Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 80 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 80 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 80

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 80
QUO WARRANTO
View Entire Chapter
CHAPTER 80
CHAPTER 80
QUO WARRANTO
80.01 Quo warranto; refusal of Attorney General to institute.
80.02 Quo warranto; control of Attorney General over certain proceedings.
80.031 Procedure.
80.032 Judgment of ouster.
80.04 Quo warranto; effect of judgment.
80.01 Quo warranto; refusal of Attorney General to institute.Any person claiming title to an office which is exercised by another has the right, on refusal by the Attorney General to commence an action in the name of the state upon the claimant’s relation, or on the Attorney General’s refusal to file a petition setting forth the claimant’s name as the person rightfully entitled to the office, to file an action in the name of the state against the person exercising the office, setting up his or her own claim. The court shall determine the right of the claimant to the office, if the claimant so desires. No person shall be adjudged entitled to hold an office except upon full proof of the person’s title to the office in any action of this character.
History.s. 2, ch. 1874, 1872; RS 1782; GS 2259; RGS 3582; CGL 5447; s. 30, ch. 67-254; s. 419, ch. 95-147.
80.02 Quo warranto; control of Attorney General over certain proceedings.When the Attorney General commences an action setting forth the name of the person rightfully entitled, or when petition is filed upon the relation of a party claiming title, the Attorney General shall not dismiss the action without the consent of the claimant, but the court shall investigate the claim and determine the right, if so desired by the person on whose relation the petition is filed, and the claimant may have counsel of his or her choice to control the action in the claimant’s behalf.
History.s. 4, ch. 1874, 1872; RS 1784; GS 2261; RGS 3584; CGL 5449; s. 30, ch. 67-254; s. 420, ch. 95-147.
80.031 Procedure.The rules about pleading and procedure in mandamus apply to actions for quo warranto as near as may be.
History.s. 30, ch. 67-254.
80.032 Judgment of ouster.When any petition is well-founded, a judgment of ouster may issue without further amendments to the extent that the petition is well-founded.
History.s. 30, ch. 67-254.
80.04 Quo warranto; effect of judgment.When an individual institutes an action without the consent of the Attorney General, the judgment is conclusive as between the parties other than the state. The judgment is not a bar to any quo warranto by the state nor shall a judgment instituted by the Attorney General be a bar to actions by any claimant other than the parties thereto. The party receiving judgment shall be entitled to exercise the office until removed by quo warranto or until his or her rights thereto shall otherwise cease.
History.s. 3, ch. 1874, 1872; RS 1783; GS 2260; RGS 3583; CGL 5448; s. 30, ch. 67-254; s. 421, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 80 on Google Scholar

F.S. 80 on Casetext

Amendments to 80


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 80
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

S316.80 1 - TRANS DANGEROUS MATERIAL - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7968 - F: S
S316.80 1 - TRANS DANGEROUS MATERIAL - UNLAWFUL CONVEYANCE OF FUEL - F: T
S316.80 2 - FRAUD - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 7969 - F: T
S316.80 2 - FRAUD - RENUMBERED. SEE REC # 8709 - F: S
S316.80 2a - FRAUD - OBT FUEL BY FRAUD CREDIT CARD OR CC ACCT NUM - F: S
S316.80 2b - FRAUD - OBT FUEL BY FRAUD UNAUTH ACCESS COMPUT NETWORK - F: S
S316.80 2c - FRAUD - OBT FUEL BY FRAUD SCAN LOST STOLEN PYMT DEV - F: S
S601.80 - HEALTH-SAFETY - USE UNCERTIFIED COLORING MATERIAL ON ORANGES - M: F


Civil Citations / Citable Offenses under S80
R or S next to points is Mandatory Revocation or Suspension

S316.80 (1) Unlawful conveyance of fuel in a CMV [(See 322.26(3)] - Points on Drivers License: 0 R
S316.80 (1) Unlawful conveyance of fuel in a NON-CMV (using a motor vehicle in connection with a felony) - Points on Drivers License: 0 R


Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

LITTLE, v. RECLAIM IDAHO,, 140 S. Ct. 2616 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Levine , 80 S.Ct. 623, 624, 4 L.Ed.2d 615, 616 (1960) (Harlan, J., in chambers)). . . .

