Florida Statute 92.153 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.153

92.153 Production of documents by witnesses; reimbursement of costs.—

(1) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section:

(a) “Disinterested witness” means a person to whom a summons is issued with respect to documents involving or relating to transactions of others and who has not initiated a proceeding, is not a party to a proceeding, and is not the subject of investigation in a proceeding and who, at the time the summons is issued, is not an officer, employee, accountant, or attorney, or acting as such, for a person who has initiated, is a party to, or is the subject of investigation in a proceeding.

(b) “Document” means any book, paper, record, or other data, or a reproduction thereof.

(c) “Proceeding” means any civil or criminal action before a court; any investigation, inquiry, or proceeding before a grand jury, a state attorney, or a state, county, municipal, or other governmental department, division, bureau, commission or other body, or any officer thereof; any action before an officer or person authorized to issue a summons; or any administrative action authorized by law.

(d) “Summons” means any subpoena, subpoena duces tecum, order, or other legal process which requires the production of documents.

(2) REIMBURSEMENT OF A DISINTERESTED WITNESS.—

(a) In any proceeding, a disinterested witness shall be paid for any costs the witness reasonably incurs either directly or indirectly in producing, searching for, reproducing, or transporting documents pursuant to a summons; however, the cost of documents produced pursuant to a subpoena or records request by a state attorney, a public defender, or a criminal conflict and civil regional counsel may not exceed 15 cents per page and $10 per hour for research or retrieval.

(b) In a proceeding before a court or an administrative agency or officer, which is not an investigation or inquiry and which by law or rule includes the right to a public trial or hearing in the same proceeding and which involves adversary parties, responsibility for payment to the disinterested witness shall be fixed by the court, agency, or officer before which the proceeding is pending. Payment shall be enforced by the court, agency, or officer upon motion by the disinterested witness.

(c) In all other proceedings, payment to the disinterested witness shall be made by the person or governmental authority requesting the summons. Any disinterested witness who desires reimbursement of such costs shall submit a request for reimbursement, supported by an affidavit, to the person or governmental authority responsible for payment. Payment shall be made within 30 days from the date the request is submitted. If payment is not made within such time, the witness may enforce payment by bringing a separate action in a court which has jurisdiction of the total amount of such costs and which is located in the judicial circuit where the witness resides.

History.—ss. 1, 2, ch. 81-196; s. 508, ch. 95-147; s. 77, ch. 2003-402; s. 6, ch. 2022-195.

F.S. 92.153 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.153 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.153

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.153

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.153.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.153

Total Results: 3

Ford v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-04-06

Citation: 652 So. 2d 1236, 1995 WL 147288

Snippet: aggravated assault with a deadly weapon; case no. 92-153-CF for burglary of a structure; case no. 88-189-CF

Howard v. Jackson County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-05-07

Citation: 618 So. 2d 320, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5074, 1993 WL 143946

Snippet: MICKLE, Judge. Appellants have consolidated their appeals from a jury verdict and final judgment finding the defendant, Jackson County (“County”), not liable in their consolidated negligence actions. The incident from which this case arose is a November 1987 collision of two vehicles driven by Jeffrey Howard and Sallie Ivey on a depressed section of two-lane County Road 162, on which a pool of water 25 feet long and 6 feet wide had formed. We reverse.the judgment and remand this cause for a new

Dhaliwal v. Don L. Leasing Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-06-17

Citation: 600 So. 2d 533, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6864, 1992 WL 131795

Snippet: PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Our affirmance in the main appeal is based on the authority of Leggiere v. Merrill Lynch Realty/Florida, Inc., 544 So.2d 240 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), the rationale of which we approve. ANSTEAD and HERSEY, 33., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Senior Judge, concur.