Florida Statute 90.902 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 90
EVIDENCE CODE

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 90.902

90.902 Self-authentication.—Extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibility is not required for:

(1) A document bearing:

(a) A seal purporting to be that of the United States or any state, district, commonwealth, territory, or insular possession thereof; the Panama Canal Zone; the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; or a court, political subdivision, department, officer, or agency of any of them; and

(b) A signature by the custodian of the document attesting to the authenticity of the seal.

(2) A document not bearing a seal but purporting to bear a signature of an officer or employee of any entity listed in subsection (1), affixed in the officer’s or employee’s official capacity.

(3) An official foreign document, record, or entry that is:

(a) Executed or attested to by a person in the person’s official capacity authorized by the laws of a foreign country to make the execution or attestation; and

(b) Accompanied by a final certification, as provided herein, of the genuineness of the signature and official position of:

1. The executing person; or

2. Any foreign official whose certificate of genuineness of signature and official position relates to the execution or attestation or is in a chain of certificates of genuineness of signature and official position relating to the execution or attestation.

The final certification may be made by a secretary of an embassy or legation, consul general, consul, vice consul, or consular agent of the United States or a diplomatic or consular official of the foreign country assigned or accredited to the United States. When the parties receive reasonable opportunity to investigate the authenticity and accuracy of official foreign documents, the court may order that they be treated as presumptively authentic without final certification or permit them in evidence by an attested summary with or without final certification.

(4) A copy of an official public record, report, or entry, or of a document authorized by law to be recorded or filed and actually recorded or filed in a public office, including data compilations in any form, certified as correct by the custodian or other person authorized to make the certification by certificate complying with subsection (1), subsection (2), or subsection (3) or complying with any act of the Legislature or rule adopted by the Supreme Court.

(5) Books, pamphlets, or other publications purporting to be issued by a governmental authority.

(6) Printed materials purporting to be newspapers or periodicals.

(7) Inscriptions, signs, tags, or labels purporting to have been affixed in the course of business and indicating ownership, control, or origin.

(8) Commercial papers and signatures thereon and documents relating to them, to the extent provided in the Uniform Commercial Code.

(9) Any signature, document, or other matter declared by the Legislature to be presumptively or prima facie genuine or authentic.

(10) Any document properly certified under the law of the jurisdiction where the certification is made.

(11) An original or a duplicate of evidence that would be admissible under s. 90.803(6), which is maintained in a foreign country or domestic location and is accompanied by a certification or declaration from the custodian of the records or another qualified person certifying or declaring that the record:

(a) Was made at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth by, or from information transmitted by, a person having knowledge of those matters;

(b) Was kept in the course of the regularly conducted activity; and

provided that falsely making such a certification or declaration would subject the maker to criminal penalty under the laws of the foreign or domestic location in which the certification or declaration was signed.

(12) A legal notice published in accordance with the requirements of chapter 50 in the print edition of a qualified newspaper or on a publicly accessible website as provided in s. 50.0311.

History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379; s. 501, ch. 95-147; s. 3, ch. 2003-259; s. 8, ch. 2021-17; s. 11, ch. 2022-103.

F.S. 90.902 on Google Scholar

F.S. 90.902 on CourtListener

Amendments to 90.902

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 90.902

Total Results: 77

Gray v. State

910 So. 2d 867, 2005 WL 1711746

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2005 | Docket: 1744640

Cited 50 times | Published

certified copy of an official public record. See § 90.902(4), Fla. Stat. (2003); Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida

State v. Cayward

552 So. 2d 971, 1989 WL 137745

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1989 | Docket: 312057

Cited 27 times | Published

from known government and private agencies. Section 90.902, Florida Statutes (1987), a part of the evidence

Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co.

711 So. 2d 1167, 1998 WL 158631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1998 | Docket: 1337660

Cited 26 times | Published

make the documents self-authenticating under section 90.902(1)(a)-(b), Florida Statutes (1995). AFFIRMED

Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.

