Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-27
Snippet: stipulated to a consent final judgment of $242,079.1 Ms. Bonsignori did not settle the claims against
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-13
Snippet: judgment was at least 25% less than the PFS. See § 768.79(1), Fla. Stat. (2022). Per statute, “judgment obtained”
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-11-08
Snippet: of no liability as contemplated in section 768.79(1).” Id.; see also Annesser, 346 So. 3d at 196 (“To
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-14
Snippet: Gorka, 36 So. 3d 646, 650 (Fla. 2010)). Section 768.79(1) provides that "[i]n any civil action for damages
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-08-02
Snippet: entireties account. She also relied on section 655.79(1), Florida Statutes (2017), arguing that it codified
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-26
Snippet: requiring a response from the detaining authority. § 79.01, Fla. Stat. (2022); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.630(d)(4)
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-05-15
Snippet: than the defendant’s offer to the plaintiff. § 768.79(1), Fla. Stat. (2021). “[T]he offer-of-judgment statute
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-04-17
Snippet: Kuhajda, 202 So. 3d at 394. Section 768.79(1), Florida Statutes, states that a defendant who
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-08
Snippet: action in 4 While section 768.79(1)–(2) references “offer[s] of judgment” and “offer[s]
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-01-17
Snippet: directed at appellants’ March 6 proposal. See § 768.79(1), Fla. Stat. (2020); Kaufman v. Smith, 693 So. 2d
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-06-15
Snippet: pursuing the penalties of this section. § 768.79(1) (emphasis added). Two portions of the text
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-04-19
Snippet: exception for shareholder derivative suits. § 768.79(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). Although rule 1.442 formerly
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-02-15
Snippet: the statutory presumption created by section 655.79(1), Florida Statutes (2011), in favor of the account
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-10-20
Snippet: So. 2d 197, 198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (“[Section 768.79(1)] does not prevent an offeree from actually accepting
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-10-12
Snippet: more than that in in 2008 by amending section 655.79(1), Florida Statutes, to provide: “Any deposit or
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-09-21
Snippet: which may be imposed by the board . . . .” § 456.079(1), Fla. Stat. These guidelines “provide reasonable
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-25
Snippet: of Florida’s drug trafficking law in 1979. Ch. 79- 1, § 1, Laws of Fla. The Legislature added trafficking
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-08-17
Snippet: and Rule 1.420(d), and fees under section 768.79, 1 Annesser filed a motion seeking a dismissal with
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-04-13
Snippet: incurred from the date the offer was served. § 768.79(1), (6)(b), Fla. Stat. (2020) (emphasis added).
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-12-01
Snippet: We begin with the relevant statute. Section 768.79(1) provides, in pertinent part: In any civil