Florida Statute 103.22 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 103
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS; POLITICAL PARTIES; EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES AND MEMBERS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 103.022

103.022 Write-in candidates for President and Vice President.—

(1) Persons seeking to qualify for election as write-in candidates for President and Vice President of the United States may have a blank space provided on the general election ballot for their names to be written in by filing an oath with the Department of State at any time after the 57th day, but before noon of the 49th day, before the date of the primary election in the year in which a presidential election is held.

(2) The Department of State shall prescribe the form to be used in administering the oath.

(3) The write-in candidates shall file with the department a certificate naming the required number of persons to serve as electors. The write-in candidates shall submit the Florida voter registration number and contact information for each presidential elector. Each presidential elector must be a qualified registered voter of this state. Such write-in candidates are not entitled to have their names on the ballot.

History.—s. 15, ch. 81-105; s. 9, ch. 83-251; s. 19, ch. 2005-286; s. 38, ch. 2023-120.

F.S. 103.022 on Google Scholar

F.S. 103.022 on CourtListener

Amendments to 103.022

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 103.022

Total Results: 26

United States v. Evans H. Starke, Jr.

62 F.3d 1374, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25225, 1995 WL 497291

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 7, 1995 | Docket: 1065798

Cited 122 times | Published

5 . Section 5313(a) and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1) require domestic financial institutions

United States v. Oscar De J. Tobon-Builes

706 F.2d 1092, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27044, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 574

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 6, 1983 | Docket: 2054222

Cited 111 times | Published

required by 31 U.S.C. § 1081 (1976) and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22 (1982). In this appeal, To-bon contends that:

United States v. Ramon J. Vazquez

53 F.3d 1216, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14280, 1995 WL 309589

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 7, 1995 | Docket: 2033990

Cited 92 times | Published

31 U.S.C.A. § 5313(a) (West 1983); 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1) (1994). A financial institution also must

United States v. $242,484.00

389 F.3d 1149, 2004 WL 2434993

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 2, 2004 | Docket: 398185

Cited 89 times | Published

transaction report, see 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 C.F.R. § 103.22; United States v. Belcher, 927 F.2d 1182, 1183

United States v. Fred W. Sans, Frank A. Weaner, Raymond O. McDonald Jr.

731 F.2d 1521, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 1010, 54 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5213, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22573

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 11, 1984 | Docket: 959695

Cited 49 times | Published

reporting requirements. The exemption, at 31 CFR § 103.22(b)(3) (1972), provided that a bank would not need

United States v. Mariano Hernando Ospina, Mauricio Lehrer

798 F.2d 1570, 21 Fed. R. Serv. 878, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30516

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 15, 1986 | Docket: 971032

Cited 47 times | Published

5313 and its implementing regulation 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1), see supra n. 2, the duty to

United States v. Jacobo Cure

804 F.2d 625, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 36337

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 17, 1986 | Docket: 804488

Cited 43 times | Published

because, under 31 U.S.C.A. § 5313 and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22, the customers of financial institutions do not

United States v. Douglas A. Denemark

779 F.2d 1559, 57 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 745, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21787

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 16, 1986 | Docket: 1094817

Cited 38 times | Published

requirement of 31 U.S.C. § 1081 and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22. The undisputed evidence showed that Tobon and

United States v. Victor Eisenstein, Beno Ghitis

731 F.2d 1540, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22535, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 14, 1984 | Docket: 1106134

Cited 34 times | Published

involving more than $10,-000. See 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a). Appellants concede that on at least two

United States v. Victor Eisenstein, Beno Ghitis

731 F.2d 1540, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22535, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 888

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: May 14, 1984 | Docket: 1106134

Cited 34 times | Published

involving more than $10,-000. See 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a). Appellants concede that on at least two

United States v. Manuel Ronald Puerto, Edgar Gilberto Puerto, L. Jean Everett, A/K/A Jean Kendall

730 F.2d 627, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23333

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 20, 1984 | Docket: 127192

Cited 34 times | Published

forms shall be furnished. Title 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a) (1983). At the Merchants Bank of Miami, the

