Cases from cite.case.law:

D. F. v. STATE, 248 So. 3d 1232 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to section 79.01, Florida Statutes (2017 . . .

HOWARTH, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 220 So. 3d 485 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . However, the defendant’s petition was properly, tiled pursuant to the provisions of section 79.01 of . . .

B. BANKS, Jr. v. STATE, 211 So. 3d 1104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, Article I, Section 13 of the Florida Constitution, and section 79.01 . . .

HENNIG, v. G. PRUMMELL, Jr. Of, 198 So. 3d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . See § 79.01, Fla. Stat. (2014). In Stafford v. . . .

CLOUGH, v. STATE, 136 So. 3d 680 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . See § 79.01, Fla. Stat. (2009). We have jurisdiction, see Fla. R. App. . . . Section 79.01 provides that a “person detained in custody” may by a writ of habeas corpus show “that . . . Clough also recognizes that when a petitioner improperly seeks relief under section 79.01, the postconviction . . . Clough filed his petition pursuant to section 79.01. . . .

BRADFORD, v. STATE PAROLE COMMISSION,, 93 So. 3d 1180 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . beyond the scope of whether Bradford is being detained by the State without lawful authority (see § 79.01 . . .

A. QUARLES, v. STATE, 56 So. 3d 857 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . . § 79.01, Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.630(d)(5). . . . .” § 79.01, Fla. Stat. See also Smith v. . . .

ROBENSON, v. A. McNEIL,, 39 So. 3d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . . § 79.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

MENDENHALL, a v. CITY OF AKRON, 374 F. App'x 598 (6th Cir. 2010)

. . . Under Section 79.01, Akron does not provide an owner with a mechanism to avoid an erroneous deprivation . . . Specifically, Section 79.01 instructs the hearing officer to consider such issues as “whether the vehicle . . . Plaintiff received a civil citation under Akron City Code § 79.01, as the owner of a car that was recorded . . .

D. THOMPSON, v. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 595 F.3d 1233 (11th Cir. 2010)

. . . . § 79.01 (2009) (vesting the state supreme court, district courts of appeal, and circuit courts with . . . Ann. §§ 79.01, 79.09. . . . The State asserts that, pursuant to Florida Statute § 79.01, a condition to filing a state habeas petition . . . Florida Statute § 79.01 provides as follows: When any person detained in custody, whether charged with . . . Ann. § 79.01. . . .

FRANKLIN, Jr. v. STATE, 25 So. 3d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 79.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

UNITED STATES v. COCCHIOLA, v., 358 F. App'x 376 (3d Cir. 2009)

. . . Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 79.01 (1965)). . . . .

BROWN, v. A. McNEIL,, 22 So. 3d 741 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . . § 79.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

C. BONNER, v. STATE, 866 So. 2d 163 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . See § 79.01, Fla. Stat. . . .

MURRAY, v. REGIER,, 872 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 2002)

. . . Fourth District Court of Appeal and transferring petition to the Fourth District Court); see also § 79.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. EASTERN MEDICAL BILLING, INC. v. v., 230 F.3d 600 (3d Cir. 2000)

. . . Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 79.01 (1965)). . . . court wishing to instruct jurors to consult with each other should use the language we quoted from § 79.01 . . . Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 79.01 (1965). . . .

NEWKIRK, v. JENNE,, 754 So. 2d 61 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Both Article V, section 5(b) of the Florida Constitution and section 79.01, Florida Statutes, provide . . .

STEELE, v. E. KEHOE,, 724 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . Section 79.01 Application and writ: When any person detained in custody, whether charged with a criminal . . .

McLEROY, v. STATE, 704 So. 2d 151 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . See § 79.01, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

CARTER, v. STATE, 693 So. 2d 111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 79.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). . §§ 784.021(l)(a), 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

ALACHUA REGIONAL JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER, v. T. O. a, 684 So. 2d 814 (Fla. 1996)

. . . Rubin, 122 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); see also § 79.01, Fla. . . .

UNITED STATES, v. GIAMPA, a k a a k a, 904 F. Supp. 235 (D.N.J. 1995)

. . . Fioravanti, 412 F.2d at 420 n. 32 (quoting Mathes & Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and, Instructions ¶ 79.01 . . .

ROY, v. L. TOMLINSON, H., 639 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . . § 79.01, Fla.Stat. . . .

UNITED STATES v. O. BERTOLI,, 854 F. Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994)

. . . Fioravanti, 412 F.2d at 420 n. 32 (quoting Mathes & Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions ¶ 79.01 . . .

In P. A. G. a DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, STATE OF FLORIDA, v. M. G., 584 So. 2d 600 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . judgment of adoption, i.e., unless there is a legal obligation to issue a writ pursuant to section 79.01 . . .

STATE v. E. BOLYEA,, 520 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1988)

. . . this state, expressed in article I, section 13 of its constitution and implemented by statute, section 79.01 . . .

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a v. C. S. Mc CROSSAN, INC. a a, 829 F.2d 702 (8th Cir. 1987)

. . . . § 79.01 (1978); a change in rate is ineffective until approved by the Commissioner, § 79.20; a change . . .

SECCIA, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 487 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 79.01, Florida Statutes. . . .

C. GLINTON, v. WILLE,, 457 So. 2d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . requirements in filing his petition, specifically: (1) failure to file an affidavit as required by Section 79.01 . . .

