Florida Statute 90.510 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 90.510

90.510 Privileged communication necessary to adverse party.—In any civil case or proceeding in which a party claims a privilege as to a communication necessary to an adverse party, the court, upon motion, may dismiss the claim for relief or the affirmative defense to which the privileged testimony would relate. In making its determination, the court may engage in an in camera inquiry into the privilege.

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379.

F.S. 90.510 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.510 on Casetext

Amendments to 90.510

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 90.510

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 90.510.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.510

Total Results: 11

Marcum LLP v. Potamkin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-02-20

Citation: 107 So. 3d 1193, 2013 WL 615698, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2609

Snippet: 2006). . § 90.5055, Fla. Stat. (2010). . § 90.510, Fla. Stat. (2010). ."On application the court

TheStreet. Com, Inc. v. Carroll

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-09-30

Citation: 20 So. 3d 947, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14516, 2009 WL 3110102

Snippet: very information claimed to be privileged. See § 90.510, Fla. Stat. We reject the trial court's suggestion

Chomat v. Northern Ins. Co. of New York

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-01-11

Citation: 919 So. 2d 535, 2006 WL 47460

Snippet: communication necessary to an adverse party under section 90.510, Florida Statutes (2005). Under the circumstances

State v. Famiglietti

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-05-08

Citation: 817 So. 2d 901, 2002 WL 879409

Snippet: authorized in this case by section 90.510, Florida Statutes, which states: 90.510. Privileged communication necessary

Downs v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-05-20

Citation: 740 So. 2d 506, 1999 WL 330082

Snippet: Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 90,510. Supreme Court of Florida. May 20, 1999. Rehearing

Myron v. Doctors General Hospital, Ltd.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-12-31

Citation: 704 So. 2d 1083, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14498

Snippet: moved to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to section 90.510, Florida Statutes (1993), which states, in pertinent

Myron Ex Rel. Brock v. DOCTORS GENERAL HOSP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-12-31

Citation: 704 So. 2d 1083

Snippet: moved to dismiss the complaint, pursuant to section 90.510, Florida Statutes (1993), which states, in pertinent

Keel v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-07-18

Citation: 582 So. 2d 174, 1991 WL 133422

Snippet: STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 90-505, 90-506 and 90-510. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Dukes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-11-21

Citation: 569 So. 2d 1380, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8892, 1990 WL 180943

Snippet: PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s conviction and sen- • tence for one count of sale of cocaine. We vacate the conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine on the authority of V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As in V.A.A. v. State, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance: WHEN A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION IS ALLEGED BASED ON THE CRIMES OF SALE AND POSSESSION (OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO SELL) OF THE SAME QUANTUM OF CONTRABAND

Bond v. Eagan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-02-11

Citation: 522 So. 2d 408, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 427, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 534

Snippet: section 90.510, Florida Statutes (1985) against Bond. We reverse and hold that section 90.510 does not

Affiliated of Florida v. U-Need Sundries, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-05-01

Citation: 397 So. 2d 764

Snippet: documents. They asked the court, pursuant to section 90.510, Florida Statutes (1979),[1] to inspect the documents