Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 92.39 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 92.39 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 92.39

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.39
92.39 Evidence of individual’s claim against the state in suits between them.In suits between the state and individuals, no claim for a credit shall be allowed upon trial, but such as shall appear to have been presented to the Chief Financial Officer for his or her examination, and by him or her disallowed in whole or in part, unless it shall be proved to the satisfaction of the court that the defendant is, at the time of the trial, in possession of vouchers not before in the defendant’s power to procure, and that the defendant was prevented from exhibiting a claim for such credit at the Chief Financial Officer’s office by unavoidable accident.
History.s. 4, Feb. 10, 1837; RS 1122; GS 1540; RGS 2740; CGL 4412; s. 517, ch. 95-147; s. 108, ch. 2003-261.
Note.Former s. 90.22.

F.S. 92.39 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.39 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.39


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.39
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.39.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 92.39

Total Results: 3

Hawkins v. Barnes

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-10-27

Citation: 661 So. 2d 1271, 1995 WL 627458

Snippet: seeking to recover $163,092.39, the balance due on the first account, and $122,092.39, the balance due on

Hannah v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1992-08-12

Citation: 602 So. 2d 698, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9066, 1992 WL 191284

Snippet: PER CURIAM. We reverse and remand the trial court’s order directing appellant to pay $200.00 in costs of prosecution. Appellant objected to the costs and raised the question of his ability to pay. The state concedes that the trial court imposed the costs without making a determination of his financial ability to pay. On remand, the trial court may again impose costs after affording appellant a hearing and upon a determination that he has the ability to pay costs as provided in section 939.01, Florida

FLA. EXPORT TOBACCO v. Dept. of Revenue

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-06-26

Citation: 510 So. 2d 936

Snippet: proceeding with the circuit court action. See section 92.39, Florida Statutes (1979); Florida Livestock Board