Cases from cite.case.law:
CARN, v. STATE,
273 So. 3d 39 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)
. . . ." § 90.401, Fla. Stat. . . .
THORNE, v. STATE,
271 So. 3d 177 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)
. . . Branham , 761 So. 2d 375, 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citing § 90.401, Fla. Stat.). . . .
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. v. GLOGER,,
273 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. App. Ct. 2019)
. . . State, 926 So.2d 1118, 1132 (Fla. 2006) ; see also § 90.401, Fla. . . .
KING, v. STATE,
260 So. 3d 985 (Fla. 2018)
. . . a variety of reasons, including: (1) the statements were irrelevant and prejudicial under sections 90.401 . . .
LOWE, v. STATE,
259 So. 3d 23 (Fla. 2018)
. . . ." § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .
PERRY, v. STATE,
256 So. 3d 888 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . ." § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .
D. SANDERS, v. STATE,
254 So. 3d 1038 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .
F. DEFILIPPO, M. D. v. H. CURTIN B. Co- J.,
255 So. 3d 351 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . Section 90.401, Florida Statutes (2017), defines "relevant evidence" as "evidence tending to prove or . . .
MACOMBER, v. STATE,
254 So. 3d 1098 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . ." § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2015). . . . See § 90.401, Fla. Stat. . . .
VEACH, v. STATE,
254 So. 3d 624 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . ." § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .
J. CORMIER III, v. STATE,
253 So. 3d 75 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . ." § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
HAWTHORNE, v. STATE,
248 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . ." § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .
PIERRE, v. STATE,
246 So. 3d 545 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)
. . . ." § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .
R. MORRIS, v. STATE,
233 So. 3d 438 (Fla. 2018)
. . . See §§ 90.401-.402, Fla. Stat. . . .
D. SUGGS, v. STATE,
238 So. 3d 699 (Fla. 2017)
. . . See §§ 90.401, 90.403, Fla. Stat. (2017). . . .
COFFEY, v. STATE,
228 So. 3d 179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . .” §§ 90.402 & 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .
STEWART, v. D. DRALEAUS,,
226 So. 3d 990 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . . §§ 90.401, 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
SEXTON, v. STATE,
221 So. 3d 547 (Fla. 2017)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. Stat, (2012). . . .
WALKER, v. STATE,
223 So. 3d 388 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .
CROSBY, v. STATE,
222 So. 3d 629 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . State, 19 So.3d 277, 291 (Fla. 2009) (citing §§ 90.401-.402, Fla. Stat. (2000)). . . .
RING POWER CORPORATION v. CONDADO- PEREZ,
219 So. 3d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . .” § 90.401. . . .
OKAFOR, v. STATE,
225 So. 3d 768 (Fla. 2017)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
MORRIS, v. STATE,
219 So. 3d 33 (Fla. 2017)
. . . See §§ 90.401-90.402, Fla. Stat. . . .
OLIVER, v. STATE,
214 So. 3d 606 (Fla. 2017)
. . . See §§ 90.401-90.402, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
PORTILLO, v. STATE,
211 So. 3d 1135 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. . . .
MORLAS, v. STATE,
211 So. 3d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .
STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, v. FIGUEROA,,
218 So. 3d 886 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . “Relevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact,” § 90.401 Fla. . . .
CALLOWAY, v. STATE,
210 So. 3d 1160 (Fla. 2017)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. . . .
ORTON, v. STATE,
212 So. 3d 377 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
. . . A relevancy objection is rooted in sections 90.401 -402, Florida Statutes, which define relevant evidence . . . See Martinez, 125 So.3d at 989 (citing section 90.401, Florida Statutes, when describing the merits of . . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2014).
I recognize that in Jones v. . . .
