Florida Statute 95.11 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS

Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 95.011

95.011 Applicability.—A civil action or proceeding, called “action” in this chapter, including one brought by the state, a public officer, a political subdivision of the state, a municipality, a public corporation or body corporate, or any agency or officer of any of them, or any other governmental authority, shall be barred unless begun within the time prescribed in this chapter or, if a different time is prescribed elsewhere in these statutes, within the time prescribed elsewhere.

History.—s. 1, ch. 74-382; s. 1, ch. 77-174.

F.S. 95.011 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.011 on CourtListener

Amendments to 95.011

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 95.011

Total Results: 1000

Moore v. Morris

475 So. 2d 666, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 336

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1985 | Docket: 2488799

Cited 253 times | Published

that the applicable statute of limitations is section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973), and the applicable

Major League Baseball v. Morsani

790 So. 2d 1071, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 465, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1401, 2001 WL 776662

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 2001 | Docket: 249004

Cited 163 times | Published

provisions of chapter 95, Florida Statutes (1991). Section 95.11 sets forth the limitations period for an action

Moransais v. Heathman

744 So. 2d 973, 1999 WL 462629

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1999 | Docket: 2527054

Cited 146 times | Published

statutory scheme for limitations of actions. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1997), reads in pertinent

Hearndon v. Graham

767 So. 2d 1179, 2000 WL 1288688

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2000 | Docket: 2487445

Cited 99 times | Published

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1987). Hearndon argued

Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co.

450 So. 2d 1157, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13078

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 1, 1984 | Docket: 1433305

Cited 96 times | Published

the statute of limitations relating to fraud (§ 95.11(5)(d), Fla. Stat. (1965)), but finding no such

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Dolgencorp, LLC

746 F.3d 1008

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 5, 2014 | Docket: 141594

Cited 92 times | Published

to enforce a restrictive covenant. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b); Pond Apple Place III Condo. Ass’n

Woodham v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Fla., Inc.

829 So. 2d 891, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 834, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1967, 2002 WL 31259952

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2002 | Docket: 2451040

Cited 87 times | Published

statute of limitations for statutory violations, section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to actions

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.

476 So. 2d 657, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 428

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 2521995

Cited 71 times | Published

exposure between those sought to be limited by section 95.11(3)(c), struck down in Overland, and those listed

Gordon Jones and Laura Jones v. John H. Childers and Talent Services, Inc.

18 F.3d 899, 40 Fed. R. Serv. 843, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6530, 1994 WL 91268

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 7, 1994 | Docket: 2167478

Cited 67 times | Published

five years. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b). 2. breach of fiduciary duty:

Bauld v. JA Jones Const. Co.

357 So. 2d 401, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4729

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 9, 1978 | Docket: 453773

Cited 67 times | Published

negligence/products liability *402 actions. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1971). In 1974 there was

Battilla v. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

392 So. 2d 874

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1980 | Docket: 1505252

Cited 64 times | Published

this section, I would limit that holding to section 95.11(3)(c). I do this not for any reason expressed

Armour v. Allen

377 So. 2d 798

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1979 | Docket: 1521679

Cited 61 times | Published

four-year limitation period of Florida Statute § 95.11(3)(p) does not apply to claims for child support

In Re: Fernando R. Alvarez, Debtor. Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. v. Fernando R. Alvarez

224 F.3d 1273

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 12, 2000 | Docket: 723268

Cited 58 times | Published

the exercise of due diligence.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4). This fact is irrelevant for our inquiry, however

Allen v. Butterworth

756 So. 2d 52, 2000 WL 381484

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 2000 | Docket: 471304

Cited 53 times | Published

court denied the writ as time barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), which states that

Grove Isle Ass'n v. Grove Isle Associates, LLLP

137 So. 3d 1081, 2014 WL 1230326, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 4401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2014 | Docket: 60240164

Cited 47 times | Published

instrument to be commenced within five years, see § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat., and claims for unjust enrichment

Beck v. Lazard Freres & Co., LLC

175 F.3d 913, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9039, 1999 WL 300894

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 13, 1999 | Docket: 2273593

Cited 45 times | Published

dismissed the complaint as being barred by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, the five-year breach

Creviston v. General Motors Corporation

225 So. 2d 331

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1969 | Docket: 688682

Cited 45 times | Published

three-year statute of limitations provided in Section 95.11(5) (e), Florida Statutes 1961, F.S.A. In affirming

Abbott Labs., Inc. v. General Elec. Capital

765 So. 2d 737, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6072, 2000 WL 664052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2000 | Docket: 1522881

Cited 44 times | Published

are barred by the statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). The facts are

Abbott Labs., Inc. v. General Elec. Capital

765 So. 2d 737, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6072, 2000 WL 664052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2000 | Docket: 1522881

Cited 44 times | Published

are barred by the statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). The facts are

Colhoun v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

265 So. 2d 18

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1972 | Docket: 666709

Cited 41 times | Published

was begun within the period set forth in F.S. Section 95.11, F.S.A. If it arose in Tennessee, however, it

Colhoun v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

265 So. 2d 18

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1972 | Docket: 666709

Cited 41 times | Published

was begun within the period set forth in F.S. Section 95.11, F.S.A. If it arose in Tennessee, however, it

Davis v. Monahan

832 So. 2d 708, 2002 WL 31477296

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 2002 | Docket: 1336041

Cited 40 times | Published

malpractice, and intentional torts based on abuse. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 2000), provides:

Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc.

531 So. 2d 84, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 435, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 831, 1988 WL 97201

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1988 | Docket: 2527053

Cited 40 times | Published

two years from the discovery of the malpractice. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1983). Other actions founded

Engle Cases 4432 Individual Tobacco v. Various Tobacco Companies

767 F.3d 1082, 89 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1199, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17450

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 10, 2014 | Docket: 1185047

Cited 39 times | Published

subject to a two-year limitations period, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d). Plaintiffs’ counsel sought leave from the

Abram-Adams v. Citigroup, Inc.

491 F. App'x 972

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 16, 2012 | Docket: 65709994

Cited 39 times | Published

claims-four-year statute of limitations, see Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3). On appeal, Abram-Adams argues that the doctrines

Silva v. Southwest Florida Blood Bank, Inc.

601 So. 2d 1184, 1992 WL 110906

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 28, 1992 | Docket: 1710931

Cited 39 times | Published

limitations for medical malpractice suits under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), or the four-year

Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

863 So. 2d 201, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 719, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1623, 2003 WL 22207887

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2003 | Docket: 1431590

Cited 38 times | Published

repose applicable to medical malpractice cases. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), extends the

Foley v. Morris

339 So. 2d 215

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1976 | Docket: 1436240

Cited 38 times | Published

the two-year statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (1973), effective July 1, 1972, rather than

Fulton County Adm'r v. Sullivan

753 So. 2d 549, 1999 WL 1072973

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1999 | Docket: 1433918

Cited 37 times | Published

was included as a tolling provision only in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995) (medical malpractice

Kala Investments, Inc. v. Sklar

538 So. 2d 909, 1989 WL 6188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1989 | Docket: 1517089

Cited 34 times | Published

and Kala's actions against them are barred by Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1985). While it is

Marek v. State

14 So. 3d 985, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 461, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1125, 2009 WL 2045416

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 2009 | Docket: 1649938

Cited 33 times | Published

depending on the cause of action asserted. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (1983) (establishing four-year

JB v. Sacred Heart Hosp. of Pensacola

635 So. 2d 945, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 194, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 577, 1994 WL 137919

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1994 | Docket: 1705398

Cited 33 times | Published

transporter for the patient fall within Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(b), the two-year statute of limitations for

Carter v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

778 So. 2d 932, 2000 WL 1726779

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2000 | Docket: 1686978

Cited 31 times | Published

539. II. Analysis A. Statute of Limitations Section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1981), states that

Universal Engineering Corp. v. Perez

451 So. 2d 463, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3026

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 17, 1984 | Docket: 1483313

Cited 31 times | Published

413 So.2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), which held section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975), unconstitutional

BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS OF MADISON CTY. v. Grice

438 So. 2d 392

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1983 | Docket: 1731665

Cited 31 times | Published

statute of limitations barred their claim. See § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (1977). Although the rules of

Cason v. FLORIDA DEPT. OF MANAGEMENT SERVS.

944 So. 2d 306, 2006 WL 3313749

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2006 | Docket: 2518596

Cited 30 times | Published

specifically includes the State within its operation. See § 95.011, Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that limitations

Knight v. EF Hutton and Co., Inc.

750 F. Supp. 1109, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15044, 1990 WL 176026

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1990 | Docket: 1041824

Cited 30 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations. Florida Statutes, § 95.11(3)(j). The statute of limitations for *1113 Florida

Baskerville-Donovan Eng's, Inc. v. Pensacola Exec. House Condominium Ass'n, Inc.

581 So. 2d 1301, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 440, 1991 Fla. LEXIS 931, 1991 WL 101180

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 1991 | Docket: 1283831

Cited 29 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1983),[2] applies only

Stebilla v. Mussallem

595 So. 2d 136, 1992 WL 24470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 1992 | Docket: 1299226

Cited 27 times | Published

that of the two year limitation of actions in section 95.11, were subject to dismissal pursuant to section

Hospital Corp. of America v. Lindberg

571 So. 2d 446, 1990 WL 198320

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1990 | Docket: 1173581

Cited 27 times | Published

jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. [3] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), provides, in

Todd Pioch v. IBEX Engineering Services, Inc.

825 F.3d 1264

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 14, 2016 | Docket: 3078150

Cited 25 times | Published

counterclaim was time-barred under Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e) (imposing a two-year statute of limitations

Hankey v. Yarian

755 So. 2d 93, 2000 WL 283692

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2000 | Docket: 1699332

Cited 25 times | Published

this scheme. LIMITATIONS SCHEME Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), an action for

Hankey v. Yarian

755 So. 2d 93, 2000 WL 283692

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 2000 | Docket: 1699332

Cited 25 times | Published

this scheme. LIMITATIONS SCHEME Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), an action for

Halkey-Roberts Corp. v. MacKal

641 So. 2d 445, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7987, 1994 WL 419054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1994 | Docket: 1648621

Cited 25 times | Published

the four-year statute of limitations applies. § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (1991). The discovery rule found

Raie v. Cheminova, Inc.

336 F.3d 1278, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 13691, 2003 WL 21525295

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 8, 2003 | Docket: 397756

Cited 23 times | Published

follows: An action for products liability under § 95.11(3) must be begun within the period prescribed in

Merkle v. Robinson

737 So. 2d 540, 1999 WL 506972

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1999 | Docket: 1709516

Cited 23 times | Published

INVOLVING FLORIDA'S STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS, SECTION 95.11, FLORIDA STATUTES? Robinson v. Merkle, 700 So

Cheylla Silva v. Baptist Health South Florida, Inc.

856 F.3d 824, 2017 WL 1830158, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 8151, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1509

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 8, 2017 | Docket: 6059679

Cited 22 times | Published

which in Florida is a four-year period, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3); see also City of Hialeah v. Rojas, 311 F.3d

Greene v. Bursey

733 So. 2d 1111, 1999 WL 314126

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 1999 | Docket: 1659804

Cited 22 times | Published

that the applicable statute of limitations is section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), which sets a

Dade County v. Lambert

334 So. 2d 844

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1976 | Docket: 1309804

Cited 22 times | Published

four-year statute of *847 limitations, provided for in § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat., applies herein. The second point

Broward Builders Exchange, Inc. v. Goehring

231 So. 2d 513, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2858

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1970 | Docket: 1297927

Cited 22 times | Published

the defense of the Statute of Limitations, F.S. § 95.11(7) (b), and moved for dismissal. The trial court

Florida Dhrs v. Sap

835 So. 2d 1091

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2002 | Docket: 1643385

Cited 21 times | Published

Additionally, since neither section 768.28 nor section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes abrogates these equitable

Wiley v. Roof

641 So. 2d 66, 1994 WL 275172

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1994 | Docket: 1648564

Cited 21 times | Published

in chapter 92-102, Laws of Florida, amended section 95.11 to read: Actions other than for recovery of

Korman v. Iglesias

736 F. Supp. 261, 16 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1626, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5852, 1990 WL 63031

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 10, 1990 | Docket: 1498702

Cited 21 times | Published

statute of limitation found in Florida Statutes § 95.11(3)(j) (1989). Plaintiff also correctly notes that

Scott v. Otis Elevator Company

524 So. 2d 642, 3 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 457, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 289, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 524, 1988 WL 40939

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1988 | Docket: 1329567

Cited 21 times | Published

court reversed, finding the action barred by section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), which provides

Clemons v. Flagler Hospital, Inc.

385 So. 2d 1134

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1980 | Docket: 1700357

Cited 21 times | Published

the two-year limitation period provided by section 95.11(4) and (6), Florida Statutes (1971), the plaintiff

Almengor v. Dade County

359 So. 2d 892

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1978 | Docket: 1418435

Cited 21 times | Published

then applicable four year statute of limitations. § 95.11(4) Fla. Stat. (1969). The plaintiff contends that

Larson & Larson, P.A. v. TSE Industries, Inc.

22 So. 3d 36, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 591, 2009 Fla. LEXIS 1868, 2009 WL 3644163

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2009 | Docket: 1432532

Cited 19 times | Published

are governed by two main authorities. First, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2002), sets forth a two-year

Auto Owners Insurance v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.

227 F. Supp. 2d 1248, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19478, 2002 WL 31114023

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2002 | Docket: 2518243

Cited 19 times | Published

five year statute of limitations in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b) begins to run. The owner in Southwest Florida

Barron v. Shapiro

565 So. 2d 1319, 1990 WL 82925

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 1990 | Docket: 1725965

Cited 19 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations in Nardone was section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1965), which provided:

Melvin v. Melvin

391 So. 2d 691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1980 | Docket: 1173871

Cited 19 times | Published

four-year limitations period of Florida Statute § 95.11(3)(p) does not apply to claims for child support

Patten v. Winderman

965 So. 2d 1222, 2007 WL 2782549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2007 | Docket: 1509287

Cited 18 times | Published

argued that Patten's actions were barred by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2006), claiming that accounting

Nadd v. Le Credit Lyonnais, SA

804 So. 2d 1226, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 769, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 2274, 2001 WL 1472623

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2001 | Docket: 1699582

Cited 18 times | Published

statute of limitations found in subsection (1) of section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1995), is applicable to actions

Jacobs v. BD. OF REGENTS, ETC.

473 F. Supp. 663, 21 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1656, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11134, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,465

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 2016541

Cited 18 times | Published

to believe based upon the facts alleged that F.S. 95.11(3)(f) is the proper statute of limitations to

Jacobs v. BD. OF REGENTS, ETC.

473 F. Supp. 663, 21 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1656, 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11134, 21 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 30,465

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 1979 | Docket: 2016541

Cited 18 times | Published

to believe based upon the facts alleged that F.S. 95.11(3)(f) is the proper statute of limitations to

Zakak v. Broida and Napier, PA

545 So. 2d 380, 1989 WL 70859

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1989 | Docket: 1345297

Cited 17 times | Published

action with prejudice. The operative statute is section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1985) which provides in

Bryne v. GULFSTREAM FIRST BANK & TRUST CO., ETC.

528 F. Supp. 692, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16439

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1981 | Docket: 2534070

Cited 17 times | Published

violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 is Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(e),[1] which pertains to limitation of actions

Sheoah Highlands, Inc. v. Daugherty

837 So. 2d 579, 2003 WL 328430

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2003 | Docket: 537491

Cited 16 times | Published

attorney's fees. THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1998), provides, in relevant

Musculoskeletal Institute v. Parham

745 So. 2d 946

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1999 | Docket: 352781

Cited 16 times | Published

ALSO EXTEND THE STATUTE OF REPOSE CONTAINED IN SECTION 95.11(4)( [b]), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)? Id. at 625

Musculoskeletal Institute v. Parham

745 So. 2d 946

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 11, 1999 | Docket: 352781

Cited 16 times | Published

ALSO EXTEND THE STATUTE OF REPOSE CONTAINED IN SECTION 95.11(4)( [b]), FLORIDA STATUTES (1989)? Id. at 625

PUBLIC H. TRUST OF DADE CTY. v. Knuck

495 So. 2d 834, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1986 | Docket: 1758741

Cited 16 times | Published

the applicable statute of limitations period, § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1985),[2] had failed to observe

Penthouse North Ass'n v. Lombardi

461 So. 2d 1350, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 508, 1984 Fla. LEXIS 3662

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1984 | Docket: 2516870

Cited 16 times | Published

characterize the nature of the cause of action. See § 95.11(3), (4), and (5), Fla. Stat. (1967). It is unnecessary

Homemakers, Inc. v. Gonzales

400 So. 2d 965

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 1981 | Docket: 1677228

Cited 16 times | Published

subsequent amendments upon the application of section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973). Brooks v. Cerrato

Daniels v. Weiss

385 So. 2d 661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1980 | Docket: 1337595

Cited 16 times | Published

applicable two-year statute of limitations [Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973)] having already

Steiner v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.

364 So. 2d 47, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 1978 | Docket: 461932

Cited 16 times | Published

therefore, barred by the Statute of Limitations, Section 95.11(3)(a) & (e), Florida Statutes (1977).[2] The

Merle Wood and Associates, Inc. v. Trinity Yachhts, LLC

714 F.3d 1234, 2013 WL 1501928, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 7479

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 15, 2013 | Docket: 2201382

Cited 15 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11, because they accrued prior to September 8, 2006

YUSUF MOHAMAD EXCAV. INC. v. Ringhaver Equip. Co.

793 So. 2d 1127, 2001 WL 1023501

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2001 | Docket: 1267340

Cited 15 times | Published

deceptive trade practice claims. We disagree. Section 95.11(3) of the Florida Statutes (1989) provides a

Veltmann v. Walpole Pharmacy, Inc.

928 F. Supp. 1161, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8247, 1996 WL 327844

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1996 | Docket: 1005074

Cited 15 times | Published

with limitations of actions in Florida and section 95.11 deals with limitations periods for causes of

Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Carter

658 So. 2d 560, 1995 WL 366678

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1995 | Docket: 602638

Cited 15 times | Published

and thus of a statute of repose. Compare also § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993) ("[H]owever, in no event

Archer v. Maddux

645 So. 2d 544, 1994 WL 630814

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1994 | Docket: 1222892

Cited 15 times | Published

before the two-year statute of limitations ran, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), and more than

Stackhouse v. Emerson

611 So. 2d 1365, 1993 WL 9788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1993 | Docket: 1677588

Cited 15 times | Published

medical malpractice, section 95.11(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes (1989). Section 95.11(4)(b) provides in

Swain v. Curry

595 So. 2d 168, 1992 WL 34638

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 19, 1992 | Docket: 1298823

Cited 15 times | Published

that the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), has commenced

Burroughs Corp. v. Suntogs of Miami, Inc.

472 So. 2d 1166, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 370

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 11, 1985 | Docket: 2518178

Cited 15 times | Published

for actions based on written contracts under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). However, the

Ash v. Stella

457 So. 2d 1377

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1984 | Docket: 426319

Cited 15 times | Published

statute of limitations governing this case is section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979), which provides:

Brown v. Wood

202 So. 2d 125

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1967 | Docket: 1710820

Cited 15 times | Published

statute of limitations for assault and battery, § 95.11 (6), Fla.Stats., F.S.A. The trial court granted

Sea Lane Bahamas Limited v. Europa Cruises Corporation, Europa Cruise Line, Ltd.

188 F.3d 1317, 2000 A.M.C. 66, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 22481, 1999 WL 727067

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 17, 1999 | Docket: 424322

Cited 14 times | Published

031(2) (Supp.1996) ("Actions for ... fraud under § 95.11(3) must be begun within the period prescribed in

Askew v. County of Volusia

450 So. 2d 233, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 1984 | Docket: 1729129

Cited 14 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations for negligence. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981). In the instant case,

SE FIDELITY INS. CO. v. Earnest

395 So. 2d 230

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 3, 1981 | Docket: 1692882

Cited 14 times | Published

Bradwell would have been entirely worthless. [3] § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (1979).

Central Home Trust Co. v. Lippincott

392 So. 2d 931, 31 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1980 | Docket: 1268664

Cited 14 times | Published

C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur. NOTES [1] Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979) sets a 5 year

Mazda Motors of Am., Inc. v. SC Henderson & Sons, Inc.

364 So. 2d 107

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1978 | Docket: 461863

Cited 14 times | Published

time the applicable statute of limitations was F.S. 95.11(5)(c), *109 Florida Statutes 1973. That statute

Walgreen Drug Stores Company v. Lee

28 So. 2d 535, 158 Fla. 260, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 565

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1946 | Docket: 3276160

Cited 14 times | Published

suit was barred by the Statute of Limitations, Section 95.11 (5E), Florida Statutes 1941. We do not think

Oliveros v. Adventist Health Systems/Sunbelt, Inc.

45 So. 3d 873, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12923, 2010 WL 3447253

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2010 | Docket: 2525062

Cited 13 times | Published

date to file a medical malpractice action. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). The filing of the notice

Fox v. Madsen

12 So. 3d 1261, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8767, 2009 WL 1872524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 2009 | Docket: 1647202

Cited 13 times | Published

limitations for specific performance of a contract. See § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. Madsen contends, on the other

Olson v. Johnson

961 So. 2d 356, 2007 WL 1855687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2007 | Docket: 1515781

Cited 13 times | Published

prosecution and civil conspiracy is four years. See § 95.11(3)(o), (p), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). "A cause of

Olson v. Johnson

961 So. 2d 356, 2007 WL 1855687

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2007 | Docket: 1515781

Cited 13 times | Published

prosecution and civil conspiracy is four years. See § 95.11(3)(o), (p), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996). "A cause of

Medalie v. FSC Securities Corp.

87 F. Supp. 2d 1295, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5455, 2000 WL 255918

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2000 | Docket: 2154367

Cited 13 times | Published

limitations applicable to Chapter 517 is set forth in § 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes, which provides: Actions

Donovan v. ST. FARM FIRE AND CAS. CO.

574 So. 2d 285, 1991 WL 17303

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 13, 1991 | Docket: 2517430

Cited 13 times | Published

applicable to actions brought on a written contract, § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1981), the trial court ruled

Seaside Community Dev. Corp. v. Edwards

573 So. 2d 142, 1991 WL 2342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 1991 | Docket: 478824

Cited 13 times | Published

for specific performance of a contract.[1]See § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). Therefore, according

Venditti-Siravo, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, Fla.

418 So. 2d 1251

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1982 | Docket: 1288930

Cited 13 times | Published

City's affirmative defenses, we believe that Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1980), to be applicable

Glass v. Camara

369 So. 2d 625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1979 | Docket: 470920

Cited 13 times | Published

barred by the two-year statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes. If the two-year limitation

Continental Casualty Co. v. Florida Power & Light Co.

222 So. 2d 58

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1969 | Docket: 1753253

Cited 13 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of limitations, § 95.11 (3), Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Since the contract was

Raphael v. Shecter

18 So. 3d 1152, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14084, 2009 WL 3018157

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2009 | Docket: 83627

Cited 12 times | Published

the time the malpractice incident occurs.[5]See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002); Patient's Compensation

Suarez v. City of Tampa

987 So. 2d 681, 2008 WL 268910

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2008 | Docket: 1724232

Cited 12 times | Published

"not specifically provided for" in the statute. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2002). The parties also acknowledge

Allan and Conrad v. University of Cent. Fl.

961 So. 2d 1083, 2007 WL 2140595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2007 | Docket: 325746

Cited 12 times | Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence. . . . § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1989) (emphasis added). The

Sarasota Welfare Home v. Sarasota

666 So. 2d 171, 1995 WL 698905

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1995 | Docket: 452644

Cited 12 times | Published

condemnation action is four years pursuant to section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1991). However, we

Turner Murphy v. SPEC. CONSTRUCT.

659 So. 2d 1242, 1995 WL 504817

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 28, 1995 | Docket: 2516314

Cited 12 times | Published

other state or territory in the United States," § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991), so that the judgment

Monte v. Tipton

612 So. 2d 714, 1993 WL 17749

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1993 | Docket: 1263182

Cited 12 times | Published

limitations had not run. Mrs. Monte argues that section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1991), bars the commencement

Fowhand v. Piper

611 So. 2d 1308, 1992 WL 389022

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1992 | Docket: 1674508

Cited 12 times | Published

limited by the statute of limitation found in section 95.11(3)(k); and (3) should not have been awarded

Arthur v. Unicare Health Facilities, Inc.

602 So. 2d 596, 1992 WL 135047

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 19, 1992 | Docket: 161001

Cited 12 times | Published

limitations is the two-year medical malpractice statute. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987). That limitations period

Keramati v. Schackow

553 So. 2d 741, 1989 WL 150082

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 1989 | Docket: 1258737

Cited 12 times | Published

ORFINGER, M., Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1977). [2] § 768.28(1), Fla

Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. LAWYERS TITLE INS.

478 So. 2d 423, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2497

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1985 | Docket: 1741604

Cited 12 times | Published

aware of them in 1973. It is also conceded that section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1983), which provides

Cristich v. Allen Engineering, Inc.

458 So. 2d 76, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2298, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15677

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1984 | Docket: 472548

Cited 12 times | Published

for professional malpractice applied here. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1981), provides in relevant

Houston v. Florida-Georgia Television Company

192 So. 2d 540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 8, 1966 | Docket: 1262405

Cited 12 times | Published

for invasion of privacy is subdivision (4) of Section 95.11, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., providing that actions

Elaine Hess, etc. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

175 So. 3d 687, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 188, 2015 Fla. LEXIS 623, 2015 WL 1472319

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 2, 2015 | Docket: 2646455

Cited 11 times | Published

[I]n any event an action for fraud under § 95.11(3) must be begun within 12 years after the date

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips

126 So. 3d 186, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 2493, 2013 WL 2096252

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: May 16, 2013 | Docket: 60236340

Cited 11 times | Published

importance,1 which we rephrase as follows: DOES SECTION 95.011, FLORIDA STATUTES, APPLY TO ARBITRATION? *188We

Lamm v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.

889 F. Supp. 2d 1321, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135008, 2012 WL 3828287

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2012 | Docket: 65984641

Cited 11 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(3).

Spadaro v. City of Miramar

855 F. Supp. 2d 1317, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25965

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2012 | Docket: 65980581

Cited 11 times | Published

infliction of emotional distress claims. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o). In Florida, a cause of action accrues “when

Chrestensen v. Eurogest, Inc.

