CopyCited 16 times | Published | District Court, M.D. Florida
...his action, and Final Judgment shall be entered in favor of the United States. NOTES [1] The Ashland-Anniston-Talladega area falls within the Eastern United States Mountainous Area designated by Part 95 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. 14 C.F.R. § 95.13 (1967)....
CopyCited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Florida | 159 Fla. 174, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 748
presumed to be in subordination to the legal title, F. S.
95.13, F.S.A. which legal title is held by the Greenes
CopyCited 7 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...He also cultivated a portion of the land. He turned possession of it over to B.J. Alderman in 1929, who in turn deeded it to Lorene in the late 1960's. Thus there was clear, positive proof of unbroken and continuous adverse possession for the required seven years. [4] § 95.13, Fla....
CopyCited 5 times | Published | Florida 3rd District Court of Appeal
...ncement of such action; and the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the passage of the title from the state or the United States." [4] See McKelvey v. Rodriquez, supra note 1. [5] 4 Tiffany, Real Property § 1142 at 424 (3rd ed. 1939); § 95.13, Fla....
CopyCited 3 times | Published | Florida 1st District Court of Appeal
...Smythe,
109 So.2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959). [12] Baugher v. Boley, supra, at 984. [13] The question of whether a fence constitutes a substantial enclosure is normally one for the jury. Wilson v. Tanner,
346 So.2d 1077, 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). [14] Section
95.13....
CopyPublished | Supreme Court of Florida | 1954 Fla. LEXIS 1307
...have been under and in subordination to the legal title, unless it appear that such premises have been held and possessed adversely to such legal title for seven years before the commencement of such action.” The quotation is the exact language of Section 95.13, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A....
CopyPublished | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 5824, 1992 WL 118462
...In the instant case, no proof has been offered or allegations made as to the “true owner” of the title to the property; therefore, neither of the adverse possessors in the instant case can prevail under the Sanders rule. Bidwell argues finally that she is entitled to the presumption of possession under section 95.13, Florida Statutes (1991), because she had established legal title by virtue of the quit claim deed conveyed to her by Musselwhite seven years prior to the commencement of the action....
