Florida Statute 90.510 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 90.510

90.510 Privileged communication necessary to adverse party.—In any civil case or proceeding in which a party claims a privilege as to a communication necessary to an adverse party, the court, upon motion, may dismiss the claim for relief or the affirmative defense to which the privileged testimony would relate. In making its determination, the court may engage in an in camera inquiry into the privilege.

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379.

F.S. 90.510 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.510 on CourtListener

Amendments to 90.510

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.510

Total Results: 9

Chomat v. Northern Ins. Co. of New York

919 So. 2d 535, 2006 WL 47460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 2006 | Docket: 1269761

Cited 16 times | Published

communication necessary to an adverse party under section 90.510, Florida Statutes (2005). Under the circumstances

State v. Famiglietti

817 So. 2d 901, 2002 WL 879409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2002 | Docket: 1430195

Cited 9 times | Published

that disclosure is authorized in this case by section 90.510, Florida Statutes, which states: 90.510. Privileged

Affiliated of Florida v. U-Need Sundries, Inc.

397 So. 2d 764

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1981 | Docket: 1357349

Cited 7 times | Published

documents. They asked the court, pursuant to section 90.510, Florida Statutes (1979),[1] to inspect the

TheStreet. Com, Inc. v. Carroll

20 So. 3d 947, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14516, 2009 WL 3110102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2009 | Docket: 1177537

Cited 3 times | Published

very information claimed to be privileged. See § 90.510, Fla. Stat. We reject the trial court's suggestion

Myron Ex Rel. Brock v. DOCTORS GENERAL HOSP.

704 So. 2d 1083

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1997 | Docket: 1706046

Cited 2 times | Published

moved to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to section 90.510, Florida Statutes (1993), which states, in

Marcum LLP v. Potamkin

107 So. 3d 1193, 2013 WL 615698, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2013 | Docket: 60228588

Published

DCA 2006). . § 90.5055, Fla. Stat. (2010). . § 90.510, Fla. Stat. (2010). ."On application the court

O'Halloran Ex Rel. Keller Financial Services of Florida, Inc. v. Williams (In Re Keller Financial Services of Florida, Inc.)

259 B.R. 391, 14 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 239, 45 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1567, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 1708, 2000 WL 33244257

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 2000 | Docket: 78138

Published

Keller's answer and affirmative defenses pursuant to § 90.510 of the Florida Statutes because the requested

Myron v. Doctors General Hospital, Ltd.

704 So. 2d 1083, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14498

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1997 | Docket: 64778423

Published

moved to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to section 90.510, Florida Statutes (1993), which states, in

Bond v. Eagan

522 So. 2d 408, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 427, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 534, 1988 WL 8384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1988 | Docket: 64633649

Published

of section 90.510, Florida Statutes (1985) against Bond. We reverse and hold that section 90.510 does