CALVARY CHAPEL DAYTON VALLEY v. SISOLAK,, 140 S. Ct. 2603 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was doomed by the Slaughter-House Cases , 16 Wall. 36, 76-80 . . .

P. BARR, v. PURKEY, 140 S. Ct. 2594 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Levine , 80 S.Ct. 623, 624, 4 L.Ed.2d 615 (1960) ). . . .

J. TRUMP, v. MAZARS USA, LLP, J. v. AG,, 140 S. Ct. 2019 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Clair. 3 Hinds' Precedents of the House of Representatives of the United States § 1725, pp. 79-80 (1907 . . .

MCGIRT, v. OKLAHOMA, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Muller , 296 U.S. 207, 210, 56 S.Ct. 183, 80 L.Ed. 158 (1935) ). . . . Tr. of Oral Arg. 79-80. . . .

OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE SCHOOL, v. MORRISSEY- BERRU St. v., 140 S. Ct. 2049 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id ., at 45a-51a, 90a-92a; see App. 79-80. . . . App. 79-80. . . .

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SAINTS PETER AND PAUL HOME, v. PENNSYLVANIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 2367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See 80 Fed. Reg. 41343-41347 (2015). . . . proposing to modify the accommodation to extend it to closely held corporations in light of Hobby Lobby ); 80 . . . ) (the First Amendment's "ministerial exception" protects "the internal governance of [a] church"); 80 . . . See post , at 2406 (quoting 80 Fed. Reg. 41325 (2015) ). . . . See 80 Fed. Reg. 41337. . . .

B. CHIAFALO, v. WASHINGTON, 140 S. Ct. 2316 (U.S. 2020)

. . . . § 7-19-80 (2018) ; Utah Code § 20A-13-304 (2020) ; Wash. Rev. . . .

ESPINOZA, v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,, 140 S. Ct. 2246 (U.S. 2020)

. . . TVA , 297 U.S. 288, 347, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring)). . . .

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 2082 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Raines , 362 U.S. 17, 21, 80 S.Ct. 519, 4 L.Ed.2d 524 (1960) ; Liverpool , New York & Philadelphia S. . . .

JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. v. RUSSO, v. LLC., 140 S. Ct. 2103 (U.S. 2020)

. . . with one provider to serve the 10,000 women annually who seek abortions in the State. 250 F.Supp.3d at 80 . . . See 250 F.Supp.3d at 80-81, 84, 87. . . . See Brief for Respondent 73, 80. This argument misconceives the question before us. . . . TVA , 297 U.S. 288, 346-348, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (opinion of Brandeis, J.). . . . Consumers Union of United States, Inc. , 466 U.S. 485, 501, 104 S.Ct. 1949, 80 L.Ed.2d 502 (1984) )); . . .

SEILA LAW LLC, v. CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, 140 S. Ct. 2183 (U.S. 2020)

. . . 879 (2005) ; Yoo, Calabresi, & Nee, The Unitary Executive During the Third Half-Century, 1889-1945, 80 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. THURAISSIGIAM, 140 S. Ct. 1959 (U.S. 2020)

. . . protected in his opposition to power." 11 Documentary History of the Ratification of the Constitution 80 . . . See also In re Belt , 7 N.Y.Leg.Obs. 80 (1848) (granting habeas to discharge an imprisoned fugitive slave . . . Id. , at 80. . . . Id. , at 80. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, J. v., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Chenery Corp. , 318 U.S. 80, 94, 63 S.Ct. 454, 87 L.Ed. 626 (1943), forcing both litigants and courts . . .

BOSTOCK, v. CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA v. Jr. Co- R. G. G. R. v., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Oncale , 523 U.S. at 79-80, 118 S.Ct. 998. Same with "motherhood discrimination." . . . communications only by placing them in their appropriate social and linguistic context," id ., at 79-80 . . . (ed. 4) II. 80 Change of Sex under the influence of external causes. 3. . . .

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION LLC, v., 140 S. Ct. 1837 (U.S. 2020)

. . . L. 89-446, 80 Stat. 199 ; § 7(c), 79 Stat. 217; Pub. L. 88-415, 78 Stat. 388. . . . See App. 79-80. . . . See id. , at 80. As relevant here, at one stretch the pipeline would cross the Trail. . . .

