Cases from cite.case.law:

PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. R. J. v. POLLARI,, 228 So. 3d 115 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . prohibiting the bolstering of expert opinions with authoritative publications derives from section 90.706 . . . Because section 90.706 only provides for the use of such treatises or publications on cross-examination . . .

STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, v. JUNOD,, 217 So. 3d 200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 90.706, Fla. Stat.; Linn v. Fossum, 946 So.2d 1032, 1039 (Fla. 2006). . . . This result flows from section 90.706 of the Florida Evidence Code, which prohibits the use of authoritative . . .

DOCTORS COMPANY, M. D. v. PLUMMER, B. A. P. L. J. P., 210 So. 3d 711 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . Although section 90.706, Florida Statutes (2014), permits statements of facts or opinion on a subject . . .

J. McDUFFIE, v. W. URIBE, M. D., 133 So. 3d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . See § 90.706, Florida Statutes (2011); Linn v. . . .

BENJAMIN, v. TANDEM HEALTHCARE, INC. a d b a a, 93 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . The Estate responded that section 90.706, Florida Statutes (2009), was dispositive and precluded use . . . to support his opinion based on the Estate’s objections regarding improper bolstering under section 90.706 . . . Gagnon had been taking these two medications for two years without any complications or side effects. . 90.706 . . .

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. W. DARRAGH,, 95 So. 3d 897 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . .”§ 90.706, Fla. Stat. (2010). . . . “Section 90.706 does not permit statements in a learned treatise to be used as substantive evidence since . . .

DUSS, A v. A. GARCIA, M. D. P. A. a, 80 So. 3d 358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . Mitchell, 407 So.2d 601, 602 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); see also § 90.706, Fla. . . . And “[s]ection 90.706 does not permit statements in a learned treatise to be used as substantive evidence . . .

OKEN, M. D. a v. WILLIAMS,, 23 So. 3d 140 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . Section 90.706, Florida Statutes (2007), the evidence rule that is most analogous to Internet information . . . malpractice case, wherein the court opined by a statement applicable here as follows: Under section 90.706 . . . Section 90.706 does not allow statements in a learned treatise to be tised as substantive evidence since . . . no evidence rule that specifically authorizes substantive use of Internet information, and section 90.706 . . . See Green, § 90.706, Fla. Stat. (2007). . . .

CABAN, v. STATE, 9 So. 3d 50 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . See e.g., § 90.706, Fla. Stat. (2007); Sanchez v. . . .

In S. E. a v. D. W. T. E. Ad, 946 So. 2d 620 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

. . . Section 90.706, Florida Statutes (2004), provides that statements of fact or opinion may be used to cross-examine . . . The Third District held as follows: Section 90.706 does not permit statements in a learned treatise to . . .

LINN, v. D. FOSSUM, M. D., 946 So. 2d 1032 (Fla. 2006)

. . . Expert testimony is governed by sections 90.702-90.706, Florida Statutes (2005). . . . See 90.706, Fla. Stat. . . . Under section 90.706, which allows the use of authoritative literature only on cross-examination, it . . . Section 90.706 provides: Statements of facts or opinions on a subject of science, art, or specialized . . .

PHILLIP MORRIS, INC. v. JANOFF,, 901 So. 2d 141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . trial, prior to the defense experts testifying, the plaintiff moved in li-mine, pursuant to section 90.706 . . . Section 90.706, Florida Statutes (2002), titled, “Authoritativeness of literature for use in cross-examination . . . “Under section 90.706, authoritative publications can only be used during the cross-examination of an . . . did not improperly bolster their expert’s opinion by the use of authoritative materials because: § 90.706 . . .

HARGROVE, M. v. W. HOWELL, D. O., 884 So. 2d 960 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . commenting that authoritative publications can be used during cross-examination of an expert under section 90.706 . . .

WHITFIELD, v. STATE, 859 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . write only to address an issue of first impression, regarding the trial court’s application of section 90.706 . . . The state objected, relying on section 90.706, Florida Statutes (2001), which provides: Authoritativeness . . . Section 90.706 permits the opposing party to cross-examine by the use of published material when the . . . Because Whitfield failed to meet his burden under section 90.706, his convictions are AFFIRMED. . . .

R. DONSHIK, M. D. v. SHERMAN,, 861 So. 2d 53 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . bolstered the credibility of the plaintiffs expert opinions and was otherwise violative of section 90.706 . . . See § 90.706, Fla. Stat. (1987). This objection was overruled. . . . the introduction of the ACAS report as part of the plaintiffs case in chief in violation of section 90.706 . . . Section 90.706 does not permit statements in a learned treatise to be used as substantive evidence since . . . Goldberg, 630 So.2d 606, 609 (Fla, 4th DCA 1993) (“Under section 90.706, ... authoritative publications . . .

