Florida Statute 90.611 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 90.611

90.611 Religious beliefs or opinions.—Evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is inadmissible to show that the witness’s credibility is impaired or enhanced thereby.

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379; s. 490, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 90.611 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.611 on Casetext

Amendments to 90.611

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 90.611

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 90.611.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.611

Total Results: 6

Mark D. Sievers v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-11-17

Snippet: Wright’s reference to having prayed violated section 90.611, Florida Statutes (2019). Sievers now argues that

Reeves v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-10-22

Citation: 862 So. 2d 60, 2003 WL 22399671

Snippet: cross-examination, pursuant to section 90.611, Florida Statutes. Section 90.611 states that "[e]vidence of the

Colbert v. Rolls

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-10-22

Citation: 746 So. 2d 1134, 1999 WL 960859

Snippet: fundamental privacy right. Dr. Colbert cites section 90.611, Florida Statutes (1997), which states that "[e]vidence

Norquoy v. Metcalf

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-03-06

Citation: 575 So. 2d 322, 1991 WL 4309

Snippet: comes close to being inadmissible under section 90.611, Florida Statutes, and that it could have had a

In the Interest of T.G.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-12-12

Citation: 570 So. 2d 1143, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9727, 1990 WL 198458

Snippet: PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s conviction for battery and adjudication as a delinquent. The trial court imposed the sum of $250 as costs towards the public defender’s fee without giving appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of these costs on the authority of Beasley v. State, 565 So.2d 721 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) and Hostzclaw v. State, 561 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART. ANSTEAD, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Wing v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-08-02

Citation: 564 So. 2d 634, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5687, 1990 WL 108844

Snippet: GOSHORN, Judge. Frederick Wing appeals the summary denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He alleges that his plea of nolo contendere was not knowingly or voluntarily entered. We remand to the trial court for either attachment of that portion of the record which refutes his allegations, or for the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim. REVERSED and REMANDED. HARRIS, J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., concurs in conclusion