Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 90.101 (2025)
Short title.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
90.101 Short title.—This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the “Florida Evidence Code.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1980–2017 · leading case: Childers v. Floyd, 642 F.3d 953 (11th Cir. 2011).
Childers v. Floyd, 642 F.3d 953 (11th Cir. 2011). “Florida's Evidence Code is codified in Fla. Stat. § 90.101 , et seq. This opinion will refer to any rule from Florida's code as a "Florida Evidence Rule.”
Action Fire Saf. v. Biscayne Fire Equip., 383 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). “[7] The present case was tried in March 1979, prior to the effective date of the Florida Evidence Code, Section 90.101, Florida Statutes (1979) et seq.”
Tober v. Sanchez, 417 So. 2d 1053 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). “81-742 took place prior to the July 1, 1979 effective date of the Florida Evidence Code, Section 90.101-.958, Florida Statutes (1979), while the bus accident in Case No.”
Florida Bar, 404 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 1981). “§§ 90.101-.958, Fla.Stat. (1979). . The text of chapter 81-93, section 1, is as follows: 90.”
Meyer v. Caruso, 731 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). “[6] See § 90.101 ("This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the `Florida Evidence Code.”
City of Tampa v. Titan Se. Constr. Corp., 535 F. Supp. 163 (M.D. Fla. 1982). “12, requires the City of Tampa to disclose documents that are attorney-client communications or whether these documents are exempt from disclosure by operation of the Florida Evidence Code, Fla.Stat. §§ 90.101-90.958. Because the meaning of the statutes is not apparent, several…”
David M. Baricko v. Barnett Transp., Inc. & York Risk etc., 220 So. 3d 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). “); § 90.101, Fla. Stat. (“This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Florida Evidence Code.”
R. A. v. State, 400 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). “1973), suggests that it is discretionary, not mandatory, that a trial court give the parties an opportunity to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the matter noticed, we note that Freimuth antedates the passage of the Florida Evidence Code,…”
In Re Florida Evidence Code, 675 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 1996). “NOTES [1] §§ 90.101-.958, Fla.Stat. (1995).”
In re the Interest of McC., 490 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). “See § 90.101 et seq., Fla.Stat. (1985); § 39.”
RA v. State, 400 So. 2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). “1973), suggests that it is discretionary, not mandatory, that a trial court give the parties an opportunity to be heard on the propriety of taking judicial notice and the nature of the matter noticed, we note that Freimuth antedates the passage of the Florida Evidence Code,…”
Childers v. Floyd, 625 F.3d 1319 (11th Cir. 2011). “On March 28, Childers notified the State and the trial court that he also intended to introduce statements by the State from the Notice of Revocation, the 8 Florida’s Evidence Code is codified in Fla. Stat. § 90.101 , et seq. This opinion will refer to any rule from Florida’s…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.