Cases from cite.case.law:

ECHO, v. MGA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., 157 So. 3d 507 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . because she assigned her rights to PIP benefits to her medical care providers; 3) interpreting section 90.409 . . . Finally, the court found that section 90.409, Florida Statutes, “prohibits the introduction of evidence . . . Section 90.409, Florida Statutes Section 90.409, Florida Statutes, in its entirety, provides: Evidence . . . Thus, in the context of section 90.409, “liability” clearly refers to an insured’s (or, in a UM claim . . . Although Shelton does not support MGA’s interpretation of section 90.409, the “unique policy considerations . . .

USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. M. SHELTON L., 932 So. 2d 605 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

. . . that, in his view, the circuit court had correctly ruled the evidence inadmissible because section 90.409 . . .

WENDELL, v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE,, 881 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 90.409 (2003), Florida Statutes, prohibits the introduction of “[ejvidence of furnishing, or . . .

JOHNSON, v. STATE, 625 So. 2d 1297 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Although no Florida case has addressed this issue, the Law Revision Council Note — 1976 to section 90.409 . . . We therefore conclude that the provisions of section 90.409 are confined to the civil setting and have . . .