Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 101.5604 (2025)
Adoption of system; procurement of equipment; commercial tabulations.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
101.5604 Adoption of system; procurement of equipment; commercial tabulations.—The board of county commissioners of any county, at any regular meeting or a special meeting called for the purpose, may, upon consultation with the supervisor of elections, adopt, purchase or otherwise procure, and provide for the use of any electronic or electromechanical voting system approved by the Department of State in all or a portion of the election precincts of that county. Thereafter the electronic or electromechanical voting system may be used for voting at all elections for public and party offices and on all measures and for receiving, registering, and counting the votes thereof in such election precincts as the governing body directs. A county must use an electronic or electromechanical precinct-count tabulation voting system.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2004–2010 · leading case: Sarasota All. for Fair Elections, Inc. v. Browning, 28 So. 3d 880 (Fla. 2010).
Sarasota All. for Fair Elections, Inc. v. Browning, 28 So. 3d 880 (Fla. 2010). “" § 101.5604, Fla. Stat. (2007) (emphasis added).”
Browning v. Sarasota All., 968 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). “See § 101.5604, Fla. Stat. (2006) ("The board of county commissioners .”
Wexler v. Lepore, 878 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). “See § 101.5604, Fla. Stat. (2003). Florida's recount procedures are governed by sections 102.”
Robert Wexler v. Arthur Anderson, 452 F.3d 1226 (11th Cir. 2006). “Fla. Stat. § 101.5604 ; see also Fla. Stat.”
Wexler v. Lepore, 319 F. Supp. 2d 1354 (S.D. Fla. 2004). “Fla. Stat. § 101.5604 ; see also Fla. Stat § 101.”
Wexler v. Lepore, 342 F. Supp. 2d 1097 (S.D. Fla. 2004). “” Fla. Stat. § 101.5604 ; see also Fla. Stat § 101.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.