Cases from cite.case.law:

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, v. GARCIA,, 254 So. 3d 565 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . Garcia objected, asserting that, under the "Best Evidence Rule" ( section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2016 . . . Section 90.952 provides: Requirement of originals. . . . modification agreement was a negotiable instrument and that a duplicate was inadmissible under sections 90.952 . . .

J. LAMB, v. STATE, 246 So. 3d 400 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . The best evidence rule is codified in section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2016): "Except as otherwise provided . . .

LIUKKONEN, v. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,, 243 So. 3d 981 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . the basis for its dependency petitions-violated the best evidence rule. 480 So.2d at 682 (citing § 90.952 . . .

H. MORALES v. FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE COMPANY,, 238 So. 3d 280 (Fla. App. Ct. 2018)

. . . . § 90.952, Fla. Stat. (2016). . . .

E. MATHIS, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC E. n k a n k a n k a, 227 So. 3d 189 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . See §§ 90.952, .958(1), Fla. . . . See §§ 90.952, .953, Fla. Stat. (2014). . . . .

D. HELLER a k a v. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, BAC LP f k a LP,, 209 So. 3d 641 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

. . . . § 90.952. . . .

RATTIGAN v. CENTRAL MORTGAGE COMPANY,, 199 So. 3d 966 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

. . . The best evidence rule, codified at section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2015), says that “[e]xeept as otherwise . . .

J. J. a v. STATE, 170 So. 3d 861 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

. . . Florida’s best evidence rule is codified in section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2014). . . .

YERO, v. STATE, 138 So. 3d 1179 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . .” § 90.952, Fla. Stat. (2012). . . .

T. D. W. a v. STATE, 137 So. 3d 574 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

. . . The Best Evidence Rule Applies Section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2012), commonly known as the “best evidence . . . on the surveillance video — that appellant was present at the scene of the burglary — making section 90.952 . . .

RAINESS, v. In ESTATE OF MACHIDA,, 81 So. 3d 504 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

. . . rights, the process of proving them is governed by the best evidence rule, which is codified in sections 90.952 . . . Section 90.952 provides that “[e]xcept as otherwise provided by statute, an original writing ... is required . . .

GARCIA- LOPEZ, v. AFFORDABLE PLUMBING VININGS INSURANCE CO., 66 So. 3d 1024 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

. . . See § 90.952- 954, Fla. Stat. (2008). . . .

F. JOHNSTON v. HUDLETT,, 32 So. 3d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . Appellants never raised any objection below based on section 90.952, Florida Statutes, generally referred . . .

DYER, v. STATE, 26 So. 3d 700 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

. . . The “best evidence rule,” codified in section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2008), is titled, “Requirement . . .

H. A. a v. STATE, 24 So. 3d 752 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

. . . H.A. contends that sections 90.952 to 90.954 required the State to produce the original videotape or . . .

DARLING a k a v. STATE a k a v. R., 966 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2007)

. . . “The best evidence rule, codified in section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2005), provides that ‘[e]xcept . . .

ENGLAND, v. STATE, 940 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 2006)

. . . The best evidence rule, codified in section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2005), provides that “[ejxcept . . . photograph is required in order to prove the contents of the writing, recording, or photograph.” § 90.952 . . .

T. PERRY J. v. FAIRBANKS CAPITAL CORP., 888 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

. . . Section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2002), indicates that original documents are required to prove the . . . mortgage, on the other hand, does not fit into the definition of the documents required by section 90.952 . . .

RUSSELL, v. STATE, 844 So. 2d 725 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The best evidence rule is set forth in section 90.952 of Florida Statutes (2000) as follows: 90.952 Requirement . . . or photograph is required in order to prove the contents of the writing, recording, or photograph. § 90.952 . . .

McKEEHAN, v. STATE, 838 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

. . . The best evidence rule is set forth in section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2002), as follows: Except as . . .

BRYANT, v. STATE, 810 So. 2d 532 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

. . . See § 90.952, Fla. . . .

REID, v. STATE, 799 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

. . . Section 90.952, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that “[ejxcept as otherwise provided by statute, an . . . We therefore hold that there was no violation of section 90.952 in allowing North to testify with the . . .

HARRIS, v. STATE, 755 So. 2d 766 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

. . . Appellant relies on section 90.952, Florida Statutes (1997), which provides: Requirement of originals . . .

GRIEM, v. ZABALA,, 744 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

. . . Section 90.952, Florida Statutes (1995), requires that the original writing be offered when proving the . . .

E. V. V. a v. STATE, 631 So. 2d 359 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

. . . We conclude (a) that there was no violation of the best evidence rule, § 90.952, Fla.Stat. (1991); (b . . .

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, v. COOKE,, 624 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 1993)

. . . Likewise, the best evidence rule, sections 90.952, .953, .954, Florida Statutes (1991), does not require . . . See § 90.952. . . .

WIMBLEDON TOWNHOUSE CONDOMINIUM I, ASSOCIATION, INC. v. WOLFSON, 510 So. 2d 1106 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

. . . . § 90.952, Fla.Stat. (1985). . . .

ALLEN, v. STATE, 492 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Code, section 90.954(1), Florida Statutes (1981), if the tape itself (as the best evidence, section 90.952 . . .

HERNANDEZ v. PINO, D. D. S. a, 482 So. 2d 450 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

. . . Section 90.952, Florida Statutes (1983) states the general rule that: Except as otherwise provided by . . . Both parties direct us to the sponsors’ note to section 90.952: Although the admissibility of X-rays . . .

In J. H. R. H. J. S. a v. STATE, 480 So. 2d 680 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . Section 90.952, Florida Statutes (1983). . . .

MORRA, v. STATE, 467 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

. . . spirit" of the rule renders it equally applicable to other physical evidence. 417 So.2d at 977; see § 90.952 . . .

K. JENKINS, v. A. L. GILLEN R., 450 So. 2d 892 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

. . . We also fail to see the applicability of the best evidence rule — as codified in Section 90.952, Florida . . .

JUSTUS, v. STATE, 438 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 1983)

. . . The best evidence rule is codified as section 90.952, Florida Statutes (1981), which provides: “Except . . .

JOSEPH BUCHECK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a v. W. E. MUSIC, a a, 420 So. 2d 410 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

. . . Jur.2d Evidence & Witnesses § 199 (1980); § 90.952, Florida Statutes (Supp.1978); cf. Nottingham v. . . .