Florida Statute 92.07 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.07

92.07 Judgments and decrees of this state.—The recitals in all judgments and decrees of the Supreme Court and of the several circuit courts of this state, when such judgment or decree appears regular and has been recorded as provided by law for more than 20 years, shall be admissible in evidence as prima facie proof of the truth of the facts so recited. Either party to any suit at law or equity may offer a properly certified copy of such judgment or decree entered and recorded more than 20 years prior to the institution of the suit in which the same is offered, and such copy shall be admissible in evidence as prima facie proof of the facts in said judgment or decree set forth; provided, however, the party offering the same shall at least 10 days before the trial of the suit in which this copy is offered in evidence give notice to the opposite side of the intention to offer such copy in evidence and the purpose for which the same will be offered, and deliver with such notice a copy of the judgment or decree; provided, that nothing in this law shall render admissible in evidence any instrument of writing based on any judgment, deed of conveyance or power of attorney included in this law where any such instrument of writing has heretofore been brought in question in any action at law or in equity in any suit now pending or heretofore decided.

History.—s. 1, ch. 10111, 1925; CGL 4391.

F.S. 92.07 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.07 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.07

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.07

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.07.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.07

Total Results: 13

Orange County v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-06-27

Citation: 823 So. 2d 732, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 608, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1394, 2002 WL 1378580

Snippet: amended section 38-1414(b) by adopting Ordinance No. 92-7 and Ordinance No. 93-01, respectively, resulting

Hartleb v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-06-05

Citation: 677 So. 2d 336, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5815, 1996 WL 293630

Snippet: subsequent to Appellee's offer of judgment. Section 73.092(7), Florida Statutes (1987), the agreed applicable

State, Department of Transportation v. Daystar, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-03-20

Citation: 674 So. 2d 754, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2621, 1996 WL 123158

Snippet: benefit of the following provision in section 73.092(7), Florida Statutes (1989): Where an offer of judgment

Baker Protective Services v. FP INC.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-07-19

Citation: 659 So. 2d 1120, 1995 WL 421874

Snippet: entitlement to fees and costs pursuant to section 73.092(7), Florida Statutes (1987)"). We find that the reasoning

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1994-09-30

Snippet: party to the document. 2 See, Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 92-7 (1992) and 91-54 (1991). 3 See, Lewis v. The Florida

Persons v. Pelaez

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-01-15

Citation: 613 So. 2d 509, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 95, 1993 WL 5307

Snippet: entitlement to fees and costs pursuant to section 73.092(7), Florida Statutes (1987)”). This analysis is equally

Townsend v. Guardian Trust Realty, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-11-24

Citation: 608 So. 2d 939, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12984, 1992 WL 348415

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Malver v. Sheffield Industries, Inc., 502 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (findings of fact made by court sitting as trier of fact will not be disturbed when supported by competent substantial evidence); Laufer v. Norma Fashions, Inc., 418 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) (same).

Powell v. Powell

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-08-26

Citation: 604 So. 2d 30, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9260, 1992 WL 206405

Snippet: PATTERSON, Judge. Robert James Powell, III, challenges the final judgment of dissolution of marriage which grants primary residential custody of the parties’ four-year-old child, Robert James Powell, IV, to the mother, Begonia Jimenez Powell. We reverse. The parties stipulated to the appointment of a guardian ad litem to assist the court in the resolution of the custody issue. In a thorough and detailed written report, the guardian recommended that primary residential custody be awarded to the father

Schick v. Dept. of Agric. & Cons. Services

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-03-26

Citation: 599 So. 2d 641, 1992 WL 56359

Snippet: that relate to factors enumerated in section 73.092.[7] It is unclear what effect the statutorily authorized

Lee County v. Sager

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-02-21

Citation: 595 So. 2d 177, 1992 WL 28950

Snippet: Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and section 73.092(7), Florida Statutes (1987), in the amount of $123

Crigler v. State, Department of Transportation

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1988-12-09

Citation: 535 So. 2d 329, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2672, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5834, 1988 WL 131111

Snippet: were made pursuant to the newly enacted section 73.092(7)-(9), Florida Statutes (1987).1 We agree with DOT

Turnipseed v. Turnipseed

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-12-10

Citation: 158 So. 2d 808

Snippet: plaintiff's behalf, and that he had devoted more than 92.7 hours of legal services in plaintiff's behalf, which

State ex rel. Carter v. Sheats

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1917-01-31

Citation: 73 Fla. 176

Snippet: ---80% 6. Sociology____________________________92% 7. % Education.— 1. Methods, etc._________________________