Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 79 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 79 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 79

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 79
HABEAS CORPUS
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 79
CHAPTER 79
HABEAS CORPUS
79.01 Application and writ.
79.02 Bond may be required.
79.03 Service of writ.
79.04 Return to writ.
79.05 Compelling return and production of body.
79.06 Effect of the return.
79.07 Procurement of evidence.
79.071 Notice to prosecutor.
79.08 Hearing and judgment.
79.09 Filing of papers.
79.10 Effect of judgment.
79.12 Trial of accused pending appeal.
79.01 Application and writ.When any person detained in custody, whether charged with a criminal offense or not, applies to the Supreme Court or any justice thereof, or to any district court of appeal or any judge thereof or to any circuit judge for a writ of habeas corpus and shows by affidavit or evidence probable cause to believe that he or she is detained without lawful authority, the court, justice, or judge to whom such application is made shall grant the writ forthwith, against the person in whose custody the applicant is detained and returnable immediately before any of the courts, justices, or judges as the writ directs.
History.s. 1, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 1, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1771; GS 2248; RGS 3571; CGL 5435; s. 29, ch. 67-254; s. 413, ch. 95-147.
79.02 Bond may be required.When it appears necessary, the court, justice, or judge granting the writ shall require bond with surety to be approved by the judge or clerk payable to the Governor executed in such manner and reasonable penalty as the court, justice, or judge prescribes; conditioned for the payment of the charges and costs awarded against the prisoner and that he or she will not escape by the way. The bond shall be filed and may be sued on in the name of the Governor for the benefit of any person interested therein. In the event of inability to give bond for the payment of charges and costs, he or she may be permitted, in the place thereof, to make deposit in such amount as the court, justice, or judge requires.
History.s. 1, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 1, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1771; GS 2248; RGS 3571; CGL 5435; s. 29, ch. 67-254; s. 414, ch. 95-147.
79.03 Service of writ.When issued, the writ shall be served by the sheriff of the county in which the petitioner is alleged to be detained on the officer or other person against whom it is issued, or in his or her absence from the place where the prisoner is confined, on the person having the immediate custody of the prisoner. When the sheriff of the county is the person holding the party detained, a delivery to or receipt of the writ by the sheriff is sufficient service.
History.s. 2, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1772; GS 2249; RGS 3572; CGL 5436; s. 29, ch. 67-254; s. 415, ch. 95-147.
79.04 Return to writ.
(1) The person on whom the writ is served shall bring the body of the prisoner, or cause it to be brought, before the court, justice or judge before whom the writ is made returnable without delay and at the same time certify to the cause of the detention.
(2) When the writ is issued, the court shall set an early return date, at which time the formal return of the defendant shall be made. In the absence of a motion to quash or a motion for discharge notwithstanding the return, issue is joined when the return is filed and the action shall be ready for final disposition.
History.s. 2, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 2, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1773; GS 2250; RGS 3573; CGL 5437; s. 29, ch. 67-254.
79.05 Compelling return and production of body.
(1) CIVIL LIABILITY.Any person failing to return to the writ served on him or her with the cause of the prisoner’s detention, or to bring the body of the prisoner before the court, justice, or judge, according to the command of the writ for 3 days after the service shall forfeit and pay to the prisoner the sum of $300.
(2) BY PROCEEDINGS BY THE COURT.A justice or judge in vacation may enforce obedience to any writ of habeas corpus and in cases pending before the Supreme Court, or any of the justices thereof, writs for the enforcement of obedience may be directed to the sheriff or other officer.
History.ss. 3, 4, Sept. 16, 1822; ss. 3, 4, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1774; GS 2251; RGS 3574; CGL 5438; s. 29, ch. 67-254; s. 416, ch. 95-147.
79.06 Effect of the return.
(1) GENERALLY.The return made to the writ may be amended, and is not conclusive as to the facts stated therein, but the court, justice or judge before whom the return is made may examine into the cause of the imprisonment or detention, receive evidence in contradiction of the return, and determine it as the truth of the case requires.
(2) IN CASES OF CONTEMPT.On the return of the writ when the cause of detention appears to be a contempt, plainly and specifically charged in the commitment by some court officer or body having authority to commit for the contempt so charged and for the time stated, the court, justice or judge before whom the writ is returnable shall remand the prisoner forthwith if the time for detention for contempt has not expired.
History.s. 6, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 6, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1775; GS 2252; RGS 3575; CGL 5439; s. 29, ch. 67-254.
79.07 Procurement of evidence.When it is inconvenient to procure the personal attendance of a witness, the witness’s affidavit, taken upon reasonable notice to the adverse party, may be received in evidence.
History.s. 7, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 7, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1776; GS 2253; RGS 3576; CGL 5440; s. 29, ch. 67-254; s. 417, ch. 95-147.
79.071 Notice to prosecutor.If the validity of any statute, criminal law proceeding or conviction is attacked by habeas corpus in the circuit court, notice of the application for the writ shall be given to the prosecuting attorney of the court in which the statute under attack is being applied, the criminal law proceeding is being maintained or the conviction has occurred.
History.s. 29, ch. 67-254.
79.08 Hearing and judgment.The court, justice, or judge before whom the prisoner is brought shall inquire without delay into the cause of the prisoner’s imprisonment, and shall either discharge the prisoner, admit him or her to bail or remand him or her to custody, as the law and the evidence require; and shall either award against the prisoner the charges of his or her transportation, not exceeding 15 cents per mile and the costs of the proceedings, or shall award the costs in the prisoner’s favor, or shall award no costs or charges against either party, as is right. The clerk of the court in which such action is pending shall issue execution for the costs and charges awarded.
History.s. 5, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 8, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1777; GS 2254; RGS 3577; CGL 5441; s. 29, ch. 67-254; s. 418, ch. 95-147.
79.09 Filing of papers.Before a circuit judge the petition and the papers shall be filed with the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which the prisoner is detained. Before the other courts, justices or judges, the papers shall be filed with the clerk of the court on which the justice or judge sits.
History.s. 8, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 8, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1778; GS 2255; RGS 3578; CGL 5442; s. 29, ch. 67-254.
79.10 Effect of judgment.The judgment is conclusive until reversed and no person remanded by the judgment while it continues in force shall be at liberty to obtain another habeas corpus for the same cause or by any other proceeding bring the same matter again in question except by an appeal or by action of false imprisonment; nor shall any person who is discharged from confinement by the judgment be afterward confined or imprisoned for the same cause except by order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
History.s. 9, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 9, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1779; GS 2256; RGS 3579; CGL 5443; s. 29, ch. 67-254.
79.12 Trial of accused pending appeal.When in any criminal prosecution a writ of habeas corpus is applied for by any person charged with any criminal offense and the accused has been remanded to custody by the court to which such application is made, a supersedeas of the order made on appeal being taken to an appellate court shall not prevent the state from proceeding with the prosecution of the accused pending the decision by the appellate court in the habeas corpus, but the state may prosecute the accused as if appeal had not been taken in habeas corpus. If the accused is convicted of the charge, the court shall withhold imposition of sentence and final judgment until the appellate court has determined the issues presented in the habeas corpus.
History.s. 1, ch. 10098, 1925; CGL 5445; s. 29, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 79 on Google Scholar

