Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 79.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 79.10 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 79.10

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 79
HABEAS CORPUS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 79.10
79.10 Effect of judgment.The judgment is conclusive until reversed and no person remanded by the judgment while it continues in force shall be at liberty to obtain another habeas corpus for the same cause or by any other proceeding bring the same matter again in question except by an appeal or by action of false imprisonment; nor shall any person who is discharged from confinement by the judgment be afterward confined or imprisoned for the same cause except by order of a court of competent jurisdiction.
History.s. 9, Sept. 16, 1822; s. 9, ch. 3129, 1879; RS 1779; GS 2256; RGS 3579; CGL 5443; s. 29, ch. 67-254.

F.S. 79.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 79.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 79.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 79.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 79.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

G. BUSS, v. REICHMAN, a k a a k a a k a, 53 So. 3d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . Mayo, 82 So.2d 591 (Fla.1955); § 79.10, Fla. . . . Once fully litigated, the matter is res judicata, and section 79.10, Florida Statutes, enjoins a prisoner . . .

R. M. S. TITANIC, INC. v. WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, a R. M. S. In, 742 F. Supp. 2d 784 (E.D. Va. 2010)

. . . . § 79.10(e)} 2. Historical Review, Scientific and Scholarly Research. a. . . . Agreement Rule 27; Interior Archeology Standards & Guidelines, 48 Fed.Reg. 44734 (std.IV); 36 C.F.R. § 79.10 . . . II & IV); 36 C.F.R. § 79.10(d)(5); 36 C.F.R. § 79.9(b)(5)(iii)} 3. Education. . . .

JONES, v. EAGLE- NORTH HILLS SHOPPING CENTRE, L. P., 478 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (E.D. Okla. 2007)

. . . Computer searches 79.10 11. Expert travel 1,040.00 12. Expert report 1,360.00 13. . . .

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, v. COUNTY OF KERN,, 462 F. Supp. 2d 1105 (C.D. Cal. 2006)

. . . Schwarzer, et al., California Practice Guide, Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial § 13:79.10, at 13- . . .

GARCIA- GOYCO v. PUERTO RICO HIGHWAY AUTHORITY d b a, 275 F. Supp. 2d 142 (D.P.R. 2003)

. . . section entitled Dissemination of Information and Public Service, at page 51, which provides: Section 79.10 . . . It is our interest that according to what is stipulated in 36 CFR Part 79.10, the visits of the Press . . .

BONNICHSEN C. W. C. Jr. L. W. J. D. v. UNITED STATES U. S. U. S. P. J. E. Jr. R. J. A. N., 217 F. Supp. 2d 1116 (D. Or. 2002)

. . . religious uses,” including scientific analysis and scholarly research by qualified professionals. 36 CFR §§ 79.10 . . .

NEWFOUND MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, GENERAL PARTNER OF NEWFOUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, v. A. SEWER,, 34 F. Supp. 2d 305 (D.V.I. 1999)

. . . Hearing on Motions, Tr. at 78.15-79.10. . . . Id. at 79.9-79.10. . . .

In LABRUM DOAK, LLP, LABRUM DOAK, a v. R. BROWN, C. J. E. R. L. I. J. H. L. M. F. M. G. L. S. T. J. A. D. A. H. J. II, P. C. A., 225 B.R. 93 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1998)

. . . matter and in the absence of argument by the Debtor, and attributing the remaining discrepancy of $79.10 . . .

HYDROTHERMAL ENERGY CORP. v. UNITED STATES,, 26 Cl. Ct. 7 (Cl. Ct. 1992)

. . . Plaintiffs exhibit 79.10, entitled "Record of Negotiated Procurement Action,” dated July 10, 1981, shows . . .

In KENDRICK, KENDRICK, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GAINESVILLE,, 75 B.R. 451 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1987)

. . . debtor is awarded damages in the sum of $3,000, actual costs and expenses of this litigation, including $79.10 . . .

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD CO. Co. Co. Co. B. St. Co. v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF STATE OF WISCONSIN,, 570 F. Supp. 585 (W.D. Wis. 1983)

. . . . §§ 79.10(1), 79.10(3). . . . Wis.Stat. § 79.10(3). . . . Wis.Stat. § 79.10(1a) (1979). . . . Under Chapters 20 and 317, Laws of 1981, the total amount of property tax credits payable under § 79.10 . . . Stat. § 79.10. . . .

POWERS, v. R. SCHWARTZ,, 357 So. 2d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

. . . by the record in regard to the instant supplemental petition for writ of habeas corpus and Section 79.10 . . .

D. GRAZIANO, v. STATE, 305 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

. . . See § 79.10 Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; State ex rel. Miller v. . . .

STATE SCALDEFERRI, v. SANDSTROM,, 285 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 1973)

. . . . § 79.10, F.S.A., and State ex rel. Miller y. Kelly, 88 So.2d 118 (Fla.1956). . . . in order to leave open the habeas corpus petition as a vehicle for review in the appellate court. § 79.10 . . . Fla.Stat. § 79.10, F.S.A.; State v. Kelly, 88 So.2d 118 (Fla.1956) (res judicata) ; cf. Jones v. . . .

SHELCO, INC. v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY SHELCO, INC. v. BOYLE- MIDWAY, INC., 322 F. Supp. 485 (N.D. Ill. 1970)

. . . composition is covered by the patent claims whether used on a hot or cold surface (PL’s Ans. to Interrog. 79.10 . . .

v., 51 T.C. 520 (T.C. 1968)

. . . There were also two receipts from Lee Drugs, one dated December 19, 1963, in the total amount of $79.10 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HALL,, 163 F. Supp. 684 (E.D.N.Y. 1958)

. . . S. check for $79.10, the uttering thereof, and its possessioh, the latter being the first count. . . .

STATE MILLER, v. J. KELLY,, 88 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1956)

. . . Section 79.10, F.S.19SS, F.S.A., provides a judgment in habeas corpus “shall be conclusive until reversed . . . those reasons we hold that the defense of res adjudicata is established on this record and Section 79.10 . . .

DURLEY v. MAYO, CUSTODIAN, FLORIDA STATE PRISON, 351 U.S. 277 (U.S. 1956)

. . . Petitioner argues that § 79.10 does not embody the traditionally broad doctrine of res judicata. . . . However, the Supreme Court of Florida has treated § 79.10 as applying the general rule of res judicata . . . It even has applied that doctrine without reference to § 79.10. See Florida ex rel. Davis v. . . . On the other hand, it has, at times, treated habeas corpus petitions as barred by § 79.10 only where . . . At most it is inconclusive and leaves room for a decision on the state grounds indicated in § 79.10 or . . .

W. MOAT, v. MAYO,, 82 So. 2d 591 (Fla. 1955)

. . . Section 79.10, F.S.1951, F.S.A.; Pope v. Mayo, Fla.1949, 39 So.2d 286; D’Alessandro v. . . .

FAGAN v. UNITED STATES, 102 F. Supp. 787 (E.D. Pa. 1952)

. . . Decedent’s average weekly earnings were $79.10. 19. . . .

CHURCH v. ALABASTINE CO., 14 F.2d 663 (6th Cir. 1926)

. . . Pure gypsum contains calcium sulphate, 79.10, and water, 20.90, its chemical formula being CaSOvUUO. . . .

C. G. O. O. v. a, 83 Fla. 4 (Fla. 1922)

. . . attached to the bill' of complaint finds for the plaintiff bank “in the sum of $400.00 principal, $79.10 . . .