LIBERATORE v. KAUFMAN, M. D. M. D. P. A. S. M. D. M. D. P. M. D. M. D. P. A. s P. A. s P. A. NME a d b a, 835 So. 2d 404 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . See § 90.706, Fla. Stat. (2000); Chorzelewski v. . . . Goldberg, 630 So.2d 606, 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)(stating that “[u]nder section 90.706, Florida Statutes . . . Section 90.706 provides in part: Authoritativeness of literature for use in cross-examination. — Statements . . .

K. FRAVEL, D. M. D. v. HAUGHEY,, 727 So. 2d 1033 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . See § 90.706, Fla. Stat. (1995). . . .

KIRKPATRICK v. WOLFORD, D. O. D. O. P. A., 704 So. 2d 708 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

. . . The court opined that “per se authoritative” is a higher standard than required by section 90.706 and . . . THE LAW Section 90.706, Florida Statutes, provides: Authoritativeness of literature for use in cross-examination . . . dissertation, pamphlet, or other writing to be authoritative and relevant to the subject matter. § 90.706 . . . There is little Florida case law interpreting section 90.706 or providing guidance as to what standard . . .

MYRON, a By BROCK B. B. v. DOCTORS GENERAL HOSPITAL, LTD. D B A N K A D. O. D. O. J. M. D. J. M. D. P. A. D. M. D. D. M. D. P. A. P. A. D B A D B A F. M. D. M. D. P. A. D B A M. D. M. D. P. A. D B A D B A D B A M. D. P. A., 704 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Section 90.706, Florida Statutes (1993), provides: Statements of facts or opinions on a subject of science . . .

ERWIN, v. TODD, 699 So. 2d 275 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . Under section 90.706, authoritative publications can only be used during the cross-examination of an . . .

SCHWARZ, v. STATE, 695 So. 2d 452 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

. . . . § 90.706, Fla. Stat. . . .

ORASAN, M. D. v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, BOARD OF MEDICINE,, 668 So. 2d 1062 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

. . . the basis that such hearsay was inadmissible to bolster the appellant’s own testimony under section 90.706 . . .

A. W. CHESTERTON v. FISHER, E. s R., 655 So. 2d 170 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

. . . Gerrit Schepers, pursuant to Section 90.706, Florida Statutes (1993). . . . Section 90.706, Florida Statutes (1993), provides as follows: Statements of facts or opinions on a subject . . .

GREEN, v. I. GOLDBERG, M. D., 630 So. 2d 606 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

. . . Under section 90.706, Florida Statutes (1991), authoritative publications can only be used during the . . .

FLANAGAN, v. STATE, 586 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . the party seeking admission of the scientific technique at the trial stage is precluded by Section 90.706 . . .

BROWN, a a v. CRANE, PHILLIPS, THOMAS METTS, P. A. d b a a E. M. D. N. M. D., 585 So. 2d 947 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

. . . Section 90.706, Florida Statutes (1987) provides: Statements of facts or opinions on a subject of science . . .

J. CHORZELEWSKI, a Co. a v. I. DRUCKER,, 546 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

. . . It is clear that section 90.706, Florida Statutes (1987), permits introduction of a medical treatise . . .

STATE v. DIAMOND,, 553 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . See § 90.706, Fla.Stat. (1987). . . .

CALL, v. TIRONE, M. D. M. D., 522 So. 2d 533 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

. . . . § 90.706, Fla.Stat. (1985); Hemingway v. . . . Evidence, § 90.706 (1987); Annotation: Use of Medical or Other Treatise In Cross-Examination of Expert . . .

QUARREL, v. MINERVINI, M. D. M. D. P. A., 510 So. 2d 977 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 90.706, Fla.Stat. (1985); Medina v. . . .

BAKER v. NIESS,, 496 So. 2d 215 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . survey constitutes material relied upon by an expert witness and so is admissible pursuant to Section 90.706 . . .

HAWTHORNE, v. STATE, 470 So. 2d 770 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . judicial notice of scientific literature as a means of substantive proof of an expert opinion, see section 90.706 . . . See Section 90.706, Fla.Stat. . . .

MEDINA a v. VARIETY CHILDREN S HOSPITAL, a Mt., 438 So. 2d 138 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

. . . Mitchell, 407 So.2d 601 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); see also § 90.706, Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .

TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. J. MITCHELL,, 407 So. 2d 601 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

. . . Therefore, the book was not used for the purposes of “cross-examination” as that term is used in § 90.706 . . . contested the Fund’s right to actively participate in the trial. . § 90.704, Fla.Stat. (1979). . § 90.706 . . .