F.S. 79 on Casetext

Amendments to 79


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 79
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S601.79 - HEALTH-SAFETY - UNLAWFULLY USE COLOR ON GRAPEFRUIT TANGERINE - M: F



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Clair. 3 Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States § 1725, pp. 79-80 (1907 . . . United States , 360 U.S. 109, 153-154, 79 S.Ct. 1081, 3 L.Ed.2d 1115 (1959) (Black, J., dissenting). . . . United States , 360 U.S. 109, 127, 79 S.Ct. 1081, 3 L.Ed.2d 1115 (1959), and Eastland , 421 U.S. at 506 . . . markedly from congressional subpoenas we have previously reviewed, e.g. , Barenblatt , 360 U.S. at 127, 79 . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bartlett , 465 U.S. 463, 104 S.Ct. 1161, 79 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984), and Nebraska v. Parker , 577 U. . . . Bartlett , 465 U.S. 463, 470, 104 S.Ct. 1161, 79 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984). . . . Creek Nation , 295 U.S. 103, 55 S.Ct. 681, 79 L.Ed. 1331 (1935). . . . Creek Nation , 295 U.S. 103, 109, 55 S.Ct. 681, 79 L.Ed. 1331 (1935). . . . Bartlett , 465 U.S. 463, 471, 104 S.Ct. 1161, 79 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984) ). . . . Tr. of Oral Arg. 79-80. . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id ., at 45a-51a, 90a-92a; see App. 79-80. . . . App. 79-80. . . . App. 79, 252-253, 256-259. . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See 573 U.S. at 736, 134 S.Ct. 2751 ; 79 Fed. . . .

