Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 20
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-25T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: the needless presentation of evidence. Section 90.612(1), Florida Statutes (2022), requires trial courts…quot;[a]void needless consumption of time." § 90.612(1)(a), (b). In furtherance of these ends,
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-06-21T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: Fla. 1st DCA 1958)). To that end, section 90.612(1), Florida Statutes (2022), expressly obligates…quot;[a]void needless consumption of time." § 90.612(1)(a), (b). Here, a testifying officer was… satisfy its statutory obligation under section 90.612(1)(b) to "[a]void needless consumption of
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-08-16T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: and “[a]void needless consumption of time.” § 90.612(1)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (2008). Further, a trial
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-09T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 263 So. 3d 214
Snippet: quot; over the interrogation of witnesses. See § 90.612(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). *216Because we find that
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-09T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 263 So. 3d 214
Snippet: quot; over the interrogation of witnesses. See § 90.612(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). *216Because we find that
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-08T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: control” over the interrogation of witnesses. See § 90.612(1), Fla. Stat. (2017). Because we find that
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2019-01-01T23:53:00-08:00
Snippet: , and (2) avoid needless consumption of time. § 90.612(1)(a), (b), Fla. Stat. (2018). “When required by
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2018-09-20T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 254 So. 3d 283
Snippet: affecting the credibility of the witness." § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2017). The trial judge has wide
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-12-11T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 180 So. 3d 1201, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18554, 2015 WL 8519504
Snippet: to an abuse of discretion standard); see also § ■90.612(1), Fla. Stat. Appellant additionally argues that
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2015-06-26T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 166 So. 3d 231, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9744, 2015 WL 3903589
Snippet: witness testimony. We would observe that section 90.612(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2013), expressly requires
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2015-05-07T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 175 So. 3d 204
Snippet: reasons. First, the plain'language of section 90.612(2), Florida Statutes, expressly provides trial … matters discussed during direct examination. § 90.612, Fla. Stat. (2002) (“Cross-examination of a witness… (emphasis supplied). Thus, pursuant to section 90.612(2), the .trial court could have permitted the defense
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-09-12T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 132 So. 3d 678, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 638, 2013 WL 5313183, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1988
Snippet: matters affecting the credibility of the witness.” § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2009). The credibility of a witness…scope of cross-examination permitted by section 90.612(2). As Goseiminski asserted to the trial court,
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-06-13T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 90 So. 3d 890, 2012 WL 2122162, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9580
Snippet: questions should be permitted on cross-examination.” § 90.612(3), Fla. Stat. (2010). There was no reason why
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2012-04-19T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 107 So. 3d 242, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 303, 2012 WL 1345485, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 754
Snippet: permit cross-examination into additional matters. § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2008); see Boyd v. State, 910 So
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-03-07T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 83 So. 3d 912, 2012 WL 716046, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3682
Snippet: discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters.” § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2010). [W]hen the direct examination
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-15T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 82 So. 3d 133, 2012 WL 469813, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2269
Snippet: discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters.” § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2008); see also Boyd v. State,
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2012-02-08T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 80 So. 3d 382, 2012 WL 385497, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1771
Snippet: examination on issues raised by direct examination. § 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. (2009) (“Cross-examination of a
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2011-07-07T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 71 So. 3d 848, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 383, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 1565, 2011 WL 2637377
Snippet: quot;[a]void needless consumption of time." § 90.612(1)(a)-(b), Fla. Stat. (2008). Further, a trial
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2011-03-04T00:00:00-08:00
Citation: 55 So. 3d 725, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2693, 2011 WL 743431
Snippet: and develop a complete record for appeal. See § 90.612, Fla. Stat. (2010). 5D09-1890 District
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-07-28T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 42 So. 3d 279, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10849, 2010 WL 2925691
Snippet: witnesses and the presentation of evidence." § 90.612(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). The prosecutor chose not