Florida Statute 92.28 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.28

92.28 Records destroyed by fire; land title suits; what may be received in evidence.—In all suits or proceedings concerning any land, or any estate, interest or right in, or any lien or encumbrance upon the same, when it shall be made to appear that the original of any deed, conveyance, map, plat or other written or record evidence has been lost or destroyed, or is not in the power, custody or control of the party wishing to use it on the trial to produce same, and the record thereof has been heretofore destroyed by fire, the court shall receive all such evidence as may have a bearing on the case to establish the execution or contents of any deed, conveyance, map, plat record, or other written evidence so lost or destroyed; provided, that the testimony of the parties themselves shall be received only in such cases, and subject to all the qualifications in respect to such testimony as now provided by law; and provided further, that any writing in the hands of any person or persons, which may become admissible in evidence under the provisions of this section, or any part of this law, shall be rejected and not admitted as evidence, unless the same appear upon the face thereof without erasure, blemish, alteration, interlineation or interpolation in any material part, unless the same shall be explained to the satisfaction of the court, and appear fairly and honestly made in the ordinary course of business.

History.—s. 5, ch. 4951, 1901; GS 1532; RGS 2732; CGL 4404.

F.S. 92.28 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.28 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.28

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.28

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.28.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.28

Total Results: 3

Florida Board of Bar Examiners re T.J.F.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-11-02

Citation: 770 So. 2d 676, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1021, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2127, 2000 WL 1637606

Snippet: unlawfully obtained a refund *677in the amount of $92.28 from a department store for a purse that she had

Lemont v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-06-23

Citation: 620 So. 2d 250, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6714, 1993 WL 216908

Snippet: PER CURIAM. We affirm appellant’s convictions but reverse the sentence on Count I and remand with directions that the trial court either strike the community control provisions of that sentence, or enter an order setting forth legally justifiable reasons for deviating from the guidelines. See State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990); Stanley v. State, 580 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). ANSTEAD, DELL and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

In re Advisory Opinion to Governor Sholtz

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1934-04-14

Citation: 114 Fla. 520, 154 So. 154

Snippet: State Soldiers’ and Sailors' Monument, 129 Ind. 92, 28 N. E. Rep. 127; People ex rel. Mc-Cauley v. Brooks