P. BARR, v. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF POLITICAL CONSULTANTS, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Mathews , 465 U.S. 728, 740, 104 S.Ct. 1387, 79 L.Ed.2d 646 (1984). . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Donnelly , 465 U.S. 668, 692, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984) (O'Connor, J., concurring). . . .

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, v. BOOKING. COM B. V., 140 S. Ct. 2298 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Folsom & Teply 1337, n. 79 (noting that consumers may believe that "no other product is the 'real thing . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id., at 79 ; see also id., at 78-79 (summarizing that testimony). • Enforcing the admitting-privileges . . . Id., at 88 ; see id., at 79, 82, 87-88. • In sum, "Act 620 does not advance Louisiana's legitimate interest . . . would stop performing abortions if he was the last provider in northern Louisiana. 250 F.Supp.3d at 79 . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 295 U.S. 602, 55 S.Ct. 869, 79 L.Ed. 1611 (1935), we held that Congress could create . . . United States , 295 U.S. 602, 55 S.Ct. 869, 79 L.Ed. 1611 (1935), rather than overruling it. . . . United States , 295 U.S. 602, 55 S.Ct. 869, 79 L.Ed. 1611 (1935), the Court unceremoniously-and unanimously-confined . . . United States , 295 U.S. 602, 55 S.Ct. 869, 79 L.Ed. 1611 (1935), as an attack on his administration. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Dotson , 544 U.S. 74, 79, 125 S.Ct. 1242, 161 L.Ed.2d 253 (2005) (similar); Munaf v. . . . Jac. 336, 79 Eng. Rep. 287 (K. . . . account, id. , at 83, which respondent confirmed was his sole basis for seeking relief, id. , at 77, 79 . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. , 523 U.S. 75, 79, 118 S.Ct. 998, 140 L.Ed.2d 201 (1998). . . . Cf. id., at 78-79, 118 S.Ct. 998 ; see Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. . . . B-54-79 (1979) (prohibiting public-employment discrimination because of "sexual preference"); Colo. . . . Id. , at 79, 118 S.Ct. 998. . . . Oncale , 523 U.S. at 79-80, 118 S.Ct. 998. Same with "motherhood discrimination." . . . Oncale , 523 U.S. at 79, 118 S.Ct. 998. . . . Oncale , 523 U.S. at 79, 118 S.Ct. 998 ; see also A. Scalia & B. . . . Ante , at 1751 (quoting 523 U.S. at 79, 118 S.Ct. 998 ). . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . L. 89-446, 80 Stat. 199 ; § 7(c), 79 Stat. 217; Pub. L. 88-415, 78 Stat. 388. . . . See App. 79-80. . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 67, 79. . . .

J. THOLE, v. U. S. BANK N. A, 140 S. Ct. 1615 (U.S. 2020)

. . . S. 728, 104 S.Ct. 1387, 79 L.Ed.2d 646 (1984), for instance, this Court recognized a plaintiff 's standing . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See 79 Fed. Reg. 30260 (2014). . . . "it [was] difficult to estimate" the "aggregate risk corridors payments and charges at [the] time." 79 . . . Reg. 15473 (HHS regulation) ; accord, 79 Fed. . . . Post, at 1331 - 1332, 1332 - 1333, 1334 - 1335; but cf., e.g., 79 Fed. . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 78-79. . . . App. 79-80. How strong is this argument? . . .

ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, v. A. CHRISTIAN,, 140 S. Ct. 1335 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Ct. , 390 Mont. 76, 79, 408 P.3d 515, 518 (2017). . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) ; Garcia v. . . . See Ring , 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428 ; Batson , 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712. . . . Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) ); DeStefano v. . . .

VF JEANSWEAR LP v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 1202 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Robbins , 519 U.S. 452, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997). . . .

