The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
. . . . § 90.705(2) (2014) (providing that if the defendant "establishes prima facie evidence that the expert . . .
. . . Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 933 So.2d 124, 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); see also § 90.705(1), Fla. . . .
. . . Section 90.705 Florida Statutes (1989), states that if a “party establishes prima facie evidence that . . .
. . . testimony and Plaintiffs may request a voir dire examination of the expert under Florida Statute § 90.705 . . .
. . . .§ 90.705(1), Fla. . . . The Ascent of Man (episode 4, Fires, Metals and Alchemy). . § 90.705(1), Fla. . . .
. . . inquire as to the basis supporting his opinion, he could have done so through cross-examination, section 90.705 . . . (1), or voir dire examination, section 90.705(2). . . .
. . . Section 90.705(1) permits the expert to testify without prior disclosure of the underlying facts or data . . .
. . . State, 608 So.2d 4, 10-11 (Fla.1992) and § 90.705(1), Fla. Stat.). . . .
. . . for the change unless questioned regarding such on cross-examination under Florida Statutes section 90.705 . . .
. . . Appellee objected to his expert opinion testimony based on section 90.705(2), Florida Statutes (2005) . . . Schacht’s testimony was controlled by section 90.705(2), Florida Statutes (2005), which states: Prior . . . The provisions of section 90.705(2), relating to the procedure for discovering the foundation of an expert . . .
. . . Section 90.705(1) provides: (1) Unless otherwise required by the court, an expert may testify in terms . . .
. . . Under sections 90.704 and 90.705, Florida Statutes, an expert may state his or her opinion without setting . . .
. . . See § 90.705, Fla. Stat. (2000). . . . , Florida Statutes, as follows: 90.705. . . . The Fourth District specifically rejected the State’s argument, stating that section 90.705 “supplies . . . He states that: even if Reaves and Gore were mistaken in asserting that section 90.705 does not apply . . . are not persuaded that simply because the State intends to use it in cross-examination under section 90.705 . . .
. . . State, 608 So.2d 4, 10-11 (Fla.1992); § 90.705(1), Fla. . . .
. . . form of an opinion; however, the opinion is admissible only if it can be applied to evidence at trial. 90.705 . . .
. . . Section 90.705(1), Florida Statutes (2001) allows an expert to “testify in terms of opinion or inferences . . .
. . . records, and the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701 — 90.705 . . .
. . . Section 90.705(1) of the Florida Statutes (1999) provides that on cross-examination an expert “shall . . .
. . . business record] under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . Finally, we recognize that section 90.705, Florida Statutes (1999), permits an expert to opine without . . . Nonetheless, without either objection or the procedural invocation of section 90.705(2), Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Moreover, under section 90.705(1) an expert testifying to an opinion may be required, on cross-examination . . .
. . . admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissable under §§ 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . and that the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701-90.705 . . . and that the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . .” § 90.705(2), Fla. Stat. (1997). . . .
. . . The admissibility of expert opinion is governed by section 90.705, Florida Statutes, which provides: . . .
. . . Moreover, section 90.705(1), Florida Statutes (1995), provides that: [u]nless otherwise required by the . . . Black, 434 So.2d 988, 993 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), section 90.705(2) requires the party against whom the . . . See § 90.705(2). . . .
. . . Under section 90.705, Florida Statutes (1993), an expert may testify in the form of an opinion without . . .
. . . admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . Relying on subsection 90.705(2), Florida Statutes (1995), CFP correctly argues that Mr. . . .
. . . admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . Furthermore, the Florida Tile interpretation contradicts sections 90.702-90.705, Florida Statutes (1991 . . .
. . . . § 90.705(2), Fla.Stat. (1991); Newell v. Best Sec. Sys., Inc., 560 So.2d 395 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). . . .
. . . field of real property valuation, section 90.704, Florida Statutes (1993), and pass the test of section 90.705 . . . If respondent’s expert meets the test of section 90.705(2), Florida Statutes (1993), which we have set . . .
. . . of opinion testimony of State’s blood identification expert without proper predicate under section 90.705 . . . defense counsel objected on the basis that a proper predicate had not been established under section 90.705 . . . An expert may testify without disclosing the facts or data upon which an opinion is based. § 90.705(1 . . . Thus, section 90.705(2) provides that “[pjrior to the witness giving his opinion, a party against whom . . . Section 90.705, Florida Statutes (1991), provides: (1) Unless otherwise required by the court, an expert . . .
. . . the subject to support the opinion expressed, the facts or data need not be admissible in evidence. 90.705 . . .
. . . admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . into the facts underlying an opposing expert witness’s opinion is covered by Florida Stat.Ann. section 90.705 . . . , which provides: 90.705 Disclosure of facts or data underlying expert opinion.— (1) Unless otherwise . . . See § 90.705, Fla.Stat. (1991). . . .
. . . Section 90.705 Florida Statutes (1989), states that if a “party establishes prima facie evidence that . . .
. . . And, subsection 2 of Section 90.705 provides that before an expert witness gives his opinion, the party . . . Black, 434 So.2d 988, 993, footnote 8 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), with specific reference to Section 90.705, . . .
. . . Section 90.705, Florida Statutes; City of Hialeah v. . . .
. . . State, 476 So.2d 134 (Fla.1985); see § 90.705, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .
. . . See § 90.705(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . Nezelek, Inc., 414 So.2d 535, 538-39 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), rev. denied, 426 So.2d 27 (Fla.1983); § 90.705 . . .
. . . and that the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . . § 90.705(2), Fla.Stat. (1987); Highlands Insurance Co. v. . . .
. . . Section 90.705, Florida Statutes (1987) provides: (1) Unless otherwise. required by the court, an expert . . .
. . . White should not have been excluded since it met all of the requirements of sections 90.702-90.705, Florida . . .
. . . See §§ 90.705, 90.956, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .
. . . Rather than allowing appellant to do so as dictated by section 90.704, and section 90.705, Florida Statutes . . .
. . . Black, 434 So.2d 988, 993 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); § 90.705(2), Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .
. . . . § 90.705(2), Fla.Stat. (1983). . . .
. . . Plaintiff, citing section 90.705 of the Evidence Code, contends that it was defendant’s burden to establish . . . Under section 90.705 “the burden of challenging the sufficiency of the basis for the opinion rests with . . .
. . . Section 90.705, Florida Statutes (1981) provides: Disclosure of facts or data underlying expert opinion . . .
. . . Section 90.705(2), Florida Statutes (1983) provides: Prior to the [expert] witness giving his opinion . . .
. . . admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701-90.705 . . . and that the opinion of paternity contained in the report would be admissible under sections 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . Gragor’s opinion under Sections 90.704 and 90.705(1), FLA. STAT. . . .
. . . Thus, Section 90.705, Florida Statutes (1979), provides in pertinent part: “If the party establishes . . .
. . . . § 90.705 (West 1979); Jones v. State, 289 So.2d 725, 727 (Fla. 1974). See also Brady v. . . .
. . . admissible under paragraph (a) unless such opinion or diagnosis would be admissible under ss. 90.701-90.705 . . .
. . . We note that the Evidence Code, Sections 90.703, 90.704, 90.705, Florida Statutes (1979), changes Florida . . . Section 90.705 now permits the expert to render his opinion without prior disclosure of the underlying . . . The Sponsors’ Note following § 90.705, (6C Fla. . . .