DAVIS, Jr. v. STATE,
207 So.3d 177 (Fla. 2016)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
PREPARED INSURANCE COMPANY, v. GAL,,
209 So. 3d 14 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. Stat.; Watkins v. . . .
GREENWICH, v. STATE,
207 So.3d 258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. . . .
ROBINSON, v. STATE,
198 So. 3d 1088 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . .” § 90.401,'Fla. Stat. . . .
BOWLES, v. STATE,
198 So. 3d 1055 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .
TOWER HILL SIGNATURE INSURANCE, v. J. SPECK, Jr. E.,
199 So. 3d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . The trial court excluded testimony about the earlier $260,000 payment as irrelevant under section 90.401 . . . material fact: it must tend to establish a fact at issue or to make an inference more or less probable. § 90.401 . . . Specks’ remaining arguments since the trial court ruled that the evidence was irrelevant under sections 90.401 . . .
DIX, v. STATE,
196 So. 3d 547 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . .
MULLENS, v. STATE,
197 So. 3d 16 (Fla. 2016)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
ARIZONA CHEMICAL COMPANY, LLC, v. MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC.,
193 So. 3d 95 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . Under section 90.401, Florida Statutes (2013), “[rjelevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove . . .
STATE v. HORWITZ,,
191 So. 3d 429 (Fla. 2016)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
RIGTERINK, v. STATE,
193 So. 3d 846 (Fla. 2016)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. . . .
PATON, v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO.,
190 So. 3d 1047 (Fla. 2016)
. . . See § 90.401,' Fla. Stat. (2015). . . .
LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC. CMS, v. K. BEEKMAN,,
187 So. 3d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . Given that the evidence code-in sections 90.401 and 90.402, Florida Statutes (2013), generally provides . . .
L. RAGIN, v. STATE,
186 So. 3d 589 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . Florida’s relevancy standard is codified in section 90.401, Florida Statutes (2012), which states: “Relevant . . . evidence need not concretely prove a material fact, it merely must tend to prove a material fact. § 90.401 . . .
P. OPSINCS, v. STATE,
185 So. 3d 654 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
D. WALKER, v. STATE,
180 So. 3d 1154 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat.
Mims v. State, 872 So.2d 453 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) is instinctive. . . .
D. DORT, v. STATE,
175 So. 3d 836 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
. . . .- § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
CLARK, v. STATE,
170 So. 3d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. . . .
ROMAN, v. STATE,
165 So. 3d 723 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2012). “All relevant evidence is admissible, unless provided by law.” . . .
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY, v. KISHA,,
160 So. 3d 549 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
. . . not relevant to prove or disprove any material fact and was, therefore, inadmissible under section 90.401 . . .
L. SHAVER, v. CARPENTER,
157 So. 3d 305 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. . . .
CASCO, v. STATE,
150 So. 3d 838 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
CAVALIERE, v. STATE,
147 So. 3d 628 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . .” §§ 90.401-402, Fla. Stat. (2012); Wright v. . . .
ORANGE, v. STATE,
149 So. 3d 74 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .
E. CASTANON, v. STATE Of,
162 So. 3d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
HILDWIN, v. STATE,
141 So. 3d 1178 (Fla. 2014)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2013). . . .
TOLBERT, v. STATE,
154 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2011) (defining relevant evidence). . . .
SPIPNIEWSKI, v. STATE,
134 So. 3d 563 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . because it was relevant and material to establish the charged offense of aggravated stalking, see § 90.401 . . .
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, v. CORCORAN,,
133 So. 3d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .
FRANCOIS, v. STATE,
132 So. 3d 1206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
SWANSON, v. J. ROBLES, A.,
128 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
. . . .” §§ 90.401, .402, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .
CHILDERS, v. L. FLOYD,, 736 F.3d 1331 (11th Cir. 2013)
. . . withdraw Junior’s plea agreement by holding that such evidence was relevant under Florida Rule of Evidence 90.401 . . . R. 90.401, “[rjelevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact.” Fla. . . . . § 90.401.
. . . .
GOSCIMINSKI, v. STATE,
132 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 2013)
. . . See §§ 90.401, 90.402, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
DATUS, v. STATE,
126 So. 3d 363 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. . . .
M. GARTNER, v. STATE,
118 So. 3d 273 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .
DAVIS, v. STATE,
121 So. 3d 462 (Fla. 2013)
. . . trial court overruled the defense’s objection, finding that the testimony was relevant under sections 90.401 . . .