ROGERS, v. GREWAL,, 140 S. Ct. 1865 (U.S. 2020)

. . . See Rostron, Justice Breyer's Triumph in the Third Battle Over the Second Amendment, 80 Geo. Wash. . . . See Cottrol & Diamond, The Second Amendment: Toward an Afro-Americanist Reconsideration, 80 Geo. L. . . .

ANDRUS v. TEXAS, 140 S. Ct. 1875 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). . . . Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), to show by a preponderance of the evidence . . . Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). . . . Washington , 466 U.S. 668 [104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674] (1984), to show by a preponderance of the . . . Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), to show by a preponderance of the evidence . . .

ST. HUBERT v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1727 (U.S. 2020)

. . . , the Eleventh Circuit published 45 such orders, while all of the other Circuits combined published 80 . . .

BANISTER, v. DAVIS,, 140 S. Ct. 1698 (U.S. 2020)

. . . United States , 298 U.S. 167, 169-170, 56 S.Ct. 706, 80 L.Ed. 1118 (1936) ("The judge had plenary power . . .

UNITED STATES, v. SINENENG- SMITH, 140 S. Ct. 1575 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Raines , 362 U.S. 17, 22, 80 S.Ct. 519, 4 L.Ed.2d 524 (1960) ). . . . ' cases," Washington State Grange , supra , at 450, 128 S.Ct. 1184 (quoting Raines , supra , at 22, 80 . . .

MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS, v. UNITED STATES v. v. v., 140 S. Ct. 1308 (U.S. 2020)

. . . corridors collections w[ould] be sufficient to pay for all" of the Government's "risk corridors payments." 80 . . . reiterated that "the Affordable Care Act requires the Secretary to make full payments to issuers," 80 . . . gains (or losses) exceeded predictions by eight percentage points, the insurers would pay (or receive) 80 . . .

NEW YORK STATE RIFLE PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK,, 140 S. Ct. 1525 (U.S. 2020)

. . . App. 79-80. How strong is this argument? . . . App. 80. . . .

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC., 140 S. Ct. 1492 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Triplex Safety Glass Co. , 298 U.S. 448, 456-457, 56 S.Ct. 792, 80 L.Ed. 1274 (1936). . . .

THRYV, INC. v. CLICK- TO- CALL TECHNOLOGIES, LP,, 140 S. Ct. 1367 (U.S. 2020)

. . . In approximately 80% of cases reaching a final decision, the Board cancels some or all of the challenged . . .

RAMOS, v. LOUISIANA, 140 S. Ct. 1390 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Juries Act 1974, ch. 23, § 17 (replacing Criminal Justice Act 1967, ch. 80, § 13). . . .

BABB, v. WILKIE,, 140 S. Ct. 1168 (U.S. 2020)

. . . But employee B is then docked 5 points because of age and thus ends up with a final score of 80. . . .

DAVIS v. UNITED STATES, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (U.S. 2020)

. . . González-Castillo , 562 F.3d 80, 83-84 (CA1 2009) ; United States v. . . .

INTEL CORPORATION INVESTMENT POLICY COMMITTEE, v. M. SULYMA, 140 S. Ct. 768 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Bruch , 489 U.S. 101, 118, 109 S.Ct. 948, 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989) (quoting H.R. Rep. . . .

ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO v. ACEVEDO FELICIANO,, 140 S. Ct. 696 (U.S. 2020)

. . . Id. , at 80, 90 (emphasis deleted). The Archdiocese petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari. . . .

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA,, 140 S. Ct. 451 (U.S. 2019)

. . . November 1, 2019 A total of 80 minutes is allotted for oral argument, and the time is divided as follows . . .

J. TRUMP, v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE,, 140 S. Ct. 451 (U.S. 2019)

. . . November 1, 2019 A total of 80 minutes is allotted for oral argument, and the time is divided as follows . . .

K. MCALEENAN, v. VIDAL,, 140 S. Ct. 451 (U.S. 2019)

. . . November 1, 2019 A total of 80 minutes is allotted for oral argument, and the time is divided as follows . . .