429 So. 2d 1216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1983 | Docket: 1667487

Cited 25 times | Published

consequently self-authenticating by virtue of Section 90.902(5), Florida Statutes, does not per se establish

Parker v. State

973 So. 2d 1167, 2007 WL 2456166

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2007 | Docket: 1688110

Cited 12 times | Published

with regard to the document at issue in Gray. Section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes, provides: 90.902 Self-authentication

Amos v. Gartner, Inc.

17 So. 3d 829, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12742, 2009 WL 2602304

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2009 | Docket: 1645336

Cited 9 times | Published

those documents which are self-authenticating. See § 90.902(1)-(11), Fla. Stat. (2008). Except as provided

Martin v. State

936 So. 2d 1190, 2006 WL 2482442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2006 | Docket: 1651152

Cited 9 times | Published

relying on amendments to section 90.803 and section 90.902, Florida Statutes, enacted by chapter 2003-259

Smith v. State

990 So. 2d 1162, 2008 WL 4146369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 2008 | Docket: 1388227

Cited 6 times | Published

records authentication under seal as provided by section 90.902(1)." Id. at 501. Because the Department's records

MBL Life Assur. Corp. v. Suarez

768 So. 2d 1129, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2010

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 2000 | Docket: 2452135

Cited 6 times | Published

prove that the statement is authentic. Under section 90.902, the prior statement of Saez, which was under

Yisrael v. State

986 So. 2d 491, 2008 WL 450398

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2008 | Docket: 1428493

Cited 5 times | Published

course of the regularly conducted activity[.] § 90.902(11)(a)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2004). Here, a records

Peterson v. State

911 So. 2d 184, 2005 WL 2205338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2005 | Docket: 1526984

Cited 5 times | Published

self-authenticating business records found in section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes. See Gray v. State, 910

Arce v. Wackenhut Corp.

40 So. 3d 813, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9869, 2010 WL 2670881

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2010 | Docket: 1667158

Cited 4 times | Published

authenticity for the disputed document pursuant to section 90.902 of the Florida Evidence Code.[3] It appears

Yisrael v. State

993 So. 2d 952, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 577, 2008 Fla. LEXIS 223, 2008 WL 5083515

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 21, 2008 | Docket: 64856305

Cited 4 times | Published

course of the regularly conducted activity!)] § 90.902(ll)(a)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2004). Here, a records

Mills v. Barker

664 So. 2d 1054, 1995 WL 699125

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1995 | Docket: 1229455

Cited 4 times | Published

self-authenticating requirements of section 90.902, Florida Statutes (1993). Section 90.902(9) provides that extrinsic

THIRD FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIAITON OF CLEVELAND v. LEAH G. KOULOUVARIS A/ K/ A LEAH KOULOUVARIS

247 So. 3d 652

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2018 | Docket: 6775141

Cited 3 times | Published

provided in the Uniform Commercial Code." § 90.902(8); see, e.g., U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

Hidden Ridge Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. Onewest Bank, N.A.

183 So. 3d 1266, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1152, 2016 WL 347321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2016 | Docket: 60252958

Cited 3 times | Published

section 90.901, Florida Statutes (2014). However, section 90.902, Florida Statutes (2014), states: “Extrinsic

Moncus v. State

69 So. 3d 341, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14062, 2011 WL 3903062

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2011 | Docket: 2359126

Cited 3 times | Published

public record is self-authenticating under section 90.902(4), Florida Statutes (2003), and needs no additional

Ordonez v. State

862 So. 2d 927, 2004 WL 57256

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2004 | Docket: 1762672

Cited 3 times | Published

document is self-authenticating pursuant to section 90.902(3), Florida Statutes (2002). See Van Den Borre

Cirillo v. Davis

732 So. 2d 387, 1999 WL 140672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1999 | Docket: 1513346

Cited 3 times | Published

(1997), requires evidence to be authenticated. Section 90.902 lists a number of items which can be self-authenticated

Turk v. State

403 So. 2d 1077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 11, 1981 | Docket: 1250660

Cited 3 times | Published

with the evidence code now in effect. Under Section 90.902 Florida Statutes (1979), a document is self-authenticated

Washburn v. Washburn

211 So. 3d 87

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2017 | Docket: 60262707

Cited 2 times | Published

would have had to meet the requirements of section 90.902(11). See § 90.803(6)(a). That section requires

