Florida Statute 95.36 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title VIII
LIMITATIONS

Chapter 95
LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS; ADVERSE POSSESSION

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 95.36

95.36 Dedications to municipalities or counties for park purposes.—

(1) Dedications of land to municipalities or counties for park purposes that have been recorded for 30 years shall not be challenged by the dedicator or any other person when the land has been put to some municipal or county use during the period of dedication or has been conveyed by the municipality or county by a deed recorded for 7 years, and all rights of the dedicator and all other persons in the land are terminated.

(2) When dedications of land to municipalities or counties for park purposes have been put to some municipal or county use, the dedication was accepted by written instrument or by actions constituting acceptance, and the municipality or county vacates the park and the ordinance or resolution vacating it recites that the municipality or county is surrendering all of its title to the dedicated land, the fee simple title shall not be challenged in any action by any person, except in cases of fraud, and the rights of all persons except the owner of the fee simple title are terminated.

(3) Any funds accruing to a municipality or county from the sale of dedicated lands pursuant to this section shall be used for park purposes.

History.—s. 1, ch. 25503, 1949; s. 1, ch. 70-337; s. 24, ch. 74-382; s. 1, ch. 89-28.

F.S. 95.36 on Google Scholar

F.S. 95.36 on Casetext

Amendments to 95.36

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 95.36

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 95.36.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 95.36

Total Results: 20

Roxana Quintana v. Rodriguez Family Investment Partnership, LLLP, Etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-12-11

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled . . . .”) (emphasis added).

1000 BRICKELL, LTD., etc. v. CITY OF MIAMI

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-06-08

Snippet: erroneous construction and application of section 95.36, Florida Statutes (1974). FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL

1000 BRICKELL, LTD., etc. v. CITY OF MIAMI

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-04-13

Snippet: erroneous construction and application of section 95.36, Florida Statutes (1974). FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL

Doe No. 3 v. Nur-Ul-Islam Academy, Inc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-03-22

Citation: 217 So. 3d 85, 2017 WL 1076928, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3777

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: (h) The minority or previously adjudicated

Brown v. Nationscredit Financial Services Corp.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-10

Citation: 32 So. 3d 661, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 2911, 2010 WL 786246

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: * * * (f) The payment of any part

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2008-09-24

Snippet: nature of the crime. In Attorney General Opinion 95-36, this office was asked whether the publication of

SOUTH MOTOR CO. v. Doktorczyk

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-04-25

Citation: 957 So. 2d 1215, 2007 WL 1217922

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: (f) The payment of any part of the

Cadle Co. v. McCartha

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2006-02-03

Citation: 920 So. 2d 144, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1255, 2006 WL 249216

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: * * * (f) The payment of any part

New York State Dept. of Taxation v. Patafio

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-10-25

Citation: 829 So. 2d 314, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 15566, 2002 WL 31396460

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 and 95.36 is tolled by: (a) Absence from the state of the

Cuillo v. McCoy

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2002-03-20

Citation: 810 So. 2d 1061, 2002 WL 423474

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: . . . (f) The payment of any part

Hankey v. Yarian

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-03-16

Citation: 755 So. 2d 93, 2000 WL 283692

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: (a) Absence from the state of the

Putnam Berkley Group, Inc. v. Dinin

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-05-26

Citation: 734 So. 2d 532, 1999 WL 333143

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: (a) Absence from the state of the

Morsani v. Major League Baseball

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1999-03-31

Citation: 739 So. 2d 610, 1999 WL 172627

Snippet: statute of limitations except §§ 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: (a) Absence from the state of the

State v. McMichael

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-02-12

Citation: 687 So. 2d 1361, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 999, 1997 WL 55718

Snippet: PER CURIAM. The above-styled cases are consolidated for the purpose of the issuance of this opinion. We affirm on authority of State v. Dugan, 665 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA), dec. appr’d, 685 So.2d 1210 (Fla.1996). DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Windham v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-12-14

Citation: 664 So. 2d 334, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 12761, 1995 WL 735469

Snippet: PER CURIAM. In accordance with Lund v. State, 658 So.2d 679 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), we strike the civil restitution lien order entered in this case, based on its noncompliance with the requirements of section 960.292(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994). As was the case in Lund, the lien at issue here is invalid in that it does not identify the person or entity in whose favor it is imposed. In view of this disposition, we decline to reach the other issues presented by appellant regarding the interpretation

INTERCARGA INTERNACIONAL v. Harper

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1995-08-23

Citation: 659 So. 2d 1208

Snippet: HARPER GROUP, INC., etc., et al., Appellees. No. 95-36. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Quaintance v. Fogg

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-01-14

Citation: 392 So. 2d 360, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18614

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: (f) The payment of any part of

STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC. v. West

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-12-20

Citation: 378 So. 2d 1220

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: ... (e) Voluntary payments by the

Ago

Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 1979-08-20

Snippet: form the local governing units adopt. See also ss. 95.36 and95.361, F. S., concerning, respectively, the

Landers v. Milton

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1979-04-19

Citation: 370 So. 2d 368

Snippet: statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35, and 95.36 is tolled by: (a) Absence from the state of the