Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
The 2024 Florida Statutes
|
||||||
|
Total Results: 13
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-07-17T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: Department of State Division of Elections); see also § 102.111, Fla. Stat. (setting forth the duties of the Elections
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-04-19T00:00:00-07:00
Snippet: of each case.” Bullington v. State, 311 So. 3d 102, 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020). The defense did not
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2010-08-20T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 43 So. 3d 124, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 12374, 2010 WL 3323746
Snippet: Commission certifies her election under section 102.111 of the Florida Statutes (2010). This argument is
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-12-10T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 772 So. 2d 1273
Snippet: to the seven-day deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112, Florida Statutes (2000), the Board…after the seven-day deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112?[7] III. THE APPLICABLE LAW A fundamental…after the seven-day deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112 under the circumstances presented. …county returns to the Department under sections 102.111 and 102.112 is in conflict with the time frame …102.166(4).[13] Second, the language in sections 102.111 and 102.112, authorizing the Secretary to ignore
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-12-07T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 772 So. 2d 1243
Snippet: for Writ of Mandamus or Other Writs. [3] See §§ 102.111, .121, Fla. Stat. (2000). [4] Bush received 2,…substitute the certification process of Section 102.111 and Section 102.112 for the contested election
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2000-11-20T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 772 So. 2d 1220
Snippet: under sections 102.111 and 102.112. Second, the mandatory language in section 102.111 conflicts with …above statutes, sections 102.111 and 102.112 contain a dichotomy. Section 102.111, which sets forth general…Fla. Stat. (2000). [29] §§ 102.111-.112, Fla.Stat. (2000). [30] §§ 102.111, .121, Fla. Stat. (2000). …completed prior to the deadline set forth in section 102.111(1), Florida Statutes (2000), requiring that all…interpretation of the deadline set forth in sections 102.111 and 102.112. The Division of Elections *1226 responded
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1999-06-17T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 739 So. 2d 561
Snippet: relied on United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 111, 85 S.Ct. 741, 13 L.Ed.2d 684 (1965), to support
Court: Fla. Att'y Gen. | Date Filed: 1998-10-01T00:53:00-07:00
Snippet: continue to receive campaign contributions). Cf., ss. 102.111-102.131, Fla. Stat., providing for the issuance
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1990-08-30T00:00:00-07:00
Citation: 565 So. 2d 1387
Snippet: number." United States v. Ventresca, 380 U.S. 102, 111, 85 S.Ct. 741, 747, 13 L.Ed.2d 684, 690 (1965)
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1988-12-07T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 536 So. 2d 1007
Snippet: Canvassing Board substantially complied with section 102.111, Florida Statutes (1987), and, therefore, deny …section 102.141, Florida Statutes (1987). Section 102.111, Florida Statutes (1987), provides that county …1988. Chappell, therefore, argues that section 102.111 mandates that the Flagler County votes not be counted…Chappell's claim, we do not find that section 102.111's "all missing counties" language…telephonically, rather than in writing, but section 102.111 does not explicitly require that the returns be
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1983-03-01T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 427 So. 2d 1042
Snippet: Summers]; 79 C.J.S. Supp. Secured Transactions §§ 102, 111, & 115 (1974). White & Summers
Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1980-09-17T00:53:00-07:00
Citation: 388 So. 2d 556
Snippet: mention of unopposed candidates is made in section 102.111(1), Florida Statutes (1979). There seems little…election. See § 101.252(2), Fla. Stat. (1979). [5] § 102.111(1), Fla. Stat. (1979). [6] Ch. 6469, § 27, Laws
Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1965-03-16T23:53:00-08:00
Citation: 173 So. 2d 483
Snippet: prevent an intelligent review on appeal. 13 A.L.R. 102, 111-114. Apparently, the same practice obtains in