SHREVEPORT CHAPTER OF UNITED DAUGHTERS OF THE CONFEDERACY, v. CADDO PARISH COMMISSION, 140 S. Ct. 233 (U.S. 2019)

. . . CADDO PARISH COMMISSION No. 19-80 Supreme Court of the United States. . . .

UTIER, v. FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT BOARD,, 140 S. Ct. 32 (U.S. 2019)

. . . September 11, 2019 Upon consideration of the August 29, 2019 motions for divided argument, a total of 80 . . .

FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, LLC,, 140 S. Ct. 33 (U.S. 2019)

. . . September 11, 2019 Upon consideration of the August 29, 2019 motion for divided argument, a total of 80 . . .

OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF DEBTORS, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT,, 140 S. Ct. 33 (U.S. 2019)

. . . September 11, 2019 Upon consideration of the August 29, 2019 motion for divided argument, a total of 80 . . .

AURELIUS INVESTMENT, v. PUERTO RICO,, 140 S. Ct. 34 (U.S. 2019)

. . . September 11, 2019 Upon consideration of the August 29, 2019 motion for divided argument, a total of 80 . . .

UNITED STATES, v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT,, 140 S. Ct. 34 (U.S. 2019)

. . . September 11, 2019 Upon consideration of the August 29, 2019 motion for divided argument, a total of 80 . . .

ELHADY, v. H. KABLE,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Va. 2019)

. . . Co. , 80 F.3d 954, 958-59 (4th Cir. 1996). . . .

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 935 F.3d 858 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press , 489 U.S. at 772, 109 S.Ct. 1468 (quoting Mink , 410 U.S. at 80 . . .

UNITED STATES v. SWEARGIN,, 935 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . The man immediately asked the Victim what she would do for $80. . . .

UNITED STATES v. LILLARD,, 935 F.3d 827 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . money to communicate with friends and family, to "periodically help[ ] out his parents who are 91 and 80 . . .

UNITED STATES v. MCADORY,, 935 F.3d 838 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . which applied Murillo in the context of United States Sentencing Guideline § 4B1.2(b), see id. at 1079-80 . . .

UNITED STATES v. HERRING,, 935 F.3d 1102 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). . . . Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 478-80, 120 S.Ct. 1029, 145 L.Ed.2d 985 (2000). . . .

F. SHARPE, v. UNITED STATES,, 935 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Appellee's Br. 45-47 (citing 844 F.2d at 779-80 ). The government contends that to award Mr. . . .

L. SMITH, v. SHARP,, 935 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . In that case, the defendant's IQ test scores ranged from 53 to 80. . . . U.S. at 309 n.5, 122 S.Ct. 2242 ; see Hooks, 689 F.3d at 1168 n.7 (noting petitioners IQ scores of: 80 . . . , 70, 61, 57, 61, 80, 72, 76, and 53, determining the 72 and 76 to be most reliable); Michael Smith, . . . Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). . . . Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68, 80-82, 105 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985). . . .

U. S. SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. HUI FENG Of PC,, 935 F.3d 721 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Feng estimated that 80 percent of his clients found him through his website, which posted comparisons . . . Section 15(a) was enacted 80 years ago, and it has been applied countless times by the courts. . . .

EDMO, v. CORIZON, INC. Al v. Al, 935 F.3d 757 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . It would eliminate 80 percent of the testosterone in her body, necessitating a lower dose of hormones . . . of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program and National Inpatient Sample Databases , 80 . . .

BELLITTO, v. SNIPES,, 935 F.3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . These calculations revealed registration rates consistently above 80% of the total 18-and-older population . . .

IN RE BOWLES,, 935 F.3d 1210 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bowles got an IQ score of 80 on the WAIS-R. . . . Bowles knew his IQ score of 80 would disqualify him from relying on Atkins, no matter what other evidence . . . On the first, which was administered in 1995, he received a score of 80. . . . adaptive functioning that had their onset during his developmental period" and that his IQ score of 80 . . .

