Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2021-05-05T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: evidence by Cancio in support of his claims. See § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2014) (entitled “Compromise and offers
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2020-09-09T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: settlement offer was inadmissible, pursuant to section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2019). That section provides… liability for the claim or its value. § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2019). “A fundamental premise
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-04-05T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: otherwise prohibit its disclosure. See, e.g., §§ 90.408 (providing that evidence of settlement negotiations… rule protecting offers of compromise [section 90.408] appears to be one more of admissibility than
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2018-08-15T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: Department of Financial Services, pursuant to section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2017). We review a trial…trial court excluded the evidence based on section 90.408 relating to offers to compromise. The trial court…door to discussion of his discipline. Section 90.408 provides: “Evidence of an offer to compromise a…none of them fall within the purview of section 90.408. Nevertheless, these errors were harmless. See
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2016-12-01T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 208 So. 3d 694, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 582, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2596
Snippet: or dismissal of a joint tortfeasor, and section 90.408, which bars the disclosure of evidence of an offer
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2016-11-23T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 208 So. 3d 221, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17476
Snippet: under their counterclaims; 6 . § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2012). 7 . The trial
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-11T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 181 So. 3d 1211, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18482, 2015 WL 8483944
Snippet: post-suit payments tendered by Tower Hill. Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “[e]vidence
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-09-24T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 201 So. 3d 103, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14018
Snippet: inadmissible in subsequent proceedings in the same case. § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2014); see also Bern v. Camejo…settlement described below.' 3 . § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2011). 4 .
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-02-05T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 156 So. 3d 1052, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 65, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 202
Snippet: by the danger of unfair prejudice under section 90.408, Florida Statutes, since it is an official business
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2014-06-26T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 151 So. 3d 402, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 459, 2014 WL 2882864, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 2061
Snippet: precluded by some specific rule of exclusion.” Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2007), provides that “[Relevant
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-06-18T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 140 So. 3d 1112, 2014 WL 2772646, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9238
Snippet: [T]he plain language of sections 768.041(3) and 90.408 expressly prohibits the admission at trial of evidence
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-06-06T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 157 So. 3d 1053, 2014 WL 2537110, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 8631
Snippet: claim and thus would be inadmissible under section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2012). That may or may not be
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-03-21T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 135 So. 3d 484, 2014 WL 1133321, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4219
Snippet: the danger of the evidence’s unfair prejudice. § 90.408 (“Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2014-01-08T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 168 So. 3d 232, 2014 WL 54830, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 179
Snippet: Acevedo collided with [the plaintiff.] . Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2012) provides: "Evidence… So.3d at 189 (noting that sections 768.041 and 90.408 do not "prohibit questions of the kind asked
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-11-20T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 134 So. 3d 1071, 2013 WL 6081811, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18417
Snippet: and was not “unduly prejudicial” under section 90.408. On a separate issue, the trial court erred in
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-10-23T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 124 So. 3d 388, 2013 WL 5744445, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16900
Snippet: danger of unfair prejudice or confusion of issues. § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2012). On this record, allowing cross-examination
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-10-10T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 127 So. 3d 478, 2013 WL 5567079
Snippet: needless presentation of cumulative evidence.” § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2006). The fact that “a photograph
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-08-30T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 107 So. 3d 262, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 537, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 1666, 2012 WL 3732823
Snippet: outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. See § 90.408, Fla. Stat. (2010). The admissibility of. evidence
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-08-10T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 95 So. 3d 950, 2012 WL 3235164, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13354
Snippet: first accident, violated section 90.408, Florida Statutes. Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2010),1 provides…interrogation was not within the limitations of section 90.408 because the settlement negotiations in the first…First District Court of Appeal discussed section 90.408, Florida Statutes, and said that “[a] fundamental… 2d DCA 1992), for the proposition that section 90.408 is applicable to settlements with different parties… letter was not authored by appellants, Section 90.408, Florida Statutes (1983) bars the receipt into
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-14T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 91 So. 3d 859, 2012 WL 447284, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2126
Snippet: 660 So.2d 244, 251 (Fla.1995). However, section 90.408, Florida Statutes (2010) requires exclusion of