Florida Statute 88.2101 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VI
CIVIL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Chapter 88
UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 88.2101

88.2101 Application of act to nonresident subject to personal jurisdiction.—A tribunal of this state exercising personal jurisdiction over a nonresident in a proceeding under this act, under another law of this state relating to a support order, or recognizing a foreign support order may receive evidence from outside this state pursuant to s. 88.3161, communicate with a tribunal outside this state pursuant to s. 88.3171, and obtain discovery through a tribunal outside this state pursuant to s. 88.3181. In all other respects, parts III through VI of this chapter do not apply, and the tribunal shall apply the procedural and substantive law of this state.

History.—s. 14, ch. 2011-92.

F.S. 88.2101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 88.2101 on Casetext

Amendments to 88.2101

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 88.2101

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 88.2101.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 88.2101

Total Results: 2

Raulerson v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-06-13

Citation: 544 So. 2d 338, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1416, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3254, 1989 WL 61540

Snippet: ERVIN, Judge. We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence for sale or delivery of cannabis. Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985); § 90.803(21), Fla.Stat. (1987). However, we reverse that portion of the sentence which imposes costs upon the appellant, because costs were imposed without notice to him, and without a hearing on the matter. “It is well settled that before costs may be assessed pursuant to sections 960.20, 943.25, and 27.3455, the state must provide a defendant with adequate notice

State v. Ohler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1989-03-14

Citation: 539 So. 2d 38, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 684, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1304, 1989 WL 21480

Snippet: PER CURIAM. The trial court failed to provide either oral or written reasons for its downward departure from the sentencing guidelines. We, therefore, reverse and remand this cause to the trial court to afford it an opportunity to enter a written order supporting the departure. See State v. Wayda, 533 So.2d 939 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). If, upon remand, the sentence entered by the trial court exceeds the sentence specified in the plea agreement, defendant shall be given the opportunity to withdraw his