: cited: 12 Gray, 393 ; 2 P. C., 237; 4 C. B., (N. S.) 78; 12 C. B., (N. S.) 74. While the text is the reasonable