RAY, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, v. As, 935 F.3d 703 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . the Fair Labor Standards Act to Domestic Service; Announcement of 30-Day Period of Non-Enforcement, 80 . . . Standards Act to Domestic Service; Dates of Previously Announced 30-Day Period of Non-Enforcement, 80 . . . the Fair Labor Standards Act to Domestic Service; Announcement of 30-Day Period of Non-Enforcement, 80 . . .

CHAMBERLAIN GROUP, INC. v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. OWT ET Co., 935 F.3d 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 221, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (quoting Mayo , 566 U.S. at 72, 80, 132 S.Ct. 1289 ). 1. . . .

PANAH, v. CHAPPELL,, 935 F.3d 657 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). . . .

GALDERMA LABORATORIES L. P. S. A. S. A. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 390 F. Supp. 3d 582 (D. Del. 2019)

. . . Id. at 1378-80. . . .

SCRIMO, v. LEE,, 935 F.3d 103 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), defense counsel rendered ineffective . . .

SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR v. BRISTOL EXCAVATING, INC., 935 F.3d 122 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . The Department of Labor, despite decades of enforcing the FLSA, has only recently discovered in that 80 . . . After all, the FLSA was drafted more than 80 years ago against a long-understood and still true principle . . . No. 89-601, § 101(a), 80 Stat. 830 (1966) (adding § 203(m) to 29 U.S.C. § 203 ). . . .

COLE v. CARSON, v., 935 F.3d 444 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Zadeh , 928 F.3d at 479-80 (Willett, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part). . . .

UNITED STATES v. MCCLOUD, II,, 935 F.3d 527 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 678-80. The government also points to this court's unpublished decision in United States v. . . .

BACA v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, G. T. L. M., 935 F.3d 887 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Valley Auth. , 297 U.S. 288, 348, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring) ("[T]he . . . McMillan , 466 U.S. 48, 51, 104 S.Ct. 1577, 80 L.Ed.2d 36 (1984) (per curiam)). . . .

PARKER, v. LANDRY,, 935 F.3d 9 (1st Cir. 2019)

. . . Elsevier, Inc., 732 F.3d 77, 80 (1st Cir. 2013). . . .

NORTH PENSION FUND v. NUTRITION MANAGEMENT SERVICES COMPANY,, 935 F.3d 93 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Glover Bottled Gas Corp. , 80 F.3d 38, 40-42 (2d Cir. 1996). . . . Jaspan , 80 F.3d at 40 (emphasis added). . . . against the non-[agreeing] employer ... the right of the fund trustees to audit the employer's records." 80 . . .

BURKE, v. REGALADO, v., 935 F.3d 960 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Br. at 80. . . . Maynard , 80 F.3d 1433, 1450 (10th Cir. 1996). The record does not warrant reassignment. . . . be little unnecessary duplication of effort in having a different judge preside over the new trial." 80 . . .

UNITED STATES v. BEGAY,, 934 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . I, § 2901, 80 Stat. 1438 (1966) (defining "crime of violence" as "voluntary manslaughter, murder, rape . . .

UNITED STATES v. CUEVAS- LOPEZ,, 934 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Ortiz-Gutierrez , 36 F.3d 80, 82 (9th Cir. 1994) ; see also United States v. . . .

BOWLES, v. DESANTIS,, 934 F.3d 1230 (11th Cir. 2019)

. . . City of Neptune Beach, 920 F.3d 1274, 1279-80 (11th Cir. 2019). . . . Ronwin, 466 U.S. 558, 569 n.18, 104 S.Ct. 1989, 80 L.Ed.2d 590 (1984) (explaining that regulation of . . .

UNITED STATES v. CANO,, 934 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . See Price , 566 F.3d at 908-09 ; Carriger , 132 F.3d at 479-80 ; United States v. . . .

ANZA TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. MUSHKIN, INC., 934 F.3d 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . Brown , 466 U.S. 147, 149 n.3, 104 S.Ct. 1723, 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). . . .

PASSARO, Jr. v. VIRGINIA, 935 F.3d 243 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Suburban Sanitary Comm'n , 631 F.3d 174, 179-80 (4th Cir. 2011) (explaining that EEOC investigations . . .

MARTINEZ, v. WALGREEN COMPANY,, 935 F.3d 396 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Walmart Stores, L.L.C. , 907 F.3d 170, 179-80 (5th Cir. 2018). Pagayon , 536 S.W.3d at 503. Id. . . .

