Cases from cite.case.law:

GROSS, v. ZIMMERMAN,, 197 So. 3d 1248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . presumption establishing the appropriate amount of child support is a presumption defined by section 90.304 . . . See § 90.304, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .

MITCHELL, v. MIAMI DADE COUNTY MDPD, 186 So. 3d 65 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . Section 90.304, Florida Statutes, provides “[i]n civil actions, all rebuttable presumptions which are . . . With regard to the presumption articulated in section 90.304, this -Court stated: When a presumption . . .

In ESTATE OF E. MURPHY. v. E. R. III, R. II,, 184 So. 3d 1221 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . confidential relationships and is therefore a presumption shifting the burden of proof under ss. 90.301-90.304 . . . 2002 amendment to section 733.107, adding subsection 2, was intended to incorporate sections 90.301-90.304 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. PRODUCTS LIABILITY, 160 So. 3d 869 (Fla. 2015)

. . . See F.S. 90.301-90.304; Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. . . . See F.S. 90.301-90.304; Universal Insurance Co. of North America v. . . .

REGIONS BANK, v. S. HYMAN,, 91 F. Supp. 3d 1234 (M.D. Fla. 2015)

. . . further held that the presumption adopted is one affecting the burden of proof pursuant to section 90.304 . . . The presumption we adopt is a presumption affecting the burden of proof pursuant to section 90.304, F.S . . .

VAN WEELDE, v. VAN WEELDE,, 110 So. 3d 918 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

. . . penalty of perjury as specified by s. 92.525(2) shall create a rebuttable presumption, as defined by s. 90.304 . . .

In STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CIVIL CASES- REPORT NO. PRODUCTS LIABILITY, 91 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 2012)

. . . See F.S. 90.301-90.304. . . .

BRIDGEVIEW BANK GROUP, v. P. CALLAGHAN,, 84 So. 3d 1154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . “The presumption we adopt is a presumption affecting the burden of proof pursuant to section 90.304, . . .

UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, v. WARFEL,, 82 So. 3d 47 (Fla. 2012)

. . . Universal also moved to apply section 90.304, Florida Statutes (2007), and requested that the jury be . . . Presumptions established to implement a particular public policy were governed by section 90.304 and . . . The Legislature had the opportunity to include language requiring the application of section 90.304, . . . Heim, 712 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), the Fourth District held that section 90.304 governs . . . The application of section 90.304 to a presumption in banking relationships is not applicable here. . . .

WARFEL, v. UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA,, 36 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Universal also asked the trial court to determine that section 90.304, Florida Statutes (2007), allowed . . . Universal also contended that section 627.7073(l)(c) created a section 90.304 presumption because it . . . Moreover, the legislature knows how to create burden-shifting presumptions under section 90.304. . . . a rebuttable presumption and the legislature specifically provided that it was governed by section 90.304 . . . section 627.7073(l)(c) was to operate as a burden-shifting presumption under sections 90.302(2) or 90.304 . . . Section 90.304 then provides: Presumption affecting the burden of proof defined. — In civil actions, . . . Section 90.304 applies to presumptions implementing public policy and, therefore, applies in this case . . . points out that the legislature knows how to expressly create burden-shifting presumptions under section 90.304 . . .

MOHORN, v. THOMAS, 30 So. 3d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . penalty of perjury as specified by s. 92.525(2), creates a rebuttable presumption, as defined by s. 90.304 . . .

In WINGATE, v., 377 B.R. 687 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2006)

. . . The presumption we adopt is a presumption affecting the burden of proof pursuant to section 90.304, Florida . . .

TABB, TABB, a v. FLORIDA BIRTH- RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION M. D. d b a, 880 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . in this chapter shall prevent the drawing of an inference that is appropriate. (4) Sections 90.301-90.304 . . .

W. HACK, v. A. JANES,, 878 So. 2d 440 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 90.304 provides that rebuttable presumptions not included within the definition of section 90.303 . . . as procedural devises, are presumptions affecting the burden of proof or the burden of persuasion. § 90.304 . . . 2002 amendment to section 733.107, adding subsection 2, was intended to incorporate sections 90.301-90.304 . . . specifically mandates that the presumption shifts the burden of proof under sections 90.301 through 90.304 . . . Sections 90.301 through 90.304 provide: 90.301. . . .

CAPUTO, v. NOUSKHAJIAN,, 871 So. 2d 266 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . exchange for the creation of a presumption which shifts the burden of proof to the estate under section 90.304 . . .

AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES, 848 So. 2d 1069 (Fla. 2003)

. . . confidential relationships and is therefore a presumption shifting the burden of proof under sections 90.301-90.304 . . . Presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence defined. § 90.304, Fla. Stat. . . .

DELTA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, v. PROFILE INVESTMENTS, INC., 830 So. 2d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . Ehrhardt, presumptions that implement public policy are rebuttable presumptions codified under section 90.304 . . .

G. D AQUISTO, v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,, 816 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . supreme court held that "[t]he presumption is one affecting the burden of proof pursuant to section 90.304 . . .

