Home
Menu
Call attorney Graham Syfert at 904-383-7448
Personal Injury Lawyer
Florida Statute 92.40 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
F.S. 92.40 Case Law from Google Scholar
Statute is currently reporting as:
Link to State of Florida Official Statute Google Search for Amendments to 92.40

The 2023 Florida Statutes (including Special Session C)

Title VII
EVIDENCE
Chapter 92
WITNESSES, RECORDS, AND DOCUMENTS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 92.40
92.40 Reports of building, housing, or health code violations; admissibility.A copy of a report, notice, or citation of a violation of any building, housing, or health code by a governmental agency charged with the enforcement of such codes, certified by the agency, if otherwise material shall be admissible as evidence.
History.s. 11, ch. 73-330.

F.S. 92.40 on Google Scholar

F.S. 92.40 on Casetext

Amendments to 92.40


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 92.40
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 92.40.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases from cite.case.law:

In CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP, INC., 738 F. Supp. 2d 602 (D. Md. 2010)

. . . Constellation stock closed at $92.40 on January 30, 2008. (See id. at ¶ 132.) . . . The share price declined by only 28.6 percent from January 2008, when it closed at $92.40 per share, . . .

TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, v. DEATON, INC., 932 F. Supp. 132 (W.D.N.C. 1996)

. . . S.E.2d 354 (emphasis, added) (quoting with approval, Larson, Workmen’s Compensation Law, Volume 2, § 92.40 . . .

ROY HORTON TOMATO COMPANY, INC. v. HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, 683 F. Supp. 714 (E.D. Ark. 1988)

. . . Tuggle, et al., 270 Ark. 106, 603 S.W.2d 452, 455 (1980) [quoting with approval Larsons, § 92.40]. . . .

In OGG d b a PRIDE FUELS, INC. v. OGG d b a, 40 B.R. 609 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1984)

. . . Ogg, being a check in the sum of $92.40 on February 23, 1983, a check in the sum of $422.40 on March . . .

VICTORY CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. a v. UNITED STATES, 510 F.2d 1379 (Ct. Cl. 1975)

. . . . $66.30 '' $92.40 $27.62 19 15 sack 94.70 77.44 sacks $269.30 $856.90 $256.15 20 90 sack 116.83 13.33 . . .

VICTORY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND PAUL KRUMMEL A JOINT VENTURE v. THE UNITED STATES, 206 Ct. Cl. 274 (Ct. Cl. 1975)

. . . . $66.30 $92.40 $27.62 19 15 sack 94.70 77.44 sacks $269.30 $856.90 $256.15 20 90 sack 116.83 13.33 sacks . . .

C. Jr. W. v., 56 T.C. 1092 (T.C. 1971)

. . . roundtrips)- $798. 00 Auto expenses — Fort Knox- 198.00 Books and supplies- 72.29 Laundry — uniforms- 92.40 . . . subsistence allowance- 263. 34 528. 66 Total _ 1,781.15 The respondent concedes the deductibility of $92.40 . . . On brief, respondent conceded that petitioners are entitled to a deduction in the amount of $92.40 for . . . Auto expenses, Port ICnox_ 198. 00 Boots and Supplies_ 72. 29 Laundry (uniforms) (not in dispute)_ 92.40 . . .

VELAZQUEZ, v. THOMPSON, G. W., 321 F. Supp. 34 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)

. . . He applied that sum ($92.40) on June 16, 1970 to the rent due, and on July 1, 1970 paid $145.18 more . . .

PEDERSEN, v. BENSON,, 255 F.2d 524 (D.C. Cir. 1958)

. . . . §§ 92.11-92.40 (Supp.1957). . 9 C.F.R. § 92.4 (1949). . Id. § 92.5. . Morrill v. . . .

McNABB v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO., 9 Fla. Supp. 51 (Fla. Industrial Comm'n 1956)

. . . partial disability of his right leg; and that at the time he was so injured his average weekly wage was $92.40 . . .

WEST STREET REALTY CO. v. BOWLES,, 156 F.2d 982 (Emer. Ct. App. 1945)

. . . 1944 1944 All Units 93.14 92.22 91.04 92.15 94.60 97.64 96.44 97.65 Rentals under $30 per month 92.49 92.40 . . .

CROWDER v. ADERHOLD,, 46 F.2d 357 (N.D. Ga. 1931)

. . . same time the sentence was suspended, and he was put on probation for two years; a restitution of $92.40 . . .

A. S. C. E., 23 Fla. 69 (Fla. 1887)

. . . November 1st, 1872, defendant gave orator his note for $92.40 for borrowed money, no part of which has . . .

A. S. C. E., 20 Fla. 204 (Fla. 1883)

. . . . $92.40 Amount paid by C. B, Nims on engine..................... 200.00 Amount of A. S. . . .

LEVY COURT OF WASHINGTON v. WASHINGTON, 15 F. Cas. 443 (C.C.D.C. 1819)

. . . all the items charged in this account are of general expenses except the item charged for discounts, $92.40 . . .

v., 2 D.C. 175 (C.C.D.C. 1819)

. . . the items charged in this account are of general expenses except the item- charged for discounts, $92.40 . . . Removing the records in 1814, 19.00 “ Advertising, 21.75 “ Express to William M’Murray, 2.50 “ Discounts, 92.40 . . .