United States v. Carolyn Brown, Richard Brown, Dorothy Lewis Brown, Rosa Brown, Shenita Jackson Brown

954 F.2d 1563, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3558, 1992 WL 28203

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 6, 1992 | Docket: 1008437

Cited 27 times | Published

excess of $10,000. 31 U.S.C. § 5313(a); 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1). In turn, section 5324(3) prohibits the

United States v. Francis Martin Giancola, and Charles A. Pifer, II

783 F.2d 1549, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22967, 54 U.S.L.W. 2518

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Mar 12, 1986 | Docket: 242817

Cited 21 times | Published

there has been a recent amendment to 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a) which in the future may or may not be sufficient

United States v. Isaac Kattan-Kassin, A/K/A Jaime Garcia

696 F.2d 893, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 31168

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jan 24, 1983 | Docket: 770305

Cited 19 times | Published

as required by 31 U.S.C.A. § 1081 and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22, 1 and, for approximately $4.8 million

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Huff

758 F. Supp. 2d 1288, 2010 WL 5287452

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Dec 17, 2010 | Docket: 2335187

Cited 14 times | Published

in a single day. See 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 CFR § 103.22. During his testimony, Huff admitted some knowledge

United States v. C. Wayne Phipps

81 F.3d 1056, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 9293, 1996 WL 167097

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 25, 1996 | Docket: 1054819

Cited 14 times | Published

currency of more than $10,000. 31 C.F.R. § 103.22 (1995). Thus, although under § 5313(a) the Secretary

United States v. James J. Belcher

927 F.2d 1182, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5137, 1991 WL 34601

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 2, 1991 | Docket: 1001664

Cited 12 times | Published

transactions involving over $10,-000. 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a) (1990). In this case, a grand jury in the Southern

United States v. Carlos Lafaurie

833 F.2d 1468, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16276

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Dec 14, 1987 | Docket: 812982

Cited 7 times | Published

exceeding $10,000. 31 U.S.C.A. § 5313; 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a). An Offer of Proof (stipulated by the

United States v. Antoinette M. Frink and James Lon Callier

912 F.2d 1413, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16907, 1990 WL 129273

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Sep 26, 1990 | Docket: 826942

Cited 6 times | Published

1990) and its implementing regulation, 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1) (1987). 2 . The government

United States v. $705,270.00 in United States Currency

820 F. Supp. 1398, 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6536, 1993 WL 164284

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Mar 31, 1993 | Docket: 1353435

Cited 5 times | Published

involving more than $10,000.00 in currency. 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1) (1992). a. Probable Cause The United States

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Huff

745 F. Supp. 2d 1284, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142776, 2010 WL 3860721

District Court, S.D. Florida | Filed: Sep 30, 2010 | Docket: 2344457

Cited 1 times | Published

in a single day. See 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 CFR § 103.22. During his testimony, Huff admitted some knowledge

United States v. $242,484.00

389 F.3d 1149

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Nov 20, 2003 | Docket: 212955

Cited 1 times | Published

transaction report, see 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 C.F.R. § 103.22; United States v. Belcher, 927 F.2d 1182, 1183

United States v. Casey Lee Paul

23 F.3d 365, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15515, 1994 WL 242209

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Jun 22, 1994 | Docket: 1034221

Cited 1 times | Published

31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1). According to Paul, in 1987, Treasury regulation § 103.22(a)(1) defined

United States v. $9,980 Seized from Community Bank & Trust Account No. 067-0022713

859 F. Supp. 2d 1281, 2012 WL 1640505

District Court, M.D. Florida | Filed: Jan 17, 2012 | Docket: 65981060

Published

exceeds $10,000. See 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a). It is illegal to “structure” transactions

United States v. Phipps

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | Filed: Apr 25, 1996 | Docket: 419641

Published

transaction in currency of more than $10,000. 31 C.F.R. § 103.22 (1995). Thus, although under § 5313(a)

Fulani v. Smith

640 So. 2d 1188, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7518, 1994 WL 391329

District Court of Appeal of Florida | Filed: Jul 29, 1994 | Docket: 64750047

Published

members of the U.S. Taxpayers Party of Florida. Section 103.022, Florida Statutes (1991), provides as follows: