Florida Statute 92.29 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.29

92.29 Photographic or electronic copies.—Photographic reproductions or reproductions through electronic recordkeeping systems made by any federal, state, county, or municipal governmental board, department or agency, in the regular course of business, of any original record, document, paper or instrument in writing or in an electronic recordkeeping system, which is, or may be, required or authorized to be made, filed, or recorded with that board, department or agency shall in all cases and in all courts and places be admitted and received as evidence with a like force and effect as the original would be, whether the original record, document, paper, or instrument in writing or in an electronic recordkeeping system is in existence or not.

History.—s. 1, ch. 20866, 1941; s. 7, ch. 94-348.

F.S. 92.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.29.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.29

Total Results: 8

Florida Bar v. Abreu

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-11-27

Citation: 833 So. 2d 752, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 989, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2459, 2002 WL 31662604

Snippet: the Practice of Immigration Law, Op. Gen. Couns. 92-29 (June 9, 1992).

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1995-02-06

Snippet: together). 10 You refer to Attorney General Opinion 92-29, in which this office concluded that to the extent

Florvil v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1993-03-30

Citation: 614 So. 2d 1226, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3926, 1993 WL 90537

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla.1991).

Nacion v. Salon Dejan, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-10-07

Citation: 605 So. 2d 990, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 10560, 1992 WL 267005

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Delores F. Nación appeals an order denying unemployment benefits. The hearing officer heard conflicting testimony regarding the reasons for the employee’s discharge, and resolved the conflict in favor of the employer. After a review of the record, we hold there exists substantial competent evidence to support the hearing officer’s decision. The order is therefore affirmed. FRANK, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Department of Transportation v. Charles

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-12-30

Citation: 481 So. 2d 69, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 6041, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 74

Snippet: accordingly amended by striking the words “less 25% or 92.29 a week” from paragraph one of the decretal portion

Turk v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-09-11

Citation: 403 So. 2d 1077

Snippet: that the documents were admissible under Sections 92.29 and 92.35, Florida Statutes (1977). In so ruling

Davis v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-07-03

Citation: 281 So. 2d 551

Snippet: records of the agent corporation. §§ 92.32 and 92.29 Fla. Stat., F.S.A. On the evidence submitted, the

Hancock v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1925-07-23

Citation: 105 So. 401, 90 Fla. 178

Snippet: 50 South. Rep. 537; Griffin v. State, 129 Ala. 92,29 South. Rep. 783; Williams v. State, 149 Ala. 4,