Cases from cite.case.law:

L. REEVES, v. STATE, 862 So. 2d 60 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to allow the cross-examination, pursuant to section 90.611 . . . Section 90.611 states that “[e]vidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion . . . appellant considered seeing Jesus to be so unconventional or unusual so as to be “fantasy,” section 90.611 . . . Federal Rule of Evidence 610 is virtually the same as section 90.611. . . .

E. COLBERT, Jr. M. D. v. C. ROLLS J., 746 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Colbert cites section 90.611, Florida Statutes (1997), which states that “[ejvidence of the beliefs or . . . Colbert is correct in his assertion that section 90.611, Florida Statutes (1997), excludes from evidence . . .

NORQUOY N. A. v. METCALF,, 575 So. 2d 322 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . It would appear that this evidence comes close to being inadmissible under section 90.611, Florida Statutes . . .