Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 95.10 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 95.10 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 95.10

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS
Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 95.10
95.10 Cause of action arising in another state.When the cause of action arose in another state or territory of the United States, or in a foreign country, and its laws forbid the maintenance of the action because of lapse of time, no action shall be maintained in this state.
History.s. 18, ch. 1869, 1872; RS 1295; GS 1726; RGS 2940; CGL 4664; s. 5, ch. 74-382.

F.S. 95.10 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.10 on Casetext

Amendments to 95.10


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 95.10
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 95.10.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 95.10

Total Results: 20

Browning v. Florida Hometown Democracy, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-02-18

Citation: 29 So. 3d 1053, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 120, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 217, 2010 WL 546768

Snippet: additional signatures), see Fla. Admin. R. 1S-2.0095(10); and *10604) Political action committees conducting

Ellis v. UNITED SERVICES AUTO. ASS'N

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-09-02

Citation: 909 So. 2d 593, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13880, 2005 WL 2105301

Snippet: limitations that applies to the action in that state. § 95.10, Fla. Stat. (1999). In Florida, the doctrine of

NEW YORK STATE COM'R OF TAXATION v. Friona

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-05-11

Citation: 902 So. 2d 864, 2005 WL 1109580

Snippet: 2002); see also § 95.11(1), Fla. Stat. (2002); § 95.10, Fla. Stat. (2002)(causes of action arising in another

McNeil v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-12-04

Citation: 832 So. 2d 227, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17783, 2002 WL 31696718

Snippet: limita*229tions affirmative defense. CSX argued that section 95.10, Florida Statutes (2000), requires the Florida court

New York State Dept. of Taxation v. Patafio

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-10-25

Citation: 829 So. 2d 314, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15566, 2002 WL 31396460

Snippet: forum. To guard against that eventuality, section 95.10, Florida Statutes, provides: When the cause of action

Jenkins v. Rockwood

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-07-03

Citation: 820 So. 2d 426, 2002 WL 1430752

Snippet: borrowing statute yields the same result. Section 95.10, Florida Statutes (2001), provides that: When the

BDO Seidman v. British Car Auctions, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-10-31

Citation: 802 So. 2d 366, 2001 WL 1335013

Snippet: NOTES [1] Florida's borrowing statute, section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1999), provides that a cause

Dean v. Johns

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-06-18

Citation: 789 So. 2d 1072, 2001 WL 672145

Snippet: 105 S.Ct. 2174. IV. Florida Law Applies Section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1997), the borrowing statute

Tune v. Philip Morris Incorporated

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-07-14

Citation: 766 So. 2d 350, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8803, 2000 WL 966037

Snippet: in tort cases. See Bishop, 389 So.2d at 1001; § 95.10, Fla. Stat. (1997); see also Merkle v. Robinson

Sylk v. Rosenberg

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-04-05

Citation: 754 So. 2d 836, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 3976, 2000 WL 346165

Snippet: injury. Florida’s “borrowing statute,” section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that "When the

Muka v. Horizon Financial Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-02-02

Citation: 766 So. 2d 239, 2000 WL 121792

Snippet: 11(2)(a) is, of course, associated with section 95.10, which bars causes of action arising in another

Fulton County Adm'r v. Sullivan

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-11-24

Citation: 753 So. 2d 549, 1999 WL 1072973

Snippet: relationship" test for use in applying section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1997) (borrowing statute), also

Merkle v. Robinson

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-07-08

Citation: 737 So. 2d 540, 1999 WL 506972

Snippet: IN APPLYING FLORIDA'S BORROWING STATUTE, SECTION 95.10, FLORIDA STATUTES, ALSO APPLY TO CASES INVOLVING

Campo v. Tafur

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-01-14

Citation: 704 So. 2d 730, 1998 WL 10882

Snippet: "borrowed" in certain situations. Specifically, section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1995) bars actions brought in

Mezroub v. Capella

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-11-19

Citation: 702 So. 2d 562, 1997 WL 716835

Snippet: dismissed the action because it concluded that section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1993), required a Florida court

ROBINSON BY HARGIS v. Merkle

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-09-19

Citation: 700 So. 2d 723, 1997 WL 577722

Snippet: relied on Florida's borrowing statute, section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1985). This statutory provision

Ondo v. F. GARY GIESEKE, PA

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-07-23

Citation: 697 So. 2d 921, 1997 WL 408322

Snippet: propounded by Pompano Beach Medical Center on 12/5/95: 10. State the date on which you became aware of the

Wak, Ltd. v. Simkins Industries, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-06-28

Citation: 658 So. 2d 571, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 6929, 1995 WL 380112

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Wak Limited, Inc., appeals a foreclosure judgment in favor of Simkins Industries, Inc. The judgment is affirmed on authority of section 59.041, Florida Statutes (1993). The foreclosure judgment in this case was entered pursuant to subsection 702.10(1), Florida Statutes (1993). At oral argument the appellant mortgagor expressed concern about the possible collateral estoppel effects of this foreclosure judgment on other pending litigation, apparently involving personal guarantees of the

Jones v. Cook

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1991-10-04

Citation: 587 So. 2d 570, 1991 WL 199935

Snippet: summary judgment in favor of appellees. Section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1989) provides that: When the

Nance v. Eagle Picher Industries

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-02-27

Citation: 559 So. 2d 93, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1209, 1990 WL 17484

Snippet: action and that, through the application of section 95.10, Florida Statutes (1979) (Florida’s borrowing statute)