Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 92.13 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 92.13 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 92.13

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.13
92.13 Certified copies of records of certified copies.Certified copies of the record of certified copies of deeds, mortgages, powers of attorney and other instruments referred to in s. 695.19 shall have the same effect as to notice and all other purposes whatsoever as the record of the original has or can have; and certified copies of the record of such certified copies shall be admissible and may be used in evidence in the same manner and with like effect and under the same conditions as certified copies of the record of the original instrument.
History.s. 2, ch. 11989, 1927; CGL 4388, 5718.

F.S. 92.13 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.13 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.13


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.13
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.13.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.13

Total Results: 11

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2008-01-17

Snippet: invalid. Similarly, in Attorney General Opinion 92-13, this office concluded that interest accumulating

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2002-06-18

Snippet: themselves and may not be directed elsewhere); 92-13 (1992) (interest earned on investment of surplus

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2000-06-22

Snippet: itself was levied. In Attorney General's Opinion 92-13, this office was asked whether the receipt of interest

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2000-05-24

Snippet: invalid. Similarly, in Attorney General Opinion 92-13, this office concluded that interest accumulating

Alachua County v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-05-13

Citation: 737 So. 2d 1065, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 212, 1999 Fla. LEXIS 803, 1999 WL 311324

Snippet: of St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U.S. 92, 13 S.Ct. 485, 37 L.Ed. 380 (1893), wherein the United

Shetler v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-05-24

Citation: 681 So. 2d 730, 1996 WL 273642

Snippet: public importance: WHETHER POLK COUNTY ORDINANCE 92-13 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE ORDINANCE

State v. Aicher

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-03-10

Citation: 614 So. 2d 50, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3170, 1993 WL 64820

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Having accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.160, this court reverses the suppression order that was presented in this appeal for review, and remands the case to the trial court. See State v. Rochelle, 609 So.2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and ANSTEAD and HERSEY, JJ., concur.

Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Peninger

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-07-24

Citation: 603 So. 2d 57, 1992 WL 171366

Snippet: PENINGER and Claudia G. Peninger, Appellees. No. 92-13. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Storer Cable TV v. Summerwinds Apartments

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-03-13

Citation: 493 So. 2d 417

Snippet: Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 148 U.S. 92, 13 S.Ct. 485, 37 L.Ed. 380 (1893). However, requiring

Flack v. Graham

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1984-07-26

Citation: 453 So. 2d 819

Snippet: ex rel. Dresskell v. City of Miami, 153 Fla. 90, 92, 13 So.2d 707, 708 (1943), we recognized the familiar

State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Avon Park

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-12-11

Citation: 158 So. 159, 117 Fla. 565

Snippet: cited. In the cases of Taliaferro v. Lee, 98 Fla. 92, 13 So. 125, the Court in its opinion, after calling