906 So. 2d 343, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 13, 2005 | Docket: 1775398

Cited 11 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations is five years. See § 95.11; Barnes v. Escambia County Employees Credit Union

Maynard v. Household Finance Corp. III

861 So. 2d 1204, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18709, 2003 WL 22899783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2003 | Docket: 463033

Cited 11 times | Published

founded on fraud must be brought within four years. § 95.11(2)(b), (3)(j)-(k), Fla. Stat. (1995). The issues

Maynard v. Household Finance Corp. III

861 So. 2d 1204, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18709, 2003 WL 22899783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2003 | Docket: 463033

Cited 11 times | Published

founded on fraud must be brought within four years. § 95.11(2)(b), (3)(j)-(k), Fla. Stat. (1995). The issues

Brooke v. Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP

828 So. 2d 1078, 2002 WL 31398610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2002 | Docket: 1523203

Cited 11 times | Published

applicable two-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2000). We reverse. On June 8

Rowe v. Schreiber

725 So. 2d 1245, 1999 WL 30612

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1999 | Docket: 1293930

Cited 11 times | Published

two year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court

Berisford v. Jack Eckerd Corp.

667 So. 2d 809, 1995 WL 699875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1995 | Docket: 2515648

Cited 11 times | Published

medical malpractice statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), does not apply

Berisford v. Jack Eckerd Corp.

667 So. 2d 809, 1995 WL 699875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 1995 | Docket: 2515648

Cited 11 times | Published

medical malpractice statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), does not apply

Robbins v. Hess

659 So. 2d 424, 1995 WL 469649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1995 | Docket: 1463304

Cited 11 times | Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence." § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (1987). On July 28, 1988, appellant

Popper v. Popper

595 So. 2d 100, 1992 WL 18543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1992 | Docket: 1298986

Cited 11 times | Published

T.D., Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] Section 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (1989). [2] But see Boyer

Lindberg v. Hosp. Corp. of America

545 So. 2d 1384, 1989 WL 75737

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 12, 1989 | Docket: 1702833

Cited 11 times | Published

litigation within the limitation period set forth in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1985), was fatal to the continuation

Adams v. Sommers

475 So. 2d 279, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2123

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1985 | Docket: 1709929

Cited 11 times | Published

cause of action for legal malpractice arose. Section 95.11(4)(a) provides that the period of limitations

Perez v. Universal Engineering Corp.

413 So. 2d 75

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 1982 | Docket: 1345003

Cited 11 times | Published

resolving the legal issues we must examine Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975) and the several

Smith v. Branch

391 So. 2d 797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 1980 | Docket: 1174425

Cited 11 times | Published

and that he would try to work something out. Section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1979) provides that

Miller v. Miami Prefabricators, Inc.

438 F. Supp. 176, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14087, 15 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 7991, 15 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1190

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 9, 1977 | Docket: 1027871

Cited 11 times | Published

one year State of Limitations pursuant to Florida Statute 95.11(7)(b) (1943) applies. It is therefore ORDERED

Josef's of Palm Beach, Inc. v. Southern Investment Co.

349 F. Supp. 1057, 1972 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11483

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1972 | Docket: 991106

Cited 11 times | Published

relief upon the ground of fraud, Florida Statute § 95.11(5)(d), F.S.A., is most applicable. Where there

Padilla v. Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc.

391 F. Supp. 3d 1108

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 21, 2019 | Docket: 64325406

Cited 10 times | Published

claim under FDUTPA is four years. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(f) ; Speier-Roche v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am.

Canete v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

967 So. 2d 412, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16862, 2007 WL 3118664

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 2007 | Docket: 1454490

Cited 10 times | Published

January 2004, his claim was untimely under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes.[2] DOC further argued

Hamilton v. Tanner

962 So. 2d 997, 2007 WL 2254572

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2007 | Docket: 480867

Cited 10 times | Published

an action on the lease agreement is five years, § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002), and that the statute

Zureikat v. Shaibani

944 So. 2d 1019, 2006 WL 565907

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2006 | Docket: 1649909

Cited 10 times | Published

for fraud or untimely action for equitable lien. § 95.11(3)(j), (k), Fla. Stat. (2004). Zureikat's argument

Spring Lake Imp. Dist. v. Tyrrell

868 So. 2d 656, 2004 WL 535429

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2004 | Docket: 451876

Cited 10 times | Published

maintenance beyond the four-year period contained in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1997). Specifically

Putnam Berkley Group, Inc. v. Dinin

734 So. 2d 532, 1999 WL 333143

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 1999 | Docket: 2516530

Cited 10 times | Published

the identity of the actual tortfeasor. While section 95.11(4)(b) provided a tolling provision for fraudulent

Pezzi v. Brown

697 So. 2d 883, 1997 WL 345702

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1997 | Docket: 1777030

Cited 10 times | Published

limitations applicable to negligence cases. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). However, the trial court

Adams v. Adams

691 So. 2d 10, 1997 WL 106956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1997 | Docket: 1424221

Cited 10 times | Published

independent action may be based, citing to section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, on limitations of actions

Goldman v. HALIFAX MEDICAL CTR., INC.

662 So. 2d 367, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9715, 1995 WL 544149

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1995 | Docket: 1683410

Cited 10 times | Published

negligent acts of a health care provider. See also § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1993); Stackhouse v. Emerson

Moneyhun v. Vital Industries, Inc.

611 So. 2d 1316, 1993 WL 2973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 11, 1993 | Docket: 1757391

Cited 10 times | Published

actions are. The contract action is controlled by Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1981), which prescribes

Malunney v. Pearlstein

539 So. 2d 493, 1989 WL 9762

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1989 | Docket: 452745

Cited 10 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations period required by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1985), and by insertion of

Scherer v. LABORERS'INTERN. UNION OF N. AMERICA

746 F. Supp. 73, 134 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2962, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17290, 1988 WL 214512

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 19, 1988 | Docket: 181733

Cited 10 times | Published

from the date of accrual of the cause of action. § 95.11(2), Fla.Stat. And, if the action is founded on

Fowler v. Taco Viva, Inc.

646 F. Supp. 152, 45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 724, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18788

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 1986 | Docket: 1345205

Cited 10 times | Published

this case, the applicable statute is Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(c), which provides a two year period in which

Steven A. Stepanian, II v. David R. Addis

782 F.2d 902, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22336

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 18, 1986 | Docket: 340934

Cited 10 times | Published

Florida Statute of Limitations, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11, the slander count should not have been dismissed

Phelan v. Hanft

471 So. 2d 648, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1595

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 1985 | Docket: 1397243

Cited 10 times | Published

August 1, 1983, the plaintiff sued Dr. Hanft.[2] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), provides in

Mitchell A. Newberger v. United States Marshals Service

751 F.2d 1162, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27765

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 28, 1985 | Docket: 488058

Cited 10 times | Published

analogous to appellant’s cause of action. Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f), which provides a four-year limitation

Szabo v. Essex Chemical Corp.

461 So. 2d 128

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 1984 | Docket: 1514574

Cited 10 times | Published

was dismissed on statute of limitation grounds. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). The trial court also found

Toledo Park Homes v. Grant

447 So. 2d 343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 1984 | Docket: 1312167

Cited 10 times | Published

limitations applicable to professional malpractice, Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1981), barred the action

School Bd. of Seminole County v. GAF Corp.

413 So. 2d 1208, 4 Educ. L. Rep. 688

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1982 | Docket: 1344802

Cited 10 times | Published

its lawsuits, in July of 1977. We agree that section 95.11(3)(c) applies to these cases rather than the

Salvaggio v. Austin

336 So. 2d 1282

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 1976 | Docket: 1720962

Cited 10 times | Published

governed by the two-year statute of limitations, § 95.11(6) F.S. 1973,[1] which provides that the cause

Smith v. Continental Insurance Company

326 So. 2d 189, 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1220, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14267

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1976 | Docket: 1729209

Cited 10 times | Published

the three year limitations period of Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(e)(1973), which governs an action upon a contract

Fletcher v. Dozier

314 So. 2d 241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1975 | Docket: 1421137

Cited 10 times | Published

deaths resulting from medical malpractice, is F.S. 95.11(6), which provides for a period of two years

Grissom v. North American Aviation, Inc.

326 F. Supp. 465, 1971 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13350

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 11, 1971 | Docket: 1618803

Cited 10 times | Published

actions in Florida, Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes, F.S. A., has run. F.S. Section 95.11(6), F.S.A., provides

Barfield v. United States Rubber Company

234 So. 2d 374

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1970 | Docket: 1354238

Cited 10 times | Published

statute of limitations set forth in Florida Statutes § 95.11(5) (e), or by the four year statute of limitations

Creviston v. General Motors Corporation

210 So. 2d 755

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 1968 | Docket: 1468635

Cited 10 times | Published

limitations in this case is three years, based on Section 95.11(5) (e). An implied warranty is an action founded

Aviation Credit Corporation v. Batchelor

190 So. 2d 8, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1966 | Docket: 2533961

Cited 10 times | Published

under seal is five years. See Fla. Stat. 1963, § 95.11(3), F.S.A. The Florida "borrowing statute" is section

Hicks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

178 So. 3d 957, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17002, 2015 WL 7017440

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2015 | Docket: 60251637

Cited 9 times | Published

alleged in the complaint, as required under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013)- (establishing

Hames v. CITY OF MIAMI FIREFIGHTERS'

980 So. 2d 1112, 2008 WL 583672

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2008 | Docket: 1418761

Cited 9 times | Published

forward with the forfeiture determination. Section 95.011 provides that in the absence of a separately

New York State Dept. of Taxation v. Patafio

829 So. 2d 314, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15566, 2002 WL 31396460

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2002 | Docket: 1733619

Cited 9 times | Published

the twenty year limitation period found in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to its

Nayee v. Nayee

705 So. 2d 961, 1998 WL 20680

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 1998 | Docket: 1560492

Cited 9 times | Published

specifically provided for in these statutes." § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (1995). Jay also filed a new

Ins. Co. of No. Amer. v. Metro. Dade Co.

705 So. 2d 33, 1997 WL 667601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 1997 | Docket: 1581319

Cited 9 times | Published

(Fla. 5th DCA 1994). Therefore, as provided in section 95.11(2)(b) Florida Statutes (1995) the proper limitations

Leasco Response, Inc. v. John Wright

99 F.3d 381, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29335, 1996 WL 616676

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 12, 1996 | Docket: 1059707

Cited 9 times | Published

relevant section of the Florida Code, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11, provides: Actions other than for recovery

Mangoni v. Temkin

679 So. 2d 1286, 1996 WL 539832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 1996 | Docket: 1666010

Cited 9 times | Published

barred by the four year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1993). Appellants filed their

Brumby v. Brumby

647 So. 2d 330, 1994 WL 706271

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1994 | Docket: 583509

Cited 9 times | Published

Furthermore, the courts have recognized that while section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1993), allows laches to

Epic Metals Corp. v. Condec, Inc.

867 F. Supp. 1009, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19417, 1994 WL 652503

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1994 | Docket: 1017324

Cited 9 times | Published

specific categories provided in Florida Statute § 95.11, the four year all inclusive statute of limitations

Pinnacle Port Community Association, Inc. v. Charles Orenstein

952 F.2d 375, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 1071

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 30, 1992 | Docket: 1007702

Cited 9 times | Published

construction of an improvement...." Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3)(c) (West 1979) (emphasis added). When reenacting

KRC Enterprises, Inc. v. Soderquist

553 So. 2d 760, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2905, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7048, 1989 WL 151468

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1989 | Docket: 1258344

Cited 9 times | Published

acceleration under the note, and pursuant to section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1987), any action after April

Puchner v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc.

553 So. 2d 216, 1989 WL 133280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1989 | Docket: 976327

Cited 9 times | Published

barred by the statute of repose. Similarly, section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), bars Puchner's

Corkery v. SuperX Drugs Corp.

602 F. Supp. 42, 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1815

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 1985 | Docket: 1200757

Cited 9 times | Published

discrimination); § 95.11(4)(c) (two years for action to recover lost wages); § 95.11(3)(f) (four years

Phillips v. Mease Hosp. and Clinic

445 So. 2d 1058, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11707

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1984 | Docket: 1685609

Cited 9 times | Published

Florida Patients Compensation Fund, pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). The summary

Cobb v. Maldonado

451 So. 2d 482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1984 | Docket: 1483152

Cited 9 times | Published

discovered in August, 1980, within four years. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975) provides in part:

Nolen v. Sarasohn

379 So. 2d 161

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 1980 | Docket: 1681348

Cited 9 times | Published

beyond the two-year time limit prescribed in Section 95.11, Florida Statutes. After hearing argument of

Harris v. Aberdeen Property Owners Ass'n

135 So. 3d 365, 2014 WL 223072, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 588

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 22, 2014 | Docket: 60239588

Cited 8 times | Published

five-year limitations period applied under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010), that the cause

Joseph v. University Behavioral LLC

71 So. 3d 913, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15862, 2011 WL 5108524

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 2011 | Docket: 60303168

Cited 8 times | Published

there*917fore is barred pursuant to Florida Statutes § 95.11.” UBC also alleged: “[UBC] asserts that this Court

Estate of Rotell Ex Rel. Rotell v. Kuehnle

38 So. 3d 783, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7735, 2010 WL 2178581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 2010 | Docket: 2409449

Cited 8 times | Published

negligence). . "A profession, within the meaning of section 95.11, is ‘any vocation requiring at a minimum a four-year

Sims v. NEW FALLS CORP.

37 So. 3d 358, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7302, 2010 WL 2077145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2010 | Docket: 1239327

Cited 8 times | Published

limitations applies, this suit is time-barred. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007) (providing a five-year

Medical Jet v. Signature Flight Support

941 So. 2d 576, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19135, 2006 WL 3300342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2006 | Docket: 431650

Cited 8 times | Published

that the five-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), barred the cause

American Bankers Life Assur. v. 2275 West

905 So. 2d 189, 2005 WL 765075

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2005 | Docket: 1711849

Cited 8 times | Published

discover. Id. The limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(c) does not affect the life of the lien or

Haskins v. City of Ft. Lauderdale

898 So. 2d 1120, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4371, 2005 WL 714049

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2005 | Docket: 1732215

Cited 8 times | Published

an action founded on negligence is four years. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2004). "As a general rule, a statute

Houck Corp. v. New River, Ltd., Pasco

900 So. 2d 601, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1314, 2005 WL 292210

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 2005 | Docket: 1514224

Cited 8 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2002). Houck asserts

Wishnatzki v. Coffman Const., Inc.

884 So. 2d 282, 2004 WL 1809875

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2004 | Docket: 1281901

Cited 8 times | Published

the four-year limitations period provided by section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), commenced to

Collections USA, Inc. v. City of Homestead

816 So. 2d 1225, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7394, 2002 WL 1062239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2002 | Docket: 752422

Cited 8 times | Published

suit was barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2001).[2] The lower

Sussman v. First Financial Title Co.

793 So. 2d 1066, 2001 WL 864179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2001 | Docket: 1677863

Cited 8 times | Published

limitations on ordinary negligence is four years. See § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1997). Appellee argues that since

Cisko v. Phoenix Medical Products, Inc.

797 So. 2d 11, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10625, 2001 WL 844675

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2001 | Docket: 1714827

Cited 8 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations was four years. § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Heekin v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc.

789 So. 2d 355, 2001 WL 513893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2001 | Docket: 1696140

Cited 8 times | Published

not specifically named in any subsection of section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1999). Therefore, the statute

HOSP. CONSTRUCTORS LTD. EX REL. LIFEMARK HOSPITALS OF FLORIDA, INC. v. Lefor

749 So. 2d 546, 2000 WL 6061

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2000 | Docket: 1690324

Cited 8 times | Published

founded on a written instrument is four years. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (1990). When an action is based

Department of Revenue v. Nemeth

733 So. 2d 970, 1999 WL 189822

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1999 | Docket: 1187992

Cited 8 times | Published

dealing with Florida's statute of limitations, section 95.11, in reaching our decision, we cited approvingly

Pontier v. City of Clearwater, Fla.

881 F. Supp. 1565, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5000, 1995 WL 224783

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 1995 | Docket: 845747

Cited 8 times | Published

1480, 1481 (11th Cir.1988); see Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3). Plaintiff filed this action four (4) years

McRae v. Douglas

644 So. 2d 1368, 1994 WL 531272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1994 | Docket: 1672155

Cited 8 times | Published

the two year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes concerning actions to

McRae v. Douglas

644 So. 2d 1368, 1994 WL 531272

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1994 | Docket: 1672155

Cited 8 times | Published

the two year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes concerning actions to

ROGER ZITRIN, MD, PA v. Glaser

621 So. 2d 748, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6910, 1993 WL 230141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1993 | Docket: 2517491

Cited 8 times | Published

two year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991). We reverse and

Wilder v. Meyer

779 F. Supp. 164, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17796, 1991 WL 259869

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1991 | Docket: 2180895

Cited 8 times | Published

Blue Sky Law claims is § 95.11(4)(e). Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(e). Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(e) requires a two prong

Public Health Trust v. Menendez

584 So. 2d 567, 1991 WL 155129

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1991 | Docket: 1515218

Cited 8 times | Published

the four-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980), barred

Public Health Trust v. Menendez

584 So. 2d 567, 1991 WL 155129

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1991 | Docket: 1515218

Cited 8 times | Published

the four-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980), barred

Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

548 So. 2d 231, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 415, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 826, 1989 WL 101543

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 1989 | Docket: 1699053

Cited 8 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1983), or the four-year

FLA. PATIENT'S COMP. FUND v. Sitomer

524 So. 2d 671

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 1988 | Docket: 1422282

Cited 8 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), and 2) in giving

Dubin v. Dow Corning Corp.

478 So. 2d 71, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2294

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1985 | Docket: 153707

Cited 8 times | Published

construction of an improvement to real property. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1981). On appeal, Dubin argues

Rebich v. BURDINE'S & LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO.

417 So. 2d 284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 16, 1982 | Docket: 1721903

Cited 8 times | Published

limitations for breach of contract contained in Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes, and are thus timely

Moorey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc.

338 So. 2d 558

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1976 | Docket: 1511857

Cited 8 times | Published

limitations on a wrongful death action is two years. Section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes. Where the last day

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Hiott

129 So. 3d 473, 2014 WL 88031, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 100

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 2014 | Docket: 60237416

Cited 7 times | Published

Reynolds argued that an action for fraud under section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, must be brought “within

Aprigliano v. American Honda Motor Co.

979 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 2013 WL 5788771, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154539

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2013 | Docket: 65995102

Cited 7 times | Published

founded on a written instrument....” Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b). Here, the express limited warranties were

Banks v. Lardin

938 So. 2d 571, 2006 WL 2683275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2006 | Docket: 2424916

Cited 7 times | Published

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2005). The trial court

Williams v. ALBERTSON'S INC.

879 So. 2d 657, 2004 WL 1750135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2004 | Docket: 463851

Cited 7 times | Published

Systems, Inc., 871 So.2d 283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes, requires an action

Holiday Furniture Factory Out. Corp. v. State Dept. of Corrections

852 So. 2d 926, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12528, 2003 WL 21980487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 21, 2003 | Docket: 1711073

Cited 7 times | Published

for actions alleging breach of contract under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995). We disagree

Muka v. Horizon Financial Corp.

766 So. 2d 239, 2000 WL 121792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 2, 2000 | Docket: 1697810

Cited 7 times | Published

that registration in Florida is barred under section 95.11(2)(a) which requires that an action "on a judgment

Morsani v. Major League Baseball

739 So. 2d 610, 1999 WL 172627

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1999 | Docket: 1293964

Cited 7 times | Published

plaintiffs had a four-year limitation under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1993), to file their

Jelenc v. Draper

678 So. 2d 917, 1996 WL 491723

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1996 | Docket: 1470833

Cited 7 times | Published

limitations for professional malpractice. Pursuant to § 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), an action for professional

Stone v. Rosenthal

665 So. 2d 276, 1995 WL 689540

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1995 | Docket: 1705135

Cited 7 times | Published

February 4, 1993. She filed suit on June 3, 1993. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), provides in

Hawkins v. Barnes

661 So. 2d 1271, 1995 WL 627458

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 1995 | Docket: 532151

Cited 7 times | Published

was beyond the applicable limitation period. Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1987) provides that

Frew v. Poole and Kent Co.

654 So. 2d 272, 1995 WL 253636

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 1995 | Docket: 1303614

Cited 7 times | Published

four year period of limitations provided by section 95.11(3)(a) would have expired, plaintiff filed a

Davis v. MacEdonia Housing Authority

641 So. 2d 131, 1994 WL 284111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1994 | Docket: 1648423

Cited 7 times | Published

limitation periods") seems to refer the reader to section 95.11(3)(m), Florida Statutes, and accompanying text:

Lindsey v. HH RAULERSON JR. MEM. HOSP.

505 So. 2d 577, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 969

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1987 | Docket: 1745860

Cited 7 times | Published

upon application of the Statute of Limitations. § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1985). Dr. Manuel Garcia performed

Bay Park Towers Condo. v. Hj Ross & Assoc.

503 So. 2d 1333, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1987 | Docket: 1453135

Cited 7 times | Published

an action founded on negligence is four years. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). Thus, a new action by

Bay Park Towers Condo. v. Hj Ross & Assoc.

503 So. 2d 1333, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 733, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12030

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1987 | Docket: 1453135

Cited 7 times | Published

an action founded on negligence is four years. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). Thus, a new action by

Whack v. SEMINOLE MEMORIAL HOSP.

456 So. 2d 561, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2089, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15227

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 1984 | Docket: 2515752

Cited 7 times | Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitation, Section 95.11, Florida Statutes; (2) the complaint failed

Hudson v. Keene Corp.

445 So. 2d 1151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 1984 | Docket: 1685553

Cited 7 times | Published

period for a wrongful death action is two years, Section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes. Section 768.19 provides:

Ves Carpenter Contractors, Inc. v. City of Dania

422 So. 2d 342, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 22127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 1982 | Docket: 1479580

Cited 7 times | Published

laches as an affirmative defense and, under Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1981), the laches period

Firearms Import & Export Corp. v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.

458 F. Supp. 88, 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15409

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1978 | Docket: 1743364

Cited 7 times | Published

period provided by Florida statute. See F.S.A. § 95.11 (West Supp. 1978). Defendant LYKES argues that

Poulos v. Vordermeier

327 So. 2d 245

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1976 | Docket: 1716217

Cited 7 times | Published

Limitations is three years, the statute being Fla. Stat. 95.11(5) (d) (1973).[1] "95.11 Limitations upon

National Auto Service Centers, Inc. v. F/R 550, LLC

192 So. 3d 498, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4820, 2016 WL 1238265

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 30, 2016 | Docket: 3049198

Cited 6 times | Published

discovered or should have been discovered”); accord § 95.11(4)(a) (indicating that the time period for action

Technical Packaging, Inc. v. Hanchett

992 So. 2d 309, 2008 WL 4366038

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 2008 | Docket: 1723137

Cited 6 times | Published

Technical-UCB sales agreements were oral contracts. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2002) (providing that "[a] legal

SOUTH MOTOR CO. v. Doktorczyk

957 So. 2d 1215, 2007 WL 1217922

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2007 | Docket: 1679102

Cited 6 times | Published

persuaded to purchase a power train warranty. Section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1996), covers "[a]n

Burke v. Snyder

899 So. 2d 336, 2005 WL 475546

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2005 | Docket: 1705681

Cited 6 times | Published

Buchanan construed the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981); O'Shea interpreted

City of Hollywood v. Petrosino

864 So. 2d 1175, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 27, 2004 WL 32691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2004 | Docket: 1727639

Cited 6 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations is five years. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001); Williams v. Cordis Corp

Town of Oakland v. Mercer

851 So. 2d 266, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11727, 2003 WL 21766236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2003 | Docket: 1312964

Cited 6 times | Published

limitations for forfeiture proceedings found in section 95.11(3)(n), Florida Statutes (2002), meaningless

Doe v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY HOSP. AUTHORITY

816 So. 2d 262, 2002 WL 1022054

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2002 | Docket: 2523263

Cited 6 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993), *263 applied

Carlton v. Germany Hammock Groves

803 So. 2d 852, 2002 WL 4555

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2002 | Docket: 1785134

Cited 6 times | Published

found the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1997) was applicable

Marsh v. Patchett

788 So. 2d 353, 2001 WL 649643

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2001 | Docket: 1286722

Cited 6 times | Published

statute of limitations for a judgment is 20 years. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1980). Several months prior

Performing Arts Center Authority v. CLARK CONST. GROUP, INC.

789 So. 2d 392, 2001 WL 485419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2001 | Docket: 1696138

Cited 6 times | Published

period of limitations had expired in February 1999. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2000). Defendants contend that

Jones v. Law Firm of Hill and Ponton

141 F. Supp. 2d 1349, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5749, 2001 WL 468486

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2001 | Docket: 2339612

Cited 6 times | Published

personal injury claim against Ramada Inn. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(a). Jones may still be successful in settlement

Monahan v. Davis

781 So. 2d 436, 2001 WL 194890

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2001 | Docket: 1294080

Cited 6 times | Published

limitations for such intentional torts was found at section 95.11(3)(o).[1] Such causes of action were different

McLeod v. Barber

764 So. 2d 790, 2000 WL 1004642

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2000 | Docket: 470284

Cited 6 times | Published

Florida's four-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes (1997).[2] The defense

Hearndon v. Graham

710 So. 2d 87, 1998 WL 169753

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 14, 1998 | Docket: 2532162

Cited 6 times | Published

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1987). Hearndon argued

Bice v. METZ CONST. CO., INC.

699 So. 2d 745, 1997 WL 473851

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1997 | Docket: 1321577

Cited 6 times | Published

statute of limitations grounds. Pursuant to section 95.11(3)(a), *747 Florida Statutes (1991), the statute

Damiano v. McDaniel

689 So. 2d 1059, 1997 WL 109214

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 1997 | Docket: 2230139

Cited 6 times | Published

the statute of repose for medical malpractice. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989).[1] The Fourth District

Grossman v. Greenberg

619 So. 2d 406, 1993 WL 182692

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 1993 | Docket: 1381664

Cited 6 times | Published

brought ten years after the sales transaction, section 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes (1991), does not bar

Lloyd Ex Rel. Lloyd v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.

570 So. 2d 984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 18, 1990 | Docket: 1704379

Cited 6 times | Published

incident giving rise to the injury occurred. [2] See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1975); see also supra n. 1.

Mm v. Mps

556 So. 2d 1140, 1989 WL 149625

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1989 | Docket: 543022

Cited 6 times | Published

separate action. [2] Appellees maintain that section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1986), bars the action

Anderson v. Emro Marketing Co.

550 So. 2d 531, 1989 WL 124597

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1989 | Docket: 1718623

Cited 6 times | Published

was two days after the complaint was filed. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981).

Barnes Surgical Specialties, Inc. v. Bradshaw

549 So. 2d 1189, 1989 WL 119549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 1989 | Docket: 374522

Cited 6 times | Published

barred by the two year statute of limitations. § 95.11(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1987). The court found, however

Robinson v. Caulkins Indiantown Citrus Co.

701 F. Supp. 208, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13176, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 459, 1988 WL 125736

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1988 | Docket: 1042410

Cited 6 times | Published

F.2d 1312 (11th Cir.1983) (applying Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(c) limitations on actions to recover wages)

Robinson v. Caulkins Indiantown Citrus Co.

701 F. Supp. 208, 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13176, 49 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 459, 1988 WL 125736

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 1988 | Docket: 1042410

Cited 6 times | Published

F.2d 1312 (11th Cir.1983) (applying Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(c) limitations on actions to recover wages)

Fladd v. Fortune Ins. Co.

530 So. 2d 388, 1988 WL 82685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 1988 | Docket: 1267933

Cited 6 times | Published

the accident alleged in the amended complaint. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1981). On appeal, appellant

Nash v. Humana Sun Bay Community Hosp., Inc.

526 So. 2d 1036, 1988 WL 60470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1988 | Docket: 415651

Cited 6 times | Published

served within the time limits set forth in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1985). Clearly, the serving

Phlieger v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.

487 So. 2d 1096, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 743, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7060

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1986 | Docket: 1797245

Cited 6 times | Published

under circumstances constituting a felony. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1983) provides for limitations

George C. Huff v. George Earl Pharr

748 F.2d 1553, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 15802

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 19, 1984 | Docket: 223224

Cited 6 times | Published

domesticate foreign judgments had expired. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(2)(a) (West 1982). Plaintiff then unsuccessfully

Farzad v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.

443 So. 2d 373

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 30, 1983 | Docket: 1459050

Cited 6 times | Published

by the statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (1981), and laches,

Notar v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

438 So. 2d 531

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1983 | Docket: 2517437

Cited 6 times | Published

consideration. We reverse both orders. Under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), a suit founded

Owens v. FLORIDA PATIENT'S COMP. FUND

428 So. 2d 708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1983 | Docket: 1719922

Cited 6 times | Published

deceased died in May of 1976. Appellee pled the § 95.11(4)(b) statute of limitations as an affirmative

CATES EX REL. CATES v. Graham

427 So. 2d 290

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1983 | Docket: 1478080

Cited 6 times | Published

asserted that Plaintiffs' action was time barred by F.S. 95.11(4)(b) which provides that in medical malpractice

CASTLE CONST. CO. v. Huttig Sash & Door Co.

425 So. 2d 573

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 15, 1982 | Docket: 1181697

Cited 6 times | Published

did not establish that the four-year limit in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes, had run prior to Huttig's

City of Brooksville v. HERNANDO CTY.

424 So. 2d 846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1982 | Docket: 1708136

Cited 6 times | Published

defense of statute of limitations under Florida Statute 95.11 is *848 tolled by the continuing negotiations

Roberts v. Casey

413 So. 2d 1226

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1982 | Docket: 1702829

Cited 6 times | Published

625, 627-28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). NOTES [1] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), which was in

Walker v. Dunne

368 So. 2d 640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 16, 1979 | Docket: 2590251

Cited 6 times | Published

and that the two-year limitation period of Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975) barred her suit

Lomelo v. American Oil Company

256 So. 2d 9

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1971 | Docket: 1522696

Cited 6 times | Published

three year statute of limitations (F.S. 1969, section 95.11(5) (b), F.S.A.). Under their second point, the

Gilbert v. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania

219 So. 2d 84

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 18, 1969 | Docket: 1352204

Cited 6 times | Published

five year statute of limitations set forth in § 95.11(3) Fla. Stat., F.S.A. Appellee argues that since

Andreasen v. Progressive Express Insurance Co.

276 F. Supp. 3d 1317

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2017 | Docket: 64315962

Cited 5 times | Published

negligence count against her barred by Florida Statute § 95.11(3)(a)’s four-year statute of limitations. [ECF

Doe v. St. John's Episcopal Parish Day School, Inc.

997 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 87 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1296, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17982, 2014 WL 585767

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2014 | Docket: 65997455

Cited 5 times | Published

Id. The court did rely on Florida Statute section 95.11(7), since the plaintiffs action was based on

Soffer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

106 So. 3d 456, 2012 WL 5233477, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 18385

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2012 | Docket: 60228206

Cited 5 times | Published

bars only the right to enforce a cause of action. § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (2005). A remedy, on the other hand

Krause v. TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORP.

59 So. 3d 1085, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 54, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 330, 2011 WL 320989

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2011 | Docket: 2362241

Cited 5 times | Published

barred by the limitations period set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005).1 Petitioners

Germ v. St. Luke's Hosp. Ass'n

993 So. 2d 576, 2008 WL 4683288

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2008 | Docket: 2550270

Cited 5 times | Published

two arguments. First, the 1996 Amendment to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2006), applies to the

Todd v. Johnson

965 So. 2d 255, 2007 WL 2681877

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2007 | Docket: 446800

Cited 5 times | Published

statute of limitations [sic] beyond four years." See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2004).[1] We reverse. "Whether

Martin v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

951 So. 2d 84, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3670, 2007 WL 737576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2007 | Docket: 1280616

Cited 5 times | Published

nonetheless reached the correct result in light of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2006), which provides

Martin v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

951 So. 2d 84, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3670, 2007 WL 737576

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2007 | Docket: 1280616

Cited 5 times | Published

nonetheless reached the correct result in light of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2006), which provides

Berg v. Wagner

935 So. 2d 100, 2006 WL 2265412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 9, 2006 | Docket: 1671196

Cited 5 times | Published

subject to a four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(o), (p), Fla. Stat. (limitations periods for

Swafford v. Schweitzer

906 So. 2d 1194, 2005 WL 1681923

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2005 | Docket: 1775244

Cited 5 times | Published

on a claim for unjust enrichment is four years. § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (1999). Generally, the statute

NEW YORK STATE COM'R OF TAXATION v. Friona

902 So. 2d 864, 2005 WL 1109580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2005 | Docket: 1674999

Cited 5 times | Published

the "domestication" of the foreign judgment. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2002), provides a twenty-year

NEW YORK STATE COM'R OF TAXATION v. Friona

902 So. 2d 864, 2005 WL 1109580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 11, 2005 | Docket: 1674999

Cited 5 times | Published

the "domestication" of the foreign judgment. Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2002), provides a twenty-year

Lundstrom Realty Advisors, Inc. v. Schickedanz Bros.-Riviera Ltd.

856 So. 2d 1117, 2003 WL 22400487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2003 | Docket: 43189

Cited 5 times | Published

two-year limitations period under Florida Statutes section 95.11(4)(c)(action to recover wages) and the one-year

O'Shea v. Phillips

746 So. 2d 1105, 1999 WL 741115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 1999 | Docket: 1714974

Cited 5 times | Published

on medical malpractice claims contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). Chapter 766

Dinerstein v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

173 F.3d 826, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 7848

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 23, 1999 | Docket: 395223

Cited 5 times | Published

Stat. Ann. § 95.11(2)(b) (West 1999). The Florida Supreme Court has held that, under § 95.11(2)(b), a breach

Robinson v. Auto Owners Ins. Co.

718 So. 2d 1283, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12957, 1998 WL 719523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 16, 1998 | Docket: 466361

Cited 5 times | Published

preserve the insurer's subrogation rights. Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), imposes a four-year

Johns v. Richards

717 So. 2d 1103, 1998 WL 646681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 1998 | Docket: 1277336

Cited 5 times | Published

to support until after the child is an adult. § 95.11(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997)(action to determine paternity

Hernandez v. Amisub, Inc.

714 So. 2d 539, 1998 WL 329412

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1998 | Docket: 461519

Cited 5 times | Published

four-year medical malpractice statute of repose. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). This Court reversed,

Parham v. Balis

704 So. 2d 623, 1997 WL 716797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 1997 | Docket: 1354557

Cited 5 times | Published

barred by the statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989).[1] This statute

Hernandez v. Metro-Dade County

992 F. Supp. 1365, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21751, 1997 WL 833305

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 7, 1997 | Docket: 1018015

Cited 5 times | Published

claim against Officer Rodriguez, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3)(o) (West Supp.1997). [2] There is no need for

Sullivan v. Fulton County Adm'r

662 So. 2d 706, 1995 WL 540280

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1995 | Docket: 1282952

Cited 5 times | Published

fraudulent concealment is only included in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (extending the time

Spivey v. Trader

620 So. 2d 212, 1993 WL 182512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 2, 1993 | Docket: 1722735

Cited 5 times | Published

These facts are not disputed. LAW AND ANALYSIS Section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1991), governs actions

Tanner v. Hartog

593 So. 2d 249, 1992 WL 571

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1992 | Docket: 1508955

Cited 5 times | Published

complaint. They argued, among other points, that section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), the two year

Flanagan v. WAGNER, NUGENT

594 So. 2d 776, 1992 WL 266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 3, 1992 | Docket: 1485507

Cited 5 times | Published

period from four to two years, impacting on section 95.11(4)(g), and having no effect on the statutory

Harr v. HILLSBOROUGH COMMUNITY MH CTR.

591 So. 2d 1051, 1991 WL 275534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 1991 | Docket: 541391

Cited 5 times | Published

limitations against health care providers, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), began to run

Novitsky v. Hards

589 So. 2d 404, 1991 WL 234545

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 14, 1991 | Docket: 1730671

Cited 5 times | Published

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 95.11(4)(b), provides that: An action for medical

Martin v. Pafford

583 So. 2d 736, 1991 WL 138151

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 1991 | Docket: 1284158

Cited 5 times | Published

determination that suit was time-barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes. We affirm. In 1981

PENSACOLA EXEC. H. CONDO. ASS'N, INC. v. Baskerville-Donovan Engineers, Inc.

566 So. 2d 850, 1990 WL 126329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1990 | Docket: 548008

Cited 5 times | Published

that appellant's cause of action was barred by Section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the two-year professional

Menendez v. PUBLIC HEALTH TRUST OF DADE CTY.

566 So. 2d 279, 1990 WL 102683

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 1990 | Docket: 547322

Cited 5 times | Published

the four-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1980). The trial

Gray v. Greyhound Retirement and Disability Trust

730 F. Supp. 415, 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1400, 1989 WL 167617

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1990 | Docket: 1814464

Cited 5 times | Published

limitations period, it should adopt Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(c), which allows for a two-year limitations

Francese v. Tamarac Hosp. Corp.

504 So. 2d 546, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 915

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1987 | Docket: 453387

Cited 5 times | Published

be sued. REVERSED AND REMANDED. NOTES [1] Section 95.11(4)(b) of the Florida Statutes (1981). [2] Florida

Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.

458 So. 2d 1136

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 26, 1984 | Docket: 2521991

Cited 5 times | Published

four-year limitations period provided for in Section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes, it was not filed within

Fabal v. FLORIDA KEYS MEMORIAL HOSP.

452 So. 2d 946

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 1984 | Docket: 474546

Cited 5 times | Published

from June 28, 1978, is barred by Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(b)... It is, therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

Taddiken v. FLA. PATIENT'S COMP. FUND

449 So. 2d 956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 1984 | Docket: 1695848

Cited 5 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977) is not applicable

DIST. SCH. BD. OF DESOTO CTY. v. Safeco Ins. Co.

434 So. 2d 38, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 8, 1983 | Docket: 2580988

Cited 5 times | Published

legislature would have said so as it did in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1981), relating to

Dye v. Houston

421 So. 2d 701

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 9, 1982 | Docket: 1373245

Cited 5 times | Published

it was barred by the statute of limitations [Section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes] since it was not filed

Birnholz v. Steisel

394 So. 2d 523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1981 | Docket: 1315577

Cited 5 times | Published

agreement governed by a five-year limitations statute. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1975).[4] The other counts are

Birnholz v. Steisel

394 So. 2d 523

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 24, 1981 | Docket: 1315577

Cited 5 times | Published

agreement governed by a five-year limitations statute. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1975).[4] The other counts are

Tobin v. Dannheisser

372 So. 2d 970

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 22, 1979 | Docket: 44135

Cited 5 times | Published

malpractice was barred by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). We reverse.

Diamond v. ER Squibb and Sons, Inc.

366 So. 2d 1221

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 1979 | Docket: 1655609

Cited 5 times | Published

products liability and fraud under subsection (3) of § 95.11 must be begun within the period prescribed in this

Smith v. Hussey

363 So. 2d 1138

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1978 | Docket: 655997

Cited 5 times | Published

1972, and that the two-year limitation period of § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1975) barred his suit filed

Smith v. Metropolitan Dade County

338 So. 2d 878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1976 | Docket: 455474

Cited 5 times | Published

she is barred by the statute of limitations [Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1975)]. On September 30

DeLuca v. Mathews

297 So. 2d 854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1974 | Docket: 1510408

Cited 5 times | Published

the statute of limitations had expired, under § 95.11(6) of Florida Statutes. The trial court granted

Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Carr

297 So. 2d 598, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 6855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 11, 1974 | Docket: 451167

Cited 5 times | Published

upon instruments in writing and, therefore, F.S. § 95.11(3), F.S.A., the five-year statute of limitations

Herrero v. Black and Decker Manufacturing Company

275 So. 2d 54

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1973 | Docket: 1726750

Cited 5 times | Published

holiday. Although the limitation statute, F.S. § 95.11, F.S.A., is silent in this regard it makes sense

Dibble v. Jensen

129 So. 2d 162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 20, 1961 | Docket: 2160756

Cited 5 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of limitations, § 95.11, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. The defendant, Ruth Mark Jensen

Wester v. Rigdon

110 So. 2d 470

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 1959 | Docket: 1409889

Cited 5 times | Published

Jr., Associate Judge, concur. NOTES [1] F.S. § 95.11(1), F.S.A. [2] Carruthers v. Peninsular Life Insurance

HSBC Bank USA, National Ass'n ex rel. Registered Holders of Nomura Home Equity Home Loan, Inc. v. Estate of Petercen

227 So. 3d 640, 2017 WL 4280603

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 60278046

Cited 4 times | Published

brought within five years of the, default per section 95.11(2)(c)[, Fla. Stat.],” the court went on to say

Effs v. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, Inc.

197 So. 3d 1243, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12043, 2016 WL 4198129

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2016 | Docket: 4118363

Cited 4 times | Published

the applicable four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2005). Thereafter, Sony Pictures

Jane Doe v. Baptist Primary Care, Inc

177 So. 3d 669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2015 | Docket: 2991541

Cited 4 times | Published

to comply with the statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, and the pre-suit notice

West Brook Isles Partner's 1, LLC v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company

163 So. 3d 635, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027, 2015 WL 1874453

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 24, 2015 | Docket: 2652162

Cited 4 times | Published

2004 closing to sue Mr. Navaretta. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004) (two-year limitation for

Al-Hakim v. Big Lots Stores, Inc.

161 So. 3d 568, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17609, 2014 WL 5461973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2014 | Docket: 60247208

Cited 4 times | Published

to make the effect of the dismissal final. See § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2011) (providing a four-year statute

Desert Palace, Inc. v. Wiley

145 So. 3d 946, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13005, 2014 WL 4114482

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 22, 2014 | Docket: 60242785

Cited 4 times | Published

832 So.2d 213, 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Under section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, the statute of limitations

Crews v. Malara

123 So. 3d 144, 2013 WL 5584090, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16285

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2013 | Docket: 60234989

Cited 4 times | Published

would have been within the 30-day time limit of section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes; however, the date stamp

Cisko v. Diocese of Steubenville

123 So. 3d 83, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14151, 2013 WL 4734567

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 4, 2013 | Docket: 60235249

Cited 4 times | Published

statute of limitations barred the action. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006). The appellants argued

Xavier v. Leviev Boymelgreen Marquis Developers, LLC

117 So. 3d 773, 2012 WL 5869998, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2012 | Docket: 60232777

Cited 4 times | Published

statute of limitations for fraud is four years. § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2009). The four years, however

Brown v. Nationscredit Financial Services Corp.

32 So. 3d 661, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2911, 2010 WL 786246

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2010 | Docket: 1197034

Cited 4 times | Published

for a FDUTPA claim is four years pursuant to section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes, as it is based on a

Cohen v. Cooper

20 So. 3d 453, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16080, 2009 WL 3446369

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 28, 2009 | Docket: 1639923

Cited 4 times | Published

a medical malpractice claim is governed by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes. The section states

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Ex Rel. Board of Trustees v. West

21 So. 3d 96, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 15800, 2009 WL 3364925

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 21, 2009 | Docket: 1655966

Cited 4 times | Published

be filed within four years of the taking date. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat (2008); New Testament Baptist

Bruno v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC (In Re Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC)

410 B.R. 710, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 2287, 2009 WL 2581712

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 2009 | Docket: 64700

Cited 4 times | Published

Protection Act (Fla.Stat.Chap.517). Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e) states that claims based on any provision

Shands v. City of Marathon

999 So. 2d 718, 2008 WL 5412069

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2008 | Docket: 1514943

Cited 4 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (2007). We therefore

Fredrick v. NORTHERN PALM BEACH CTY. IMP.

971 So. 2d 974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 2, 2008 | Docket: 1446952

Cited 4 times | Published

barring the claims of the Homeowners here. Section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (2006) establishes a

Anderson v. Wagner

955 So. 2d 586, 2006 WL 4540506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2006 | Docket: 1659350

Cited 4 times | Published

limitations in medical negligence actions, section 95.11(4)(b) is two (2) years. The statute ran out

Cooper v. Florida Parole Commission

924 So. 2d 966, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 4991, 2006 WL 862965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2006 | Docket: 229189

Cited 4 times | Published

court properly denied the petition as untimely. § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal

Sarasota County v. CITY BANK OF CLEVELAND

902 So. 2d 233, 2005 WL 1125050

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 13, 2005 | Docket: 1256791

Cited 4 times | Published

Stat. (2001). We grant relief, holding that section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), has no application

Carter v. Winn-Dixie Store, Inc.

889 So. 2d 960, 2004 WL 2921786

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2004 | Docket: 1742685

Cited 4 times | Published

C.J. and WEBSTER, J., Concur. NOTES [1] See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). [2] See also Chaffin

Brown v. Ameri Star, Inc.

884 So. 2d 1065, 2004 WL 2309035

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2004 | Docket: 1281871

Cited 4 times | Published

the four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1998), Brown filed

Richey v. Modular Designs, Inc.

879 So. 2d 665, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 11703, 2004 WL 1773534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2004 | Docket: 1514429

Cited 4 times | Published

barred by two-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2000); that the cause

Florida Hosp. Waterman v. Stoll

855 So. 2d 271, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14924, 2003 WL 22259832

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2003 | Docket: 1752472

Cited 4 times | Published

for a medical malpractice action is two years. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. However, chapter 766 provides

POND APPLE PLACE III CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC. v. Russo

841 So. 2d 526, 2003 WL 470247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2003 | Docket: 1233669

Cited 4 times | Published

performance and was, therefore, time-barred by section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes. We disagree with the

Omar Ex Rel. Cannon v. Lindsey

243 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6580, 2003 WL 257552

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2003 | Docket: 2488653

Cited 4 times | Published

(11th Cir.1988) (stating that Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(3) provides for a four-year limitations period

Gundlah v. Moore

831 So. 2d 780, 2002 WL 31696736

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2002 | Docket: 1722861

Cited 4 times | Published

precludes the court from exercising jurisdiction. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2000); Fla. R.App. P. 9.100(c)

Hillsborough County Hosp. Auth. v. Coffaro

829 So. 2d 862, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 791, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 1946, 2002 WL 31190892

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2002 | Docket: 1733529

Cited 4 times | Published

Yarian, 755 So.2d 93 (Fla.2000): Pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), an action for

Cheves v. Department of Veterans Affairs

227 F. Supp. 2d 1237, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17840, 2002 WL 31103998

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2002 | Docket: 2393787

Cited 4 times | Published

for intentional torts is four years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11. At the April 24, 2002 hearing, the plaintiffs

Snyder v. Wernecke

813 So. 2d 213, 2002 WL 491855

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2002 | Docket: 1403077

Cited 4 times | Published

the four-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2000), which governs

Cuillo v. McCoy

810 So. 2d 1061, 2002 WL 423474

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1224105

Cited 4 times | Published

five-year statute of limitation set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), bars the enforcement

White v. City of Pompano Beach

813 So. 2d 1003, 2002 WL 429241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 2002 | Docket: 1402939

Cited 4 times | Published

to bring a civil action under this section. See § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. (1999); Joshua v. City of Gainesville

Garden Street Iron & Metal, Inc. v. Tanner

789 So. 2d 1148, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 9028, 2001 WL 725681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 2001 | Docket: 1326135

Cited 4 times | Published

limitations statute applicable to trespass actions. § 95.11(3)(g), Fla. Stat. (1995). But the record contained

Virginia Ins. Reciprocal v. Walker

765 So. 2d 229, 2000 WL 1049874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2000 | Docket: 428608

Cited 4 times | Published

requirements, we note that it is still contained in section 95.11, Florida Statutes, the general statute of limitations

Bardol v. Martin

763 So. 2d 1119, 1999 WL 1243870

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1999 | Docket: 1278234

Cited 4 times | Published

the father of a child born outside marriage. Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), provided that

Sartori v. Department of Revenue

714 So. 2d 1136, 1998 WL 396717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1998 | Docket: 205814

Cited 4 times | Published

subsequently found. (Emphasis added). See also § 95.11(3)(m), Fla. Stat. (1993)(providing that four-year

Kalway v. Singletary

708 So. 2d 267, 1998 WL 79065

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1998 | Docket: 1528252

Cited 4 times | Published

1995, which was denied as time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995). The district court

Abbott v. Friedsam

682 So. 2d 597, 1996 WL 612635

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 1996 | Docket: 1271388

Cited 4 times | Published

that the two-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1993), had run after

Willoughby v. Dowda and Fields, Chartered

643 So. 2d 1098, 1994 WL 391044

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 1994 | Docket: 1493663

Cited 4 times | Published

GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] § 95.11, Fla. Stat. (1993). [1] See Allie v. Ionata, 503

Ross v. Twenty-Four Collection, Inc.

617 So. 2d 428, 1993 WL 130559

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1993 | Docket: 2588018

Cited 4 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations for tort claims. Section 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (1989). These causes of action

Whigham v. SHANDS TEACHING HOSP.

613 So. 2d 110, 1993 WL 13463

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 1993 | Docket: 128465

Cited 4 times | Published

order dismissing appellants' suit as barred by section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989). Appellants contend

Sands v. Blando

575 So. 2d 1306, 1991 WL 7694

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1991 | Docket: 1731193

Cited 4 times | Published

appellant based upon the statute of limitations.[1] Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that the

Sheils v. Jack Eckerd Corp.

560 So. 2d 361, 1990 WL 52323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1990 | Docket: 1477633

Cited 4 times | Published

that appellants' cause of action was barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), the two-year

Sheils v. Jack Eckerd Corp.

560 So. 2d 361, 1990 WL 52323

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1990 | Docket: 1477633

Cited 4 times | Published

that appellants' cause of action was barred by section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), the two-year

Elliot v. Barrow

526 So. 2d 989, 1988 WL 55785

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1988 | Docket: 1273047

Cited 4 times | Published

arguing that the 2 year statute of limitations of § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. barred plaintiff's claim. Specifically

Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

516 So. 2d 1148, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 3, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11695, 1987 WL 3174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 24, 1987 | Docket: 1677894

Cited 4 times | Published

complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes. Under that section

Leenen Ex Rel. Leenen v. Ruttgers Ocean Beach Lodge, Ltd.

662 F. Supp. 240, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13980

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 1987 | Docket: 938441

Cited 4 times | Published

barred by Florida's statute of limitations, Fla.Stat. 95.11(3)(a), which provides that an action founded

Wood v. Hunter

504 So. 2d 553, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 971

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1987 | Docket: 453434

Cited 4 times | Published

claim was barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2), Florida Statutes. The master's report was

Otis Elevator Co. v. Scott

503 So. 2d 941, 110 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 56,013

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1987 | Docket: 1453914

Cited 4 times | Published

that the applicable statute of limitations is Section 95.11(4)(c) Florida Statutes (1979), which provides

Black v. Nesmith

475 So. 2d 963, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2092

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 10, 1985 | Docket: 1301814

Cited 4 times | Published

1220 (Fla. 1979), the trial court ruled that Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), providing for

Colon v. Celotex Corp.

465 So. 2d 1332, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 732

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 1985 | Docket: 1323670

Cited 4 times | Published

Under the Florida statute of limitations, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1983), a plaintiff has four

Jones v. Williams Steel Indus., Inc.

460 So. 2d 1004, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 23

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 1984 | Docket: 1765941

Cited 4 times | Published

of the judgment, which is twenty years under section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes.[1] Appellant argues that

Wilhelm v. Traynor

434 So. 2d 1011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1983 | Docket: 1693143

Cited 4 times | Published

suit that a lesion on his knee was cancerous. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1979). In March 1978, Wilhelm

Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Campbell

433 So. 2d 25, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 15, 1983 | Docket: 1425154

Cited 4 times | Published

invoking the five-year statute of limitations, Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1971). On April 25, 1979

Lake v. Martin Marietta Corp.

538 F. Supp. 725, 113 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2522, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13613

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 1982 | Docket: 2142660

Cited 4 times | Published

statute of *729 limitations found in Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(c). That statute (which was in effect in 1975)

Denes and Denes & Associates, Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.

396 So. 2d 760, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18973

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 1981 | Docket: 2552218

Cited 4 times | Published

equitable lien and to award equitable relief. § 95.11(5), Fla. Stat. (1975); Kimbrell v. Fink, 78 So

Johnson v. Szymanski

368 So. 2d 370

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 9, 1979 | Docket: 1723364

Cited 4 times | Published

argued that the two-year limitation period of § 95.11(6), Fla. Stat. (1973) expired in October 1975,

Gonzales v. Jacksonville General Hospital, Inc.

365 So. 2d 800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 22, 1978 | Docket: 1314670

Cited 4 times | Published

action to be barred by the statute of limitations, F.S. 95.11(6), Florida Statutes 1973. During the evening

Mosley v. State Ex Rel. Broward Cty.

363 So. 2d 172

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1978 | Docket: 461239

Cited 4 times | Published

limitations for forfeiture proceedings is four years. Section 95.11(3)(n) Florida Statutes (1975). Sections 943

Metropolitan Dade County v. Peterson

311 So. 2d 119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 1975 | Docket: 1168484

Cited 4 times | Published

payment of wages is one year. See, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(7)(b), F.S.A. It is our inclination to agree with

Codding v. Phillips

296 So. 2d 554

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 1974 | Docket: 1617069

Cited 4 times | Published

ground that the statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(5)(d), F.S.A., pertaining to causes of action alleging

Tejera v. Lincoln Lending Services

271 So. 3d 97

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2019 | Docket: 14572880

Cited 3 times | Published

to a four-year statute of limitations (see section 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2009)), when that four-year

Siegel v. Tower Hill Signature Insurance Co.

225 So. 3d 974, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 12424, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1891

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2017 | Docket: 6145452

Cited 3 times | Published

reversed, finding that under a prior version of § 95.11(2)(e), the statute of limitations did not begin

Donald Kipnis v. Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank, etc.

