Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 90.101 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 90.101 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 90.101

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 90.101
90.101 Short title.This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Florida Evidence Code.”
History.s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379.

F.S. 90.101 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.101 on Casetext

Amendments to 90.101


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 90.101
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 90.101.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.101

Total Results: 20

J.J.J. v. D.G. and A.G.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-07-24

Snippet: one another.’” M.W. v. Davis, 756 So. 2d 90, 101 (Fla. 2000) (quoting Forsythe v. Longboat

JAMES ENRIQUEZ vs ASHLEY VELAZQUEZ

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-11-03

Snippet: original) (quoting M.W. v. Davis, 756 So. 2d 90, 101 (Fla. 2000)). In the instant case, the dissent

JON J. RAPPAPORT v. ARTHUR F. SCHERR, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-05-26

Snippet: it.” Kamen v. Kemper Fin. Svcs., Inc., 500 U.S. 90, 101 (1991). 4 We disagree with, and distinguish

PATTY DAVIS v. SHERIDAN HEALTHCARE, INC. AND SHERIDAN RADIOLOGY SERVICES OF PINELLAS, INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-10-16

Snippet: original) (quoting M.W. v. Davis, 756 So. 2d 90, 101 (Fla. 2000)). To the extent that such consideration

WILLIAM DAVID FITTS v. BILL FURST, PROPERTY APPRAISER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-09-13

Snippet: " Id. (quoting M.W. v. Davis, 756 So. 2d 90, 101 (Fla. 2000)). The title of section 196.161 and

State of Florida v. Peter Peraza

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-12-13

Snippet: harmony with one another.” M.W. v. Davis, 756 So. 2d 90, 101 (Fla. 2000) (quoting Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach

David M. Baricko v. Barnett Transportation, Inc. and York Risk etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-01-17

Citation: 220 So. 3d 1219, 2017 WL 163692, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 404

Snippet: Laws of Fla. (amending § 90.702, Fla. Stat,); § 90.101, Fla. Stat. (“This chapter shall be known and may

Taylor v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-08-06

Citation: 44 So. 3d 618, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11431, 2010 WL 3056612

Snippet: parcels. See MERSCORP, Inc. v. Romaine, 8 N.Y.3d 90, 101, 828 N.Y.S.2d 266, 861 N.E.2d 81, 83 (N.Y.2006)

Brock v. Board of County Commissioners of Collier County ex rel. Collier County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-01-30

Citation: 9 So. 3d 635, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 652

Snippet: and obvious meaning. M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000). Section 28.33 is such a clear and unambiguous

Dianderas v. FL. BIRTH RELATED NEUROLOGICAL

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-12-21

Citation: 973 So. 2d 523, 2007 WL 4458151

Snippet: and obvious meaning. M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000); Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Huntington

MORTGAGE ELECT. REGISTRATION v. Revoredo

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-03-14

Citation: 955 So. 2d 33, 2007 WL 754690

Snippet: land law. See MERSCORP, Inc. v. Romaine, 8 N.Y.3d 90, 101, 828 N.Y.S.2d 266, 861 N.E.2d 81 (2006)(Kaye, C

State v. Ducharme

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-08-20

Citation: 881 So. 2d 70, 2004 WL 1856023

Snippet: Id. at 693; see also M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000); McLaughlin v. State, 721 So.2d 1170

Parker v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-05-26

Citation: 874 So. 2d 683, 2004 WL 1161849

Snippet: harmony with one another.'" M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla. 2000) (quoting Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach

Rayburn v. Orange Park Medical Center, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-04-15

Citation: 842 So. 2d 985, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 5239, 2003 WL 1872491

Snippet: provides notice. See M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000) (stating that statute should be given

Graham v. Jenne

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-02-12

Citation: 837 So. 2d 554, 2003 WL 289263

Snippet: harmony with one another.'" M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000) (quoting Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach

Jackson County Hosp. Corp. v. Aldrich

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-12-27

Citation: 835 So. 2d 318, 2002 WL 31875153

Snippet: and obvious meaning. M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000); Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Huntington

Schur v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-11-25

Citation: 832 So. 2d 188, 2002 WL 31641524

Snippet: provides notice. See M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000) (stating that statute should be given

Woodham v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Fla., Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-10-10

Citation: 829 So. 2d 891, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 834, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1967, 2002 WL 31259952

Snippet: consistent whole, see M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000); Sun Ins. Office, Ltd. v. Clay, 133

Florida Hospital v. State Agency for Health Care Administration

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-08-20

Citation: 823 So. 2d 844, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11906

Snippet: given its plain meaning. M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000); Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Huntington

Florida Hosp. v. AHCA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-08-20

Citation: 823 So. 2d 844

Snippet: given its plain meaning. M.W. v. Davis, 756 So.2d 90, 101 (Fla.2000); Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Huntington