Kristy S. Holt v. Calchas, LLC

155 So. 3d 499, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1039, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 296

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2015 | Docket: 2628637

Cited 2 times | Published

self-authentication rules contained within section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes (2013), which states:

State v. Davis

133 So. 3d 1101, 2014 WL 444041, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1431

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2014 | Docket: 60238677

Cited 2 times | Published

self-authenticating document signed and under seal. See § 90.902(1), Fla. Stat. The Court determined, however,

Leatherwood v. State

108 So. 3d 1154, 2013 WL 1007669, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4191

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2013 | Docket: 60229004

Cited 2 times | Published

business record pursuant to section 90.808(6) and section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes (2012). The State, therefore

Campbell v. State

949 So. 2d 1093, 2007 WL 403551

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2007 | Docket: 1374429

Cited 2 times | Published

certified copy of an official public record. See § 90.902(4), Fla. Stat. (2003); Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida

Van Den Borre v. State

596 So. 2d 687, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 548, 1992 WL 12174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1992 | Docket: 1358972

Cited 2 times | Published

303 Md. 471, 494 A.2d 939 (1985). Further, section 90.902 of the Florida Evidence Code recognizes that

Baker v. Niess

496 So. 2d 215, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2225

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1986 | Docket: 428564

Cited 2 times | Published

self-authenticating document within the purview of Section 90.902, Florida Statutes. Second, they contend the

In Re Estate of Perez

470 So. 2d 48, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 1261079

Cited 2 times | Published

document was not authenticated pursuant to section 90.902, Florida Statutes (1983). Appellee has not

Vaughan v. Broward General Medical Center

105 So. 3d 569, 2012 WL 6602797, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21759

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 2012 | Docket: 60227868

Cited 1 times | Published

those documents that are self-authenticating. See § 90.902(1)-(11), Fla. Stat. (2011). Except as provided

Riggins v. State

67 So. 3d 244, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17177, 2010 WL 4484629

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2010 | Docket: 60302078

Cited 1 times | Published

evidence either a certification in accord with section 90.902 or testimony from someone with knowledge that

Armstrong v. State

42 So. 3d 315, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11712, 2010 WL 3155021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2010 | Docket: 1647293

Cited 1 times | Published

*317 to self-authenticate them as permitted by section 90.902(11). The trial court overruled the hearsay

Allen v. State

12 So. 3d 919, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9610, 2009 WL 2031012

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2009 | Docket: 2555253

Cited 1 times | Published

release date-letter, written under seal, or a section 90.902(11) business record certification, may be used

Ray v. State

7 So. 3d 656, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5429, 2009 WL 1393370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 2527840

Cited 1 times | Published

release date-letter, written under seal, or a section 90.902(11) business record certification, *657 may

Ingram v. State

7 So. 3d 657, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5434, 2009 WL 1393341

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2009 | Docket: 1655210

Cited 1 times | Published

*658 date-letter, written under seal, or a section 90.902(11) business record certification, may be used

Corker v. State

7 So. 3d 521, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 294, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 408, 2009 WL 702780

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2009 | Docket: 199582

Cited 1 times | Published

properly authenticated under seal as provided by section 90.902(1), Florida Statutes (2003). See Yisrael, 993

Christie v. State

951 So. 2d 1029, 2007 WL 911795

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 28, 2007 | Docket: 1682575

Cited 1 times | Published

self-authenticating under section 90.902, Florida Statutes (2003). Section 90.902, Florida Statutes (2003)

Kirk v. State

869 So. 2d 670, 2004 WL 689779

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2004 | Docket: 1175037

Cited 1 times | Published

require extrinsic evidence of authenticity. Section 90.902, Florida Statutes (2003), states a self-authenticating

Kelly v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV.

