Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 92.09 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 92.09 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 92.09

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.09
92.09 Effect of reversal, etc., of judgment or successful attack on deed.No copy of a judgment or decree shall be admitted in evidence as aforesaid when it shall be made to appear that such decree has been reversed, annulled, vacated, or set aside, or that the same in collateral proceedings has been successfully attacked. No deed shall be admitted in evidence as hereinbefore provided if it shall appear that the execution or validity of said deed has been successfully attacked in any proceedings to which the grantee therein named or those or any of them holding under such grantee has been a party or parties.
History.s. 3, ch. 10111, 1925; CGL 4393.

F.S. 92.09 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.09 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.09


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.09
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.09.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.09

Total Results: 12

STATE OF FLORIDA vs EDUARDO ARTURO TORRES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-09-09

Snippet: State appealed. Id. at 391–92. 9 The Fourth District rejected

CITY OF OPA-LOCKA, FLORIDA, etc. v. GEORGE SUAREZ

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-01-13

Snippet: Broin, 641 So. 2d at 891–92, 9 It would be

Volusia County School Bd. v. VOLUSIA HOMES

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-11-17

Citation: 946 So. 2d 1084, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19309, 2006 WL 3327632

Snippet: certifications of the Board contemplated in Ordinance 92-9 of the Volusia County Council imposing a countywide

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2005-02-09

Snippet: 2d 545 (Fla. 1985). Accord, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 92-09 (1992) (utilities commission not authorized to alter

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2004-03-24

Snippet: maintenance, retention and disposal of public records); 92-09 (1992) (utilities commission not authorized to alter

Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-05-18

Citation: 760 So. 2d 126, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 390, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 911, 2000 WL 633052

Snippet: October 1, 1992, Volusia County enacted Ordinance No. 92-9, imposing countywide public school impact fees on

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1996-07-15

Snippet: Company,105 S.Ct. 2315 (1985); Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 92-9 (1992) (utilities commission not authorized to alter

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1994-09-07

Snippet: Ct. 2315; Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 75-50 (1975) and 92-9 (1992). 6 See, Michel v. Douglas, 464 So.2d 545

Tarno v. Ouellette

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-09-29

Citation: 606 So. 2d 690, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10249, 1992 WL 240643

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Vukovich v. Leo, 447 So.2d 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA1984).

National Adoption Counseling Service, Inc. v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-12-31

Citation: 480 So. 2d 250, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 94, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6030

Snippet: enforce the provisions thereof except in section 63.092(9), having to do with intermediaries. That section

North v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1952-10-21

Citation: 65 So. 2d 77, 1952 Fla. LEXIS 1616

Snippet: and quotes from the case of Shaw v. State, 83 Ga. 92, 9 S.E. 768, 769. In that case the bailiff was ordered

State Ex Rel. Willys v. Chillingworth

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1936-05-14

Citation: 168 So. 249, 124 Fla. 274

Snippet: Fla. 1180, 138 So. 775; Bender v. Damon, 72 Tex. 92, 9 S.W. 747; Arnold v. Hawley, 67 Iowa 313, 25 N.W