Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 15
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-08-29
Snippet: elections “called by local governing See § 97.011, Fla. Stat. (“Chapters 97-106 inclusive shall be
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-18
Citation: 268 So. 3d 668
Snippet: ordinances not inconsistent with general law." Section 97.011, Florida Statutes (2018), provides "[c]hapters
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04
Snippet: (emphasis added), defines a 5. Section 97.011, Florida Statutes (2018), provides “[c]hapters
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-08-26
Citation: 18 So. 3d 1112, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12508, 2009 WL 2601834
Snippet: consists of chapters 97-106, Florida Statutes. § 97.011, Fla. StaL. (2008). . The statute has been implemented
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2007-11-07
Snippet: 008, Fla. Stat. 6 See Pinellas County Ordinance 97-11. Cf. Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 01-45 (2001) (town's governing
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2007-10-31
Citation: 968 So. 2d 637, 2007 WL 3170111
Snippet: Statutes (2006), constitute the Election Code. See § 97.011. Its expressed intent is to "[o]btain and maintain
Court: Florida Attorney General Reports | Date Filed: 2007-10-08
Snippet: VIII, section4, Florida Constitution. 20 See s. 97.011, Fla. Stat. 21 See Department of Legal Affairs
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2004-10-25
Citation: 885 So. 2d 453, 2004 WL 2375632
Snippet: approved, 560 So.2d 782 (Fla.1990). However, section 97.011, Florida Statutes (2004), tells us that the term
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-08-05
Citation: 719 So. 2d 919, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 9759, 1998 WL 438805
Snippet: PER CURIAM. We affirm in all respects except we reverse the amount of the alimony award. The trial court did not err in determining that the former wife’s monthly needs were $8,500, although this figure is well below what the former wife requested. However, by failing to take into account the tax implications of *920the sourcing of much of the income which the court anticipated appellant would receive, the trial court substantially overestimated the spendable income appellant would have. As a result
Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-02-06
Citation: 707 So. 2d 338, 1998 WL 44973
Snippet: Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 97-00011. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1981-06-25
Citation: 402 So. 2d 1155
Snippet: 692 (1960). [10] Hochman, supra note 8, at 696-97. [11] The strength of a tort recovery in this weighing
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1970-04-22
Citation: 234 So. 2d 360, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2782
Snippet: . 152 Fla. 96, 11 So.2d 303 (1943). . Id. at 97, 11 So.23 303, 304 (1943). . 110 Ga.App. 23, 137
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1959-06-17
Citation: 113 So. 2d 368
Snippet: 081 is a part the Election Code of 1951, see § 97.011, Fla. Stat., F.S.A. require the same conclusion
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1958-07-25
Citation: 104 So. 2d 524
Snippet: violations of the State Election Code, F.S.A. § 97.011 et seq. It should be noted that six days elapsed
Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1921-11-30
Citation: 82 Fla. 414, 90 So. 469
Snippet: Northern etc. R. Co., 3 Dak. 168, 14 N. W. Rep. 97, 11 Am. & Eng. R. Cas. 421; Smith v. Chicago etc. R