Florida Statute 83.14 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 83.14

83.14 Replevy of distrained property.—The property distrained may be restored to the defendant at any time on the defendant’s giving bond with surety to the sheriff levying the writ. The bond shall be approved by such sheriff; made payable to plaintiff in double the value of the property levied on, with the value to be fixed by the sheriff; and conditioned for the forthcoming of the property restored to abide the final order of the court. It may be also restored to defendant on defendant’s giving bond with surety to be approved by the sheriff making the levy conditioned to pay the plaintiff the amount or value of the rental or advances which may be adjudicated to be payable to plaintiff. Judgment may be entered against the surety on such bonds in the manner and with like effect as provided in s. 76.31.

History.—s. 3, ch. 3131, 1879; RS 1766; s. 1, ch. 4408, 1895; RGS 3561; CGL 5425; s. 34, ch. 67-254; s. 16, ch. 82-66; s. 9, ch. 83-255; s. 434, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 83.14 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.14 on Casetext

Amendments to 83.14

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 83.14

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 83.14.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 83.14

Total Results: 15

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1999-02-05

Snippet: addressed by this office in Attorney General Opinion 83-14, wherein it was concluded that a school lacked statutory

State v. A.C.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-07-22

Citation: 714 So. 2d 617, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9082

Snippet: provisions. See Duncan v. State, 152 U.S. 377, 382-83, 14 S.Ct. 570, 38 L.Ed. 485 (1894)(“the prescribing

State v. AC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-07-22

Citation: 714 So. 2d 617, 1998 WL 409004

Snippet: provisions. See Duncan v. State, 152 U.S. 377, 382-83, 14 S.Ct. 570, 38 L.Ed. 485 (1894)("the prescribing

159 East Inc. v. Margolis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-12-10

Citation: 702 So. 2d 286, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13660, 1997 WL 756601

Snippet: and dissolution. See §§ 78.068(3), (4), 83.12, 83.14, Fla. Stat. (1995). Thus, the appellee’s error did

Arrow Air, Inc. v. Walsh

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-11-17

Citation: 645 So. 2d 422, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 592, 10 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 84, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 1806, 1994 WL 643760

Snippet: Petitioner, v. Michael WALSH, Respondent. No. 83,014. Supreme Court of Florida. November 17, 1994. Kathleen

Goodman v. Brasseria La Capannina, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-06-11

Citation: 602 So. 2d 1245, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 353, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1028, 1992 WL 125114

Snippet: In Phillips we held sections 83.11, 83.12 and 83.14-.19, Florida Statutes (1975), unconstitutional as

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1984-10-11

Snippet: district as prescribed by law." (e.s.) Cf., AGO's 83-14 (district school board not authorized by law to

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1984-06-14

Snippet: McLean, 115 So.2d 764 (1 D.C.A. Fla., 1959); AGO's 83-14, 82-59, 80-73 and 80-42. I am not aware of any statute

Drury v. Harding

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-12-29

Citation: 443 So. 2d 360

Snippet: State of Florida v. Sandra P. Lemunyon, Case No. 83-14-AP; State of Florida v. John D. Thompson, Case No

Brownlee v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-12-14

Citation: 442 So. 2d 1049, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25126

Snippet: PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. *1050ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN, J., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents with opinion.

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1983-10-18

Snippet: Legislature has conferred on them. See, e.g., AGO's 83-14, 82-59, 80-73, 80-42, 76-61, 75-148. See also, Harvey

New Hampshire Insurance Co. v. Conner

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-06-22

Citation: 435 So. 2d 274, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19674

Snippet: BOARDMAN, Judge. New Hampshire Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s ruling by summary judgment that the insured, appellee Law*275rence Conner, did not knowingly select the minimum uninsured motorist (UM) coverage authorized by law.1 We reverse. The insured signed an insurance renewal questionnaire and supplemental application selecting UM coverage of $10,000 per person and $20,000 per accident. While Conner acknowledged having signed these documents, he denied that he understood the significance

State v. Miller

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-07-18

Citation: 373 So. 2d 677, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4755

Snippet: from the New York courts. . §§ 83.11, 83.12, 83.14-.19, Fla.Stat. (1975). . §§ 77.031, 77.04, 77

Phillips v. Guin & Hunt, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1977-03-31

Citation: 344 So. 2d 568

Snippet: correct in ruling that Sections 83.11, 83.12, and 83.14-.19, Florida Statutes, failed to pass constitutional

Dworkis v. Dworkis

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-05-05

Citation: 111 So. 2d 70

Snippet: 186 So. 669; 2 Nelson, Divorce & Annulment, §§ 14.83, 14.84 (2d ed. 1945). While the record does not show