Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 95.192 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 95.192 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 95.192

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS
Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 95.192
95.192 Limitation upon acting against tax deeds.
(1) When a tax deed has been issued to any person under s. 197.552 for 4 years, no action shall be brought by the former owner of the property or any claimant under the former owner.
(2) When a tax deed is issued conveying or attempting to convey real property before a patent has been issued thereon by the United States, or before a conveyance by the state, and thereafter a patent by the United States or a conveyance by the state is issued to the person to whom the property was assessed or a claimant under him or her, and the tax deed grantee or a claimant under the tax deed grantee has paid the taxes for 4 successive years at any time after the issuance of the patent or conveyance, the patentee, or grantee, and any claimant under the patentee or grantee shall be presumed to have abandoned the property and any right, title, and interest in it. Upon such abandonment, the tax deed grantee and any claimant under the tax deed grantee is the legal owner of the property described by the tax deed.
(3) This statute applies whether the tax deed grantee or any claimant under the tax deed grantee has been in actual possession of the property described in the tax deed or not. If a tax deed has been issued to property in the actual possession of the legal owner and the legal owner or any claimant under him or her continues in actual possession 1 year after issuance of the tax deed and before an action to eject him or her is begun, subsections (1) and (2) shall not apply.
History.s. 27, ch. 73-332; s. 201, ch. 85-342; s. 524, ch. 95-147.

F.S. 95.192 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.192 on Casetext

Amendments to 95.192


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 95.192
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 95.192.



Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 95.192

Total Results: 7

Valdes v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-04-07

Citation: 728 So. 2d 1225, 1999 WL 187025

Snippet: Officers Career Criminal Act of 1995", Chapter 95-192, Laws of Florida. As I have previously stated in

John v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-03-24

Citation: 728 So. 2d 824, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3417, 1999 WL 157380

Snippet: Officers Career Criminal Act of 1995,” Chapter 95-192, Laws of Florida. As I have previously indicated

McGowan v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-02-17

Citation: 725 So. 2d 470, 1999 WL 71608

Snippet: Officers Career Criminal Act of 1995," Chapter 95-192, Laws of Florida. As we have done a number of times

Waldo v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-02-10

Citation: 728 So. 2d 280, 1999 WL 68541

Snippet: force and that his sentence, pursuant to Chapter 95-192, Laws of Florida, otherwise known as the "Evelyn

English v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-23

Citation: 721 So. 2d 1250, 1998 WL 889237

Snippet: Officers Career Criminal Act of 1995," Chapter 95-192, Laws of Florida, is unconstitutional in that it

Green v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-02-10

Citation: 651 So. 2d 132, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1200, 1995 WL 51178

Snippet: PER CURIAM. Jerome Green appeals the denial of his motion for belated appeal, which this court treats as a motion for postconviction relief *133pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied the motion by stamp, without attachments. Because this court is unable to determine whether the motion was properly denied, we reverse and remand this case. On remand, if the trial court again denies Green’s motion, it should attach those parts of the record or files substantiating

Adams v. Adams

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1987-09-24

Citation: 512 So. 2d 1150, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2307

Snippet: of limitations provisions of sections 95.191 and 95.192 are applicable. Accordingly, we reverse the trial