HARVILLE, v. CITY OF HOUSTON, MISSISSIPPI,, 935 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . In her deposition, Futral stated that after Harville's departure, approximately 80 percent of the work . . .

UNITED STATES v. BROWN,, 935 F.3d 43 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Preacely , 628 F.3d 72, 80 (2d Cir. 2010) (quoting United States v. . . . Encountering an "ambiguity," 628 F.3d at 80, as to whether the sentencing judge understood the option . . .

BOXILL, v. P. O GRADY E. E. T., 935 F.3d 510 (6th Cir. 2019)

. . . Gibson , 355 U.S. 41, 47, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957), and it was abandoned over a decade ago. . . .

UNITED STATES v. FELICIANOSOTO,, 934 F.3d 783 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). See id. at 342-44. . . .

MENAKER, v. HOFSTRA UNIVERSITY,, 935 F.3d 20 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Sundowner Offshore Servs. , 523 U.S. 75, 80, 118 S. Ct. 998, 140 L.Ed.2d 201 (1998). . . .

HAWKINS v. I- TV DIGITALIS TAVKOZLESI ZRT. f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V. v. i- TV f k a DMCC Rt. DIGI RCS RDS S. A. RCS S. A. DIGI N. V., 935 F.3d 211 (4th Cir. 2019)

. . . Contacts": Invoking Aiding-and-Abetting Jurisdiction to Hold Foreign Nonparties in Contempt of Court , 80 . . .

UNITED STATES v. CLARK,, 935 F.3d 558 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Clark had been found in a hotel room with more than 80 grams of a mixture of heroin and fentanyl, a digital . . . In Wisconsin, Clark possessed more than 80 grams of fentanyl, most of which was packaged in retail packages . . .

UNITED STATES v. SCANZANI,, 392 F. Supp. 3d 210 (D. Mass. 2019)

. . . Frabizio , 459 F.3d 80, 86 (1st Cir. 2006). 2. . . .

JEFFERIES, v. UNC REGIONAL PHYSICIANS PEDIATRICS, 392 F. Supp. 3d 620 (M.D.N.C. 2019)

. . . Co., 80 F.3d 954, 959 (4th Cir. 1996). . . .

IN RE J. SHENK, Sr. J. Sr. v. U. S., 603 B.R. 671 (Bankr. N.D. N.Y. 2019)

. . . Hr'g Tr. p. 80 at 9. . . . Hr'g Tr. p. 80 at 6-7. . . . Plaintiff's exhibits ("P Ex.") include: Pre-Trial Statement (Doc.80) (P Ex. . . .

UNITED STATES v. SIMS,, 933 F.3d 1009 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Spring , 80 F.3d 1450, 1462 (10th Cir. 1996). . . .

IN RE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE S SUNDAY TICKET ANTITRUST LITIGATION, Jr. v. LLC LLC NFL LLC LLC LP LLC LLC NFL LP LLC LP LLC LP Co. LLC LP LLC, 933 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Rcd. 4875, 4879-80 (1993). . . .

LATURNER, v. UNITED STATES,, 933 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See Regulations Governing United States Savings Bonds, 80 Fed. Reg. 37,559, 37,3560 (U.S. . . .

KELSAY, v. ERNST,, 933 F.3d 975 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . Robinson , 928 F.3d 457, 479-80 (5th Cir. 2019) (Willet, J. concurring in part, dissenting in part) ( . . .

OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. L. B. L. LLC G. v. PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION S. PTC K. PTC T. PTC T. Sr. PTC N. PTC P. PTC R. PTC s, 934 F.3d 283 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288, 347, 56 S.Ct. 466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) (Brandeis, J., concurring)). . . .

MCMICHAEL, v. TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING, INCORPORATED RIGP DCL, L. L. C. USA,, 934 F.3d 447 (5th Cir. 2019)

. . . Transocean fired 80 employees from the DCL before eventually taking the entire rig out of service in . . . into a percentage: Unsatisfactory equaling 40%, Conditional equaling 60%, Fully Successful equaling 80% . . . the manager assigns a potential score of one, the employee receives a potential percentage score of 80% . . . This earned him a score of 80%. . . .