In M. S. a, 455 So. 2d 557 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . First, it did not comply with section 79.01, Florida Statutes (1983), as there was no showing of any . . .

TAYLOR, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 418 So. 2d 1095 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See § 79.01, Fla. Stat. (1981); Velluei v. Cochran, 138 So.2d 510 (Fla. 1962); and Coleman v. . . .

JENRETTE, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 410 So. 2d 575 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 79.01, Florida Statutes (1981), expressly provides that a habeas petitioner may meet his initial . . .

UNITED STATES v. C. LaBAR,, 521 F. Supp. 203 (M.D. Pa. 1981)

. . . Government Exhibit 79.01 showed a close correlation between the amount of cash paid by Petroleum Suppliers . . . The Defendants argued at trial and renew their argument now that Exhibit 79.01 was inaccurate because . . . Government Exhibit 79.01 accurately sets forth the information on which it was based. . . . The Court’s conclusion that Exhibit 79.01 was properly admitted is not effected by the fact that two . . . For these reasons, admission of Government Exhibit 79.01 was proper and not a ground for a new trial. . . .

BECKHAM, a k a v. STATE, 397 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . See Section 79.01, Florida Statutes (1979). . . .

M. PICCIRILLO, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 382 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

. . . Florida Statutes, § 79.01, is, in pertinent part, as follows: “Whenever any person detained in custody . . .

POLK, v. CROCKETT,, 379 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

. . . And § 79.01, Fla.Stat., requires that such a petition shall be granted only upon “affidavit or evidence . . .

UNITED STATES v. MARCONI, 449 F. Supp. 81 (E.D. Pa. 1978)

. . . This instruction, extracted from “Federal Jury Practice and Instructions,” Mathes and Devitt, 1965, § 79.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. D. LEE,, 532 F.2d 911 (3d Cir. 1976)

. . . The court used the charge set out in Mathes and Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions § 79.01 . . .

KOHLER, v. SANDSTROM,, 305 So. 2d 76 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

. . . submit a sworn petition or affidavits, or offer evidence under oath, denying identity; and (that § 79.01 . . .

STATE J. RENALDI, v. O. SANDSTROM,, 276 So. 2d 109 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

. . . This is so because of the express provision of § 79.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A., that the court (whether Supreme . . .

GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS v. FELIX CARRION HERNANDEZ IRIS LOPEZ HERNANDEZ GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS v. FELIX CARRION HERNANDEZ IRIS LOPEZ HERNANDEZ, 9 V.I. 604 (3d Cir. 1973)

. . . process to the charge suggested by Mathes and Devitt, “Federal Jury Practice and Instructions,” 1965, § 79.01 . . .

GOVERNMENT OF VIRGIN ISLANDS v. HERNANDEZ,, 476 F.2d 791 (3d Cir. 1973)

. . . process to the charge suggested by Mathes and Devitt, “Federal Jury Practice and Instructions,” 1965, § 79.01 . . .

UNITED STATES v. A. SAWYERS, J. W., 423 F.2d 1335 (4th Cir. 1970)

. . . recommended use of the charge formulated in Mathes & Devitt, Federal Jury Practice and Instructions, § 79.01 . . .

A. BAGGETT, v. L. WAINWRIGHT,, 229 So. 2d 239 (Fla. 1969)

. . . Section 79.01, F.S.A., confers similar jurisdiction to circuit judges. Nevertheless, F.S. . . .

BROWN, v. CHASTAIN, 416 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1969)

. . . . § 79.01 (1969 supp.) ; see e. g., Trotman v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FIORAVANTI,, 412 F.2d 407 (3d Cir. 1969)

. . . following charge extracted from “Federal Jury Practice and Instructions,” Mathes and Devitt, 1965, § 79.01 . . .

MATERA, v. T. A. BUCHANAN,, 192 So. 2d 18 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

. . . Cochran, 1960, Fla., 118 So.2d 193; 79.01 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

W. COX, Jr. v. STATE, 180 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1965)

. . . Section 79.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., imposes the burden upon any person applying for a writ of habeas . . .

E. O NEAL, v. J. O NEAL,, 158 So. 2d 586 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)

. . . Porter, 60 Fla. 407, 53 So. 546; § 79.01, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. . . .

STATE, MORRIS v. BUCHANAN,, 22 Fla. Supp. 39 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1963)

. . . Sec. 79.01, Fla. Statutes. . . .

NEGRON, v. H. G. COCHRAN, Jr., 130 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1961)

. . . but without prejudice to the person detained to file a new or amended petition conforming to Section 79.01 . . .

WOOD, v. H. G. COCHRAN, Jr., 118 So. 2d 193 (Fla. 1960)

. . . We think it appropriate to remind that Section 79.01, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., requires that an applicant . . .

SHOEMAKER, v. MAYO,, 75 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 1954)

. . . in the premises when he filed his petition for habeas corpus, sworn to as the law requires, section 79.01 . . .

SNEED v. MAYO, 66 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 1953)

. . . communication sent by the prisoner to one of the Justices . did not conform with the requirements of section 79.01 . . .

STAFFORD ALLISON v. L. R. BAKER,, 152 Fla. 274 (Fla. 1943)

. . . Sections 79.01 to 79.12, Florida Statutes 1941, prescribe proceedings in habeas corpus. . . .

v. Co., 11 Ct. Cust. 99 (C.C.P.A. 1921)

. . . The five readings of the first test of a portion of the sample taken resulted as follows: 79.02, 79.01 . . .