Florida Statute 92.29 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE

Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 92.29

92.29 Photographic or electronic copies.—Photographic reproductions or reproductions through electronic recordkeeping systems made by any federal, state, county, or municipal governmental board, department or agency, in the regular course of business, of any original record, document, paper or instrument in writing or in an electronic recordkeeping system, which is, or may be, required or authorized to be made, filed, or recorded with that board, department or agency shall in all cases and in all courts and places be admitted and received as evidence with a like force and effect as the original would be, whether the original record, document, paper, or instrument in writing or in an electronic recordkeeping system is in existence or not.

History.—s. 1, ch. 20866, 1941; s. 7, ch. 94-348.

F.S. 92.29 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.29 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.29

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.29

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.29.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.29

Total Results: 8

Florida Bar v. Abreu

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2002-11-27T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 833 So. 2d 752

Snippet: the Practice of Immigration Law, Op. Gen. Couns. 92-29 (June 9, 1992). No. SC01-2019 Supreme

Ago

Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1995-02-05T23:53:00-08:00

Snippet: together). 10 You refer to Attorney General Opinion 92-29, in which this office concluded that to the extent

Florvil v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1993-03-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 614 So. 2d 1226

Snippet: McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla.1991). No. 92-29 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Nacion v. Salon Dejan, Inc.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1992-10-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 605 So. 2d 990

Snippet: THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur. No. 92-00029 District Court of Appeal of Florida fladistctapp

Department of Transportation v. Charles

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-12-30T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 481 So. 2d 69

Snippet: accordingly amended by striking the words “less 25% or 92.29 a week” from paragraph one of the decretal portion

Turk v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1981-09-11T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 403 So. 2d 1077

Snippet: that the documents were admissible under Sections 92.29 and 92.35, Florida Statutes (1977). In so ruling

Davis v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1973-07-03T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 281 So. 2d 551

Snippet: records of the agent corporation. §§ 92.32 and 92.29 Fla. Stat., F.S.A. On the evidence submitted, the

Hancock v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1925-07-23T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 105 So. 401, 90 Fla. 178

Snippet: ,50 South. Rep. 537; Griffin v. State, 129 Ala. 92,29 South. Rep. 783; Williams v. State, 149 Ala. 4,