Syfert Injury Law Firm

Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-04-18

Citation: 268 So. 3d 668

Snippet: at 640. The Fifth District held that section 97.0115, Florida Statutes, expressly preempts the Orange

Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc.

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-01-04

Snippet: Below, the Fifth District held that section 97.0115, Florida Statutes (2010), expressly preempts the

Orange County v. Singh

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-12-08

Citation: 230 So. 3d 639

Snippet: Statutes. In 2010, the Legislature enacted section 97.0115, which expressly provided that all matters set

Jackson v. Leon County Elections Canvassing Board

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-11-22

Citation: 204 So. 3d 571, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 17402

Snippet: a limited exception for municipal elections. § 97.0115, Fla. Stat. (2016) (“All matters set forth in chapters

Classy Cycles, Inc. v. Bay County

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-09-28

Citation: 201 So. 3d 779, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 14507

Snippet: specifically authorized by state or federal law. See § 97.0115, Fla. Stat. . We do not address Appellant’s argument

The Florida Bar v. Committe

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-10-12

Citation: 916 So. 2d 741, 2005 WL 2509186

Snippet: from the Act itself. Heintz, 514 U.S. at 296-97, 115 S.Ct. 1489. The referee was clearly bothered by

Dusseau v. Metropolitan Dade County Board of County Commissioners

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-05-17

Citation: 794 So. 2d 1270, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 329, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 1028

Snippet: Dusseau v. Board of County Commissioners, No. 97-115-AP, slip op. at 8 (Fla. 11th Cir.Ct. May 22, 1998)

Dusseau v. METRO. DADE CO. BD. OF COM'RS

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2001-05-17

Citation: 794 So. 2d 1270

Snippet: Dusseau v. Board of County Commissioners, No. 97-115-AP, slip op. at 8 (Fla. 11th Cir.Ct. May 22, 1998)

DiLorenzo v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-06-17

Citation: 711 So. 2d 1362, 1998 WL 314625

Snippet: Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 97-0115. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

State v. Crocker

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-01-02

Citation: 703 So. 2d 1221, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 47, 1998 WL 2503

Snippet: HARRIS, Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. This case points out dramatically why a trial judge should state the basis of his or her ruling so clearly that even an appellate court can determine what was done below. Otherwise, a judge may be affirmed or reversed for the wrong reason. In either ease, justice is not served. Some judges seem to believe that the less they say the better their chances of being upheld. The majority opinion herein seems to support that belief. But it is better that