596 So. 2d 130, 1992 WL 48386

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1992 | Docket: 1358587

Cited 1 times | Published

thus we cannot determine its authenticity. Cf. § 90.902(4), Fla. Stat. (extrinsic evidence of authenticity

Sunnyvale Maritime Co., Inc. v. Gomez

546 So. 2d 6, 1989 WL 6193

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1989 | Docket: 2562645

Cited 1 times | Published

self-authentication of foreign documents set out in Section 90.902, Florida Statutes (1987), that is, the failure

Jose Sala v. Penelope Wood

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2025 | Docket: 69674469

Published

before it. See § 90.803(6), Fla. Stat. (2024); § 90.902(11), Fla. Stat. (2024). After carefully considering

Mishelle Addys Perdomo Vindel v. Scott Aron Stewart

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 2024 | Docket: 68230488

Published

must satisfy the requirements set forth in section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes (2021), which generally

MORTGAGE ASSETS MANAGEMENT, LLC vs UNKNOWN SPOUSE, HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES, LIENORS, CREDITORS,TRUSTEES AND ALL OTHER PARTIES CLAIMING AN INTEREST BY, THROUGH, UNDER OR AGAINST, ETC., ET AL.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 2023 | Docket: 68034175

Published

grant relief from the waiver. Section 90.902(11), provides: (11) An

B. M. v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 2019 | Docket: 16432695

Published

public record is self-authenticating under section 90.902(4), Florida Statutes (2003), and needs no additional

WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A. v. QUEST SYSTEMS, L L C, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE

269 So. 3d 598

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865429

Published

Such agreements are self-authenticating under section 90.902(8), Florida Statutes (2017), which provides

CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

270 So. 3d 371

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 2019 | Docket: 14560240

Published

business record pursuant to section 90.803(6) and section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes (2012).”); McKown, 46

M.S. v. State

260 So. 3d 552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64699797

Published

preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness"); § 90.902(11), Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing that "[e]xtrinsic

M.S. v. State

260 So. 3d 552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64699798

Published

preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness"); § 90.902(11), Fla. Stat. (2017) (providing that "[e]xtrinsic

JUSTIN FRIEDLE and SANDRA FRIEDLE v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, etc.

226 So. 3d 976, 2017 WL 4280592, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 13581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6159006

Published

ground that it was . self-authenticating under section 90.902, Florida Statutes (2016). While it was certified

CLARENCE TERRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA

224 So. 3d 763, 2017 WL 2983283, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10053

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2017 | Docket: 6088831

Published

public record, is self-authenticating under section 90.902(4), Florida Statutes, and needs no additional

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Roseman

214 So. 3d 728, 92 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 159, 2017 WL 1013189, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2017 | Docket: 60264230

Published

original note on the basis of authenticity. Section 90.902(8), Florida Statutes (2015), provides: “Extrinsic

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., As Trustee, etc. v. James Ousley A/K/A James E. Ousley, Jr.,etal

212 So. 3d 1056, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9226, 2016 WL 3268330

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 2016 | Docket: 3078540

Published

objection to lack of foundation is without merit. § 90.902(4), Fla. Stat. (2015); see also Vaughan

Smith v. State

194 So. 3d 483, 2016 WL 3065852, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3068915

Published

admissible as a self-authenticating document under section 90.902(2), Florida Statutes (2014), and therefore

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Aldape

192 So. 3d 635, 2016 WL 3030833, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8051

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2016 | Docket: 3069650

Published

section 90.803(6), Florida Statutes (2014). Section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes (2014), allows for self-authentication

Eveland v. State

189 So. 3d 990, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5100, 2016 WL 1273264

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2016 | Docket: 3050106

Published

So.2d at 957 (alteration in original) (quoting § 90.902(11)). In this case, the State’s notice merely

Morrill v. State

184 So. 3d 541, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19101, 2015 WL 9287015

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 2015 | Docket: 60253323

Published

trustworthiness.... § 90.803(6)(a), Fla. Stat. In turn, section 90.902 provides that “[e]xtrinsic evidence of authenticity

AS Lily, LLC v. Morgan

164 So. 3d 124, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6879, 2015 WL 2138346

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2015 | Docket: 2655616

Published

is immaterial in this case. See § 90.902(8); Bryson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co

Kristy S. Holt v. Calchas, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2014 | Docket: 2592847

Published

self-authentication rules contained within section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes (2013), which states:

Bennett v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

124 So. 3d 320, 2013 WL 5538764, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2013 | Docket: 60235449

Published

a note was self-authenticating pursuant to section 90.902(8), Florida Statutes (2008). In Riggs, this

Carroso v. State

129 So. 3d 374, 2013 WL 5224914, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 2013 | Docket: 60237376

Published

Instead, they were introduced pursuant to section 90.902(11), Florida Statutes (2010), by a certification

Brown v. State

49 So. 3d 336, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18659, 2010 WL 4962858

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 2010 | Docket: 1927518

Published

sealed Certification of Records complying with § 90.902(H).[1] A computer printout detailing Defendant's

Sweet v. HSBC Bank, N.A.

