The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)
|
||||||
|
. . . See §§ 90.951-90.954, Fla. Stat. (2009). Reversed and remanded for a new trial. . . .
. . . Section 90.951(4)(a) defines a duplicate as: “A counterpart produced by the same impression as the original . . .
. . . (Fla.1969), vacated as to sentence only, 408 U.S. 935, 92 S.Ct. 2857, 33 L.Ed.2d 751 (1972); see § 90.951 . . . by chemical reproduction; or by equivalent technique that accurately reproduces the original.... § 90.951 . . .
. . . . § 90.951-.954 (essentially the same as the above-recited federal rules). . . .
. . . .” § 90.951(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989). . . .
. . . that the ruling of the trial court should be upheld on the basis of the best evidence rule, sections 90.951 . . .
. . . copy is not an accurate reproduction, they say, it is not a “duplicate” within the meaning of section 90.951 . . .
. . . applicable only if the duplicate is produced by a method which insures accuracy and genuineness, see § 90.951 . . .
. . . Section 90.951 provides in pertinent part 90.951 Definitions (4) “Duplicate” includes (a) A counterpart . . .
. . . . § 90.951(4), Fla.Stat. (1981). . . .
. . . typed likenesses of the $2,800 and $20,000 promissory notes are not duplicates as defined by Section 90.951 . . .