OWENS v. PUBLIX SUPERMARKETS, INC. v. B B, 802 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2001)

. . . The presumption is one affecting the burden of proof pursuant to section 90.304, Florida Statutes (2000 . . . Almand & Associates, 780 So.2d 45, 59 n. 20 (Fla.2001): Section 90.304 provides that "in civil actions . . .

BEAL BANK, SSB, v. ALMAND AND ASSOCIATES,, 780 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 2001)

. . . The presumption we adopt is a presumption affecting the burden of proof pursuant to section 90.304, Florida . . . 598 So.2d 225, 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), to the extent it imposes a higher burden of proof. .Section 90.304 . . .

A. MORRIS, v. CRAWFORD,, 718 So. 2d 354 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . statistical probability of paternity of 95 percent or more creates a rebuttable presumption, as defined by s. 90.304 . . .

J. HEIM, Jr. v. M. HEIM,, 712 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See §§ 90.302(2), 90.304, Fla: Stat. (1997). . . .

MARTIN, v. STATE, 711 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 90.304, Fla. . . .

J. HOLMEN, G. J. O. J. G. v. HOLMEN, RAHN,, 697 So. 2d 866 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . held, a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity shall create a rebuttable presumption as defined by s. 90.304 . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, D. A. R. v. C. M. N., 661 So. 2d 22 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . proceeding was held, a determination of patemily shall create a rebuttable presumption, as defined by s. 90.304 . . .

In ESTATE OF V. COMBEE, FARMER, v. A. WALKER,, 601 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 1992)

. . . exchange for the creation of a presumption which shifts the burden of proof to the estate under section 90.304 . . .

S. JENNINGS, v. DADE COUNTY, 589 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . that a quasi-judicial officer received an ex parte contact, a presumption arises, pursuant to section 90.304 . . . effect is presumed to be prejudicial unless the defendant proves the contrary by competent evidence. § 90.304 . . . . § 90.304, Fla.Stat. (1991); Department of Agriculture & Consumer Servs. v. . . .

In ESTATE OF V. COMBEE, A. WALKER I. v. FARMER Jr. a, 583 So. 2d 708 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . statute, however, creates a presumption which shifts the burden of proof to the estate under section 90.304 . . .

CITY OF DELRAY BEACH Lt. v. A. BARFIELD,, 579 So. 2d 315 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . entirely agree with appellee’s argument that the 45-day presumption is of the kind covered by section 90.304 . . .

GILTY, v. VILLAGE OF OAK PARK,, 919 F.2d 1247 (7th Cir. 1990)

. . . Furthermore, the officer ranked second on the promotional list had a total score of 90.304/100, whereas . . .

VALDES, v. LAMBERT,, 568 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . statistical probability of paternity of 95 percent or more creates a rebuttable presumption, as defined by s. 90.304 . . .

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, v. H. BONANNO,, 568 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 1990)

. . . Section 90.304, Florida Statutes (1987), defines the second type of rebuttable presumption: In civil . . .

HLAD, Jr. v. STATE, 565 So. 2d 762 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Each of the two statutory definitions of presumptions (§§ 90.303 and 90.304, Fla.Stat.) are qualified . . . Morgan-McCormick-§ 90.302(2) presumption is a rule of substantive law used to implement public policy (see § 90.304 . . .

VIDAL, v. RIVAS,, 556 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . statistical probability of paternity of 95 percent or more creates a rebuttable presumption, as defined by s. 90.304 . . .

JONES v. CRAWFORD,, 552 So. 2d 926 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . statistical probability of paternity of 95 percent or more creates a rebuttable presumption, as defined by s. 90.304 . . . probability of paternity equal to or greater than 95 percent, a rebuttable presumption under Section 90.304 . . . Florida Department of Administration, 372 So.2d 438 (Fla.1979), the Supreme Court held that Section 90.304 . . .

IN RE MURPHY, 32 Fla. Supp. 2d 97 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1989)

. . . Code 90.304) It would also appear that the operative presumption in this case is of the latter type. . . .

IN RE ADOPTION OF P. M. J. M., 28 Fla. Supp. 2d 32 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 1988)

. . . Thus, the Court has cast upon the Whites the burden of proof in this issue in accordance with F.S. 90.304 . . .

PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF DADE COUNTY, d b a v. VALCIN,, 507 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 1987)

. . . See also, §§ 90.303 and 90.304, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, v. E. JIRIK,, 498 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 1986)

. . . Law Revision Council Note-1976, § 90.304, Fla.Stat. (1979). . . .

In ESTATE OF E. DAVIS,, 428 So. 2d 774 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 90.304 provides: Presumption affecting the burden of proof defined. — In civil actions, all rebuttable . . .

INSURANCE COMPANY OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, a a v. ESTATE OF GUZMAN, a, 421 So. 2d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Section 90.304, Florida Statutes (1979), provides: In civil actions, all rebuttable presumptions which . . .

F. B. BYSTROM, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF UNITED STATES, a a, 416 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . .-302(2) and 90.304, Florida Statutes (1977), mandates the result stated above. . . . Consequently, even without the historical development of the law in Florida, Sections 90.302(2) and 90.304 . . . with respect to the appraiser, that even in the absence of deci-sional law, Sections 90.302(2) and 90.304 . . . Tuck, supra; §§ 90.302(2) and 90.304, Fla.Stat. (1977), supra. . . .