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, v. FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD., 140 S. Ct. 1081 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Fibre Disintegrating Co. , 2 F.Cas. 78, 79 (EDNY 1868) ; see Atkins , 18 Wall. at 299. . . . Atkins , 2 F.Cas. at 79. . . . Gulf Refining Co. , 79 F.2d 521 (CA2 1935) (per curiam ) (the "charter party was itself an express assurance . . .

COMCAST CORPORATION, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN- OWNED MEDIA,, 140 S. Ct. 1009 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Hilliard, Law of Torts 78-79 (1866); 1 T. Sedgwick, Measure of Damages 199 (9th ed. 1912). . . . Warley , 245 U.S. 60, 78-79, 38 S.Ct. 16, 62 L.Ed. 149 (1917) (emphasis added); see also Jones v. . . .

K. KAHLER, v. KANSAS, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 365 A. 2d 64, 79, n. 30 (D. C. 1976). . . .

KANSAS, v. GARCIA v. v., 140 S. Ct. 791 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 79-3298 (2018 Cum. . . . Garmon , 359 U.S. 236, 246, 79 S.Ct. 773, 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959). . . .

C. ROTKISKE, v. KLEMM,, 140 S. Ct. 355 (U.S. 2019)

. . . United States , 535 U.S. 43, 49-50, 122 S.Ct. 1036, 152 L.Ed.2d 79 (2002). . . .

NATIONAL REVIEW, INC. v. E. MANN v. E., 140 S. Ct. 344 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Hustler Magazine, Inc. , 465 U.S. 770, 781, 104 S.Ct. 1473, 79 L.Ed.2d 790 (1984) (regular circulation . . .

ALBRECHT, v. ALBRECHT, 140 S. Ct. 222 (U.S. 2019)

. . . Katherine ALBRECHT No. 19-79 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

G NDARA- GORRITZ, v. SCOTIABANK DE PUERTO RICO,, 603 B.R. 871 (D. P.R. 2019)

. . . In re Gracey, 79 B.R. 597, 601 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1987) (citations omitted). . . .

UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR, v., 935 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . George , 975 F.2d 72, 79 (2d Cir. 1992) ("When a warrant is severed (or redacted) the constitutionally . . .

UNITED STATES v. LILLARD,, 935 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Massachusetts , 308 U.S. 79, 83, 60 S.Ct. 34, 84 L.Ed. 93 (1939) ). . . .

D. WALDRON, TRUSTEE FOR VENTURE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,, 935 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See McCarthy , 348 F.3d at 1078-79 ; Parker , 24 F.3d at 1152-54. . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . and 76 to be most reliable); Michael Smith, 824 F.3d at 1244 (noting petitioner's IQ scores of 76, 79 . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kosilek , 774 F.3d at 76-79 (recounting testimony questioning the WPATH Standards of Care). . . . See Kosilek , 774 F.3d at 76-79. . . .

RAY, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, v. As, 935 F.3d 703 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . timeline of the Department's existing time-limited non-enforcement policy announced in October 2014. 79 . . .

ARTHREX, INC. v. SMITH NEPHEW, INC., 935 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See e.g. , In re DBC , 545 F.3d 1373, 1378-79 (Fed. . . .

CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. OWT ET Co., 935 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . to the laws of nature that is not already present when the steps are considered separately," id. at 79 . . .

PANAH, v. CHAPPELL,, 935 F.3d 657 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959), claim, the district court held that, even . . . be such by representatives of the State, must fall under the Fourteenth Amendment." 360 U.S. at 269, 79 . . .

GALDERMA LABORATORIES L. P. S. A. S. A. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 582 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . Perricone , 432 F.3d at 1378-79. . . .

IN RE J. BARIBEAU,, 603 B.R. 797 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. 2019)

. . . HydroChem, Inc. , 367 F.3d 473, 478-79 (5th Cir. 2004) (citations and internal quotations omitted). . . .

ZUNIGA, v. P. BARR,, 934 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Robbins , 519 U.S. 452, 461, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997) (holding that courts should generally . . .

UNITED STATES v. V. GILLIAM,, 934 F.3d 854 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . May 22, 2018), ECF No. 79. Gilliam objected to the hearsay. . . .

