|
|
The 2025 Florida Statutes
|
|
|
|
|
F.S. 90.95190.951 Definitions.—For purposes of this chapter:(1) “Writings” and “recordings” include letters, words, or numbers, or their equivalent, set down by handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photography, magnetic impulse, mechanical or electronic recording, or other form of data compilation, upon paper, wood, stone, recording tape, or other materials. (2) “Photographs” include still photographs, X-ray films, videotapes, and motion pictures. (3) An “original” of a writing or recording means the writing or recording itself, or any counterpart intended to have the same effect by a person executing or issuing it. An “original” of a photograph includes the negative or any print made from it. If data are stored in a computer or similar device, any printout or other output readable by sight and shown to reflect the data accurately is an “original.” (4) “Duplicate” includes:(a) A counterpart produced by the same impression as the original, from the same matrix; by means of photography, including enlargements and miniatures; by mechanical or electronic rerecording; by chemical reproduction; or by other equivalent technique that accurately reproduces the original; or (b) An executed carbon copy not intended by the parties to be an original. History.—s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379.
| |
Annotations, Discussions, Cases:
Cases Citing Statute 90.951
Total Results: 10
660 So. 2d 705, 1995 WL 555315
Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1995 | Docket: 2451253
Cited 27 times | Published
X-ray films, videotapes, and motion pictures. § 90.951(2) Fla. Stat. (1993).
810 So. 2d 532, 2002 WL 100414
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2002 | Docket: 1654794
Cited 7 times | Published
935, 92 S.Ct. 2857, 33 L.Ed.2d 751 (1972); see § 90.951(2), Fla. Stat. (2000) ("`Photographs' include
963 F. Supp. 1158, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5189, 1997 WL 189100
District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1997 | Docket: 1219087
Cited 5 times | Published
under the control of the original); Fla. Stat. § 90.951-.954 (essentially the same as the above-recited
596 So. 2d 687, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 548, 1992 WL 12174
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1992 | Docket: 1358972
Cited 2 times | Published
duplicates of the original "writings" and "recordings." § 90.951(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). Although the Florida
24 So. 3d 752, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20393
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2009 | Docket: 60287279
Cited 1 times | Published
the circumstances to admit the duplicates. Section 90.951(4)(a) defines a duplicate as: “A counterpart
24 So. 3d 752, 2009 WL 5125101
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 2009 | Docket: 2533306
Cited 1 times | Published
the circumstances to admit the duplicates. Section 90.951(4)(a) defines a duplicate as: "A counterpart
483 So. 2d 470, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 422, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6503
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1986 | Docket: 64617465
Cited 1 times | Published
duplicate if it “accurately reproduces the original.” § 90.-951(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983). The Lopezes contend that
472 So. 2d 1353, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1824, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14481
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1985 | Docket: 64613277
Published
method which insures accuracy and genuineness, see § 90.951(4), is to save time and expense previously wasted
426 So. 2d 1200, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19030
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1983 | Docket: 64595137
Published
not intended by the parties to be an original.
§ 90.951(4), Fla.Stat. (1981). In the case at bar, the
409 So. 2d 1171, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19283
District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 1982 | Docket: 64587978
Published
promissory notes are not duplicates as defined by Section 90.951(4), Florida Statutes (1981). See Law Revision