202 So. 3d 859, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2422

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2016 | Docket: 4485247

Cited 3 times | Published

Act); § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2013) (negligence); § 95.11(3)0’), Fla- Stat. (fraud); § 95.11(3)(p)

Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Sunderman

201 So. 3d 139, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16471

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 2015 | Docket: 3009676

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations for a foreclosure action set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Flori *140 da Statutes (2014)

Snow v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

156 So. 3d 538, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 406, 2015 WL 160326

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 2015 | Docket: 2624227

Cited 3 times | Published

relevant statute of limitations is provided in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2008). 2

BIEL REO, LLC v. Barefoot Cottages Development etc.

156 So. 3d 506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 2014 | Docket: 2614605

Cited 3 times | Published

under § 56.29. The debtor argued the UFTA and § 95.11(3)’s limitations periods barred proceedings supplementary

Arlene Donovan v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Company

147 So. 3d 566, 2014 WL 3189914, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2014 | Docket: 1153

Cited 3 times | Published

after the 2005 loss and was time-barred by section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2011), and that Donovan

Medical Data Systems, Inc. v. Coastal Insurance Group, Inc.

139 So. 3d 394, 2014 WL 2101238, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7632

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2014 | Docket: 60241089

Cited 3 times | Published

four years of when the cause of action accrued. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2009). “A cause of action accrues

Rizo v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.

133 So. 3d 1114, 2014 WL 464090, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1432

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 5, 2014 | Docket: 60238680

Cited 3 times | Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010).1 The pertinent

Kaan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

981 F. Supp. 2d 1271, 2013 WL 5944074, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 160288

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2013 | Docket: 65995367

Cited 3 times | Published

Singleton, 882 So.2d at 1008. See also Fl. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c) (setting a five year statute of limitation

Chau Kieu Nguyen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

709 F.3d 1342, 2013 WL 646410, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3780

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 884499

Cited 3 times | Published

213-14 (McKinney 2012), and Florida, Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (2012), barred her claims. 1 The District

Chau Kieu Nguyen v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

709 F.3d 1342, 2013 WL 646410, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3780

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 884499

Cited 3 times | Published

213-14 (McKinney 2012), and Florida, Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (2012), barred her claims. 1 The District

Woodburn v. Florida Department of Children & Family Services

854 F. Supp. 2d 1184, 2011 WL 7661425, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154858

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2011 | Docket: 65980458

Cited 3 times | Published

founded on statutory liability is four years. Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f) (2011). The limitations period is statutorily

City of Quincy v. Womack

60 So. 3d 1076, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2666, 2011 WL 714334

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 2, 2011 | Docket: 60300044

Cited 3 times | Published

filed within the limitations time allowed under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. But the City is calculating

Ultimate Makeover Salon & Spa, Inc. v. DiFrancesco

41 So. 3d 335, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 10586, 2010 WL 2882401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 2010 | Docket: 2530203

Cited 3 times | Published

on the two-year limit set for wage claims in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2007). The motion incorporated

Rayner v. AIRCRAFT SPRUCE-ADVANTAGE INC.

38 So. 3d 817, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8777, 2010 WL 2425958

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 2010 | Docket: 1658793

Cited 3 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations was August 18, 2005. § 95.11(3)(e), Fla. Stat. (2009). Shortly before this deadline

Auto-Owners Insurance v. Ace Electrical Service, Inc.

648 F. Supp. 2d 1371, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75367

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2009 | Docket: 345738

Cited 3 times | Published

and contractual causes of action. See, e.g., Fla. Stat. 95.11(4)(a) ("An action *1382 for professional malpractice

Villa Maria Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. South Broward Hospital District

8 So. 3d 1167, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2893, 2009 WL 928461

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 1156921

Cited 3 times | Published

malpractice against the hospital had run. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). In its answer brief,

BDI Const. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

995 So. 2d 576, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 15915, 2008 WL 4568075

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 2008 | Docket: 1286243

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations is the five-year period provided in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1999). Their dispute

In Re Biddiscombe Intern., LLC

392 B.R. 909

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2008 | Docket: 1467586

Cited 3 times | Published

the same subject matters at equity. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (2007). The statute of limitations for a legal

In Re Biddiscombe Intern., LLC

392 B.R. 909

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2008 | Docket: 1467586

Cited 3 times | Published

the same subject matters at equity. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(6) (2007). The statute of limitations for a legal

Poux v. State

985 So. 2d 1191, 2008 WL 2663496

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2008 | Docket: 37162

Cited 3 times | Published

motion. We can discern no reason not to apply section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, mandating a four year

Thomas v. Lopez

982 So. 2d 64, 2008 WL 1752207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2008 | Docket: 1204492

Cited 3 times | Published

found in chapter 766, Florida Statutes.[2] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, establishing a two-year

Thomas v. Lopez

982 So. 2d 64, 2008 WL 1752207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2008 | Docket: 1204492

Cited 3 times | Published

found in chapter 766, Florida Statutes.[2] Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, establishing a two-year

Haigh v. Planning Bd. of Town of Medfield

940 So. 2d 1230, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18452, 2006 WL 3102275

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 2006 | Docket: 1523997

Cited 3 times | Published

noting that the five year limitations period in section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes, "applies only to independent

Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Law Fabrication, LLC

459 F. Supp. 2d 1236, 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3171, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36445, 2006 WL 1895476

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 2006 | Docket: 2481221

Cited 3 times | Published

judicial suits to compel arbitration pursuant to Fla. Stat. 95.11(5)(a), in lieu of borrowing the sixmonth statute

Walters v. Ocean Gate Phase I Condominium

925 So. 2d 440, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 5070, 2006 WL 888093

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2006 | Docket: 1517007

Cited 3 times | Published

one-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2004). Generally, the

Aristide v. JACKSON MEMORIAL HOSP.

917 So. 2d 253, 2005 WL 3409690

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2005 | Docket: 1509416

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations applicable to this case is set forth in section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes: (b) An action for medical

Maggio v. Department of Labor and Employment Security

910 So. 2d 876, 2005 WL 1875486

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2005 | Docket: 1494970

Cited 3 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2002). According to

Donald R. Buse v. Robert J. Kuechenbert

325 F.3d 1249, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 5922, 2003 WL 1563731

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 27, 2003 | Docket: 212877

Cited 3 times | Published

must be brought within five years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). Since Buse registered his judgment

Brown v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc.

212 F.R.D. 602, 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6023, 2003 WL 164523

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 15, 2003 | Docket: 66018018

Cited 3 times | Published

Plaintiffs’ RISA claims is four years. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(f) (2002). Thus, for class-wide RISA claims, the

Bearse v. Main Street Investments

220 F. Supp. 2d 1338, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17802, 2002 WL 31103989

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 3, 2002 | Docket: 2397505

Cited 3 times | Published

years from the accrual of the cause of action. Fla. Stat. 95.11(j). According to the Florida courts, Florida's

Mosher v. Anderson

817 So. 2d 812, 2002 WL 716163

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2002 | Docket: 1728254

Cited 3 times | Published

contain repayment terms or is payable on demand. Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2001), mandates that

Glucksman v. PERSOL NORTH AMERICA, INC.

813 So. 2d 122, 2002 WL 272295

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2002 | Docket: 1725749

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations governing legal malpractice actions is section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). See Peat, Marwick

Gilbride, Heller & Brown, PA v. Watkins

783 So. 2d 224, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 173, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 606, 2001 WL 277992

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2001 | Docket: 1259335

Cited 3 times | Published

THE TWO-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS PERIOD OF SECTION 95.11(4)(a), FLORIDA STATUTES, BEGIN TO RUN FROM THE

King Ex Rel. Murray v. Rojas

767 So. 2d 510, 2000 WL 827065

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2000 | Docket: 1661612

Cited 3 times | Published

with the text of the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(4)(b) provides: "An action for medical malpractice

State, Dept. of Transp. v. Echeverri

736 So. 2d 791, 1999 WL 492601

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 1999 | Docket: 1445151

Cited 3 times | Published

barred by the statute of repose contained in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995). It provides:

Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Alley

728 So. 2d 272, 1999 WL 43516

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1999 | Docket: 562656

Cited 3 times | Published

found in section 95.11(4)(d) applies." 487 So.2d at 1097. Nissan concedes that it is section 95.11(4)(d)

Sabal Chase Homeowners v. Disney World

726 So. 2d 796, 1999 WL 9784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1999 | Docket: 1307248

Cited 3 times | Published

appellees because the statute of repose in Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), barred the cause

Sabal Chase Homeowners v. Disney World

726 So. 2d 796, 1999 WL 9784

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 13, 1999 | Docket: 1307248

Cited 3 times | Published

appellees because the statute of repose in Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1995), barred the cause

Ramsey v. Jonassen

698 So. 2d 581, 1997 WL 423435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1997 | Docket: 434011

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations period for professional malpractice. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Because we reverse Ramsey's

Hager v. Venice Hospital, Inc.

944 F. Supp. 1530, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16682, 1996 WL 650933

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1996 | Docket: 970429

Cited 3 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations provided in Section 95.11(4)(g), Fla.Stat. (1995). The elements that a

Schrank v. Pearlman

683 So. 2d 559, 1996 WL 603645

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 23, 1996 | Docket: 2525557

Cited 3 times | Published

or liability founded on a written instrument." § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989). They reason that the

Hernandez v. AMISUB (AMERICAN HOSP.)

659 So. 2d 1316, 1995 WL 521109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 1995 | Docket: 1748215

Cited 3 times | Published

statute of repose found in Florida Statutes, Section 95.11(4)(b). The trial court granted A.M.I.'s motion

Doe v. Young

656 So. 2d 569, 1995 WL 358085

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1995 | Docket: 1283617

Cited 3 times | Published

outside the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), as opposed

Mason v. Salinas

643 So. 2d 1077, 1994 WL 570625

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1994 | Docket: 398671

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations period for this cause of action. Section 95.11(3)(o) and (p), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1974)

Sarasota County v. Ex

645 So. 2d 7, 1994 WL 397617

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 3, 1994 | Docket: 1654521

Cited 3 times | Published

by a four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1991). The Exes contend

Caprio v. American Airlines, Inc.

848 F. Supp. 1528, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4852, 1994 WL 136327

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1994 | Docket: 1338443

Cited 3 times | Published

intentional torts is four years. See Fla.Stat. § 95.11(3) (1993). Plaintiff filed the instant action with

Allen v. Orlando Regional Medical Center

606 So. 2d 665, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 9889, 1992 WL 228916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 18, 1992 | Docket: 129735

Cited 3 times | Published

served within the time limits set forth in Section 95.11. However, during the 90 day period, the statute

Williams v. Johnson

584 So. 2d 90, 1991 WL 134866

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 1991 | Docket: 1515192

Cited 3 times | Published

limitations to which the court referred was section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1953) which provided that

National Fire Ins. Co. v. LJ Clark Const. Co., Inc.

579 So. 2d 743, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 2967, 1991 WL 44982

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 1991 | Docket: 1728612

Cited 3 times | Published

subject to the five year limitation period in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1990 Supp.). School

Meir v. KIRK, PINKERTON, McCLELLAND, SAVARY & CARR, PA

561 So. 2d 399, 1990 WL 60902

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 1990 | Docket: 1480926

Cited 3 times | Published

trial court that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1974), is not

Williams v. Shuler

551 So. 2d 585, 1989 WL 132570

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 1, 1989 | Docket: 527699

Cited 3 times | Published

twenty-year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (1987). The wife argues

Lane v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

540 So. 2d 922, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 840, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1712, 1989 WL 30790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1989 | Docket: 1294313

Cited 3 times | Published

is discovered or should have been discovered. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985).

Lane v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.

540 So. 2d 922, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 840, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1712, 1989 WL 30790

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 4, 1989 | Docket: 1294313

Cited 3 times | Published

is discovered or should have been discovered. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985).

Wallis v. Grumman Corp.

515 So. 2d 1276, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 590, 1987 Fla. LEXIS 2541, 1987 WL 2366

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1987 | Docket: 1749316

Cited 3 times | Published

sale of personal property" as set forth in section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes (1985). We reject this

Assoc. Coca Cola v. Spec. Disability Tr.

508 So. 2d 1305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 1987 | Docket: 1648798

Cited 3 times | Published

within the four-year limitations period of section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1985). We conclude

Boyd v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith

611 F. Supp. 218, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18788

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1985 | Docket: 1831315

Cited 3 times | Published

the two year limitations period contained in section 95.11(4)(e) of the Florida Investor Protection Act

SCHOOL BD. OF VOLUSIA v. Fidelity Co. of Md.

468 So. 2d 431, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1082, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14133, 25 Educ. L. Rep. 721

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1985 | Docket: 1402754

Cited 3 times | Published

supplier, the architect and other defendants, § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1983),[1] it is well established

Rahn v. AMP INC.

447 So. 2d 929

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 1984 | Docket: 1691197

Cited 3 times | Published

upon the date of the death of the deceased. Section 95.11(4)(d) Florida Statutes (1977); Walker v. Beech

Carlton v. Ridings

422 So. 2d 1067

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1982 | Docket: 1739871

Cited 3 times | Published

claim for medical malpractice is barred by Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). We affirm. On

Jones v. Rainey

386 So. 2d 1319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 1980 | Docket: 194074

Cited 3 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations was twenty years. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (1959). As part of a general revision

City of St. Petersburg v. Norris

335 So. 2d 333

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1976 | Docket: 1306354

Cited 3 times | Published

2d 876. The applicable statute here, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(7)(b), (1973), states that: ... [a]ctions other

Westinghouse Credit Corp. v. GRANDOFF INVEST., INC.

297 So. 2d 104

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1974 | Docket: 1510384

Cited 3 times | Published

that the applicable statute of limitations, Section 95.11(5)(e), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.,[1] has run

Grant v. Citizens Bank, N.A.

263 So. 3d 156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64702734

Cited 2 times | Published

written instrument," or "to foreclose a mortgage." § 95.11(2)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). In the context of

Grant v. Citizens Bank, N.A.

263 So. 3d 156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64702734

Cited 2 times | Published

written instrument," or "to foreclose a mortgage." § 95.11(2)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). In the context of

SOUTHERN SPECIALTIES, INC. v. FARMHOUSE TOMATOES, INC

259 So. 3d 869

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2018 | Docket: 8221306

Cited 2 times | Published

actions not founded on a written instrument. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. It also filed a counterclaim

Weeks v. Town of Palm Beach

252 So. 3d 258

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 64685932

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations for a defamation suit is two years. See § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2012) ; Wagner, Nugent, Johnson

AVELO MORTGAGE, LLC. v. VERO VENTURES, LLC. etc.

254 So. 3d 439

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2018 | Docket: 7292510

Cited 2 times | Published

the five-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014) has been clearly

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Health & Wellness Servs., Inc.

389 F. Supp. 3d 1137

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2018 | Docket: 64325239

Cited 2 times | Published

he maintains applies under Florida Statute section 95.11(3)(j) has long since run as to any of the claims

WHITNEY BANK, a Mississippi state v. Von Daniel Grant Jr., and Lisa D. Grant

223 So. 3d 476, 2017 WL 3360822, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11399

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2017 | Docket: 6133736

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida Statutes (2015). Because we conclude that section 95.11(5)(h) does not apply to the current cause of

Morrison v. Homewise Preferred Insurance Co.

209 So. 3d 682, 2017 WL 543427, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 1648

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2017 | Docket: 4586777

Cited 2 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations is found in section 95.11(5)(d), Florida Statutes (2011). The issue presented

Amato and Bouchard v. City of Miami Beach

208 So. 3d 235, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18048

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 7, 2016 | Docket: 4549400

Cited 2 times | Published

the statute of limitations is four years. See § 95.11(3) (a), (o), (p), Fla. Stat. (2010); Kelly v. Lodwick

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Burnette

177 So. 3d 1032, 2015 WL 6594312

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 2015 | Docket: 60251062

Cited 2 times | Published

applicable five-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(b), (c), Florida Statutes (2007), rendered

U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Bartram

140 So. 3d 1007, 2014 WL 1632138, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 6057

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 2014 | Docket: 60241334

Cited 2 times | Published

Singleton, 882 So.2d at 1008. See also Fl[a], Stat. § 95.11(2)(c) (setting a five year statute of limitation

Gren v. Gren

133 So. 3d 1066, 2014 WL 51640, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 175

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60238658

Cited 2 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations provided by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2011). Lastly, she

Homaday v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

994 F. Supp. 2d 1264, 2014 WL 260568, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10292

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 7, 2014 | Docket: 65997075

Cited 2 times | Published

years and runs from the date of death. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d); Fulton Cnty. Adm’r v. Sullivan, 753 So.2d

Goodwin v. Sphatt

114 So. 3d 1092, 2013 WL 2501984, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 9268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2013 | Docket: 60231746

Cited 2 times | Published

liability founded on a written instrument.” See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005). The statute of limitations

Estate of Eisen v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

126 So. 3d 323, 2013 WL 1442256, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2013 | Docket: 60236408

Cited 2 times | Published

the two-year *327statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes (2008). . As indicated

Magwood v. Tucker

98 So. 3d 725, 2012 WL 4760846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 2012 | Docket: 60312545

Cited 2 times | Published

within the thirty-day limitations period of section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, and noted appellant’s

Doe ex rel. Doe's Mother v. Sinrod

90 So. 3d 852, 2012 WL 1934498, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8744

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 2012 | Docket: 60309662

Cited 2 times | Published

her claims are not time-barred, pursuant to section 95.11(7), Florida Statutes, because her claims are

Kelly v. Balboa Insurance

897 F. Supp. 2d 1262, 2012 WL 4761905, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86463

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 29, 2012 | Docket: 65985496

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(e). Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(e) establishes a five (5) year

Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips

110 So. 3d 908, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 18182, 2011 WL 5555691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2011 | Docket: 60230516

Cited 2 times | Published

“actions” or “proceedings” for purposes of section 95.011, Florida Statutes (2005), we affirm. In doing

Rearick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

68 So. 3d 944, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 12910, 2011 WL 3586158

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2011 | Docket: 2356699

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida's four-year statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011), which would

Milan Investment Group, Inc. v. City of Miami

50 So. 3d 662, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18004, 2010 WL 4740293

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2010 | Docket: 60297331

Cited 2 times | Published

assertion that the four-year statute of limitations, § 95.11(3), applies to (and bars) Milan Investment’s challenges

Beyer v. CITY OF MARATHON

37 So. 3d 932, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8164, 2010 WL 2292118

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 9, 2010 | Docket: 1239634

Cited 2 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations imposed by section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. We reverse. We review

Harris v. State

30 So. 3d 674, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3809, 2010 WL 1049979

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 24, 2010 | Docket: 1431861

Cited 2 times | Published

apply [to a motion for return of property] section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, mandating a four year

Smith v. Florida Department of Corrections

27 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 546, 2010 WL 255984

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2010 | Docket: 1664367

Cited 2 times | Published

chapter 95 and the rules of civil procedure. Section 95.011 provides that a “civil action ... including

Sutton v. Monroe County

34 So. 3d 22, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20048, 2009 WL 4928219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 2009 | Docket: 1641526

Cited 2 times | Published

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2007). Sutton, the landowner

Lake Forest Master Community Ass'n v. Orlando Lake Forest Joint Venture

10 So. 3d 1187, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7464, 2009 WL 1639564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2009 | Docket: 1642515

Cited 2 times | Published

repose was reduced from fifteen to ten years. § 95.11(c)(3), Fla. Stat. (2008). Thus, if Association

McFall v. TRUBEY

992 So. 2d 867, 2008 WL 4482578

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 3, 2008 | Docket: 1723843

Cited 2 times | Published

statute of limitations applicable to such suits, § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2003). Accordingly, the court

Nicarry v. Eslinger

990 So. 2d 661, 2008 WL 4179476

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2008 | Docket: 2527668

Cited 2 times | Published

barred by the statute of limitations found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2004). We affirm. Nicarry

Maraj v. North Broward Hosp. Dist.

989 So. 2d 682, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11593, 2008 WL 2906956

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2008 | Docket: 2530321

Cited 2 times | Published

concluded that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2007), had run with

SALTPONDS CONDO. v. Walbridge Aldinger Co.

979 So. 2d 1240, 2008 WL 1883903

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2008 | Docket: 1714657

Cited 2 times | Published

(Fla. 3d DCA 1982), we stated in dicta that section 95.11(3)(c) of the Florida Statutes provided the "applicable

Sutton v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

975 So. 2d 1256, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3397, 2008 WL 649610

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2008 | Docket: 1727413

Cited 2 times | Published

covered by the one-year time limitation of section 95.11(5)(f), rather than rule 9.100(c)(2). We also

Head v. McNeil

975 So. 2d 583, 2008 WL 515029

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2008 | Docket: 1727162

Cited 2 times | Published

petition for writ of mandamus as untimely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2006). Appellant argues

Manicini Enterprises, Inc. v. American Express Co.

236 F.R.D. 695, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58975

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 31, 2006 | Docket: 66027516

Cited 2 times | Published

founded upon a written instrument. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(k). Thus, if the Court were to find that the

INTEGRATED BROADCAST SERVICES v. Mitchel

931 So. 2d 1073, 2006 WL 1816442

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 5, 2006 | Docket: 425944

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations for legal malpractice is two years, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2003). This suit for

RUSSO ASSOCIATES v. City of Dania Beach

920 So. 2d 716, 2006 WL 437388

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 2006 | Docket: 1440867

Cited 2 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations found within section 95.11(3)(p) has been held to govern inverse condemnation

Eastman v. State

883 So. 2d 889, 2004 WL 2191691

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2004 | Docket: 1718275

Cited 2 times | Published

defects: First, it was untimely pursuant to section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2003), which became the

American Home Assurance Co. v. APAC-FLA., INC.

834 So. 2d 369, 2003 WL 69549

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2003 | Docket: 2504341

Cited 2 times | Published

governed by the longer statute of limitations in section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1995). Although this result

Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. S.A.P.

835 So. 2d 1091, 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 980, 2002 Fla. LEXIS 2458

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 27, 2002 | Docket: 64820153

Cited 2 times | Published

Additionally, since neither section 768.28 nor section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes abrogates these equitable

Beach Higher Power Corp. v. Rekant

832 So. 2d 831, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16878, 2002 WL 31519797

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 13, 2002 | Docket: 1335740

Cited 2 times | Published

limitations for professional malpractice contained in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2001).[1] We reverse

Lane v. Health Options, Inc.

221 F. Supp. 2d 1301, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17998, 2002 WL 31096748

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2002 | Docket: 2353823

Cited 2 times | Published

failure to provide pre-suit notice and Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(b). The Honorable Leroy Moe, state circuit court

Ortiz v. Moore

776 So. 2d 333, 2001 WL 50479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2001 | Docket: 421945

Cited 2 times | Published

days of rendition of that order. Similarly, section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, requires that a court

Myklejord v. Morris

766 So. 2d 1160, 2000 WL 1228028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 31, 2000 | Docket: 1697744

Cited 2 times | Published

from suing appellees. The pertinent statute is section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993): An action for

In Re Conrad

252 B.R. 559, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 334, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 980, 2000 WL 1251898

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 26, 2000 | Docket: 1429193

Cited 2 times | Published

the California Final Judgment is barred by Fla. Stat. 95.11, the applicable statute of limitations of

Watkins v. GILBRIDE HELLER & BROWN, PA

754 So. 2d 759, 2000 WL 256327

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 8, 2000 | Docket: 431087

Cited 2 times | Published

is not time barred. Our analysis starts with section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), which provides

Coffaro v. HILLSBOROUGH CTY. HOSP. AUTH.

752 So. 2d 712, 2000 WL 216713

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 2000 | Docket: 1280268

Cited 2 times | Published

Supreme Court as one of great public importance. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), provides a two-year

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Solomon

996 F. Supp. 1473, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3318, 1998 WL 125814

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 1405982

Cited 2 times | Published

breach of written instruments. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b)(1989). Since Defendant was a Florida resident

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Solomon

996 F. Supp. 1473, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3318, 1998 WL 125814

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 1998 | Docket: 1405982

Cited 2 times | Published

breach of written instruments. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b)(1989). Since Defendant was a Florida resident

Singletary v. Van Meter

708 So. 2d 266, 1998 WL 79686

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 1998 | Docket: 1528210

Cited 2 times | Published

1996), wherein the district court declared section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), invalid. We have

Jaisinghani v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.

973 F. Supp. 1450, 25 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1888, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5745, 1997 WL 405929

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 1997 | Docket: 1229498

Cited 2 times | Published

allowing his claims to proceed. See Fl.Stat. § 95.11(4)(g). The Court heard oral argument on this issue

Murphy v. Tucker

689 So. 2d 1164, 1997 WL 90840

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1997 | Docket: 1477449

Cited 2 times | Published

court did not err in applying the provisions of section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1995), to the facts of

Van Meter v. Singletary

682 So. 2d 1162, 1996 WL 625398

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1996 | Docket: 1276519

Cited 2 times | Published

a disciplinary infraction. We conclude that section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), which the trial

SOUTHWEST FLA. RETIREMENT CTR., INC. v. Fed. Ins. Co.

682 So. 2d 1130

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1996 | Docket: 1276343

Cited 2 times | Published

forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). All parties agree that section 95.11(2)(b), pertaining

Nealon v. RIGHT HUMAN RESOURCE CONSUL.

669 So. 2d 1120, 1996 WL 120338

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 20, 1996 | Docket: 1526154

Cited 2 times | Published

recovery of unpaid wages or overtime contained in section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statute (1993). At issue here

Higgs v. Florida Dept. of Corrections

654 So. 2d 624, 1995 WL 258900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 5, 1995 | Docket: 1710399

Cited 2 times | Published

occurrence out of which the cause of action accrued. § 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993).[1] There has been

Mason v. Bisogno

633 So. 2d 464, 1994 WL 28838

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 4, 1994 | Docket: 1708111

Cited 2 times | Published

the two year statute of limitations expired. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1991).[1] The effect of the

J.B. And J.W.B., Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, S.B. And E.B. And M.B. Individually v. Sacred Heart Hospital of Pensacola

996 F.2d 276, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 19190

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 27, 1993 | Docket: 372177

Cited 2 times | Published

medical malpractice actions set forth in Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(b). On December 17, 1991, the U.S. District

Seawatch at Marathon Condo. Ass'n v. CHARLEY TOPPINO AND SONS, INC.

610 So. 2d 470, 1992 WL 318499

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1992 | Docket: 1734786

Cited 2 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations period in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1991);[2] or (2) that

Robinson v. Caulkins Indiantown Citrus Co.

771 F. Supp. 1205, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12688, 1991 WL 179747

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 1991 | Docket: 1245306

Cited 2 times | Published

filing of their complaint. See Florida Statutes § 95.11(3)(o) (1989). Though the general principle is that

USX Corp. v. Schilbe

535 So. 2d 719, 1989 WL 191

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 1989 | Docket: 2573062

Cited 2 times | Published

action to foreclose a mortgage is controlled by section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1987), and the duration

Fuller v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

677 F. Supp. 1131, 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12721, 1987 WL 35077

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1987 | Docket: 66653378

Cited 2 times | Published

Specifically, the issue is one of preemption. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), establishes

Dade County v. Rohr Industries, Inc.

826 F.2d 983, 4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 770

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 8, 1987 | Docket: 66227983

Cited 2 times | Published

Fla.Stat. § 672.2-725 or alternatively Fla.Stat. § 95.-11(2)(b) should apply to this case.5 Section 672

Velzy v. Estate of Miller

502 So. 2d 1297, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 590

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 20, 1987 | Docket: 1181224

Cited 2 times | Published

barred by the general statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(i) and (j), Florida Statutes (1983); and

PISUT BY PISUT v. Sichelman

455 So. 2d 620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 1984 | Docket: 1317195

Cited 2 times | Published

decision regarding the constitutionality of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977).[1] On October

Hilsenroth v. Kessler

446 So. 2d 147

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1984 | Docket: 1780276

Cited 2 times | Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1981). Nonetheless, it is an

Lipshaw v. PINOSKY, PINOSKY, PA

442 So. 2d 992

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 8, 1983 | Docket: 1515934

Cited 2 times | Published

of limitations for medical malpractice actions. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1979). We affirm in part and

Engle v. Acopian

432 So. 2d 113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 1983 | Docket: 1265210

Cited 2 times | Published

statutory laches bars the action by the Acopians. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1981), provides: LACHES

Allie v. Ionata

417 So. 2d 1077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 4, 1982 | Docket: 1383583

Cited 2 times | Published

the four-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(l),[1] Florida Statutes, pertaining to rescission

Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Authority

537 F. Supp. 175, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17792

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1982 | Docket: 2177296

Cited 2 times | Published

Sections 95.11(3)(a), 95.11(4)(a) and 95.11(5)(a). Section 95.11(5)(a) speaks of a one year limitations period

Arnold v. Duval County School Board

549 F. Supp. 25, 7 Educ. L. Rep. 286, 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17714

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 1981 | Docket: 1716600

Cited 2 times | Published

two-year statute of limitations found in Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(c) (1979) ("action[s] to recover wages or overtime

Lustig v. McCormick

358 So. 2d 844

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 2, 1978 | Docket: 1691022

Cited 2 times | Published

shorten the general statute of limitations, Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1975). The trial court's

Enfield v. Held

357 So. 2d 772

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1978 | Docket: 453689

Cited 2 times | Published

233, 1st DCA, Opinion filed April 5, 1978. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975) provides a two

Lewis v. ASSOCIATED MED. INSTITUTIONS, INC.

345 So. 2d 852, 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 965

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 1977 | Docket: 1478065

Cited 2 times | Published

applied the three year statute of limitations, Section 95.11(5)(e), Florida Statutes (1973), rather than

MOUNT SINAI HOSP. OF GR. MIAMI, INC. v. Cordis Corp.

285 So. 2d 645, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6409

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 30, 1973 | Docket: 2544080

Cited 2 times | Published

claim to be barred by the statute of limitations, F.S. 95.11, F.S.A.[1] Appellant contends (1) the trial court's

Crummer Co. v. Du Pont

117 F. Supp. 870, 1954 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4633

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 14, 1954 | Docket: 66001317

Cited 2 times | Published

Florida three-year statute of limitations, F.S.A. § 95.11(5) (a), is applicable. This section reads as follows:

Broz v. Reece

272 So. 3d 512

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 10, 2019 | Docket: 14909101

Cited 1 times | Published

common ground that the applicable statute, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2007), specifies a

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC. v. TERESA NORTON & SAMUEL NORTON

267 So. 3d 478

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2019 | Docket: 14717611

Cited 1 times | Published

Nortons 1Until July 1, 2013, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes' five-year limitation

Connie L. Mielke and Blair C. Mielke v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc.

264 So. 3d 249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 10, 2019 | Docket: 8488328

Cited 1 times | Published

current complaint was time-barred pursuant to section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Deutsche Bank responded

Brown v. Poole

261 So. 3d 708

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2018 | Docket: 64700830

Cited 1 times | Published

four-year statute of limitations governs these claims. § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2015). This time did not begin

Hayes v. Reverse Mortgage Solutions

260 So. 3d 391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2018 | Docket: 8221184

Cited 1 times | Published

impression as to when the statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, begins to run for

HOME TITLE COMPANY OF MARYLAND, INC. v. MICHAEL J. LASALLA

257 So. 3d 640

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2018 | Docket: 8200208

Cited 1 times | Published

complaint was not filed until December 2013.1 See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2006); Goodwin v. Sphatt, 114

Gindel v. Centex Homes

267 So. 3d 403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 64709209

Cited 1 times | Published

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. KENNETH H. GRAYBUSH and ROBIN B. GRAYBUSH

253 So. 3d 1188

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 2018 | Docket: 7664435

Cited 1 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2017). As a result

Wells Fargo Bank v. Diz

253 So. 3d 705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 8, 2018 | Docket: 7619131

Cited 1 times | Published

under the applicable statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). There is no basis, in

CAN FINANCIAL, LLC v. DARYL R. KRAZMIEN

253 So. 3d 8

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7567957

Cited 1 times | Published

by the five year statute of limitations of section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2009); and a valid

TRILOK DESAI v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ETC.

240 So. 3d 729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 7, 2018 | Docket: 6326616

Cited 1 times | Published

not barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015); § 95.031, Fla. Stat.

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey

881 F.3d 876

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Feb 5, 2018 | Docket: 6292397

Cited 1 times | Published

5-year limitations period established in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). 1 Id. In so holding, the District

Bollettieri Resort Villas Condominium Association, Inc. v. the Bank of New York Mellon, etc.

228 So. 3d 72, 2017 WL 4546114

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 12, 2017 | Docket: 6168330

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida, regarding how the statute of limitations, § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2017), operates vis-á-vis a

Doe No. 3 v. Nur-Ul-Islam Academy, Inc.

217 So. 3d 85, 2017 WL 1076928, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3777

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2017 | Docket: 60265900

Cited 1 times | Published

the legislature in 2010 enacted a revision to section 95.11 which provides for an unlimited time period

City of Riviera Beach v. J & B Motel Corp.

213 So. 3d 1102, 2017 WL 1018521, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3435

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2017 | Docket: 60263443

Cited 1 times | Published

general limitations period contained in Chapter 96. § 95.011, Fla. Stat. (“A civil action or proceeding, called

Eric Green v. Calvin Cottrell

204 So. 3d 22, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 506, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2487

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2016 | Docket: 4487516

Cited 1 times | Published

Green’s state law claims were time-barred under section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2007), which provides

Alvarez v. United States

207 F. Supp. 3d 1291, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123437, 2016 WL 4733183

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2016 | Docket: 64310270

Cited 1 times | Published

barred by Florida’s statute of repose, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e). A. McLeod’s Status as an Employee or Contractor

Riverwalk at Sunrise Homeowners Ass'n v. Biscayne Painting Corp.

199 So. 3d 348, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 12068, 2016 WL 4205352

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2016 | Docket: 60256588

Cited 1 times | Published

four years after the cause of action accrues. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). “A cause of action accrues

W.D. v. Archdiocese of Miami, Inc. Archdiocese of Miami, a Corporation Sole Archbishop Wenski, etc.

197 So. 3d 584, 2016 WL 3065748, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8343

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2016 | Docket: 3071343

Cited 1 times | Published

circumvent the statute of limitations; (2) section 95.11(9), Florida Statutes, is inapplicable because

Gregor Woodward v. Orator E. Woodward, individually, and as Trustee of the Mary T. Woodward Trust, etc., Lorence Woodward, Marcus Woodward, Serena Woodward and Maureen Woodward

192 So. 3d 528, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881, 2016 WL 2342152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2016 | Docket: 3062271

Cited 1 times | Published

erred in finding that laches barred the action. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that “[l]aches

Gregor Woodward v. Orator E. Woodward, individually, and as Trustee of the Mary T. Woodward Trust, etc., Lorence Woodward, Marcus Woodward, Serena Woodward and Maureen Woodward

192 So. 3d 528, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6881, 2016 WL 2342152

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 4, 2016 | Docket: 3062271

Cited 1 times | Published

erred in finding that laches barred the action. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2012), provides that “[l]aches

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. Beauvais

188 So. 3d 938, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2016 | Docket: 3053146

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations governing mortgage foreclosures. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). According to Aqua, the

Brock v. Garner Window & Door Sales, Inc.

187 So. 3d 294, 2016 WL 830452

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 2016 | Docket: 3045487

Cited 1 times | Published

determination of which statute applies is one of law. Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes, provides a four-year

Jenkins v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

185 So. 3d 675, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1764, 2016 WL 519618

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 2016 | Docket: 3035163

Cited 1 times | Published

contract claim would have run. See § 95.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2005) (providing' five-year statute

Firestone v. Temple Beth Sholom

183 So. 3d 1225, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 675, 2016 WL 231339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 20, 2016 | Docket: 3029449

Cited 1 times | Published

to the four-year limitations period found in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2012). The complaint explains

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. B&A Diagnostic, Inc.

145 F. Supp. 3d 1154, 2015 WL 7272738

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2015 | Docket: 64305406

Cited 1 times | Published

of unjust enrichment in Florida. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11. Instead, courts apply various limitations, periods

Harris v. Goderick

608 F. App'x 760

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 22, 2015 | Docket: 65959998

Cited 1 times | Published

false arrest claims is four years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o). As noted previously, a complaint may be

Sylvia A. Russ v. Carolyn Williams

159 So. 3d 408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 19, 2015 | Docket: 2643351

Cited 1 times | Published

statute of limitations expired. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (providing that an “action founded

Juan Luciano and Vickie Luciano v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company

156 So. 3d 1108, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1043, 2015 WL 340802

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 2015 | Docket: 2628640

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations for breach of contract actions under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). 1

Anderson v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.

56 F. Supp. 3d 1345, 85 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 83, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154767, 2014 WL 5522478

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2014 | Docket: 64298098

Cited 1 times | Published

Judge Rosenbaum’s Order. ECF No. [78] at 7-14. Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes, provides that both “action[s]

Rodriguez v. Bank of America, N.A.

49 F. Supp. 3d 1154, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142653, 2014 WL 4851777

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2014 | Docket: 64297489

Cited 1 times | Published

for mortgage foreclosure under Florida Statute § 95.11(2)(c), and the five-year statute of repose under

Uffner v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

46 F. Supp. 3d 1339, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 132893, 2014 WL 4716144

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2014 | Docket: 64297271

Cited 1 times | Published

of Limitations Pursuant to Florida Statute section 95.11, Engle personal injury actions must be brought

Snell v. Mott's Contracting Services, Inc.

141 So. 3d 605, 2014 WL 2118044, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 21, 2014 | Docket: 60241961

Cited 1 times | Published

term ‘civil action or proceeding' found in section 95.011[, Florida Statutes].” 126 So.3d at 188. Upon

Scullock v. Gee

161 So. 3d 421, 2014 WL 948877, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3492

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 2014 | Docket: 60247135

Cited 1 times | Published

subject to a four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2010). Scullock’s cause of action

Belanger v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

140 So. 3d 598, 2014 WL 538744, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1847

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2014 | Docket: 60241558

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations period for product liability actions, § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1994), an individual's Engle cause

American Home Assurance Co. v. Weaver Aggregate Transport, Inc.

990 F. Supp. 2d 1254, 2013 WL 7659924

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2013 | Docket: 65996623

Cited 1 times | Published

resulting damages have occurred. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(o); Halkey-Roberts Corp. v. Mackal, 641 So.2d

Janie Doe 1 ex rel. Miranda v. Sinrod

117 So. 3d 786, 2013 WL 1890647, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7361

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2013 | Docket: 60232780

Cited 1 times | Published

the original Complaint. It also argued that section 95.11(7), Florida Statutes (2006), does not toll the

Frantz v. Walled

513 F. App'x 815

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 18, 2013 | Docket: 65704430

Cited 1 times | Published

a four-year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). Therefore, they too were untimely filed

Woodward v. Olson

107 So. 3d 540, 2013 WL 645908, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2937

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 60228746

Cited 1 times | Published

medical malpractice statute of repose found in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2009). Because the

Spencer v. EMC Mortgage Corp.

97 So. 3d 257, 2012 WL 3705166, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2012 | Docket: 60311737

Cited 1 times | Published

thus triggering the limitations period under section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2012), well more than

Castleman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

97 So. 3d 875, 2012 WL 3537237, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13620

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 17, 2012 | Docket: 60311991

Cited 1 times | Published

fraud, and negligence actions is four years. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. However, the Florida Supreme Court

Graney v. Caduceus Properties, LLC

91 So. 3d 220, 2012 WL 2345120, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 10028

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2012 | Docket: 60309847

Cited 1 times | Published

1990). The four-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2006), governs actions

Starling v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

845 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 151514, 2011 WL 6965854

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 2, 2011 | Docket: 65979342

Cited 1 times | Published

10); see Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(d) (2011) (“Section 95.11(4)(d)”). Section 95.11(4)(d) and the case law

Lopez-Loarca v. Cosme

76 So. 3d 5, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16363, 2011 WL 4949808

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 19, 2011 | Docket: 60304558

Cited 1 times | Published

in the second year following the accident. Section 95.11, Florida ■ Statutes (2000), provides a four

BLACK DIAMOND PROPERTIES, INC. v. Haines

69 So. 3d 1090, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15169, 2011 WL 4435805

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2011 | Docket: 2359435

Cited 1 times | Published

applicable statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes, which provides for

Capone v. Philip Morris U.S.A. Inc.

56 So. 3d 34, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18323, 2010 WL 4861743

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 2010 | Docket: 60298578

Cited 1 times | Published

death action is two years from the date of death. § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2008). Frank Capone died on

Traveler Indemnity Co. of Conn. v. Centimark Corp.

746 F. Supp. 2d 1284, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103310, 2010 WL 3834611

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Docket: 2340538

Cited 1 times | Published

years of the time of the improvement. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(c); Havatampa Corp. v. McElvy, Jennewein, Stefany

NATIONAL FRANCHISEE ASS'N v. Burger King Corp.

715 F. Supp. 2d 1232, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50721, 2010 WL 2102993

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: May 20, 2010 | Docket: 2403973

Cited 1 times | Published

Florida law for breach of contract had expired. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (the statute of limitations for

MOGER v. Florida Parole Commission

22 So. 3d 138, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 17264, 2009 WL 3817893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 2009 | Docket: 178785

Cited 1 times | Published

deemed untimely by the circuit court pursuant to section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes. The final agency action

Fields v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

751 F. Supp. 2d 1260, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130131, 2009 WL 7115136

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 27, 2009 | Docket: 2338669

Cited 1 times | Published

a four year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(2008). The Florida Legislature has made clear

Petersen v. Whitson

14 So. 3d 300, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 11573, 2009 WL 2514164

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 19, 2009 | Docket: 1650054

Cited 1 times | Published

a court of record in Florida is twenty years. § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2007); Commercebank, N.A. v. Taylor

Milliken & Co. v. HAIMA GROUP CORP.

654 F. Supp. 2d 1374, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72855, 2009 WL 2567025

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2009 | Docket: 2381430

Cited 1 times | Published

entity from the Judgment Debtors, (2) Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a)'s five (5) year statute of limitation bars

Arvelo v. Park Finance of Broward, Inc.

15 So. 3d 660, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8526, 2009 WL 1766693

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 24, 2009 | Docket: 1192159

Cited 1 times | Published

should be quashed. Petition granted. NOTES [1] § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002). Although Ms. Arvelo argued

Conrad v. Young

10 So. 3d 1154, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6047, 2009 WL 1456720

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 27, 2009 | Docket: 1642437

Cited 1 times | Published

easement is five years after discovery of its breach. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2002). According to appellant

Krause v. TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORP.

10 So. 3d 208, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3246, 2009 WL 1025406

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2009 | Docket: 2536564

Cited 1 times | Published

five-year state law limitations provision found in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005), and that the

New Testament Baptist Church v. DOT

993 So. 2d 112, 2008 WL 4643792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 1516172

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations applies to inverse condemnation claims. See § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat.; Heckman v. City of Oakland Park

New Testament Baptist Church v. DOT

993 So. 2d 112, 2008 WL 4643792

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 22, 2008 | Docket: 1516172

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations applies to inverse condemnation claims. See § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat.; Heckman v. City of Oakland Park

Tse Industries, Inc. v. Larson & Larson, Pa

987 So. 2d 687, 2008 WL 268914

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2008 | Docket: 1723746

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations for professional malpractice. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002). The Larson Defendants

Bryant v. Florida Parole Commission

965 So. 2d 825, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14871, 2007 WL 2766716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2007 | Docket: 330244

Cited 1 times | Published

mandamus occurred prior to the effective date of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, the circuit court erred

Bryant v. Florida Parole Commission

965 So. 2d 825, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14871, 2007 WL 2766716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2007 | Docket: 330244

Cited 1 times | Published

mandamus occurred prior to the effective date of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, the circuit court erred

Design Pallets, Inc. v. Grayrobinson, P.A.

515 F. Supp. 2d 1246, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57005, 2007 WL 2274432

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 6, 2007 | Docket: 34296

Cited 1 times | Published

alleges that this claim is time barred by Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). (Doc. 33 at 19). Plaintiffs do not respond

Carpenter v. Florida Parole Commission

958 So. 2d 564, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9494, 2007 WL 1757097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2007 | Docket: 1258763

Cited 1 times | Published

his habeas petition was not time-barred by section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2004), based on the

Carpenter v. Florida Parole Commission

958 So. 2d 564, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9494, 2007 WL 1757097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2007 | Docket: 1258763

Cited 1 times | Published

his habeas petition was not time-barred by section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2004), based on the

University of Miami v. Wilson

948 So. 2d 774, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2728, 2006 WL 1687685

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 28, 2007 | Docket: 1767914

Cited 1 times | Published

death, section 95.11(4)(d), controlled.[7] *786 At the time of the decedent's death, section 95.11(4)(b)

Cadle Co. v. McCartha

920 So. 2d 144, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1255, 2006 WL 249216

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 2006 | Docket: 1730627

Cited 1 times | Published

liability founded on a written instrument." See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. She contends that each of the

Indemnity Insurance Company v. American Aviation

399 F.3d 1275

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 3, 2003 | Docket: 397789

Cited 1 times | Published

"profession" as defined by Florida law. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (defining professional as "any vocation requiring

CLARK CONST. GROUP, INC. v. Wentworth Plastering of Boca Raton, Inc.

840 So. 2d 357, 2003 WL 729171

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2003 | Docket: 1748361

Cited 1 times | Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. Citing Federal Insurance

Williams v. Southeast Florida Cable, Inc.

782 So. 2d 988, 2001 WL 388094

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2001 | Docket: 456465

Cited 1 times | Published

statute of limitations for statutory violations, section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), applies to actions

Slapikas v. Llorente

766 So. 2d 440, 2000 WL 1224878

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 1329878

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations for legal malpractice is two years. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997). In this case, the action

Clemente v. Freshman

760 So. 2d 1059, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 7577, 2000 WL 784229

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 2000 | Docket: 64798132

Cited 1 times | Published

year statute of limitation period found in section 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). We reverse and remand

In Re Miller

248 B.R. 198, 44 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 79, 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 185, 2000 Bankr. LEXIS 500, 2000 WL 622748

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2000 | Docket: 2512405

Cited 1 times | Published

Court also notes the applicability of Fla. Stat. § 95.11 mandating that actions on judgments issued by Florida

Fremont Indemnity v. Carey Dwyer

197 F.3d 1053

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 6, 1999 | Docket: 395662

Cited 1 times | Published

limitation period imposed by Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4)(a), where (1) the alleged malpractice complained

Hazen v. Kaplan

734 So. 2d 441, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5537, 1999 WL 252479

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1999 | Docket: 64788579

Cited 1 times | Published

from the myelogram or since the myelogram. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1993) states, in pertinent

Barnes v. Clark Sand Co.

721 So. 2d 329, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12730

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1998 | Docket: 64784514

Cited 1 times | Published

County, 541 So.2d 92, 95 (Fla.1989) (holding “section 95.11(4)(b) was properly grounded on an announced

Crutchley v. Brevard County Sheriff's Office

688 So. 2d 371, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 231, 1997 WL 24241

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 1997 | Docket: 64771225

Cited 1 times | Published

barred by the four year statute of limitation in section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes. We affirm. The sheriff

Fowler v. Towse

900 F. Supp. 454, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14185, 1995 WL 574812

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1995 | Docket: 66000056

Cited 1 times | Published

allegedly advanced by Fowler. DONE and ORDERED. . Section 95.11 (3)(k) applies to a “legal or equitable action

Edwards v. Okaloosa County

5 F.3d 1431, 1993 WL 413896

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 3, 1993 | Docket: 64015088

Cited 1 times | Published

1988, two years after Molbert’s death. Fla.Stat. § 95.11(4)(d) (Supp.1992); Walker v. Beech Aircraft Corp

Cardenas ex rel. Cardenas v. Godbold

625 So. 2d 98, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10093, 1993 WL 393654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 8, 1993 | Docket: 64743306

Cited 1 times | Published

favor based on the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991). The appellants maintain

City of Fort Lauderdale v. Ross, Saarinen, Bolton & Wilder, Inc.

815 F. Supp. 444, 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20938, 1992 WL 448861

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 26, 1992 | Docket: 1153066

Cited 1 times | Published

of an improvement to real property." Fla.Stat. § 95.11(3)(c). If the action involves a latent defect,

M.M. v. M.P.S.

556 So. 2d 1140, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2874, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 12, 1989 | Docket: 64648127

Cited 1 times | Published

separate action. . Appellees maintain that section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1986), bars the action

King v. Gandolfo

714 F. Supp. 1180, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6862, 1989 WL 68003

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1989 | Docket: 2112023

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations period is set forth at Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e), which provides in pertinent part: Actions

King v. Gandolfo

714 F. Supp. 1180, 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6862, 1989 WL 68003

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 1989 | Docket: 2112023

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations period is set forth at Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(e), which provides in pertinent part: Actions

Morales v. Scherer

528 So. 2d 1, 1988 WL 8096

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1988 | Docket: 1717589

Cited 1 times | Published

the purpose of the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes. However, case law fails

EAGLE NAT. BANK OF MIAMI v. Burks

502 So. 2d 69, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 496, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1987 | Docket: 222838

Cited 1 times | Published

since they were no longer enforceable under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979), the five year

Richardson v. Wilson

490 So. 2d 1039, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1437

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1986 | Docket: 1488798

Cited 1 times | Published

action was barred by the statute of limitation, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1983). A default judgment

Sherrod v. Palm Beach County School Board

620 F. Supp. 1275, 28 Educ. L. Rep. 809, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24072

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1985 | Docket: 1017862

Cited 1 times | Published

governing wages and overtime claims. Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(4)(c) (West 1982). This assertion is incorrect

Amis v. Gulf Abstract & Title, Inc.

564 F. Supp. 1121, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17447

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 25, 1983 | Docket: 957146

Cited 1 times | Published

private antitrust action as the federal statute. Fla.Stat. 95.11(3)(f) (1981). No party has suggested any reason

Hood v. Hood

392 So. 2d 924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1980 | Docket: 1268023

Cited 1 times | Published

statute of limitations does not bar wife's claim. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1977) provides that

Hood v. Hood

392 So. 2d 924

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1980 | Docket: 1268023

Cited 1 times | Published

statute of limitations does not bar wife's claim. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1977) provides that

Wong v. Calvin

87 F.R.D. 145, 30 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1434, 1980 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13219, 23 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 447

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1980 | Docket: 66077714

Cited 1 times | Published

for actions to recover wages.2 The statute, Section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1977), creates a two-year

Pritchett v. Kerr

354 So. 2d 972, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15194

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 8, 1978 | Docket: 64562640

Cited 1 times | Published

ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur. . Florida Statutes, § 95.11 (2)(b). . A federal court in Florida has since

Gissendanner v. Manchester Ins. Co.

307 So. 2d 876

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 1975 | Docket: 1699850

Cited 1 times | Published

Reversed and remanded with directions. NOTES [1] See § 95.11(3) Fla. Stat.

Miami Beach First National Bank v. Borbiro

201 So. 2d 571, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4634

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 1967 | Docket: 64502025

Cited 1 times | Published

of the Statute of Limitations prescribed by Section 95.11(7) (b), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which provides

Sykes v. Fireman's Fund Insurance

269 F. Supp. 229, 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8773

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 14, 1967 | Docket: 66041543

Cited 1 times | Published

limitations for contracts provided in Florida Statutes § 95.11(3), applies. Defendant contends that this is an

Fowler v. Matheny

184 So. 2d 676, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5726

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1966 | Docket: 64496200

Cited 1 times | Published

plaintiff could not revive the cause of action. F.S.A. § 95.11(5) (d), the fraud exception to statutes of limitation

Davis v. Big Bend Hospice, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2025 | Docket: 71154550

Published

the four- year limitation period set out in section 95.11(3)(e), Florida Statutes, applied, as held by

Emilio Perez v. University of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 2025 | Docket: 71155248

Published

written instrument’ is five years.” (quoting § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2023))); Mendoza v. V.A. Crudele

Daisha Ervin v. Sergio A. Alvarez, M.D.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 23, 2025 | Docket: 70891676

Published

MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2016) (“An action for medical

City of Parker v. Wilson

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 25, 2025 | Docket: 70629877

Published

before 2017, five years before she filed suit. See § 95.11(6), Fla. Stat. (2022) (codifying laches bar); Corona

Terrace Gallery, LLC v. Gallery One Condominium Association

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2025 | Docket: 70387157

Published

actions based on a contract, as set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). DEJ argued that

Vista Financial Group, LLC v. the Bank of New York Mellon, Etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2025 | Docket: 70387851

Published

990 So. 2d 661, 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“Section 95.11, Florida Statutes, outlines the statute of

Vista Financial Group, LLC v. the Bank of New York Mellon, Etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2025 | Docket: 70387851

Published

990 So. 2d 661, 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (“Section 95.11, Florida Statutes, outlines the statute of

Gallery One Condominium Association, Inc. v. Terrace Gallery, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2025 | Docket: 70387159

Published

actions based on a contract, as set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). DEJ argued that

Condominium Association of Golf Villas II, Inc. v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 2025 | Docket: 69998664

Published

would appear that Florida Statute § 95.11(2)(b) and § 95.11(5)(d) are in conflict, but they are

George Escalona v. People's Trust Insurance Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2025 | Docket: 69898822

Published

the second amended complaint as untimely. See § 95.11(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (“Actions other than for recovery

Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation v. Kaufman Lynn Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 5, 2025 | Docket: 69708071

Published

year statute of limitations. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b). And the Sec- ond District recently

Eddie Edwin Gaitor v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 2025 | Docket: 69632705

Published

outside the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3)(h), Fla. Stat. (setting forth four-year limitation

Mishiyev v. Davis, Beasley Media Group, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2025 | Docket: 69596386

Published

as barred by the statute of limitations, see § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2020), and for failure to comply

Kenneth Marcantonio v. Carol Marcantonio Sansone, Individually and as Successor Trustee for the Joseph and Mary

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2024 | Docket: 69208059

Published

on a four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2015). The trial court

Mario Zequeira v. MMPB Group, LLC, Etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2024 | Docket: 69193510

Published

five-year statute of limitations provided for in section 95.11(2)(d), Florida Statutes, warranted dismissal

Aaron Shaw v. the State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 25, 2024 | Docket: 69193514

Published

by the controlling statutory limitations of section 95.11, Florida Statutes. The State responded to

Mark Kinchla, Individually and Mark 48, LLC v. Ran Investments, LLC, Kilgore Properties, LLC, Nanlann, Inc., Robert Pola, Newton Corner Condominium

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 6, 2024 | Docket: 69135349

Published

statute of limitations. Although it agreed that section 95.11(2)(b) applied, it concluded that Mark 48’s

ENGELKE, I I I v. LOGAN, SMART COMMUNICATIONS PASCO, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2024 | Docket: 69021511

Published

limitation for oral agreements set forth in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (2019).

Shawn M. Daugherty v. Robert Neil McDavid

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 2024 | Docket: 68848306

Published

easement and thus the action was untimely under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes. The trial court rejected

Beachway Restaurants 2 and James Wigg v. Santo & June, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2024 | Docket: 68301810

Published

accordance with Fla. Stat. 475.01(1)(a) and Fla. Stat. 95.11(4)(a).” On appeal, the Buyers argue the

Hernando County, Florida v. Hernando County Fair Association, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 3, 2024 | Docket: 68103703

Published

Golf Course Dist. Ass’n, 288 So. 1 See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2007). 2 The parties’

Blue Water Coast Services, LLC and Jacqueline Hyatt v. Maize

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 17, 2024 | Docket: 68443447

Published

verdict to conform to the jury’s intent 1 See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2011) (establishing a four-year

CHHS HOSPITAL COMPANY LLC, D/B/A CHESTNUT HILL HOSPITAL v. JOHN HARMON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 13, 2024 | Docket: 68335133

Published

years." See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2021). Harmon argued that under section 95.11(3)(k), CHHS had

ROSEMARY ARWAY v. PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 2024 | Docket: 67419166

Published

limitations for actions on written contracts under section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, running from the date

Fagan v. Jackson County Hospital District, Jackson Hospital

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 14, 2024 | Docket: 68251065

Published

accrues. § 768.28(6)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2017); see § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (establishing two-year statute

TAMPA PORT AUTHORITY v. BOB HENRIQUEZ, AS PROPERTY APPRAISER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2023 | Docket: 68123866

Published

Florida's civil statutes of limitation generally. Section 95.11, which prescribes limitations for civil lawsuits

Palm Beach Polo Holdings, Inc. v. Wellington Acquisition, LLC and Ethrensa Family Trust Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2023 | Docket: 68043001

Published

performance claim to exercise its right/option. See § 95.11(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2016); see also Wing, 107 So

REBECCA HUGHES v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 67718527

Published

otherwise apply to an insured’s claim under section 95.11, Florida Statutes. Most significantly

REBECCA HUGHES v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 2023 | Docket: 67718527

Published

otherwise apply to an insured’s claim under section 95.11, Florida Statutes. Most significantly

DELMARIE DONALD v. MRYLENE BARRERA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2023 | Docket: 67912620

Published

031(2)(a), 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2020) (fraud); § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2020) (negligence).

SLAVICA RAFFAY AND ATTILA RAFFAY v. LONGWOOD HOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 2023 | Docket: 67811572

Published

5 instrument” is five years. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2023). The limitations period

STUART L. LONGMAN vs ATLANTIC COAST BANK, ROBERT J. MCKAY, WHITFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORP., DREAMFIELDS EQUESTRIAN COMMUNITY HOMEWONERS ASSOCIATION, INC. AND TDMA, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2023 | Docket: 68034317

Published

motion for deficiency was untimely based on section 95.11(5)(h), Florida Statutes. We agree with Longman’s

IT'S A NEW 10, LLC, IT'S A 10, INC, and CAROLYN ARONSON v. MICHAEL WILSON

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2023 | Docket: 67657810

Published

expired four years later, by November 22, 2017. See § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“Actions other than for

AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FDH INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2023 | Docket: 67454249

Published

professional malpractice limitation imposed in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2022). On appeal,

JOHN DENNIS ENLOW AND LISA ENLOW vs E.C. SCOTT WRIGHT, P.A. AND MOLETTEIRE INJURY LAW, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2023 | Docket: 63654623

Published

cause of action is or should be ‘discovered,’ § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002).”); Silvestrone v. Edell

JOHN DENNIS ENLOW AND LISA ENLOW vs E.C. SCOTT WRIGHT, P.A. AND MOLETTEIRE INJURY LAW, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2023 | Docket: 63654623

Published

cause of action is or should be ‘discovered,’ § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2002).”); Silvestrone v. Edell

THE LEXI CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. MOSS & ASSOCIATES, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2023 | Docket: 67173912

Published

with the exercise of due diligence” (quoting § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat.)).

ISRAEL REYES, etc. v. BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION, INC., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 29, 2023 | Docket: 61718833

Published

statute of limitations began to run pursuant to section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2005). In addressing

JOHN DOE 1 v. ARCHDIOCESE OF MIAMI, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 22, 2023 | Docket: 63180115

Published

therefore be brought “at any time” pursuant to § 95.11(9), Florida Statutes (2022). I. INTRODUCTION

DANIEL FETZER vs STATE OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, ET AL.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 2023 | Docket: 67221662

Published

Florida’s statute of limitations codified at section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2009), because it sought

WINNIEFRED RAMSAY vs SOUTH LAKE HOSPITAL, KERRY L. NEALL, M.D., AND HOLLY B. SAUNDERS, M.D.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 2023 | Docket: 65664774

Published

under the statute of limitations codified at section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2015), because it

AISY ALEU, PHARM. D. v. NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2023 | Docket: 66814493

Published

this case, the four- year limitation period in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2015), for “[a]n action

AISY ALEU, PHARM. D. v. NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2023 | Docket: 66814493

Published

this case, the four- year limitation period in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2015), for “[a]n action

MIAMI BEACH CRUISERS, LLC v. ROLLY MARINE SERVICE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2023 | Docket: 66814463

Published

BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Actions other than for

MIAMI BEACH CRUISERS, LLC v. ROLLY MARINE SERVICE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 2023 | Docket: 66814463

Published

BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Actions other than for

Jane Doe v. Richard L. Swearingen

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Oct 21, 2022 | Docket: 65597053

Published

1480, 1482 (11th Cir. 1988) (citing Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)). Neither party addresses the statute of limitations

David Terrence Stephens v. Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 28, 2022 | Docket: 65382148

Published

Appellant filed his petition as required by section 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2020) (“Any action challenging

MARIA MARTINEZ v. DON JOHN PEREZ-ORTIZ, M. D. AND THE PEREZ EYE CENTER, P. L.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2022 | Docket: 65370802

Published

litigation on Dr. Perez Ortiz and Perez Eye Center. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015); see also § 766.106(4)

IGOR MIKHAYLOV v. BILZIN SUMBERG BAENA PRICE & AXELROD LLP

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2022 | Docket: 64952865

Published

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, which applies to a

CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS, etc. v. CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2022 | Docket: 63654659

Published

by the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3), Florida Statute; and 4) dismissed Counts

GULAM JAFFER v. 153 REHC LLC, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 1, 2022 | Docket: 63352034

Published

LC, 6 So. 3d 681, 685 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009))); § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (providing that the statute of

LUIS N. MENDEZ, etc. v. GREEN MOUNTAIN HOLDINGS (CAYMAN) LTD.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2022 | Docket: 63318824

Published

the complaint, the action is not barred by section 95.11(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes.”).

DR. MARC BIVINS v. CHARLES W. DOUGLAS, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 2021 | Docket: 60660124

Published

298 So. 3d 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020). Section 95.11(3)(b) of the Florida Statutes imposes a four-year

EDWIN TORRES v. KENDALL HEALTHCARE GROUP, LTD., etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2021 | Docket: 60642691

Published

comply with the statute of limitations in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, as well as the mandatory

Orlan L. Hagins v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 2021 | Docket: 60414528

Published

correctly dismissed the complaint as time barred. See § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2020) (barring action “challenging

SYDNEY SMITH v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 15, 2021 | Docket: 60385559

Published

cases, a 4-year statute of limitations applies. § 95.11(3)(i), Fla. Stat. (establishing 4-year statute

OLAYA MILIAN v. ADRIAN GARCIA

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 2021 | Docket: 60290976

Published

at 192 (“The limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(c) does not affect the life of the lien or

MICHAEL R. MAISONNEUVE and CYNTHIA A. MAISONNEUVE v. SITUS INVESTMENTS, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 18, 2021 | Docket: 60199086

Published

last payment required under the mortgage. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2011). Ultimately, the trial

GUILLERMO POZO v. SUNSET REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 11, 2021 | Docket: 60123693

Published

containing the avoidance.” (emphasis added)); § 95.11(3)(p), Fla. Stat. (2020) (providing that the statute

DORAL HEALTH CENTER, P.A., A/A/O ESPERANZA ESCARIZ v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2021 | Docket: 60056679

Published

within five years of the cause of action accruing. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). The breach occurs upon

KEYS COUNTRY RESORT, LLC v. 1733 OVERSEAS HIGHWAY, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 7, 2021 | Docket: 60041119

Published

(“[A] legal action ‘on a contract’ to which [section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes,] applies connotes an

JUAN FRANCISCO VEGA v. ANDREW FRANKLIN RIER

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2021 | Docket: 59936522

Published

two-year statute of limitations, pursuant to section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2020). Upon finding

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2021 | Docket: 59245136

Published

numbers. (1) 7 Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11 (2017). (2) 30 Fla. Stat. Ann

FALISHA BELL v. SCOTT WAGNER & ASSOCIATES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 2020 | Docket: 18748376

Published

JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (“An action for professional

EDMUND ACCARDI v. REGIONS BANK

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 9, 2020 | Docket: 18726938

Published

one-year statute of limitations specified in section 95.11(5)(h), Florida Statutes (2018), apply to a motion

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure - 2020 Regular-Cycle Report

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 29, 2020 | Docket: 18584684

Published

numbers. (1) 7 Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11 (2017). (2) 30 Fla. Stat. Ann

R.R. v. New Life Community Church of CMA, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2020 | Docket: 18495687

Published

arguments that their claims were timely under section 95.11(7) or 95.11(9), Florida Statutes (2019), or

GABRIJI, LLC v. HOLLYWOOD EAST, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2020 | Docket: 18488454

Published

improvement of real property” is one year. See § 95.11(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2019). Accepting the allegations

Joselyn Santiago v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 31, 2020 | Docket: 17532535

Published

action for trespass on real property. Fla. Stat. § 95.11.

SANDRA SANTIAGO AND NORMA CACERES, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF RAMONA REYES v. FRANCISCO A. RODRIGUEZ, MD

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2019 | Docket: 16350302

Published

applicable to medical malpractice actions under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2017), had expired

Kelly Mitchell v. Applebee's Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2019 | Docket: 16275551

Published

beyond the four-year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2012). The trial court

Jimmy Stephens v. Florida Department of Corrections

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 2019 | Docket: 16275552

Published

the filing of his petition was timely under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes, and that the trial court

James Harrell v. The Ryland Group, doing business as Ryland Homes, a foreign for-profit corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2019 | Docket: 16049254

Published

erred in ruling that the statute of repose of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2016), applies. In

FAIRWAYS AT EAGLE RIDGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. EAGLE RIDGE PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2019 | Docket: 15897424

Published

by the parties in this appeal, we affirm. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2015). In doing so, we voice

Enlow v. E.C. Scott Wright, P.A.

274 So. 3d 1192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2019 | Docket: 64718925

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence." § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014). The statute of limitations

CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA v. CHILDREN'S CANCER CARING CENTER, INC.

274 So. 3d 1102

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 29, 2019 | Docket: 15688838

Published

claim of unjust enrichment is four years. See § 95.11(3)(k), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing a four-year

Covenant Baptist Church v. Vasallo Construction

273 So. 3d 236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2019 | Docket: 15658403

Published

we affirm the final judgment under review. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2018); Kelley, 435 So. 2d at

Covenant Baptist Church v. Vasallo Construction

273 So. 3d 236

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 22, 2019 | Docket: 15658403

Published

we affirm the final judgment under review. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2018); Kelley, 435 So. 2d at

Manney v. MBV Eng'g, Inc.

273 So. 3d 214

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2019 | Docket: 64716088

Published

the ten-year statute of repose contained in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2017), which provides:

Adams v. State

273 So. 3d 195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2019 | Docket: 64716074

Published

motion for return of personal property based on section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes (2010). In his motion

Adams v. State

273 So. 3d 195

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2019 | Docket: 64716073

Published

motion for return of personal property based on section 95.11(3)(i), Florida Statutes (2010). In his motion

Linda Byrd Goley v. Robert Anthony Goley

272 So. 3d 800

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 2019 | Docket: 15059372

Published

to the statutes of fraud and limitations. See § 95.11, Fla. Stat.

Gindel v. Centex Homes

272 So. 3d 417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 64714672

Published

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? Fernandez and

Gindel v. Centex Homes

272 So. 3d 417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 64714671

Published

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? Fernandez and

ROBERT C. GINDEL v. CENTEX HOMES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 3, 2019 | Docket: 14865451

Published

TO TOLL THE STATUTE OF REPOSE SET FORTH IN SECTION 95.11(3)(C), FLORIDA STATUTES (2014)? FERNANDEZ and

Lee Memorial Health System etc. v. State of Florida, Agency For Agency For Health etc.

272 So. 3d 431

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2019 | Docket: 14572789

Published

years of the date the cause of action accrues. § 95.11(3)(f), Fla. Stat. A cause of action accrues when

Otero v. Arcia

264 So. 3d 1140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2019 | Docket: 64705117

Published

limitations for litigation-related malpractice under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), begins to run

Otero v. Arcia

264 So. 3d 1140

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2019 | Docket: 64705116

Published

limitations for litigation-related malpractice under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1997), begins to run

Grant v. Citizens Bank, N.A.

263 So. 3d 156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 26, 2018 | Docket: 64702735

Published

written instrument," or "to foreclose a mortgage." § 95.11(2)(b)-(c), Fla. Stat. (2016). In the context of

Bank of New York Mellon v. Arnoux

257 So. 3d 1179

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 31, 2018 | Docket: 8110463

Published

of the five-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013). 1 During the pendency

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.800

257 So. 3d 91

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 25, 2018 | Docket: 8081306

Published

Stat. Ann. 116 (Supp.1975)7 Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11 (2017). 30 Fla. Stat. Ann. 69-70 (2004)

Gindel v. Centex Homes

267 So. 3d 403

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 64709210

Published

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run

ROBERT C. GINDEL v. CENTEX HOMES

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 12, 2018 | Docket: 7863695

Published

Centex. From this date, the statute of repose, section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2014), began to run

Gonzalez v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 1, 2018 | Docket: 7567940

Published

Florida Supreme Court stated that: 3 See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013).

Brexendorf v. Bank of Am., N.A.

319 F. Supp. 3d 1257

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2018 | Docket: 64319485

Published

from when the cause of action accrued. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(j). Fraud actions accrue when the plaintiff

Dixon v. Dixon Bellamy

252 So. 3d 349

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 7511608

Published

2 of limitations under section 95.11, Florida Statutes required Bellamy to have

Nails v. Walmart

252 So. 3d 332

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 64685943

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(o ), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing four-year limitations period

JASON WEEKS v. TOWN OF PALM BEACH

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 25, 2018 | Docket: 7511622

Published

limitations for a defamation suit is two years. See § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2012); Wagner, Nugent, Johnson

In Re: The Name Change of Maria Fernanda Benitez

250 So. 3d 153

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2018 | Docket: 7144555

Published

elapsed from W.M.B.’s attainment of her majority. § 95.11(3)(b), Fla Stat. (2018); see also, Rose v. Sonson

U.S. Bank v. Morelli

249 So. 3d 717

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2018 | Docket: 7061968

Published

five-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2014). Because under

R.R. v. New Life

248 So. 3d 232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 14, 2018 | Docket: 6911556

Published

four-year statute of limitations outlined in section 95.11(3)(a), (p), Florida Statutes (1996). In reaching

Gonzalez v. Stern

244 So. 3d 1187

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 23, 2018 | Docket: 6385785

Published

statute of limitations barred her complaint. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (2004) (providing two-year statute

Wells Fargo Bank v. Rendon

245 So. 3d 917

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 2018 | Docket: 6366300

Published

the applicable five-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015). For the reasons that

Deutsche Bank v. Miller

239 So. 3d 789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 2018 | Docket: 6336046

Published

the default date alleged in the complaint. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013) (providing five-year statute

INLET MARINA OF PALM BEACH, LTD. v. ANDERSON MOORE CONSTRUCTION

237 So. 3d 395

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 2018 | Docket: 6288115

Published

statute of limitations as a matter of law. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013) (“Actions . . . shall

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 2018 | Docket: 6282760

Published

the five-year limitations period provided in section 95.11(2)(a), Florida Statutes. The judgment

Velden v. Nationstar Mortgage

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2018 | Docket: 6262719

Published

first missed payment. We disagree. Section 95.11(2)(c) of the Florida Statutes (2014) provides

Republic of Ecuador v. Dassum

255 So. 3d 390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 27, 2017 | Docket: 6248130

Published

four-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. C. Proceedings

Flatirons Bank v. the Alan W. Steinberg Limited Partnership

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 2017 | Docket: 6236488

Published

Florida’s delayed discovery doctrine12 11 Section 95.11 reads, in relevant part, as follows:

Green v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC

280 F. Supp. 3d 1349

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 30, 2017 | Docket: 64316164

Published

228 So.3d at 74; Fla. Stat. § 95.031(1); Id. § 95.11(2); Id. § 673.1181. Here, Green promised to pay

Flanzer v. Kaplan

230 So. 3d 960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 29, 2017 | Docket: 6232643

Published

undue influence claim challenging a trust. See § 95.011 (“A civil action ... shall be barred unless begun

Rogers v. Jones

227 So. 3d 759, 2017 WL 4449511

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 6, 2017 | Docket: 60278058

Published

time-barred under the one-year limitation period of section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2011). However, the

Jerry Layne Rogers, Sr. v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 2017 | Docket: 6165240

Published

time-barred under the one-year limitation period of section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2011). However, the

HSBC BANK USA , NATIONAL ASSOC., ETC. v. THE ESTATE OF CHLOE ANN PETERSEN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6159009

Published

brought within five years of the default per section 95.11(2)(c)[, Fla. Stat.],” the court went on to say

HSBC BANK USA , NATIONAL ASSOC., ETC. v. THE ESTATE OF CHLOE ANN PETERSEN

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6159009

Published

brought within five years of the default per section 95.11(2)(c)[, Fla. Stat.],” the court went on to say

Llano Financing Group, LLC v. Theodore F. Petit

230 So. 3d 141

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 27, 2017 | Docket: 6158976

Published

based on that faulty appraisal and subject to section 95.11(3)’s four-year statute of limitations accrue

Espinoza v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP

708 F. App'x 625

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 26, 2017 | Docket: 65966261

Published

instrument,” or “to foreclose a mortgage.” Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b),(c). The Espinozas argue that the statute

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Diamond

228 So. 3d 177, 2017 WL 3795319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 2017 | Docket: 6148684

Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2016), The trial CQurt

Bank of New York Mellon Corp. v. Anton

230 So. 3d 502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 30, 2017 | Docket: 6145460

Published

barred by the five-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2009). The trial court entered

Anderson Jerome Parker, Sr. v. The Geo Group, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2017 | Docket: 6144165

Published

one-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2012), which led the

Anderson Jerome Parker, Sr. v. The Geo Group, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 2017 | Docket: 6144165

Published

one-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2012), which led the

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. BH-NV Investments 1, LLC

230 So. 3d 60

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 2017 | Docket: 6138592

Published

five-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes. A review of the record

Parker v. Geo Group, Inc.

224 So. 3d 857, 2017 WL 3469420, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 11631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 14, 2017 | Docket: 60271737

Published

one-year statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2012), which led the

Sandra A. Forero and William L. Forero v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC

223 So. 3d 440, 2017 WL 2989493, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 10145

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 14, 2017 | Docket: 6119596

Published

and because the statute of limitations in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, did not bar the action

Halveland v. Florida Department of Corrections

219 So. 3d 1037, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2017 | Docket: 60266350

Published

limitations for prisoners bringing suit under , section 95.11(5)(g) applied, as opposed to section 768.28(14))

Halveland v. Florida Department of Corrections

219 So. 3d 1037, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 9305

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2017 | Docket: 60266350

Published

limitations for prisoners bringing suit under , section 95.11(5)(g) applied, as opposed to section 768.28(14))

Desylvester v. The Bank of New York Mellon

219 So. 3d 1016, 2017 WL 2562370, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8729

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 14, 2017 | Docket: 6073810

Published

applicable to actions on a written instrument. See § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2008). In Mr. Desylvester’s

Riverwood Nursing Center, LLC. etc. v. John F. Gilroy, ind., And John F. etc.

219 So. 3d 996, 2017 WL 2438333, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8127

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 6, 2017 | Docket: 6069479

Published

that the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, barred the claims as

Peters v. The Bank of New York Mellon

227 So. 3d 175, 2017 WL 2304263, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7646

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 26, 2017 | Docket: 6066405

Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1997). The trial court

Ventures Trust 2013-I-NH Ex Rel. MCM Capital Partners, LLC v. Johnson

220 So. 3d 1227, 2017 WL 2200226, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2017 | Docket: 6066351

Published

five-year statute of limitations as set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2015). In opposing

Bush v. Whitney Bank

219 So. 3d 257, 2017 WL 2200223, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7182

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 19, 2017 | Docket: 6066362

Published

the one-year statute of limita*258tions in section 95.11(5)(h) of the Florida Statutes (2015) did not

Companion Property & Casualty Group v. Built Tops Building Services, Inc.

218 So. 3d 989, 2017 WL 1908372, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 6584

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 10, 2017 | Docket: 6060373

Published

expiration of the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012). We reverse because

Juan A. Salinas v. Sue Ann Ramsey

858 F.3d 1360, 27 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 533, 2017 WL 1593469, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 7775

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 2, 2017 | Docket: 6057546

Published

five-year limitations period established in Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(a). Id. at 1049, 1051. The facts here are nearly

Busch v. Lennar Homes, LLC

219 So. 3d 93, 2017 WL 1372085, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5106

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2017 | Docket: 5099902

Published

applicable to construction defect claims. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015). Because the complaint

D.H. Ex Rel. R.H. v. Adept Community Services, Inc.

217 So. 3d 1072

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 5, 2017 | Docket: 4669313

Published

limitations applicable to negligence claims under section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2006). In case 2D15-677

John Patrick v. Richard Hess

212 So. 3d 1039, 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 174, 2017 WL 632259, 2017 Fla. LEXIS 337

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 16, 2017 | Docket: 4586139

Published

twenty-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes (2012), is applicable to

Collazo v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

213 So. 3d 1012, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15115

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2016 | Docket: 4478843

Published

motion for rehearing and for certification. 3 § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2014).

Dhanasar v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

201 So. 3d 825, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15119

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 13, 2016 | Docket: 4478841

Published

on mortgage foreclosure actions pursuant to section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2013). The trial

Blue v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

201 So. 3d 808, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 15059

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 10, 2016 | Docket: 60257088

Published

for writ of manda*809mus as time barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, and also finding that

Wyndell Blue v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2016 | Docket: 4477776

Published

for writ of mandamus as time barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes, and also finding that

Rose v. Sonson

208 So. 3d 136, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 7, 2016 | Docket: 4419696

Published

paternity claim had already been extinguished by section 95.11(3)(b) of the Florida Statute (1986), the applicable

Dhanasar v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 27, 2016 | Docket: 4114288

Published

on mortgage foreclosure actions pursuant to section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013). The

Mobley and Sanders v. Homestead Hospital, Inc.

202 So. 3d 868, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11076

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2016 | Docket: 4112461

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2013). See also Tanner

Discount Sleep of Ocala, LLC v. City of Ocala

200 So. 3d 156, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9379, 2016 WL 3364655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2016 | Docket: 3082135

Published

the four-year limitations period set forth in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes (2014). We agree and

Townes v. National Deaf Academy, LLC

197 So. 3d 1130, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 9383, 2016 WL 3381809

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2016 | Docket: 3082126

Published

601 So.2d 1184, 1186 (Fla.1992) (quoting § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1992)). “In ordinary, common

Anthony v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

550 B.R. 577, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59802, 2016 WL 2586659

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: May 5, 2016 | Docket: 65517271

Published

the statute of limitations period found in section 95.11(2)(e), Florida Statutes”). Deutsche Bank Trust

Collazo v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 13, 2016 | Docket: 3053147

Published

barred by the statute of limitations found in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes, provided the subsequent

Bove v. Naples HMA, LLC

196 So. 3d 411, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047, 2016 WL 1273260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2016 | Docket: 3050108

Published

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2011). 3

Bove v. Naples HMA, LLC

196 So. 3d 411, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 5047, 2016 WL 1273260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2016 | Docket: 3050108

Published

two-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2011). 3

Hummer v. Adams Homes of Northwest Florida, Inc.

198 So. 3d 750, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2853, 2016 WL 746423

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 26, 2016 | Docket: 3039679

Published

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(3). In reaching its decision, it appears the majority

City of Miami v. 346 Nw 29th Street, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2016 | Docket: 3031225

Published

applicability of either section 194.171 or section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes, as we find any such

City of Miami v. 346 NW 29th Street, LLC

184 So. 3d 592, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 1006, 2016 WL 313977

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 27, 2016 | Docket: 60253333

Published

applicability of either section 194.171 or section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes, as we find any such

Trust Mortgage LLC v. Residential Credit Solutions Inc. (In re Gonzalez)

544 B.R. 716

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jan 13, 2016 | Docket: 65788299

Published

by the five year statute of limitations in Fla. Stat. 95.11(2)(c). Count II of the Amended Complaint alleges

Nina Solonenko and Valeriy Solonenko v. Georgia Notes 18, LLC

182 So. 3d 876, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 257, 2016 WL 72580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026035

Published

mortgage has a five-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013), Appellants argue that

Nina Solonenko and Valeriy Solonenko v. Georgia Notes 18, LLC

182 So. 3d 876, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 257, 2016 WL 72580

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026035

Published

mortgage has a five-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2013), Appellants argue that

Winston R. Wilkins v. State of Florida

182 So. 3d 843, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 198, 2016 WL 64974

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 6, 2016 | Docket: 3026012

Published

for actions to recover personal property in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes-(2014). Poux v. State

City of Fort Pierce v. Australian Properties, LLC WTC, LLC Ted Glasrud Associates FL, LLC William D. McKnight and Kathryn A. McKnight, etc.

179 So. 3d 426, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 16980, 2015 WL 7245219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 12, 2015 | Docket: 3011960

Published

the four-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes, based on the annual

Green v. Cottrell

172 So. 3d 1009, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13129, 2015 WL 5164938

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 3, 2015 | Docket: 60250002

Published

one-year statute of limitations period outlined in section 95.11(5)(g), Florida Statutes (2007). We affirm appellant’s

In re Anthony

534 B.R. 834, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 319, 2015 Bankr. LEXIS 2526, 2015 WL 4522971

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 20, 2015 | Docket: 65787738

Published

denied without prejudice. ORDERED. . Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c). . Fla. Stat. § 95.281(1)(a). . (Debtor’s

Ervans v. The City of Venice, Florida

169 So. 3d 267, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 10491, 2015 WL 4154176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 10, 2015 | Docket: 2679111

Published

a four-year limitations period. See § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (2009). While it is possible

Stern v. Bank of America Corp.

112 F. Supp. 3d 1297, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84804, 2015 WL 3991058

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2015 | Docket: 64302689

Published

a five-year statute of limitations. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(c). Stern argues that the limitations period

Barrier v. JFK Medical Center Ltd. Partnership

169 So. 3d 185, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9264, 2015 WL 3759641

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2015 | Docket: 60248867

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence .... ” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). In Tanner v. Hartog,

Pamela Barrier, etc. v. JFK Medical Center Limited Partnership, etc., Palm Beach Emergency Medical Associates, P.L., etc., Jason Sevald, M.D., Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., etc., Tanya Beaumont, L.P.N., Shara Davis, L.P.N., Patricia Salmon, L.P.N., Garry J. Beauzile, M.D., and Pierre Dorsainvil, M.D.

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 17, 2015 | Docket: 2679257

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence . . . .” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010). In Tanner v. Hartog

Jax Utilities Management, Inc. v. Hancock Bank, A Foreign Corp.

164 So. 3d 1266

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2015 | Docket: 2663945

Published

(1) the statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(5)(b), Florida Statutes (2011), barred Jax’s

Angel Barreiro v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

164 So. 3d 1249

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 2015 | Docket: 2663949

Published

as it relates to that decision, see § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat.; Moger v. Fla. Parole Comm’n

Purrier v. Department of Corrections

164 So. 3d 783, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8180, 2015 WL 3408090

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 28, 2015 | Docket: 60248057

Published

Department’s final disposition; it was thereby timely. § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2015) (“Any court action challenging

Hess v. Patrick

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 20, 2015 | Docket: 2658381

Published

year statute of limitations to bring the action. § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). Such an action results

Cypress Fairway Condominium v. Bergeron Construction Co.

164 So. 3d 706, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6841, 40 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1097

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 8, 2015 | Docket: 60248036

Published

ten-year statute of repose period. Pursuant to section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2010), an action founded

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. B & A Diagnostic, Inc.

104 F. Supp. 3d 1366, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64336, 2015 WL 2217312

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 6, 2015 | Docket: 64302009

Published

enrichment claim is four (4) years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(k). Therefore, Defendants state that as State

Hess v. Patrick

164 So. 3d 19, 2015 WL 1443113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2015 | Docket: 2646049

Published

five-year statute of limitations to bring the action. § 95.11(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012). Such an action results

Doris Rich Corya, etc. v. Roy Sanders

155 So. 3d 1279, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 11, 2015 | Docket: 2633414

Published

affirmative defense of lach-es, pursuant to section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (2008), was an issue to

Wolack v. Florida Commission on Offender Review

155 So. 3d 1257, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 1280, 2015 WL 404109

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2015 | Docket: 60245595

Published

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See § 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. (2012). MARSTILLER and RAY, JJ., and TERRELL, TERRY

CCM Pathfinder Palm Harbor Management, LLC v. Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Grantees, Assignees, Lienors, Creditors, Trustees, or other of Norman W. Gendron

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 21, 2015 | Docket: 2626276

Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(c), Florida Statutes (2013), and by the

Byrnes v. Small

60 F. Supp. 3d 1284, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 161770, 2014 WL 6467305

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Nov 18, 2014 | Docket: 64298464

Published

time-barred by the statute of limitations, Fla. Stat. § 95.11. That section provides that, absent fraud, concealment

Hardey v. Shell

144 So. 3d 668, 2014 WL 3929140, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12408

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Docket: 935068

Published

Limitations would begin to run pursuant to Florida Statute 95.11, at the latest, as of the filing of that

Roden v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

145 So. 3d 183, 2014 WL 3928495, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 12422

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 13, 2014 | Docket: 936951

Published

limitations on a wrongful death claim is two years. § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2013). 3 . Based

Nieve & Marisol Linares v. Universal Property & Casualty

141 So. 3d 719, 2014 WL 2965882, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 10168

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 2, 2014 | Docket: 434339

Published

of the cause of action accruing. See § 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2010). “A cause of action

Olean Medical Condominium Ass'n v. Azima

144 So. 3d 561, 2014 WL 2783190, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9384

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 2014 | Docket: 60242511

Published

from the accrual of his action had passed. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2010) (setting forth the five-year

Romero v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc.

15 F. Supp. 3d 1279, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58185, 2014 WL 1623703

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Apr 22, 2014 | Docket: 64294588

Published

year statute of limitations under Florida Statute § 95.11 to bring a foreclosure action on the mortgage or

Dutra v. Kaplan

137 So. 3d 1190, 2014 WL 1491639, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5557

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 2014 | Docket: 60240213

Published

of limitations *1192for breach of contract, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), began to run

Buccellati Holding Italia Spa v. Laura Buccellati, LLC

5 F. Supp. 3d 1368, 2014 WL 1202965

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 18, 2014 | Docket: 64293753

Published

statute of limitations period, provided by Fla. Stat. 95.11(3)(f). The statute of limitations period does

Smith v. Miami-Dade County

21 F. Supp. 3d 1286, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72781, 2014 WL 2139248

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2014 | Docket: 64295108

Published

four-year statute of limitations. See Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(f); Maggio v. Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec

Arrowood Indemnity Co. v. Conroy, Simberg, Ganon, Krevans, Abel, Lurvey, Morrow & Schefer, P.A.

134 So. 3d 1079, 2014 WL 51692, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 167

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60239027

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). Recognizing that the

Phillips v. City of West Palm Beach

133 So. 3d 1071, 2014 WL 51665, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 159, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 135

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 2014 | Docket: 60238661

Published

limitations on a negligence claim is four years. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2011). A negligence claim does

Broward County v. 8705 Hampshire Drive Condominium, Inc.

127 So. 3d 853, 2013 WL 6244200, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 19190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 4, 2013 | Docket: 60236893

Published

statute of limitations had expired in July 2008. See § 95.11(2)(b) and (c), Fla. Stat. (2009). Nevertheless

Judkins v. Walton County

128 So. 3d 62, 2013 WL 3491163, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 11184

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 2013 | Docket: 60237131

Published

four year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3)(p), Florida Statutes. Judkins argues that

Langley Ltd. Partnership v. School Board of Lake County

113 So. 3d 995, 2013 WL 1482779

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 12, 2013 | Docket: 60231684

Published

one-year statute of limitations set forth' in section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes, for an action seeking

Evanston Insurance v. Premium Assignment Corp.

935 F. Supp. 2d 1300, 2013 WL 1233190, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42330

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2013 | Docket: 65990069

Published

five-year statute of limitations ran pursuant to § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. Evanston’s Endorsement No. 4

Wendler v. City of St. Augustine

108 So. 3d 1141, 2013 WL 1007290, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 4206

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 15, 2013 | Docket: 60228994

Published

the analysis in Russo. Consequently, under section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (2010), the Wendlers

Lewis v. Florida Parole Commission

112 So. 3d 534, 2013 WL 828013, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60231137

Published

untimely as a result of the application of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2011). He alleges that

Lewis v. Florida Parole Commission

112 So. 3d 534, 2013 WL 828013, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3623

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 6, 2013 | Docket: 60231137

Published

untimely as a result of the application of section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2011). He alleges that

Hill v. Crews

109 So. 3d 267, 2013 WL 692976, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3162

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 2013 | Docket: 60229535

Published

that Appellant’s claim is time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Fla. Stat. (2009), as to the legal documents

Whitfield v. Department of Corrections

107 So. 3d 1210, 2013 WL 646059, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 60228595

Published

state’ ”) (quoting Haag, 591 So.2d at 617). Section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2011), provides that “[a]ny

Calhoun v. Nienhuis

110 So. 3d 24, 2013 WL 645348, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 60230260

Published

statute of limitations for prisoner claims, section 95.11(5)(g), because she filed her complaint more

Calhoun v. Nienhuis

110 So. 3d 24, 2013 WL 645348, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2949

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 2013 | Docket: 60230260

Published

statute of limitations for prisoner claims, section 95.11(5)(g), because she filed her complaint more

Bustetter v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.

919 F. Supp. 2d 1282, 2013 WL 247106, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9002

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 23, 2013 | Docket: 65988295

Published

period set forth in Florida Statute § 95.11(4)(b) has expired. Section 95.11(4)(b) provides the following:

AFFCO New Zealand, Ltd. v. American Fine Foods Corp.

913 F. Supp. 2d 1331, 2012 WL 6644997, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180097

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 20, 2012 | Docket: 65987481

Published

years for a breach of contract claim, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b), and one year for specific performance against

Smith v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

103 So. 3d 955, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21520, 2012 WL 6216756

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 14, 2012 | Docket: 60227270

Published

years from the date of death. Id. at 56 (citing § 95.11(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (2001)). But the two-year statute

Spence v. Tucker

107 So. 3d 444, 2012 WL 6097977, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2012 | Docket: 60228659

Published

disciplinary proceedings was time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2011), but asserts the

Spence v. Tucker

107 So. 3d 444, 2012 WL 6097977, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21208

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 10, 2012 | Docket: 60228659

Published

disciplinary proceedings was time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (2011), but asserts the

Stevens v. Peebles

103 So. 3d 220, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20442, 2012 WL 5933023

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 2012 | Docket: 60227006

Published

limitations period for injunctive relief had run. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009). We have considered the

Bistricer v. Palmer

93 So. 3d 1231, 2012 WL 3237813, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13342

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 10, 2012 | Docket: 60310501

Published

limitations applicable to actions alleging fraud. See § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2002). We reverse. Although

Taplin v. Taplin

88 So. 3d 344, 2012 WL 1605253, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7207

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 9, 2012 | Docket: 60308243

Published

bringing an action for an intentional tort under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (2007).2 We disagree

Joseph v. Estate of Joseph

83 So. 3d 965, 2012 WL 933020, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4358

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 21, 2012 | Docket: 60306554

Published

not subject to the statute of limitations, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (2010). McFall v. Trubey,

Coconut Grove Station Development, Ltd. v. Miami-Dade County

76 So. 3d 369, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 20455, 2011 WL 6373024

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 2011 | Docket: 60304508

Published

under the applicable statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2009) (providing a five year

MELBOURNE OCEAN CLUB CONDOMINIUM v. Elledge

71 So. 3d 144, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 13416, 2011 WL 3754655

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 26, 2011 | Docket: 2536265

Published

one year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (2007): Actions other

Downs v. United States

833 F. Supp. 2d 1361, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64020, 2011 WL 2416049

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2011 | Docket: 65977649

Published

of an improvement to real property, Fla. Stat. § 95.11(3)(c), bars Downs’ cause of action and, alternatively

McLeod v. Bankier

63 So. 3d 858, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8398, 2011 WL 2200705

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2011 | Docket: 60301185

Published

limitations governing legal malpractice actions is section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2008). See Peat, Marwick

Patrick v. Gatien

65 So. 3d 42, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 7156, 2011 WL 1879201

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 18, 2011 | Docket: 60301712

Published

the statute began to run on June 10, 2004. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that an “action

Shouman v. Ecker

53 So. 3d 1091, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 124

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 12, 2011 | Docket: 60297982

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (2004); Steele v. Kehoe, 747 So.2d 931, 933 (Fla

Jones v. Florida Parole Commission

48 So. 3d 704, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 578, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 1732, 2010 WL 4007652

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 14, 2010 | Docket: 60296619

Published

without merit, and . . . untimely," citing section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2008), as the basis

Knighten v. PALISADES COLLECTIONS, LLC

721 F. Supp. 2d 1261, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67168, 2010 WL 2696768

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 6, 2010 | Docket: 2404546

Published

year statute of limitations applies. Fla. Stat. § 95.11. He claims that his alleged debt was last paid

Amaran v. Marath

34 So. 3d 88, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4509, 2010 WL 1329801

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 2010 | Docket: 1641764

Published

instead of the usual two years provided by section 95.11 of the Florida Statutes. See 46 App. U.S.C.A

Mariner Club, Ltd. v. Summit Contractors, Inc.

20 So. 3d 1014, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16544, 2009 WL 3645190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2009 | Docket: 380176

Published

defect(s) of which the former owner complains. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003). Our examination of the

Mariner Club, Ltd. v. Summit Contractors, Inc.

20 So. 3d 1014, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16544, 2009 WL 3645190

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 5, 2009 | Docket: 380176

Published

defect(s) of which the former owner complains. See § 95.11(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003). Our examination of the

Arrington v. Walgreen Co.

664 F. Supp. 2d 1230, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94285, 2009 WL 3273217

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 2009 | Docket: 2483748

Published

pharmacists under Florida law is two years. Fla. Stat. § 95.11(4)(a). Walgreens filled the prescription at issue

Rodriguez v. Favalora

11 So. 3d 393, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2861, 2009 WL 928467

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 2009 | Docket: 1657060

Published

connection with intentional torts based on abuse. § 95.11(7), Fla. Stat. (1992). Subsection 7 states: An

Miller v. ANHEUSER BUSCH, INC.

591 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106241, 2008 WL 5427990

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 29, 2008 | Docket: 2286439

Published

the specific categories provided in Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (entitled "Limitations other than for the recovery

Park v. CITY OF WEST MELBOURNE

999 So. 2d 673, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 18369, 2008 WL 5100339

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 5, 2008 | Docket: 464682

Published

statutes, within the time prescribed elsewhere." § 95.011, Fla. Stat. (1998). However, a limitations period

Stubbs v. Plantation General Hospital Ltd. Partnership

988 So. 2d 683, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11585, 2008 WL 2907995

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 2008 | Docket: 64855493

Published

applicable to professional negligence actions. See § 95.11(4), Fla. Stat. (2005). The motion further alleged

Ressler v. McNeil

993 So. 2d 1069, 2008 WL 2403651

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 2008 | Docket: 2581355

Published

habeas corpus petition as time-barred under section 95.11(5)(f), Florida Statutes (2005). Appellee correctly

Cadle Co. v. Rhoades

978 So. 2d 833, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 4335, 2008 WL 782813

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 2008 | Docket: 64854566

Published

five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2005).2 In its reply

Blackburn v. BARTSOCAS

972 So. 2d 311, 2008 WL 238568

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 30, 2008 | Docket: 1650745

Published

reality a claim for past wages and is limited by section 95.11(4)(c), Florida Statutes (2001), which provides

Thompson v. McDonough

967 So. 2d 971, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16690, 2007 WL 3085011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 64853002

Published

limitation for such claims provided for by section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. The Department moves for

Thompson v. McDonough

967 So. 2d 971, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16690, 2007 WL 3085011

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 2007 | Docket: 64853002

Published

limitation for such claims provided for by section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. The Department moves for

Schachter v. Krzynowek

958 So. 2d 1061, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 9197, 2007 WL 1687774

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 13, 2007 | Docket: 64851115

Published

return of deposit or specific performance. Section 95.11(5), Florida Statutes (2003), allowed the buyer

Tweed v. McDonough

956 So. 2d 1267, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 8311, 2007 WL 1554146

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 31, 2007 | Docket: 64850819

Published

denied his - mandamus as time-barred under section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes. He argues, among other

Carter v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

954 So. 2d 734, 2007 WL 1213670

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 26, 2007 | Docket: 175277

Published

prejudice based upon the statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2002). Carter's complaint

Leavitt Communications, Inc. v. Quality Communications of America, Inc.

939 So. 2d 257, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17298, 2006 WL 2956052

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2006 | Docket: 64847189

Published

June 27, 1999, and expired on June 27, 2004. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999) (providing a limitation

Noughton v. Hooker

941 So. 2d 1176, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17272, 2006 WL 2959156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 18, 2006 | Docket: 64847804

Published

entered the order dismissing the complaint. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998).

Fuddruckers, Inc. v. Fudpucker's, Inc.

436 F. Supp. 2d 1260, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33217, 2006 WL 1517049

District Court, N.D. Florida | Filed: May 25, 2006 | Docket: 2314107

Published

expiration of the four-year limitations period in § 95.11(3)(j). This Court finds it difficult to believe

Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez

921 So. 2d 572, 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 789, 2005 Fla. LEXIS 2211, 2005 WL 3005556

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Nov 10, 2005 | Docket: 64842500

Published

DCA 1996). The limitations period is four years. § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (2004). The children argue that

Horta v. Department of Children & Families

911 So. 2d 139, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 8507, 2005 WL 1338260

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 2005 | Docket: 64840410

Published

of Limitations. [She] cite[s] Florida Statutes § 95.11(3)(f) (2003) which limits an action founded on

Best v. Lakeland Regional Medical Center, Inc.

899 So. 2d 424, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 4482, 2005 WL 735000

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 2005 | Docket: 64837632

Published

limitations applicable to negligence claims. See § 95.11(3)(a), (4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1991). The trial court

City of Pembroke Pines v. Villasenor

894 So. 2d 991, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6, 2005 WL 17673

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 5, 2005 | Docket: 64836248

Published

the four-year statute of limitations found in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes. This, rather than the

Apac-Florida, Inc. v. Onebeacon Insurance Co.

888 So. 2d 126, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17939, 2004 WL 2729722

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 24, 2004 | Docket: 64834449

Published

See ch.2001-211, § 2, Laws of Fla. (amending § 95.11(2)(b), (5)(e), Fla. Stat.). The parties agree that

Mercado v. Fitell

875 So. 2d 807, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9212, 2004 WL 1459417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 2004 | Docket: 64831155

Published

four year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (2004), the trial court=s

Efron v. Milton

892 So. 2d 497, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8739, 2004 WL 1393535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 2004 | Docket: 64835735

Published

four-year statute of limitations pursuant to section 95.11(3)(0), Florida Statutes. The claims for civil

Wayne Charles Oken v. The Monsanto Co.

371 F.3d 1312, 58 ERC (BNA) 1683, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 11013, 2004 WL 1237063

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 4, 2004 | Docket: 398098

Published

statute of limitations is provided by Fla. Stat. § 95.11, which states that "[a]n action founded on negligence

Pierson D. Construction, Inc. v. Yudell

863 So. 2d 413, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19757, 2003 WL 23095239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 31, 2003 | Docket: 64827482

Published

the case with prejudice. Pierson argues that section 95.11 contains the applicable statute of limitations

Cortes v. Williams

850 So. 2d 634, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 11113, 2003 WL 21705239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 24, 2003 | Docket: 64824127

Published

alleged malpractice occurred September 30, 1999. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, requires, in relevant

Young v. Ball

835 So. 2d 385, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 761, 2003 WL 187439

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 2003 | Docket: 64820097

Published

were first asserted against them in 1999.2 See § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1993). The circuit court agreed

RAIE v. Cheminova, Inc.

221 F. Supp. 2d 1297, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17763, 2002 WL 31127286

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 23, 2002 | Docket: 2353910

Published

Thompson, 159 Fla. 453, 31 So.2d 710 (1947) and § 95.11(4)(d), Fla.Stat. (1985)). The parties have cited

Woods v. Sapolsky

821 So. 2d 376, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9581, 2002 WL 1457939

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 9, 2002 | Docket: 64816411

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence.” § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1999). This Court has previously

Nehme v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

822 So. 2d 519, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9169, 2002 WL 1390728

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 28, 2002 | Docket: 64816627

Published

four year statute of repose as set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes, which requires that

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Warren

805 So. 2d 1074, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 952, 2002 WL 125608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 1, 2002 | Docket: 64812038

Published

736(5)(b), which establishes the 30-day period and section 95.11(2)(b), which affords medical providers five

Landrum v. South Dade Healthcare Group, Ltd.

802 So. 2d 1154, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16423, 2001 WL 1471756

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 2001 | Docket: 64811228

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla. Stat. (1995); Hankey v. Yarian, 755 So.2d 93, 94 (Fla

Caiazza v. Tuff Realty Corp.

805 So. 2d 29, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16284, 2001 WL 1440803

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 16, 2001 | Docket: 64811743

Published

foreign country must be commenced within five years. § 95.11(2), Fla. Stat. (2000). “Every judgment gives rise

Papa v. State

792 So. 2d 1270, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12471, 2001 WL 1007824

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 5, 2001 | Docket: 64807909

Published

See Fla. Admin. Code Ann. r. 33-103.007 (2000); § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat.(2000); Fla. R.App. Proc. 9.100(c);

Admiral Security & Investment Co. v. Curtis

804 So. 2d 354, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12126, 2001 WL 984793

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 2001 | Docket: 64811540

Published

Florida, as expressed in legal authority such as section 95.11(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1985), which seek to

Medical Cost Control & Management, Inc. v. Dougherty

791 So. 2d 498, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8822, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1587

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 2001 | Docket: 64807391

Published

period for a suit to recover “wages” is two years. § 95.11(4)(c), Fla. Stat. (1997).1 Each of the appellants’

Onofrio v. Johnston & Sasser, P.A.

782 So. 2d 1019, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5732, 2001 WL 427353

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 27, 2001 | Docket: 64804912

Published

four year statute of limitations prescribed in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1996) bars any recovery

Schultz v. Amica Mutual Insurance

778 So. 2d 402, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 490, 2001 WL 55788

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 24, 2001 | Docket: 64803766

Published

running of the five year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (2000); Bolin v. Mass. Bay Ins

DCc Constructors, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

770 So. 2d 1283, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14798, 2000 WL 1700700

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 15, 2000 | Docket: 64801641

Published

1119, 1121 (Fla.1998) (“We expressly hold that section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), as it applies

Florida Department of Insurance v. ADP Totalsource, Inc.

775 So. 2d 367, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13192, 2000 WL 1506192

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 2000 | Docket: 64802947

Published

of limitations bars this contract action. See § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1997); Burr v. Florida Patient’s

Seale v. EMSA Correctional Care, Inc.

767 So. 2d 1188, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 689, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1831, 2000 WL 1288895

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Sep 14, 2000 | Docket: 64800607

Published

for statutory causes of action embodied in section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1999), applies when

Nale v. Montgomery

768 So. 2d 1166, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11682, 2000 WL 1283863

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 2000 | Docket: 64800868

Published

negligence must be commenced within four years. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999). Pursuant to section 95

Johnson, Blakely v. Fernando R. Alvarez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 395965

Published

the exercise of due diligence.” Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4). This fact is irrelevant for our inquiry, however

Johnson, Blakely v. Fernando R. Alvarez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 395962

Published

exercise of due diligence." Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4). This fact is irrelevant for our inquiry, however

Johnson, Blakely v. Fernando R. Alvarez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Aug 30, 2000 | Docket: 395962

Published

exercise of due diligence." Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(4). This fact is irrelevant for our inquiry, however

McDowell v. SCHOOL BD. OF LEON COUNTY

765 So. 2d 804, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10182, 2000 WL 1088608

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 2000 | Docket: 1522916

Published

"[a]n action founded on a statutory liability," section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1993), the Milano and

Tobin v. Damian

772 So. 2d 13, 2000 WL 1060487

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 2, 2000 | Docket: 1435962

Published

limitations under section 95.11(3)(o), Florida Statutes (1991), and that neither section 95.11(7), Florida

Penagos v. Capital Bank

766 So. 2d 1089, 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 751, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9419, 2000 WL 1034525

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 2000 | Docket: 64800301

Published

obligation founded on a written instrument, see § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (1987), had expired because suit

V.J. Usina Contracting, Inc. v. Putnam County

777 So. 2d 985, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 5708, 2000 WL 569900

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 12, 2000 | Docket: 64803576

Published

knowledge met the’ discovery aspect of either section 95.11(3)(a) or (c), Florida Statutes. Second, the

Elmore v. Florida Power & Light Co.

760 So. 2d 968, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4579, 2000 WL 390329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 19, 2000 | Docket: 64798095

Published

and (5)(a), Florida Statutes (1997). Under section 95.11(2)(b), an action for damages for breach of a

American Airlines, Inc. v. Montero

741 So. 2d 587, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11705, 1999 WL 674552

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 1, 1999 | Docket: 64791068

Published

determine beneficiaries, American argued that section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), requires an

Biscayne Developments Ltd. v. Venetian Isle Condominium, Inc.

738 So. 2d 464, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10067, 1999 WL 542848

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1999 | Docket: 64789770

Published

trial judge that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), bars the Appellants’

Biscayne Developments Ltd. v. Venetian Isle Condominium, Inc.

738 So. 2d 464, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 10067, 1999 WL 542848

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1999 | Docket: 64789770

Published

trial judge that the statute of limitations, section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1995), bars the Appellants’

Multi-Line Claims Service, Inc. v. Cumis Insurance Society

739 So. 2d 144, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9638, 1999 WL 510624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 64790144

Published

four-year statute of limitations as set forth in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1997) began to run

Kolnick v. FOUNTAINVIEW ASS'N, INC.

737 So. 2d 1192, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9700, 1999 WL 510666

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1999 | Docket: 1709634

Published

on the basis of the statute of limitations, section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1993). The trial court

Dinerstein v. Paul Revere Ins.

173 F.3d 826

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 23, 1999 | Docket: 395225

Published

Fla. Stat. § 95.11(2)(b) (1995). The Florida Supreme Court has held that, under § 95.11(2)(b), a breach

Reed v. Lincoln

731 So. 2d 104, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4903, 1999 WL 218324

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 16, 1999 | Docket: 64787821

Published

barred by the five year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla. Stat. The facts in this case are not

Schweihs v. Bianchini

728 So. 2d 1229, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326, 1999 WL 187224

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1999 | Docket: 64787062

Published

Bianchini moved to dismiss all claims based on Florida Statute 95.11(3)(b), which provided for a four-year statute

Balfour Beatty v. Boca Raton

170 F.3d 1048

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 25, 1999 | Docket: 395142

Published

Florida. Hence, it must be concluded that [§]95.11(2)(a) will operate as an exception

Northcutt v. Balkany

727 So. 2d 382, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2448, 1999 WL 110843

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 5, 1999 | Docket: 64786501

Published

95’s applicability in general is covered by section 95.011: Applicability. — A civil action or proceeding

Trustman v. Gelfman

724 So. 2d 1266, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 858, 1999 WL 44196

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 3, 1999 | Docket: 64785867

Published

estate, as the action was barred by laches. Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1997), provides: Laches

Maxwell v. Allison Construction Co.

720 So. 2d 1134, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 13917, 1998 WL 771390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 4, 1998 | Docket: 64784375

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(5)(d), Fla. Stat. (1995); § 631.68, Fla. Stát. (1995); Miller v. Pagodin

Archey v. Government Healthcare Services

718 So. 2d 249, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10789, 1998 WL 530888

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 25, 1998 | Docket: 64783164

Published

by the statute of limitations and repose in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes. We conclude that the

Helton v. Gunderson

708 So. 2d 1029, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3675, 1998 WL 158846

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 8, 1998 | Docket: 64780046

Published

barred by the four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (1991). However, as the plaintiff

DeSouza v. DeSouza

708 So. 2d 993, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2932, 1998 WL 130077

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 25, 1998 | Docket: 64780027

Published

beyond the four year statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1995). He argues for

State Environ. Reg. v. Ctl Distribution

715 So. 2d 262, 1998 WL 75058

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1998 | Docket: 1365946

Published

proffer this proof, both were held liable. [4] Section 95.11(3)(f), Florida Statutes (1995), provides for

Pierce v. Insurance Co. of North America

699 So. 2d 827, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11152, 1997 WL 599653

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 1, 1997 | Docket: 64775973

Published

last element constituting the cause of action. Section 95.11 sets forth the statutes of limitations for causes

Rubenstein v. Saldariagga

699 So. 2d 754, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9678, 1997 WL 530344

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 27, 1997 | Docket: 64775943

Published

limitations provi*755sions of sections 681.68 and section 95.11(5)(d) were constitutional, The court acknowledged

Williams v. Ivey

708 So. 2d 287, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 337, 1997 WL 35262

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 31, 1997 | Docket: 64779863

Published

mandamus. The trial court apparently relied upon section 95.11(8), Florida Statutes (1995), in denying the

Hanano v. Petrou

683 So. 2d 637, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12502, 1996 WL 685534

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 2, 1996 | Docket: 64769363

Published

that the statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), had run. The

Southwest Florida Retirement Center, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.

682 So. 2d 1130, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10389

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1996 | Docket: 64768995

Published

legislature would have said so as it did in section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1981).”). The majority

Wilson v. Scruggs

685 So. 2d 1206

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 18, 1996 | Docket: 64770227

Published

court dismissed Scruggs’ claim, finding that section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), the statute

Steinmetz v. G.D. Parker Sod, Inc.

673 So. 2d 968, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5313, 1996 WL 273508

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 24, 1996 | Docket: 64764743

Published

governed by a four year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1995). The cause of action accrues

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Skinner

649 So. 2d 280, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 204, 1995 WL 15481

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 18, 1995 | Docket: 64753775

Published

motion for partial summary judgment refers to section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1991).1 We agree with

Daugherty v. Sarasota County

157 F.R.D. 542, 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21677, 1994 WL 515521

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 20, 1994 | Docket: 66312350

Published

Florida, this period is four years. Fla.Stat. § 95.11(3) (1993). Plaintiff argues that a four year statute

Rosenbaum v. South Miami Hospital, Inc.

642 So. 2d 60, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8377, 1994 WL 454873

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1994 | Docket: 64750623

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); Martinez v. Lifemark Hosp. of Florida, Inc

J.B. And J.W.B., Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, S.B. And E.B. And M.B. Individually v. Sacred Heart Hospital of Pensacola

27 F.3d 506, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19618

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jul 28, 1994 | Docket: 362565

Published

TRANSPORTER FOR THE PATIENT FALL WITHIN FLA. STAT. § '95.11(4)(b), THE TWO-YEAR STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR

Scruggs v. Wilson

640 So. 2d 1152, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6315, 1994 WL 284113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1994 | Docket: 64750028

Published

determined that the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), bars her from

Scruggs v. Wilson

640 So. 2d 1152, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6315, 1994 WL 284113

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 29, 1994 | Docket: 64750028

Published

determined that the statute of limitations in section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), bars her from

Kagan v. Pollock

638 So. 2d 151, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5411, 1994 WL 246515

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 8, 1994 | Docket: 64749086

Published

extended. DELL, C.J., and STEVENSON, J„ concur. . Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991), provides in

N.G. ex rel. M.G. v. Arvida Corp.

630 So. 2d 1164, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12518, 1993 WL 530857

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 21, 1993 | Docket: 64746010

Published

of the accrual date, or by August 9, 1988. See § 95.11(3)(a), Fla.Stat. (1983). Rule 1.210, Florida Rules

Stokes v. Huggins Construction Co.

626 So. 2d 327, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11521, 1993 WL 469419

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1993 | Docket: 64743939

Published

four-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). We reverse.

Davis v. Green

625 So. 2d 130, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10631, 1993 WL 416219

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 20, 1993 | Docket: 64743325

Published

is unclear as to the date this occurred. . Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1991) provides in pertinent

Ehrlich v. Mangicapra

626 So. 2d 702, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9617, 1993 WL 383489

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 29, 1993 | Docket: 64744009

Published

by the five-year statute of limitations. F.S.A. § 95.11. Thus, under Swanson, when a mortgage contains

Dampf v. Furst

624 So. 2d 368, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9440, 1993 WL 365574

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 21, 1993 | Docket: 64742983

Published

on a finding that the action was barred by section 95.11(4)(b), the four-year medical malpractice statute

State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Sippert v. Tindall

622 So. 2d 115, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7889, 1993 WL 280506

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1993 | Docket: 64698011

Published

the date the child reaches the age of majority. § 95.11(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991). Actions for past due child

Kahler v. Kent

616 So. 2d 601, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3812, 1993 WL 100649

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 7, 1993 | Docket: 64695411

Published

action was barred by the statute of limitations. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989). We distinguish this case

Fisher v. Fisher

613 So. 2d 1370, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2039, 1993 WL 40415

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 17, 1993 | Docket: 64694377

Published

moved for a directed verdict on the basis that section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1989) required dismissal

Parker v. Critton

611 So. 2d 46, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12843, 1992 WL 379893

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1992 | Docket: 64693130

Published

actions complained of occurred over ten years ago. § 95.11, Fla.Stat. (1992 Supp.). As to the former husband’s

Rogers v. Ruiz

594 So. 2d 756, 1991 WL 262916

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 27, 1992 | Docket: 1485806

Published

that the two-year statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985), had expired

Popper v. Popper

595 So. 2d 100, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 894

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 7, 1992 | Docket: 64665822

Published

and SAWAYA, T.D., Associate Judge, concur. . Section 95.11(2)(a), Fla.Stat. (1989). . But see Boyer v

Vellanti v. Maercks

590 So. 2d 495, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11975, 1991 WL 253819

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 3, 1991 | Docket: 64663728

Published

within the two year statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. *496(1985). Accordingly, we reverse

Garden v. Frier

580 So. 2d 873, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5034, 1991 WL 90962

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 30, 1991 | Docket: 64659287

Published

to be a professional within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes, the two-year professional

Armus v. Kuttler

578 So. 2d 835, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3906, 1991 WL 65954

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 30, 1991 | Docket: 64658339

Published

entered the final summary judgment under review. Section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1986), provides

Miles Plastering & Associates, Inc. v. McDevitt & Street Co.

573 So. 2d 931, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 1986

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1991 | Docket: 64656034

Published

regarding improvements to real property had run. § 95.11(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1989). Miles responded arguing

Lemelin v. Gensler

570 So. 2d 1131, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9289, 1990 WL 198316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 11, 1990 | Docket: 64654833

Published

construction, is barred by the statute of limitations. Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1989), provides that the

Vergara v. Butter

568 So. 2d 976, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7671, 1990 WL 149810

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 9, 1990 | Docket: 64653886

Published

would be barred by the statute of limitations. See § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1989). The order under review is

Weisfeld v. Cassel

568 So. 2d 962, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7482, 1990 WL 143661

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1990 | Docket: 64653881

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1979).

Kornaker v. Payor

565 So. 2d 899, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6417, 1990 WL 120765

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 23, 1990 | Docket: 64652451

Published

the time required by the statute of limitations. § 95.11(6), Fla.Stat.; cf. Pratt v. Durkop, 356 So.2d 1278

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Riede

565 So. 2d 883, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6350, 1990 WL 120007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 16, 1990 | Docket: 64652431

Published

under Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes, or a four-year limitations period under Section 95.11(3)(p)

In re Kessler Manufacturing Corp.

109 B.R. 516, 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2312

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Dec 29, 1989 | Docket: 65779944

Published

Statute of Limitations set forth in FLA.STAT. Section 95.11(3)(k), which provides: Actions other than for

City of North Miami v. Williams

555 So. 2d 399, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2704, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6483, 1989 WL 139510

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 21, 1989 | Docket: 64647493

Published

the applicable four-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). We affirm the final judgment

Corinthian Investments, Inc. v. Reeder

555 So. 2d 871, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2559, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6123, 1989 WL 130679

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1989 | Docket: 64647567

Published

barred by so-called “statutory laches” under section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1985). The trial court

Merkle v. Hogan

545 So. 2d 471, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1521, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3564

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 21, 1989 | Docket: 64643309

Published

four-year statute of limitations set forth in section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1987), is the applicable

Bilic v. New Fairways Investment of Florida, Inc.

543 So. 2d 458, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1273, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2942, 1989 WL 54232

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 25, 1989 | Docket: 64642637

Published

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur. . § 95.11(3)(h), Fla.Stat. (1987). . § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1987).

Winkelman v. Department of Banking & Finance

537 So. 2d 591, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2308, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4459, 1988 WL 103874

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1988 | Docket: 64640027

Published

Securities and Investor Act upon holdings that (1) Section 95.11(4)(e), Florida Statutes (1987), the two-year

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Robinson

529 So. 2d 1210, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1781, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3407, 1988 WL 76416

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1988 | Docket: 64636478

Published

AFFIRMED, DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur. . Section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1975): 95.11 Limitations

Lowell v. Singer Co.

528 So. 2d 60, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1539, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2883, 1988 WL 68084

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 1, 1988 | Docket: 64635877

Published

instead sued within the two years provided by section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes. Once she did so, Pullum

Leyte-Vidal v. Murray

523 So. 2d 1266, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1043, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1669, 1988 WL 37849

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 28, 1988 | Docket: 64634319

Published

applicable statute of limitations in this case is section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981), which provides

Panther Air Boat Corp. v. MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Insurance Agency

520 So. 2d 601, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 523, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 654

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1988 | Docket: 1709424

Published

limited to persons in privity with the professional. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1985). The term "profession"

King v. Estate of Anderson

519 So. 2d 67, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 296, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 297, 1988 WL 4391

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 28, 1988 | Docket: 64632201

Published

barred by the four year limitation period in section 95.11(3)(b) for actions relating to the determination

Yacht Investors, Inc. v. Lazar (In re Lazar)

81 B.R. 148, 1988 Bankr. LEXIS 6

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. | Filed: Jan 8, 1988 | Docket: 65779505

Published

fraud is four years, which period has expired. See § 95.11(3)(j), Florida Statutes (1986). However, the four

Commenos v. Family Practice Medical Group, Inc.

516 So. 2d 37, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2697, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11183, 1987 WL 1908

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 1, 1987 | Docket: 64631188

Published

discovered with the exercise of due diligence. Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1985). In the present

Fabian v. City of Miami

513 So. 2d 703, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10156

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 8, 1987 | Docket: 64629935

Published

1977), cert. denied, 358 So.2d 131 (Fla.1978); § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (1977). Appellant’s other point

Paige v. Florida Department of Transportation

502 So. 2d 96, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 517, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6681

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 12, 1987 | Docket: 64624907

Published

Judge. This case involves the application of section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), a statute of

Hellinger v. Fike

503 So. 2d 905, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2333, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11543

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 6, 1986 | Docket: 64625697

Published

by the medical malpractice statute of repose. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1983). The trial court denied

Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Knuck

495 So. 2d 834, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2123, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10007

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 7, 1986 | Docket: 64622207

Published

the applicable statute of limitations period, § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1985),2 had failed to observe

Fast v. Florida Patients Compensation Fund

490 So. 2d 1262, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 351, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2398

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jul 17, 1986 | Docket: 64620408

Published

2d 349 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), in which it held section 95.11(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1981) bars recovery

Freel v. Fleming

489 So. 2d 1209, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1300, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1986 | Docket: 64620081

Published

barred by the statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes. The trial court granted

Freel v. Fleming

489 So. 2d 1209, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1300, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8233

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 10, 1986 | Docket: 64620081

Published

barred by the statute of limitations under section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes. The trial court granted

Pines v. George Hunt, Inc. (In re George Hunt, Inc.)

60 B.R. 128, 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 6486

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 17, 1986 | Docket: 65779169

Published

statute of limitations pursuant to Fla.Stat.Ann. § 95.11(3) (West 1982). The Plaintiffs have not raised

Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Isabella

478 So. 2d 1063, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 576, 1985 Fla. LEXIS 3933

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Oct 24, 1985 | Docket: 64615707

Published

whether the two-year statute of limitations of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983), is applicable

Vaughter v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

619 F. Supp. 463, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16370

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Aug 29, 1985 | Docket: 66166402

Published

Fla.Stat. § 95.11(2)(b), § 95.-ll(3)(a), § 95.11(3)(f), or § 95.11(3)(p). Fla.Stat. § 95.11(2)(b) provides

Lugo v. Ford Motor Co.

611 F. Supp. 789, 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18790

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jun 18, 1985 | Docket: 66165851

Published

the State of Florida is four years. FLA.STAT. § 95.-11(3) (1983). In contrast to the statute of limitations

Scherer v. Schultz

468 So. 2d 539, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1234, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14183

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 15, 1985 | Docket: 64611826

Published

discovered the incident giving rise to the action. § 95.11(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1979). This court defined the

Estes v. Rockinson

461 So. 2d 989, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2639, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16268

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 1984 | Docket: 64609163

Published

provider of health care within the meaning of section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1983). AFFIRMED. SMITH

Daytona Development Corp. v. McFarland

454 So. 2d 761, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 1841, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14772

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 24, 1984 | Docket: 64606472

Published

barred by the applicable statute of limitations, section 95.11(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1977). This section

Lugo v. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund

452 So. 2d 633, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13578

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 12, 1984 | Docket: 64605773

Published

two year statute of limitations provided by Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1977), so that the

Wartena v. deClaire

446 So. 2d 715, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 11944

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 1984 | Docket: 64603420

Published

four year statute of limitations contained in section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1981), and limited

Valero v. Tri-City Title Co.

445 So. 2d 1116, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12039

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 29, 1984 | Docket: 64603163

Published

and section 4663, Compiled General Laws 1927, section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1941) (providing that actions

Velazquez v. Metropolitan Dade County

442 So. 2d 1036, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25174

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 13, 1983 | Docket: 64601805

Published

CURIAM. We reject the plaintiff’s challenge to section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), as an unconstitutional

Rosa v. Roth

442 So. 2d 323, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24547

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 6, 1983 | Docket: 64601505

Published

the applicable two-year statute of limitations. § 95.11(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1981). We reverse and remand

Thorney v. Clough

438 So. 2d 985, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24504

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 11, 1983 | Docket: 64600023

Published

filed the next day). Reversed and remanded. . See § 95.11, Fla.Stat. (1981): Limitations other than for the

Maiden v. Cogdill

428 So. 2d 376, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19314

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 23, 1983 | Docket: 64595766

Published

appellant alleged that the action was barred by section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). Appellee’s reply

Cates ex rel. Cates v. Graham

427 So. 2d 290, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18710

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 22, 1983 | Docket: 64595271

Published

asserted that Plaintiffs’ action was time barred by F.S. 95.11(4)(b) which provides that in medical malpractice

Creative Property Management, Inc. v. Gaines

416 So. 2d 1266, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1982 | Docket: 64591290

Published

subject to the five year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1981). However, appellee was

Creative Property Management, Inc. v. Gaines

416 So. 2d 1266, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20556

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 21, 1982 | Docket: 64591290

Published

subject to the five year statute of limitations. § 95.11(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1981). However, appellee was

Roberts v. Casey

413 So. 2d 1226, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19865

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 21, 1982 | Docket: 64589960

Published

concur. SHARP, J., dissents with opinion. . Section 95.11(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1975), which was in

Stuyvesant Insurance v. Square D. Co.

399 So. 2d 1102, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20330

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 23, 1981 | Docket: 64583348

Published

the applicable statute of limitations was section 95.11(10), Florida Statutes (1973), which established

Aguilar v. Community General Hospital

396 So. 2d 149, 1981 Fla. LEXIS 2595

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 12, 1981 | Docket: 64581447

Published

running of the applicable statute of limitations. § 95.11(4), Fla.Stat. (1977). Summons was served on JMH

Rudner v. Lyons

395 So. 2d 247

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1981 | Docket: 64581006

Published

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. § 95.11(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1979); § 95.281(3), Fla.Stat. (1979); Carpenter v. Florida

Bronson v. Board of County Commissioners

394 So. 2d 575, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18854

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 4, 1981 | Docket: 64580653

Published

claim was barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.11(4), Florida Statutes (1973), or by section 197

Backus v. Howard W. Backus Towing, Inc.

391 So. 2d 378, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18254

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 23, 1980 | Docket: 64579283

Published

Corporation also argues that under any circumstances Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1977), and the case law interpreting

Richardson v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services ex rel. Goodrich

389 So. 2d 1099, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 18016

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 7, 1980 | Docket: 64578672

Published

action was barred by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1979). We affirm. Appellant’s

Dubose v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.

387 So. 2d 461, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17535

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 15, 1980 | Docket: 64577892

Published

the two-year statute of limitations set forth in § 95.11(4)(d), Fla.Stat. Appellant asserted that the four-year

Bradbury v. Fuller

385 So. 2d 7, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1980 | Docket: 64576854

Published

its face that plaintiff’s action is barred by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1977). Plaintiff contends

Bradbury v. Fuller

385 So. 2d 7, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16650

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 27, 1980 | Docket: 64576854

Published

its face that plaintiff’s action is barred by section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1977). Plaintiff contends

Valdes v. Western Knapp Engineering Co.

382 So. 2d 1371, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16477

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: May 6, 1980 | Docket: 64575817

Published

12-year statute of limitation contained in Section 95.11(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1977). Subsequent to

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports | Filed: Aug 29, 1979 | Docket: 3255926

Published

exceptions, they come under the scope of s. 95.091. Section 95.011, F. S., states: 95.011 Applicability.

Kay v. Fernandez

373 So. 2d 946

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 7, 1979 | Docket: 2573027

Published

statute of limitations. See the wording of Section 95.11(1), Florida Statutes, as it appears in 1973

O'Neil v. Lorain National Bank

369 So. 2d 378, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14401

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 27, 1979 | Docket: 64569467

Published

that the statute of limitations bars the action. § 95.11(6) Fla.Stat. (1973). Appellee also alleges that

DuBreuil v. James

365 So. 2d 184, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 17103

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 28, 1978 | Docket: 64567478

Published

time specified by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11, Florida Statutes (1973), had run, the judgment

Hill v. Virgin

359 So. 2d 918, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16111

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 20, 1978 | Docket: 64564959

Published

the time of the filing of this lawsuit was Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973), as amended by Laws

Edwards v. Lindsley

349 So. 2d 817, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16581

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 13, 1977 | Docket: 64560085

Published

required to be commenced within five years. Section 95.11(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1975). The *818trustees

Nelson v. Winter Park Memorial Hospital Ass'n

350 So. 2d 91, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16222

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 12, 1977 | Docket: 64560389

Published

date of the two-year statute of limitations (Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes (1973)) governing malpractice

Reinhardt v. Schwab

343 So. 2d 837, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3848

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Mar 10, 1977 | Docket: 64557672

Published

legislative intent to provide retroactive effect to Section 95.-11(6), Florida Statutes, is not express, clear

Guarantee Trust Life Insurance v. Fundora

343 So. 2d 71, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15417

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 1, 1977 | Docket: 64557455

Published

five year statute of limitations contained in Section 95.11(2), Florida Statutes (1975), is governing in

Fenner v. Florentine Forge, Inc.

342 So. 2d 136, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15239

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 15, 1977 | Docket: 64557002

Published

of limitations is five years as set forth in Section 95.11(3), Florida Statutes (1973). '■ The trial court

Moloughney v. Tropical Park, Inc.

339 So. 2d 309, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15967

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 23, 1976 | Docket: 64555898

Published

Corporation, 74 Misc.2d 471, 343 N.Y.S.2d 651; Section 95.11(3)(k), Florida Statutes (1975).

International Graphics, Inc. v. MTA-Travel Ways, Inc.

71 F.R.D. 598, 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14097

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Jul 15, 1976 | Docket: 66072135

Published

STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS According to Fla.Stat. § 95.11, “a legal or equitable action on a contract, obligation

Harris v. Miles

330 So. 2d 181, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14957

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Mar 26, 1976 | Docket: 64553254

Published

we have for consideration the applicability of § 95.11(6), F.S.1972, the new statute of limitations governing

Fuller v. Hahn

313 So. 2d 419, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14811

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 3, 1975 | Docket: 64546736

Published

the injuries and damages resulting therefrom. F.S. 95.11(6) Florida Statutes 1971, specifically provides

Kansas City Mortgage Co. v. Burgess

306 So. 2d 161, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14703

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 1975 | Docket: 64543784

Published

Statute of Limitations for an action for fraud (Section 95.11(5) (d), F.S.) applies, and, ultimately, may

Vance v. Florida Reduction Corp.

263 So. 2d 585, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1972 | Docket: 64526501

Published

two-year statute of limitations provided in Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes, requiring an action for

Vance v. Florida Reduction Corp.

263 So. 2d 585, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6624

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 18, 1972 | Docket: 64526501

Published

two-year statute of limitations provided in Section 95.11(6), Florida Statutes, requiring an action for

Gaines v. MacArthur

254 So. 2d 8, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 5658

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 5, 1971 | Docket: 64522823

Published

action stated in the count was barred by F.S. § 95.11(3), F.S.A.1 The trial court entered the summary

B. B. S. v. R. C. B.

252 So. 2d 837

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Sep 22, 1971 | Docket: 64522295

Published

was barred by the statute of limitations, F.S. § 95.11(9) F.S.A. He also filed a motion for summary judgment

State ex rel. Gerstein v. Hialeah Race Course, Inc.

245 So. 2d 53, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3917

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Feb 25, 1971 | Docket: 64519147

Published

controlled was not this statute, but rather Fla.Stat. § 95.11(7) (a), F.S.A., which provided for a one year limit

Gasparro ex rel. Gasparro v. Horner

245 So. 2d 901, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6960

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 8, 1971 | Docket: 64519568

Published

follows: Does the four year Statute of Limitations (F.S. 95.11(4), Laws of 1964) bar the tort claim of an infant

Coquette Originals, Inc. v. Canadian Gulf Line of Florida, Inc.

240 So. 2d 847, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5669

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 17, 1970 | Docket: 64517403

Published

parties were controlled by maritime law. Under § 95.11(5) (c) Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the limitation period

Williams v. Covell

236 So. 2d 447, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6319

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 16, 1970 | Docket: 64515010

Published

applicable Statute of Limitation for such claim — F.S. § 95.11(5) (c), F.S.A. Therefore the motion does not allege

Barfield v. United States Rubber Co.

234 So. 2d 374, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6502

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Apr 1, 1970 | Docket: 64514311

Published

statute of limitations set forth in Florida Statutes § 95.11(5) (e), or by the four year statute of limitations

Shanks v. Brothers

230 So. 2d 501, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 7022

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 9, 1970 | Docket: 64512857

Published

arising under Section 627.0851, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Section 95.11(5) (a), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., allows three years

Hendon v. Stanley Home Products, Inc.

225 So. 2d 553, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5459

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 5, 1969 | Docket: 64510994

Published

limitations had run, relying on the three year statute § 95.11(5) (e). The trial court granted summary judgment

Gallizzi v. Williams

218 So. 2d 499, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6284

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jan 29, 1969 | Docket: 64508329

Published

the statute of limita*500tions. Florida Statutes § 95.11(6), F.S.A. requires that an action for slander

Imperial Apartment Hotel, Inc. v. Aronson

213 So. 2d 610, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5176

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Aug 20, 1968 | Docket: 64506554

Published

statute of limitation was based upon a finding that § 95.11(5) (e), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.,1 applied to the counterclaim

2765 South Bayshore Drive Corp. v. Fred Howland, Inc.

212 So. 2d 911, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5390

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 30, 1968 | Docket: 64506366

Published

Both answers raised the statute of limitations, § 95.11, Fla.Stat., *913F.S.A., as an affirmative defense

Pitts v. Pitchford

201 So. 2d 563, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4631

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 28, 1967 | Docket: 64502023

Published

limitations of 20 years would apply under F.S.A. § 95.11(1), and if not under seal, then the 5-year statute

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of Public Instruction

195 So. 2d 41, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1967 | Docket: 64499735

Published

ruling that the 20-year statute of limitations of § 95.11(1), Fla.Stats., F.S.A., governed. That ruling is

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Board of Public Instruction

195 So. 2d 41, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5316

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Feb 10, 1967 | Docket: 64499735

Published

ruling that the 20-year statute of limitations of § 95.11(1), Fla.Stats., F.S.A., governed. That ruling is

Rowland v. Wolf

192 So. 2d 47, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4586

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 22, 1966 | Docket: 64498689

Published

monies is barred by the statute of limitations, Section 95.11(5) (e), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which requires

Bambrick v. Citizens National Bank of Orlando

192 So. 2d 68, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4600

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Nov 3, 1966 | Docket: 64498700

Published

limitations applicable to unwritten contracts, F.S.A. § 95.11(5), rather than the five year statute applicable

Meyer v. Roth

189 So. 2d 515, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4783

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 26, 1966 | Docket: 64497869

Published

159 Cal.App.2d 566, 323 P.2d 1043 (1958). Section 95.11 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. permits actions on oral contracts

Markham v. Gottsegen

179 So. 2d 100, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3716

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 15, 1965 | Docket: 64494327

Published

we need not deal with the other defenses. Section 95.11(2), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., provides that

Young v. Williamson

169 So. 2d 856

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Dec 16, 1964 | Docket: 64491470

Published

embodied in Fla.Stat. 95.11(4), F.S.A., or upon the arguably applicable limitation in Fla.Stat. 95.-11(5) (e)

Patterson v. Sodders

167 So. 2d 789

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Oct 2, 1964 | Docket: 64490773

Published

of this action” basing this defense on F.S. section 95.11(9), F.S.A. The aforesaid section provides that

France v. Ross

165 So. 2d 780, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4433

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 30, 1964 | Docket: 60222354

Published

year statute relating to wages was applicable (§ 95.11(7) (b), and in the alternative relied on the three

Insurance Co. of the South v. Kennedy & Ely Insurance

143 So. 2d 199, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3014

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jun 5, 1962 | Docket: 60205753

Published

as argued by^ appellee under Florida Statutes § 95.11(3), F.S.A., or does the three-year statute of limitations

Young v. Wilder

77 So. 2d 604, 48 A.L.R. 2d 397

Supreme Court of Florida | Filed: Jan 25, 1955 | Docket: 64486306

Published

controlled by Section 95.11(6) F.S.A. Speaking of limitation on actions, Section 95.11(6) provides that