WOLFINGTON, v. RECONSTRUCTIVE ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES II PC, a k a, 935 F.3d 187 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Reg. at 40,425. 519 U.S. 452, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997). . . . Corp. , 512 U.S. 79, 85, 114 S.Ct. 2048, 129 L.Ed.2d 67 (1994) ("Nor would we adopt a court-made rule . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . App. at 79. . . . App. at 79. . . . Hancock , 426 U.S. at 178-79, 96 S.Ct. 2006 ; Leser , 258 U.S. at 136, 42 S.Ct. 217. . . . United States , 295 U.S. 602, 627, 55 S.Ct. 869, 79 L.Ed. 1611 (1935) (recognizing Myers "concerned ' . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 79. . . .

CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE, v. MCMAHON,, 934 F.3d 1076 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bartlett , 465 U.S. 463, 466-68, 104 S.Ct. 1161, 79 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984). . . .

BOWLES, v. DESANTIS,, 934 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Diagnostic Prison, 686 F.3d 1261, 1277-79 (11th Cir. 2012) (holding that § 3599 does not provide for . . .

SINGLETON, v. ARKANSAS HOUSING AUTHORITIES PROPERTY CASUALTY SELF- INSURED FUND, INC. BRK, 934 F.3d 830 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . . §§ 21-9-301 and 23-79-210 because the housing authority's liability insurer, Evanston Insurance Co. . . .

TIJERINO v. STETSON DESERT PROJECT, LLC, L J., 934 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Elsevier , 559 U.S. at 160-69, 130 S.Ct. 1237 ; Day , 698 F.3d at 1099-1100 ; Leeson , 671 F.3d at 970-79 . . . Arbaugh , 546 U.S. at 515, 126 S.Ct. 1235 (internal citation omitted); see also Leeson , 671 F.3d at 978-79 . . .

AMAZON. COM, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,, 934 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Robbins , 519 U.S. 452, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997). . . . Robbins , 519 U.S. 452, 461-62, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997). . . .

STATES v. RYAN,, 935 F.3d 40 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Pica, 692 F.3d 79, 88 (2d Cir. 2012) (applying a "preponderance of the evidence" standard in the context . . .

HARVILLE, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, MISSISSIPPI,, 935 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cal-Western Packaging Corp. , 602 F.3d 374, 378-79 (5th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted) . . .

NEW YORK STATE CITIZENS COALITION FOR CHILDREN, v. J. POOLE,, 935 F.3d 56 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . the dissent inappropriately "read[s] the tea leaves" to reach this conclusion, Poole , 922 F.3d at 79 . . . Poole , 922 F.3d at 79. . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Jones , 465 U.S. 783, 104 S.Ct. 1482, 79 L.Ed.2d 804 (1984) ). . . .

ROMO, v. P. BARR,, 933 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Holder , 628 F.3d 1071, 1075-79 (9th Cir. 2010), but relatively more serious non-fraudulent crimes do . . .

SANOFI- AVENTIS U. S. LLC, IP, v. DR. REDDY S LABORATORIES, INC. Dr. s USA, LLC, LLC, LLC,, 933 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Decision , slip op. at 45-46, 79-83. . . .

LILLY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK NYPD No. NYPD No., 934 F.3d 222 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Joint App'x 277-79. Id. See Millea v. Metro-North R. Co., 658 F.3d 154, 166 (2d Cir. 2011). Id. . . . Id. at 435-37, 103 S.Ct. 1933. 465 U.S. 886, 896-97, 104 S.Ct. 1541, 79 L.Ed.2d 891 (1984). . . .

W. C. ENGLISH, INC. v. RUMMEL, KLEPPER KAHL, LLP CDM, 934 F.3d 398 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . DPI Midatlantic, Inc. , 270 Va. 285, 619 S.E.2d 76, 79 (2005) (distinguishing between the concepts of . . .

ARCHER AND WHITE SALES, INCORPORATED, v. HENRY SCHEIN, INCORPORATED L. L. C. L. L. C., 935 F.3d 274 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. , 537 U.S. 79, 83, 123 S.Ct. 588, 154 L.Ed.2d 491 (2002). . . .

UNITED STATES v. NEJAD,, 933 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. 2d 79, 89-91 (D.D.C. 2006), rev'd , 524 F.3d 1361, 1377-78 (D.C. . . .

LATURNER, v. UNITED STATES,, 933 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Robbins, 519 U.S. 452, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997) ] deference unless the regulation is genuinely . . .