A. GREGORY, v. STATE,
118 So. 3d 770 (Fla. 2013)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .
MARTINEZ, v. STATE,
125 So. 3d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
. . . State, 473 So.2d 1282, 1285 (Fla.1985); § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .
TYSON, v. STATE,
114 So. 3d 443 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
. . . Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 90.401 (1992 ed.)). . . .
HOLLOWAY, v. STATE,
114 So. 3d 296 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
. . . .” § 90.401 Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
GUERRERO, v. STATE,
125 So. 3d 811 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
. . . State, 991 So.2d 962, 966 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2007)). . . .
PETRUSCHKE, v. STATE,
125 So. 3d 274 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .
LEBRON, v. STATE Of,
127 So. 3d 597 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
PATRICK, v. STATE,
104 So. 3d 1046 (Fla. 2012)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat.
Edwards v. State, 39 So.3d 447, 448-49 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). . . .
ELMER, v. STATE,
114 So. 3d 198 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .
RUBINGER, v. STATE,
98 So. 3d 659 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2006). . . .
Jo BOWEN v. TAYLOR- CHRISTENSEN,,
98 So. 3d 136 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . ("Included within the section 90.401 definition of relevancy is the concept of materiality; the evidence . . .
D. HALL, v. STATE,
107 So. 3d 262 (Fla. 2012)
. . . See §§ 90.401-.402, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . .
L. JACKSON, Jr. v. STATE,
89 So. 3d 1011 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .
METAYER, v. STATE,
89 So. 3d 1003 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
HARDEN, v. STATE,
87 So. 3d 1243 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . .
TOMAS, v. STATE,
126 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. . . .
BLANCO, v. STATE,
89 So. 3d 933 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . See § 90.401, .403, Fla. Stat. (2008); United States v. . . .
NSHAKA, v. STATE,
92 So. 3d 843 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2011). . . .
A. HOLMES, v. STATE,
91 So. 3d 859 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. . . .
McCOSKEY, v. STATE,
76 So. 3d 1012 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. . . .
SPECIAL, v. BAUX, M. D. M. D. P. A. P. L.,
79 So. 3d 755 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2009). . . . attack the credibility of a witness on a material issue, such evidence is “relevant” under section 90.401 . . .
WILSON, v. STATE,
72 So. 3d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2009) (emphasis added). . . .
SANTIAGO, v. STATE,
70 So. 3d 720 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
. . . See § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
LEON, v. STATE,
68 So. 3d 351 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
ANDREWS, v. STATE,
82 So. 3d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
. . . appellant asserts the trial court admitted the irrelevant testimony of three witnesses contrary to section 90.401 . . .
DOWNS, v. STATE,
65 So. 3d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. [ (2009) ]. . . .
MALDONADO, v. STATE,
64 So. 3d 166 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. . . .
RIGTERINK, v. STATE,
66 So. 3d 866 (Fla. 2011)
. . . . § 90.401, Fla. . . .
CHILDERS, v. L. FLOYD,, 642 F.3d 953 (11th Cir. 2011)
. . . The verdict was, in the State’s view, irrelevant under Florida Evidence Rule 90.401, or more prejudicial . . .
DUROUSSEAU, v. STATE,
55 So. 3d 543 (Fla. 2010)
. . . State, 77 Fla. 505, 82 So. 44, 49 (1919); § 90.401, Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, v. J. ASHE,,
50 So. 3d 645 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
. . . .” § 90.401, Fla. Stat. . . .
ABDOOL, v. STATE,
53 So. 3d 208 (Fla. 2010)
. . . Section 90.401, Florida Statutes, defines relevant evidence as “evidence tending to prove or disprove . . .
AGUILUZ, v. STATE,
43 So. 3d 800 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
. . . Relevant evidence is defined in section 90.401 as “evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact . . .
JOHNSON, v. STATE,
40 So. 3d 883 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
. . . . §§ 90.401-90.402, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .
HERNANDEZ, v. PARIS INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE Co.,
39 So. 3d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
. . . . § 90.401 Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .
