Syfert Injury Law Firm

Shawn M. Daugherty v. Robert Neil McDavid

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-12

Snippet: they argued that the action was barred by section 95.12, Florida Statutes, and section 95.11(3)(p), Florida

CRAIG A. MARLOWE vs CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE, KEVIN VAN DYKE, MARCY A. VAN DYKE, PAUL A. LEONARD AND SUSAN J. LEONARD, TRUSTEES OF THE LEONARD FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST DATED 23RD JANUARY, 2007, ET AL

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-09-08

Snippet: claim against them was time-barred under section 95.12, Florida Statutes (2004). Lastly, Marlowe

CRAIG A. MARLOWE vs CITY OF ST. AUGUSTINE, KEVIN VAN DYKE, MARCY A. VAN DYKE, PAUL A. LEONARD AND SUSAN J. LEONARD, TRUSTEES OF THE LEONARD FAMILY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST DATED 23RD JANUARY, 2007, ET AL

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-07-14

Snippet: claim against them was time- barred under section 95.12, Florida Statutes (2004). Lastly, Marlowe

Browning v. Florida Hometown Democracy, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-02-18

Citation: 29 So. 3d 1053, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 120, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 217, 2010 WL 546768

Snippet: ballot, see Fla. Admin. R. lS-2.0091(2)(a)2., 1S-2.0095(12). Therefore, section 100.371 permits, and the administrative

Tarin v. Sniezek

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-11-29

Citation: 942 So. 2d 458, 2006 WL 3422112

Snippet: counterclaim was foreclosed as a matter of law by section 95.12, Florida Statutes (2006). The Sniezeks responded

Sembler Marine Partners, Ltd. v. Skidmore

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-04-16

Citation: 842 So. 2d 1003, 2003 WL 1877586

Snippet: for the prescriptive period of seven years. See § 95.12, Fla. Stat. (1975). Prior to the institution of

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2000-04-04

Snippet: 2000, (Fla. 2000). 7 See, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 95-12 (1995) (Department of Health and Rehabilitative

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1999-09-17

Snippet: party's negligence." In Attorney General Opinion 95-12, this office was asked to consider whether the above

Estate of Johnston v. TPE Hotels, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-09-11

Citation: 719 So. 2d 22, 1998 WL 601324

Snippet: denied, 534 So.2d 400 (Fla.1988). Thus sections 95.12 and 95.14 are inapplicable because they govern actions

Capalbo v. Casino Casa Blanca, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-12-06

Citation: 664 So. 2d 50, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12592, 1995 WL 713958

Snippet: PER CURIAM. We reverse the trial court’s entry of summary final judgment finding that appellees have not met their burden of conclusively showing the absence of any genuine issue of material fact. See Lenhal Realty, Inc. v. *51Transamerica Commercial Fin. Corp., 615 So.2d 207 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). GUNTHER, C.J., and STONE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Costa Broom Works, Inc. v. Feliciano

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-31

Citation: 660 So. 2d 345, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9169, 1995 WL 511417

Snippet: DAVIS, Judge. Appellants, Costa Broom Works, Inc. and Wausau Insurance Co. (employer and carrier, respectively, hereinafter e/c), appeal a *346final order determining claimant Miguel Feli-ciano’s entitlement to wage loss benefits from February 2, 1994, and continuing. There is no dispute over the compensability of the shoulder injury Mr. Feliciano received on July 28, 1987. However, e/c controverted claimant’s claim for benefits based upon the defenses that claimant had failed to undertake a good

In Re Court Divisions

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-10-03

Citation: 648 So. 2d 761

Snippet: Neurological Injury Compensation Plan) (y) Section 944.095(12) (Decisions of Governor and Cabinet relating to

McDonald v. Givens

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-07-15

Citation: 509 So. 2d 992, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1721

Snippet: and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur. NOTES [1] Section 95.12, Florida Statutes (1985), provides: "No action to

Rigby v. Liles

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-04-10

Citation: 505 So. 2d 598, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1002

Snippet: seven year statute of limitation contained in § 95.12 bars the appellants' actions for substantive relief

Turner v. Wheeler

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-12-16

Citation: 498 So. 2d 1039, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2629

Snippet: Real property actions are governed by Section 95.12, providing that "[n]o action to recover real property

Richards Enterprises v. Swofford

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1986-10-02

Citation: 495 So. 2d 1210, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2099

Snippet: to be in adverse possession of real property (§§ 95.12 — 95.18, Fla. Stat.). In most situations an act

Kempfer v. St. Johns River Water Management

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1985-08-08

Citation: 475 So. 2d 920, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1921

Snippet: were barred by the statute of limitations, section 95.12, Florida Statutes (1979), sovereign immunity, and

Kitzinger v. Gulf Power Co.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-05-25

Citation: 432 So. 2d 188

Snippet: [1] Gulf Power counters by citation to section 95.12, which provides that an "action to recover real

McDonald v. O'Steen

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-03-29

Citation: 429 So. 2d 407

Snippet: also raised a statute of limitations defense (§ 95.12, Florida Statutes) and asserted that the action

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Morgan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1983-02-03

Citation: 426 So. 2d 1122

Snippet: we held that the statute of limitations, Section 95.12, Florida Statutes (1963), when considered in connection