MCMICHAEL, v. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INCORPORATED RIGP DCL, L. L. C. USA,, 934 F.3d 447 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Cal-Western Packaging Corp. , 602 F.3d 374, 378-79 (5th Cir. 2010). . . .

OSBORNE, v. HALL,, 934 F.3d 428 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Illinois , 360 U.S. 264, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959), by relying on false evidence provided . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLOSE,, 931 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Alcaraz-Garcia , 79 F.3d 769, 772 n.4 (9th Cir. 1996). . . .

COEUR D ALENE TRIBE, a v. W. HAWKS A., 933 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Int'l Terminal Operating Co. , 358 U.S. 354, 379, 79 S.Ct. 468, 3 L.Ed.2d 368 (1959) ). . . . Halderman , 465 U.S. 89, 119, 104 S.Ct. 900, 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984) )). . . .

RILEY, v. FILSON D., 933 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Riley I , 786 F.3d at 723-24 (quoting Powell , 838 P.2d at 927, vacated on other grounds , 511 U.S. 79 . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 465 U.S. 482, 490-97, 104 S.Ct. 1172, 79 L.Ed.2d 458 (1984) (construing "public officials . . .

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, N. A. v. UNITED STATES,, 932 F.3d 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Bd. of Educ. , 302 U.S. 74, 79, 58 S.Ct. 98, 82 L.Ed. 57 (1937) ). . . . Id . at 79-81, 58 S.Ct. 98. 2. . . . Id . at 77, 79-81, 58 S.Ct. 98. . . . Dodge , 302 U.S. at 79, 58 S.Ct. 98. . . .

SIEGEL, s s v. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC. HSBC USA, N. A. HBUS,, 933 F.3d 217 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Dingman , 893 F.3d 73, 78-79 (2d Cir. 2018). . . .

FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, INC. v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH,, 933 F.3d 275 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Donnelly , 465 U.S. 668, 679, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984) (eschewing "any single test or criterion . . . Donnelly , 465 U.S. 668, 687, 692, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984) (O'Connor, J., concurring)). . . .

MARKS JLF, a GWF, a GJH, a GJR, v. HUDSON, 933 F.3d 481 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Illinois , 360 U.S. 264, 269, 79 S.Ct. 1173, 3 L.Ed.2d 1217 (1959). . . .

BOUCHER, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,, 934 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 77-79. 2. . . .

CONSTANCE S. v. SAUL,, 389 F. Supp. 3d 583 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . (R. 203, 173-79). . . .

BRENDA L. v. SAUL,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 858 (N.D. Ill. 2019)

. . . Massanari, 270 F.3d 1171, 1178-79 (7th Cir.2001) ; Shramek v. . . .

WINDRIDGE OF NAPERVILLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY,, 932 F.3d 1035 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Randolph , 531 U.S. 79, 89, 121 S.Ct. 513, 148 L.Ed.2d 373 (2000). . . .

AGUA CALIENTE TRIBE OF CUPE O INDIANS OF PALA RESERVATION, v. SWEENEY, 932 F.3d 1207 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . F.C.C. , 750 F.2d 70, 79-80 (D.C. . . .

O NEAL, v. BALCARCEL,, 933 F.3d 618 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . R. 14-2 (Trial Test. at 77-79) (Page ID #601-03). . . . United States , 358 U.S. 74, 80, 79 S.Ct. 136, 3 L.Ed.2d 125 (1958) (declining to find an error harmless . . .

T. SCHMITT v. LAROSE,, 933 F.3d 628 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . See 412 F.3d at 278-79. . . .

KORTRIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, TY v. INVESTCORP INVESTMENT ADVISERS LIMITED,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (Trial Tr. at 678-79, 827-31 (Vamvakas).) . . . (Trial Tr. at 678-79; 827 (Vamvakas).) . . . (Trial Tr. 578-79.) . . . Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 895 n.11, 104 S.Ct. 1541, 79 L.Ed.2d 891 (1984) ). . . . (See, e.g., Trial Tr. at 1278-79 (Popplewell).) . . .

WOZNIAK, v. ADESIDA,, 932 F.3d 1008 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Halderman , 465 U.S. 89, 103-23, 104 S.Ct. 900, 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984).) . . .

