Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 83.54 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 83.54 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 83.54

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 83
LANDLORD AND TENANT
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 83.54
83.54 Enforcement of rights and duties; civil action; criminal offenses.Any right or duty declared in this part is enforceable by civil action. A right or duty enforced by civil action under this section does not preclude prosecution for a criminal offense related to the lease or leased property.
History.s. 2, ch. 73-330; s. 7, ch. 2013-136.

F.S. 83.54 on Google Scholar

F.S. 83.54 on Casetext

Amendments to 83.54


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 83.54
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 83.54.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 83.54

Total Results: 7

OLEN PROPERTIES CORPORATION v. Moss

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-05-14

Citation: 984 So. 2d 558, 2008 WL 2038249

Snippet: or requirements set forth" in the Act. Section 83.54 states that "[a]ny right or duty declared" in the

Grant v. Wester

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-09-30

Citation: 679 So. 2d 1301, 1996 WL 549370

Snippet: Appliances 83.54 Septic Tank

Metropolitan Dade County v. Floyd, Pearson, Richman, Greer, Weil, Zack & Brumbaugh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-02-06

Citation: 559 So. 2d 614, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 708, 1990 WL 8627

Snippet: the commission, on July 5, 1983, passed Ordinance 83-54 which replaced WASA’s general counsel with the county

Paterson v. Deeb

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-06-12

Citation: 472 So. 2d 1210, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1417

Snippet: recover damages caused by the noncompliance." §§ 83.54, 83.55, Fla. Stat. (1981).[4] The act has been characterized

Eig v. INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-03-13

Citation: 447 So. 2d 377, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12297

Snippet: INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Appellee. No. 83-54. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Bidders, Inc. v. City of Cocoa

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-09-29

Citation: 440 So. 2d 388, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25445

Snippet: ORFINGER, Chief Judge. Because a directed verdict should not be granted where there is any reasonable evidence upon which a jury could legally predicate a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, American Motors Corp. v. Ellis, 403 So.2d 459 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), and because the court, in passing on a motion for directed verdict must evaluate the evidence and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, Reams v. Vaughn, 435 So.2d 879 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983),

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1982-06-18

Snippet: 50(83.762), 83.51 and83.52(83.758), 83.53(83.757), 83.54(83.761[1]), 83.55(83.761[2]),83.56(83.763), 83.60(83