Florida Statute 99.103 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 99
CANDIDATES

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 99.103

99.103 Department of State to remit part of filing fees and party assessments of candidates to state executive committee.—

(1) If more than three-fourths of the full authorized membership of the state executive committee of any party was elected at the last previous election for such members and if such party is declared by the Department of State to have recorded on the registration books of the counties, as of the first Tuesday after the first Monday in January prior to the primary election in general election years, 5 percent of the total registration of such counties when added together, such committee shall receive, for the purpose of meeting its expenses, all filing fees collected by the Department of State from its candidates less an amount equal to 15 percent of the filing fees, which amount the Department of State shall deposit in the General Revenue Fund of the state.

(2) Not later than 20 days after the close of qualifying in even-numbered years, the Department of State shall remit 95 percent of all filing fees, less the amount deposited in general revenue pursuant to subsection (1), or party assessments that may have been collected by the department to the respective state executive committees of the parties complying with subsection (1). Party assessments collected by the Department of State shall be remitted to the appropriate state executive committee, irrespective of other requirements of this section, provided such committee is duly organized under the provisions of chapter 103. The remainder of filing fees or party assessments collected by the Department of State shall be remitted to the appropriate state executive committees not later than the date of the primary election.

History.—s. 1, ch. 29935, 1955; s. 24, ch. 57-1; s. 1, ch. 57-62; s. 4, ch. 57-166; s. 1, ch. 69-295; ss. 10, 35, ch. 69-106; s. 11, ch. 77-175; s. 2, ch. 83-251; s. 4, ch. 91-107; s. 14, ch. 97-13; s. 10, ch. 2005-286.

F.S. 99.103 on Google Scholar

F.S. 99.103 on Casetext

Amendments to 99.103

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 99.103

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 99.103.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 99.103

Total Results: 20

951 Harbor Drive, LLC, etc. v. SD Construction, LLC, etc.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2024-06-19

Snippet: DCA 2019); Ladner v. AmSouth Bank, 32 So. 3d 99, 103 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“The determination of the

Reynaldo Figueroa-Sanabria v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2023-06-29

Snippet: (quoting Marshall v. Hendricks, 307 F.3d 36, 99, 103 (3d Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted))

STATE OF FLORIDA v. JEFFREY DARTER

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2022-11-02

Snippet: 1194; cf. United States v. Bradley, 488 Fed. Appx. 99, 103 (6th Cir. 2012) (“Courts have doubted the wisdom

David Puzio v. State of Florida

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2021-06-24

Snippet: victim.” 1 See Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99, 103 (2013) (“Any fact that, by law, increases the

Franklin Vereen v. State of Florida

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2019-03-28

Citation: 267 So. 3d 548

Snippet: that must be submitted to the jury.” 570 U.S. 99, 103 (2013). In calculating Vereen’s lowest permissible

Earl Raymond Campos v. Joana Campos

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2017-10-24

Citation: 230 So. 3d 553

Snippet: circumstances.” Pollock v. T & M Invs., Inc., 420 So.2d 99, 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). In contrast to final judgments

Sanabria v. Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLC

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2016-07-15

Citation: 197 So. 3d 94, 90 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 57, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10878, 2016 WL 3767181

Snippet: de novo. See Ladner v. AmSouth Bank, 32 So.3d 99, 103 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (“The determination of the sufficiency

Atwater v. City of Cape Coral

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2013-07-10

Citation: 120 So. 3d 595, 2013 WL 3449645

Snippet: pending cases.’ ” Mortimer v. State, 100 So.3d 99, 103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting Alamo Rent-A-Car,

Jardines v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2011-04-14

Citation: 73 So. 3d 34, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 147, 2011 Fla. LEXIS 884, 2011 WL 1405080

Snippet: multiple officers. See Place, 462 U.S. at 698-99, 103 S.Ct. 2637 (describing law enforcement activity

Bell v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2010-03-25

Citation: 33 So. 3d 724, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3864, 2010 WL 1076229

Snippet: (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Sule v. State, 968 So.2d 99, 103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (discussing when severance

McGee v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2009-10-07

Citation: 19 So. 3d 1074, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14918, 2009 WL 3189171

Snippet: abuse of discretion." Sule v. State, 968 So.2d 99, 103 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). "[O]ffenses are related offenses

Chandler v. Crosby

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 2005-10-06

Citation: 916 So. 2d 728, 2005 WL 2456006

Snippet: scrutiny." California v. Ramos, 463 U.S. 992, 998-99, 103 S.Ct. 3446, 77 L.Ed.2d 1171 (1983). Precluding

Wallace v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2003-07-02

Citation: 851 So. 2d 216, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9923, 2003 WL 21502939

Snippet: (1982)4 see also People v. Stewart, 161 Ill.App.3d 99, 103, 112 Ill.Dec. 655, 514 N.E.2d 51, 54 (1987)(“[T]here

Westerheide v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 2000-09-29

Citation: 767 So. 2d 637, 2000 WL 1434081

Snippet: views of the defendant's doctors. 463 U.S. at 898-99, 103 S.Ct. 3383 (footnote omitted). We agree with the

J.L. v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-17

Citation: 727 So. 2d 204, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 626, 1998 Fla. LEXIS 2422

Snippet: See generally United States v. Bold, 19 F.3d 99, 103 (2d Cir.1994). But for these types of tips (presently-occurring

JL v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1998-12-17

Citation: 727 So. 2d 204, 1998 WL 873070

Snippet: See generally United States v. Bold, 19 F.3d 99, 103 (2d Cir.1994). But for these types of tips (presently-occurring

Secretary of State v. Milligan

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1997-12-08

Citation: 704 So. 2d 152, 1997 WL 765659

Snippet: and the remainder distributed pursuant to section 99.103. Section 99.093, Florida Statutes (1995), provided

Libertarian Party of Florida v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-12-05

Citation: 687 So. 2d 1292, 1996 WL 693606

Snippet: which challenged the constitutionality of section 99.103, Florida Statutes (1993). The challenged statute

Libertarian Party of Florida v. Smith

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1996-01-04

Citation: 665 So. 2d 1119, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 41, 1996 WL 1728

Snippet: which challenged the constitutionality of section 99.103, Florida Statutes (1993). The challenged statute

Denmark v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1994-10-12

Citation: 646 So. 2d 754, 1994 WL 551527

Snippet: front of the jury.'"); Kellum v. State, 104 So.2d 99, 103 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958) (evidence that other police