Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 90.408 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 90.408 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 90.408

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 90.408
90.408 Compromise and offers to compromise.Evidence of an offer to compromise a claim which was disputed as to validity or amount, as well as any relevant conduct or statements made in negotiations concerning a compromise, is inadmissible to prove liability or absence of liability for the claim or its value.
History.s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379.

F.S. 90.408 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.408 on Casetext

Amendments to 90.408


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 90.408
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 90.408.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.408

Total Results: 20

CENTRAL CONCRETE SUPERMIX, INC. v. JOSE A. "PEPE" CANCIO, SR.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-05-05T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: evidence by Cancio in support of his claims. See § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2014) (entitled “Compromise and offers

PATRICIA GUY MOULTROP v. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-09-09T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: settlement offer was inadmissible, pursuant to section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2019). That section provides… liability for the claim or its value. § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2019). “A fundamental premise

STEVEN PAUL ANDERSON v. MARY MITCHELL

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-05T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: otherwise prohibit its disclosure. See, e.g., §§ 90.408 (providing that evidence of settlement negotiations… rule protecting offers of compromise [section 90.408] appears to be one more of admissibility than

LEXINGTON CLUB COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. v. LOVE MADISON, INC. D/B/A ALEXANDER INSURANCE

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-08-15T00:53:00-07:00

Snippet: Department of Financial Services, pursuant to section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2017). We review a trial…trial court excluded the evidence based on section 90.408 relating to offers to compromise. The trial court…door to discussion of his discipline. Section 90.408 provides: “Evidence of an offer to compromise a…none of them fall within the purview of section 90.408. Nevertheless, these errors were harmless. See

John Robert Sebo v. American Home Assurance Company, Inc.

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-12-01T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 208 So. 3d 694, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2596

Snippet: or dismissal of a joint tortfeasor, and section 90.408, which bars the disclosure of evidence of an offer

Rodriguez and Caballero v. Ocean Bank

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-11-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 208 So. 3d 221, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17476

Snippet: under their counterclaims; 6 . § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2012). 7 . The trial

Sanchez v. Tower Hill Signature Insurance

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-11T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 181 So. 3d 1211, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18482, 2015 WL 8483944

Snippet: post-suit payments tendered by Tower Hill. Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “[e]vidence

Sam Sugar v. in Re:stern

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-09-24T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 201 So. 3d 103, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14018

Snippet: inadmissible in subsequent proceedings in the same case. § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2014); see also Bern v. Camejo…settlement described below.' 3 . § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2011). 4 .

Emilia L. Carr v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-02-05T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 156 So. 3d 1052, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 65, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 202

Snippet: by the danger of unfair prejudice under section 90.408, Florida Statutes, since it is an official business

Mark Anthony Poole v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-06-26T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 151 So. 3d 402, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 459, 2014 WL 2882864, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2061

Snippet: precluded by some specific rule of exclusion.” Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2007), provides that “[Relevant

Panama City-Bay County Airport & Industrial District v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-06-18T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 140 So. 3d 1112, 2014 WL 2772646, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9238

Snippet: [T]he plain language of sections 768.041(3) and 90.408 expressly prohibits the admission at trial of evidence

Bellamy v. Ameri-Pride, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-06-06T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 157 So. 3d 1053, 2014 WL 2537110, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8631

Snippet: claim and thus would be inadmissible under section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2012). That may or may not be

Mathis v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-03-21T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 135 So. 3d 484, 2014 WL 1133321, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4219

Snippet: the danger of the evidence’s unfair prejudice. § 90.408 (“Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative

Bern v. Camejo

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-01-08T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 168 So. 3d 232, 2014 WL 54830, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 179

Snippet: Acevedo collided with [the plaintiff.] . Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2012) provides: "Evidence… So.3d at 189 (noting that sections 768.041 and 90.408 do not "prohibit questions of the kind asked

People's Trust Insurance Co. v. Roddy

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-11-20T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 134 So. 3d 1071, 2013 WL 6081811, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18417

Snippet: and was not “unduly prejudicial” under section 90.408. On a separate issue, the trial court erred in

Ware v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-10-23T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 124 So. 3d 388, 2013 WL 5744445, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16900

Snippet: danger of unfair prejudice or confusion of issues. § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2012). On this record, allowing cross-examination

Victorino v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-10-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 127 So. 3d 478, 2013 WL 5567079

Snippet: needless presentation of cumulative evidence.” § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2006). The fact that “a photograph

Hall v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-08-30T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 107 So. 3d 262, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 537, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1666, 2012 WL 3732823

Snippet: outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. See § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2010). The admissibility of. evidence

Rubrecht v. Cone Distributing, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-08-10T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 95 So. 3d 950, 2012 WL 3235164, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13354

Snippet: first accident, violated section 90.408, Florida Statutes. Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2010),1 provides…interrogation was not within the limitations of section 90.408 because the settlement negotiations in the first…First District Court of Appeal discussed section 90.408, Florida Statutes, and said that “[a] fundamental… 2d DCA 1992), for the proposition that section 90.408 is applicable to settlements with different parties… letter was not authored by appellants, Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (1983) bars the receipt into

Holmes v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-14T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 91 So. 3d 859, 2012 WL 447284, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2126

Snippet: 660 So.2d 244, 251 (Fla.1995). However, section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2010) requires exclusion of