Florida Statute 90.406 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 90.406

90.406 Routine practice.—Evidence of the routine practice of an organization, whether corroborated or not and regardless of the presence of eyewitnesses, is admissible to prove that the conduct of the organization on a particular occasion was in conformity with the routine practice.

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379.

F.S. 90.406 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.406 on Casetext

Amendments to 90.406

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 90.406

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 90.406.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.406

Total Results: 20

REYNALDO P. SANTANA v. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-01-13

Snippet: company’s routine business practices under section 90.406, Florida Statutes (20[20]), may be sufficient to

PEGGY A. THORLTON v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, L L C

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-10-17

Citation: 257 So. 3d 596

Snippet: related to routine business practices under section 90.406, Florida Statutes (2016), or lack of personal

STEVEN E. SOULE v. U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-07-13

Citation: 253 So. 3d 679

Snippet: default letter was mailed. Id. (citing § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2014)). But the witness

PNC Bank v. Roberts

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-23

Citation: 246 So. 3d 482

Snippet: were actually mailed to Borrowers in this case.4 § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2009); Brown v. Giffen Indus., Inc

ISAIAH L. SPENCER & SHATIKA L. SPENCER v. DITECH FINANCIAL, L L C

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2018-04-04

Citation: 242 So. 3d 1189

Snippet: that the default letter was mailed. Id. (citing § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2014)). But the witness must have

Edmonds v. U.S. Bank National Association

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-04-05

Citation: 215 So. 3d 628, 2017 WL 1277738, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4573

Snippet: mailing letters.” Allen, slip op. at 4; see also § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2014); CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Hoskinson

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Ayers

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-29

Citation: 219 So. 3d 89, 2017 WL 1175877, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 4177

Snippet: routine practice under Florida’s Evidence Code, see § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2015), and was sufficient to preclude

Allen v. Wilmington Trust, N.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-24

Citation: 216 So. 3d 685, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3970

Snippet: company’s routine business practices under section 90.406, Florida Statutes (2014), may be sufficient to

Citimortgage, Inc. v. Hoskinson

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-08

Citation: 200 So. 3d 191, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10455, 2016 WL 3653523

Snippet: evidence of an organization’s routine practice. § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2014); see Brown v. Giffen Indus

Natacha Peuguero and Angelo Peuguero v. Bank of America, N.A.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2015-07-15

Citation: 169 So. 3d 1198, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10774

Snippet: was in conformity with the routine practice.” § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2013); People’s Trust Ins. Co

People's Trust Insurance Co. v. Roddy

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-11-20

Citation: 134 So. 3d 1071, 2013 WL 6081811, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18417

Snippet: was in conformity with the routine practice.” § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2012). This evidence went to the heart

Thigpen v. United Parcel Services, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2008-09-10

Citation: 990 So. 2d 639, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13824, 2008 WL 4146663

Snippet: is misplaced in the organizational context of § 90.406. The fact that corporate policy is long-standing

SHANDS TEACHING HOSP. AND CLINICS v. Dunn

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-11-20

Citation: 977 So. 2d 594, 2007 WL 4105356

Snippet: we turn first to the applicable statute. Section 90.406, Florida Statutes states, Evidence of the routine

Marion County v. Kirk

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-09-21

Citation: 965 So. 2d 330, 2007 WL 2735936

Snippet: county and delivered to MSTU for mailing. See § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2006). Furthermore, the grant of mandamus

Tabb Ex Rel. Tabb v. FLORIDA NICA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-08-30

Citation: 880 So. 2d 1253

Snippet: received the brochure when she pre-registered. See § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (2001) ("Evidence of the routine practice

Thurman v. UAC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-08-24

Citation: 881 So. 2d 89, 2004 WL 1877360

Snippet: principle that has been adopted by this court. Section 90.406, Florida Statutes, states, Evidence of the routine

McKeithan ex rel. McKeithan v. HCA Health Services of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-06-30

Citation: 879 So. 2d 47, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9185, 2004 WL 1462100

Snippet: all patients within the unit. *49Although section 90.406, Florida Statutes (2003), does not apply to the

State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Higgins

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-01-03

Citation: 788 So. 2d 992, 2001 WL 6187

Snippet: So.2d 733, 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Under section 90.406, Florida Statutes (2000), evidence of a business

Best Meridian Ins. Co. v. Tuaty

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-03-29

Citation: 752 So. 2d 733, 2000 WL 313574

Snippet: was in conformity with the routine practice." § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (1997). "Evidence of a business' routine

Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ledford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-04-18

Citation: 691 So. 2d 1164, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3995, 1997 WL 186264

Snippet: v. Jones, 414 So.2d 1169 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); § 90.406, Fla. Stat. (1995). . We note that the Ledfords