47 So. 3d 967, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18154

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2010 | Docket: 60296424

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 90.902(4), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.120(c), 1.140(b).

Sweet v. HSBC BANK, NA

47 So. 3d 967, 2010 WL 4740321

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2010 | Docket: 193951

Published

SUAREZ and CORTIÑAS, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 90.902(4), Fla. Stat. (2009); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.120(c)

Del Risco v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

31 So. 3d 255, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2010 | Docket: 60289559

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 90.902(8), Fla. Stat. (2009); Leviton v. Philly Steak-Out, Inc., 533 So

Del Risco v. US Bank Nat. Ass'n

31 So. 3d 255

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2010 | Docket: 1450727

Published

and ROTHENBERG, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 90.902(8), Fla. Stat. (2009); Leviton v. Philly Steak-Out

Perkins v. State

17 So. 3d 1289, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15203, 2009 WL 3248099

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2009 | Docket: 250732

Published

release-date letter, written under seal, or a section 90.902(11) business record certification, may be used

Corker v. State

18 So. 3d 1, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6904, 2009 WL 1531609

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 2009 | Docket: 1179708

Published

release-date letter, written under seal, or a section 90.902(11) business record certification, may be used

Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code

891 So. 2d 1037, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 787, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 2244, 2004 WL 2814287

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2004 | Docket: 64835629

Published

admissibility of the evidence before trial.1 Section 90.902, Florida Statutes, was amended to provide that

Castellano v. State

732 So. 2d 446, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5669, 1999 WL 270404

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1999 | Docket: 64788190

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 90.902, Fla. Stat. (1997).

Monroe County v. McCormick

692 So. 2d 214, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3107, 1997 WL 148728

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 1997 | Docket: 64772607

Published

meeting the self-authentication requirements of section 90.902, Florida Statutes (1995), because the clerk

Dollar v. State

685 So. 2d 901, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12772, 1996 WL 695285

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1996 | Docket: 64770161

Published

rule. The state further points out that under section 90.902(6), Florida Statutes, a newspaper is self-authenticating

Roberts v. Hart

573 So. 2d 12, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7886, 1990 WL 155069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 17, 1990 | Docket: 64655860

Published

extrinsic evidence authenticating the documents. § 90.902(2), Fla.Stat. (1989). However, we acknowledge

T.A. v. State

553 So. 2d 1310, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1989 | Docket: 64647073

Published

self-authentication provisions for documents, § 90.902(1), Fla.Stat. (1987), since it did not comply

TA v. State

553 So. 2d 1310, 1989 WL 149638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1989 | Docket: 1259200

Published

self-authentication provisions for documents, § 90.902(1), Fla. Stat. (1987), since it did not comply

Baumann v. Community Villas Partners, Ltd.

517 So. 2d 794, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 180, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 94, 1988 WL 979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 1988 | Docket: 64631792

Published

filed in the circuit court in Alachua County. § 90.902(4), Fla.Stat. (1985); M. Graham, Handbook on Florida

Lopez v. Perez

470 So. 2d 48, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1280, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14021

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 1985 | Docket: 64612415

Published

document was not authenticated pursuant to section 90.902, Florida Statutes (1983). Appellee has not

Castellanos v. State

432 So. 2d 783, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1983 | Docket: 64597468

Published

1976); Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44, 45 (Fla.1974); § 90.902(1), Fla.Stat. (1981).

Courtheoux v. George

410 So. 2d 532, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19091

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1982 | Docket: 64588241

Published

personal service on the defendant, pursuant to section 90.-902, Florida Statutes (1979), and the plaintiff