Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 80.04 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 80.04 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 80.04

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 80
QUO WARRANTO
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 80.04
80.04 Quo warranto; effect of judgment.When an individual institutes an action without the consent of the Attorney General, the judgment is conclusive as between the parties other than the state. The judgment is not a bar to any quo warranto by the state nor shall a judgment instituted by the Attorney General be a bar to actions by any claimant other than the parties thereto. The party receiving judgment shall be entitled to exercise the office until removed by quo warranto or until his or her rights thereto shall otherwise cease.
History.s. 3, ch. 1874, 1872; RS 1783; GS 2260; RGS 3583; CGL 5448; s. 30, ch. 67-254; s. 421, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 80.04 on Google Scholar

F.S. 80.04 on Casetext

Amendments to 80.04


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 80.04
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 80.04.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 80.04

Total Results: 20

David B. Ingraham v. The State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-03-06

Snippet: Henry was at least 95 years old. 175 So. 3d at 679–80. 4 Kelsey also contained language that “could be

UPRIGHT OPEN MRI, LLC a/a/o VIRGINIA JURADO v. INFINITY AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2020-09-23

Snippet: applicable deductible, reimbursed at 80% 4 pursuant to the statutory fee

Smith v. Manno

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2014-05-16

Citation: 138 So. 3d 1143, 2014 WL 1975967, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7295

Snippet: reversed, emphasizing that, pursuant to section 741.80(4), Florida Statutes, if the petition alleged either

Hughes v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-04-28

Citation: 901 So. 2d 837, 2005 WL 977019

Snippet: violation. The scoresheet required a sentence of 80.4 months, which is longer than the statutory maximum

Hughes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-10-02

Citation: 826 So. 2d 1070, 2002 WL 31174440

Snippet: (1997),[1] the trial court sentenced the appellant to 80.4 months in state prison. The appellant's conviction

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2002-03-15

Snippet: Following issuance of Attorney General's Opinion 80-04, related issues were litigated in City of Miramar

State v. R.M.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-07-02

Citation: 696 So. 2d 449, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7537

Snippet: Alabama, 361 U.S. 199, 206-07, 80 S.Ct. 274, 279-80, 4 L.Ed.2d 242 (1960) (“[I]n eases involving involuntary

State v. RM

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-07-02

Citation: 696 So. 2d 449, 1997 WL 361586

Snippet: Alabama, 361 U.S. 199, 206-07, 80 S.Ct. 274, 279-80, 4 L.Ed.2d 242 (1960) ("[I]n cases involving involuntary

Wiggins v. Braman Cadillac, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-13

Citation: 669 So. 2d 332, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2320, 1996 WL 106391

Snippet: that nonsettling defendant is liable ($918,452.80); (4) noneconomic damages ($1,500,000.00) × percentage

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1993-10-08

Snippet: fees. 3 Section 218.80(2), F.S. See also, s. 218.80(4), F.S., stating: This section does not require disclosure

Debose v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-05-05

Citation: 598 So. 2d 195, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5128, 1992 WL 91395

Snippet: change AFDC grant payees. Fla.Admin.Code Rule 10C-1.080(4). The Department failed to proceed promptly, according

Akers v. Akers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-06-21

Citation: 582 So. 2d 1212, 1991 WL 109680

Snippet: savings and checking accounts ($27,565.09 and $569.80)[4]; First Huntington C & O Credit Union accounts ($836

State v. Sawyer

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-01-05

Citation: 561 So. 2d 278, 1990 WL 748

Snippet: Alabama, 361 U.S. 199, 206-207, 80 S.Ct. 274, 279-80, 4 L.Ed.2d 242, 248 (1960), a case dealing expressly

City Com'n of City of Miami v. Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-08-01

Citation: 553 So. 2d 1227, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1799, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4378, 1989 WL 85243

Snippet: being ninety-six and the smallest being two. (R.80). [4] The Woodlawn traffic survey estimates that there

H & W ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Ellis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-04-23

Citation: 467 So. 2d 790, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1013

Snippet: CKJ's claim at the time of the trial was $86,080: $4,000 per month for 22 months, $88,000, less $1,920

State v. Green

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-03-05

Citation: 395 So. 2d 532, 7 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1025

Snippet: 1.63 Court Personnel 1. Not at all 80.4% 2. Slightly 9.3% 3. Moderately

Humphreys v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-09-17

Citation: 388 So. 2d 607, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17247

Snippet: HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge. Carroll Humphreys appeals from convictions of burglary in the course of which he armed himself with a dangerous weapon and possession of burglary tools. He received a thirty-year sentence for the burglary and a consecutive five-year sentence for possession of burglary tools. On appeal, Humphreys argues that he should not have received a separate sentence for possession of burglary tools, but only one sentence for burglary. Under the circumstances of this case, we agree

All Children's Hospital, Inc. v. First State Bank of Miami

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1980-05-13

Citation: 388 So. 2d 567, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17675

Snippet: PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from a non-final order entered in a guardianship proceeding. The order appealed from is not a non-final order for which appeal is authorized by Fla.R. App.P. 9.130. We accept jurisdiction for review of that order upon treating the filed appeal as a petition for common law certio-rari, as provided for by Fla.R.App.P. 9.040. The factual basis upon which the questioned order was entered, as revealed in the pleadings and the record of the hearing thereon, includes the following

Florida Bar v. Morrison

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1978-09-21

Citation: 362 So. 2d 1356, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4918

Snippet: Payment of costs in this matter in the amount of $114.80; 4. On June 15,1978, the Executive Committee of the

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1976-11-15

Snippet: QUESTION 2: Your inquiry refers to ss.17.04, 239.80(4), 240.103(2), and 402.17(1), F. S., and points out