ATEN INTERNATIONAL CO. LTD. v. UNICLASS TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD. Co. Co., 932 F.3d 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Bard, Inc. , 79 F.3d 1572, 1578 (Fed. Cir. 1996). . . .

HAIDAK, v. UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS- AMHERST, 933 F.3d 56 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Coll., 892 F.3d 67, 79 (1st Cir. 2018) (quoting Roman Catholic Bishop of Springfield v. . . .

UNITED STATES v. NYGREN,, 933 F.3d 76 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Quirion, 714 F.3d 77, 79 (1st Cir. 2013). . . . us 'with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.' " Quirion, 714 F.3d at 79 . . .

WALLER, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, a, 932 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Iqbal , 556 U.S. at 678-79, 129 S.Ct. 1937 ; see also Roth v. Wilder , 420 F. . . .

UNITED STATES v. HUNTER, 932 F.3d 610 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79, 89, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). . . .

HUBBELL, v. FEDEX SMARTPOST, INC., 933 F.3d 558 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . App'x 674, 678-79 (3d Cir. 2010) ; Duk v. . . .

INGRAM v. UNITED STATES, 932 F.3d 1084 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . court determined that "[t]he N.D. of Iowa ranks fourth in the nation in its use of § 851 enhancements (79% . . .

ASSOCIATION OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS AGCO CNH LLC v. BURGUM, s, 932 F.3d 727 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bowers, 358 U.S. 522, 528, 79 S.Ct. 437, 3 L.Ed.2d 480 (1959) (noting that, in the Equal Protection Clause . . .

DIALYSIS ACCESS CENTER, LLC Tr M. D. v. RMS LIFELINE, INC., 932 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . fraud in its effort to determine what type of legal claim was likely being raised. 638 F.3d at 378-79 . . .

LONGORIA, v. HUNTER EXPRESS, LIMITED, 932 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Supp. at 478-79 (citing 6A MOORE'S FED. PRAC. , at 3743-44 (2d ed. 1966)). . . .

UNITED STATES v. BOSYK,, 933 F.3d 319 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Compare J.A. 74-79 (probable cause to search home months after IP address accessed link posted on Bulletin . . .

D. LISLE, Jr. v. WELBORN,, 933 F.3d 705 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), challenging the use of peremptory strikes . . . Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), that those three strikes were racially . . . him on trial before a jury from which members of his race have been purposefully excluded." 476 U.S. 79 . . .

GALEA, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. LLC,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 1212 (E.D. Cal. 2019)

. . . Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). . . .

A. P. a BY E. F. v. LOWER MERION SCHOOL DISTRICT, 389 F. Supp. 3d 322 (E.D. Pa. 2019)

. . . 11-14, 41:24-25 - 42:1, 8-25 - 43:1-4, 10-12, 66:12-25 - 67:1-2, 70:14-25 - 71:1-11, 22-24, 72:2-17, 79 . . .

AL- AMIN, v. WARDEN, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 932 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . United States , 295 U.S. 78, 88, 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314 (1935). . . .

BRAKEBILL v. JAEGER,, 932 F.3d 671 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ante at 678-79. . . .

YOC- US, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES v., 932 F.3d 98 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 278-79. . . .

FORCE, A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F. N. S. F. S. R. F. A. H. H. F. A. L. F. N. E. F, N. S. F. S. R. F. TZVI S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. S. S. R. M. M. R. R. M. R. S. Z. R. v. FACEBOOK, INC., 934 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Mandel Bros ., Inc., 359 U.S. 385, 388-89, 79 S.Ct. 818, 3 L.Ed.2d 893 (1959) (alterations in original . . .

INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES, v. UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,, 388 F. Supp. 3d 51 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Office for Immigration Review (AILA ), 830 F.3d 667, 676-79 (D.C. Cir. 2016). . . .

ATLAS BREW WORKS, LLC, v. P. BARR,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 6 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Case No. 19-cv-79 (CRC) United States District Court, District of Columbia. . . .

AMERICAN TUNABOAT ASSOCIATION, v. ROSS, 391 F. Supp. 3d 98 (D.D.C. 2019)

. . . Robbins , 519 U.S. 452, 117 S.Ct. 905, 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997). . . .

IN RE WASHINGTON, v. N. A., 602 B.R. 710 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019)

. . . In re Akram , 259 B.R. at 378-79. . . .