Cases from cite.case.law:

RIVERA, v. STATE, 182 So. 3d 861 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . interpreters to translate for non-English speaking or otherwise language-impaired witnesses, see § 90.606 . . .

LOPEZ, v. STATE v. v. v., 153 So. 3d 927 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . introduced unless a translator who was an independent official translator was sworn pursuant to section 90.606 . . . The concept of an official translation emanates from section 90.606, which governs the use of interpreters . . .

PEREZ- SOVIAS, v. STATE, 95 So. 3d 327 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Section 90.606 of the Florida Statutes acknowledges this mandate, requiring use of interpreters and translators . . . understood, an interpreter who is duly qualified to interpret for the witness shall be sworn to do so. § 90.606 . . . Section 90.606 also provides that “[a] person who serves in the role of interpreter or translator in . . . any action or proceeding is subject to all the provisions of this chapter relating to witnesses.” § 90.606 . . .

JIMENEZ, v. SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,, 450 F. App'x 826 (11th Cir. 2012)

. . . . § 90.606 are not properly before this Court, because: (i) they are outside the scope of the district . . .

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM, v. O. R., 45 So. 3d 974 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . As the Department says, [pjursuant to § 90.606, Fla. . . .

T. OBANDO, v. STATE, 988 So. 2d 87 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

. . . The use of interpreters during testimony is governed by section 90.606, Florida Statutes (2006), and . . . English of any writing which he or she is required by his or her duties to decipher or translate. § 90.606 . . .

B. C. S. S. r. l. v. E. WISE,, 910 So. 2d 871 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2005)

. . . The policy was written in Italian and should have been translated into English pursuant to section 90.606 . . .

GOPAR- SANTANA, v. STATE, 862 So. 2d 54 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . State, 721 So.2d 350, 351 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); see also § 90.606(1)(a), (2), Fla. . . . Section 90.606(3), Florida Statutes (2001), requires that the interpreter take an oath that he or she . . .

TEHRANI, v. STATE, 764 So. 2d 895 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Also, in Florida, a witness has a statutory right to an interpreter: 90.606. . . . Section 90.606, Florida Statutes (1997). . . .

V. ECHEMENDIA, v. STATE, 735 So. 2d 555 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Pursuant to section 90.606(3), Florida Statute (1997), an interpreter must “make a true interpretation . . .

ORTEGA, v. STATE, 721 So. 2d 350 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . witness, he was not required to take the oath set forth for interpreters and translators under section 90.606 . . .

APOLINAR, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 710 So. 2d 199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . See § 90.606, Fla. Stat. (1995). Reversed and remanded. . . .

RODRIGUEZ, Sr. Jr. v. STATE, 664 So. 2d 1077 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . contend that the trial court erred in failing to have the interpreter sworn as required by Section 90.606 . . .

STATE v. ASFOUR,, 555 So. 2d 1280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

. . . Any party, or the court on its own motion, may request the aid of an interpreter, as provided in s. 90.606 . . .

MESIDOR, v. STATE, 521 So. 2d 333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . During the plea proceedings, the trial court failed to comply with § 90.606, Florida Statutes (1985), . . .

MONTE, v. STATE, 443 So. 2d 339 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . The record does not reveal whether the specific oath required by section 90.606(3) was administered, . . . We emphasize, as we must, that the decision to appoint an interpreter in accordance with section 90.606 . . . qualifications of the court-appointed interpreter, his name, the specific oath required by section 90.606 . . . Balderrama, supra; see also § 90.606. Neither exception was present in this case. . . . Section 90.606, Florida Statutes (1981), provides as follows: Interpreters and translators.— (1) When . . .

BALDERRAMA, v. STATE, 433 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . . § 90.606(3), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

R D SOD FARMS, INC. v. VESTAL,, 432 So. 2d 622 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Section 90.606, Florida Statutes requires that an interpreter who testifies be qualified to interpret . . . showing that the claimant’s brother was qualified and he was not sworn to interpret as required by § 90.606 . . .

KAELIN, v. STATE, 410 So. 2d 1355 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . See Section 90.606, Florida Statutes, Law Revision Council Note (1976). . . .