J. BAUWENS, v. REVCON TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., 935 F.3d 534 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Bruch , 489 U.S. 101, 110, 109 S.Ct. 948, 103 L.Ed.2d 80 (1989) (quoting Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. . . .

IN RE WEINHOLD,, 603 B.R. 513 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2019)

. . . For purposes of this Order, it is enough to say that when the Debtor filed this chapter 7 case, his 80% . . . Partners and Douglas Smith, in North Carolina seeking a declaration that he is the sole owner of the 80% . . . the complaint are predicated on two central allegations: (1) at all times, the Debtor has owned the 80% . . . this Court to reopen this bankruptcy case and find that Carolina Preservation Partners acquired the 80% . . . pending in North Carolina that was predicated on allegations that he, at all times, owned both the 80% . . .

LAFFERTY, v. BENZON,, 933 F.3d 1237 (10th Cir. 2019)

. . . Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) ). . . . United States, 362 U.S. 402, 80 S. . . . United States, 362 U.S. 402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960)," and that the state trial court "made . . .

UNITED STATES v. HATAWAY,, 933 F.3d 940 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . King, 673 F.3d 274, 279-80 (4th Cir. 2012), the Fourth Circuit, deferring to South Carolina appellate . . .

N. S. v. KANSAS CITY BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, 933 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 2019)

. . . justify denying both kinds of immunity in some cases, see, e.g. , Div. of Emp't Sec. , 864 F.3d at 979-80 . . .

NAUMOVSKI, v. NORRIS, 934 F.3d 200 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . Leibowitz , 874 F.3d 73, 80 (2d Cir. 2017) (explaining that qualified immunity "applies unless a plaintiff . . . See Ganek , 874 F.3d at 80. 570 U.S. 744, 133 S. . . .

SHIFFLETT, v. Mr. KORSZNIAK, SCI Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. Dr. P., 934 F.3d 356 (3rd Cir. 2019)

. . . Garner , 216 F.3d 970, 979-80 (11th Cir. 2000) (en banc ) (suggesting that, where a prisoner's suit is . . .

MARTIN, v. MARINEZ,, 934 F.3d 594 (7th Cir. 2019)

. . . Id. at 679-80 ; Morfin v. . . . § 1983 suit to recover compensation for expenses incurred during his criminal prosecution based on 80 . . .

IN RE MIAMI METALS I, INC., 603 B.R. 727 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . (citing In re Ore Cargo, Inc. , 544 F.2d 80, 82 (2d Cir. 1976) ); Am. . . .

LIVADITIS, v. DAVIS,, 933 F.3d 1036 (9th Cir. 2019)

. . . Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). See Ayala v. . . .

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, v. HOSPIRA, INC. v. Dr. s Dr. s, 933 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

. . . See DRL J.A. 7879-80 (overcoming the Arsenyan anticipation rejection by arguing that it "does not disclose . . .

UNITED STATES v. NG LAP SENG, Ng, Ng W. C., 934 F.3d 110 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . . § 288 (listing more than 80 entities "designated by executive order as public international organizations . . . including establishing the [Center] as the permanent site of the annual UNOSSC Expo"); Trial Tr. at 80 . . .

IN RE FIFTH AVENUE AND RELATED PROPERTIES, 934 F.3d 147 (2nd Cir. 2019)

. . . See In re 650 Fifth Ave. , 830 F.3d at 80 (citing Exec. Order No. 12,957, 60 Fed. . . .

UNITED STATES v. M. SWARTZ,, 391 F. Supp. 3d 199 (N.D.N.Y. 2019)

. . . Nos. 75, 80); and Continental Trust Corporation Limited ("Continental Trust") (Dkt. No. 86). . . . ("Grace Ventures"), a Delaware corporation, and then "sold" 80 percent of the Jreck Subs franchise to . . . No. 80. On September 26, 2017, the Government moved to dismiss the trust's petition. Dkt. No. 85. . . . No. 80-4, neither the proposed § 853(n) petition that petitioner filed as an exhibit to the trust's motion . . . No. 80, has been signed by an attorney. See, e.g. , Bell v. S. Bay European Corp. , 486 F. . . .