Florida Statute 103.022 - Full Text and Legal Analysis

The 2025 Florida Statutes

Title IX
ELECTORS AND ELECTIONS

Chapter 103
PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS; POLITICAL PARTIES; EXECUTIVE COMMITTEES AND MEMBERS

View Entire Chapter

103.022 Write-in candidates for President and Vice President.—

(1) Persons seeking to qualify for election as write-in candidates for President and Vice President of the United States may have a blank space provided on the general election ballot for their names to be written in by filing an oath with the Department of State at any time after the 57th day, but before noon of the 49th day, before the date of the primary election in the year in which a presidential election is held.

(2) The Department of State shall prescribe the form to be used in administering the oath.

(3) The write-in candidates shall file with the department a certificate naming the required number of persons to serve as electors. The write-in candidates shall submit the Florida voter registration number and contact information for each presidential elector. Each presidential elector must be a qualified registered voter of this state. Such write-in candidates are not entitled to have their names on the ballot.

History.—s. 15, ch. 81-105; s. 9, ch. 83-251; s. 19, ch. 2005-286; s. 38, ch. 2023-120.

F.S. 103.022 on Google Scholar

F.S. 103.022 on CourtListener

Amendments to 103.022

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 103.022

Total Results: 25

United States v. Evans H. Starke, Jr., 62 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 122 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25225, 1995 WL 497291

5 . Section 5313(a) and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1) require domestic financial institutions

United States v. Oscar De J. Tobon-Builes, 706 F.2d 1092 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 111 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 27044, 13 Fed. R. Serv. 574

required by 31 U.S.C. § 1081 (1976) and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22 (1982). In this appeal, To-bon contends that:

United States v. Ramon J. Vazquez, 53 F.3d 1216 (11th Cir. 1995).

Cited 92 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14280, 1995 WL 309589

31 U.S.C.A. § 5313(a) (West 1983); 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1) (1994). A financial institution also must

United States v. $242,484.00, 389 F.3d 1149 (11th Cir. 2004).

Cited 89 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 2004 WL 2434993

transaction report, see 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 C.F.R. § 103.22; United States v. Belcher, 927 F.2d 1182, 1183

United States v. Fred W. Sans, Frank A. Weaner, Raymond O. McDonald Jr., 731 F.2d 1521 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 49 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 15 Fed. R. Serv. 1010, 54 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5213, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22573

reporting requirements. The exemption, at 31 CFR § 103.22(b)(3) (1972), provided that a bank would not need

United States v. Mariano Hernando Ospina, Mauricio Lehrer, 798 F.2d 1570 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 47 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 21 Fed. R. Serv. 878, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30516

5313 and its implementing regulation 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1), see supra n. 2, the duty to

United States v. Jacobo Cure, 804 F.2d 625 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 43 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 36337

because, under 31 U.S.C.A. § 5313 and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22, the customers of financial institutions do not

United States v. Douglas A. Denemark, 779 F.2d 1559 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 38 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 57 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 745, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21787

requirement of 31 U.S.C. § 1081 and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22. The undisputed evidence showed that Tobon and

United States v. Victor Eisenstein, Beno Ghitis, 731 F.2d 1540 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 34 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22535, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 888

involving more than $10,-000. See 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a). Appellants concede that on at least two

United States v. Manuel Ronald Puerto, Edgar Gilberto Puerto, L. Jean Everett, A/K/A Jean Kendall, 730 F.2d 627 (11th Cir. 1984).

Cited 34 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23333

forms shall be furnished. Title 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a) (1983). At the Merchants Bank of Miami, the

United States v. Carolyn Brown, Richard Brown, Dorothy Lewis Brown, Rosa Brown, Shenita Jackson Brown, 954 F.2d 1563 (11th Cir. 1992).

Cited 27 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 3558, 1992 WL 28203

excess of $10,000. 31 U.S.C. § 5313(a); 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1). In turn, section 5324(3) prohibits the

United States v. Francis Martin Giancola, and Charles A. Pifer, II, 783 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir. 1986).

Cited 21 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22967, 54 U.S.L.W. 2518

there has been a recent amendment to 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a) which in the future may or may not be sufficient

United States v. Isaac Kattan-Kassin, A/K/A Jaime Garcia, 696 F.2d 893 (11th Cir. 1983).

Cited 19 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 31168

as required by 31 U.S.C.A. § 1081 and 31 C.F.R. § 103.22, 1 and, for approximately $4.8 million

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Huff, 758 F. Supp. 2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 14 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 WL 5287452

in a single day. See 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 CFR § 103.22. During his testimony, Huff admitted some knowledge

United States v. C. Wayne Phipps, 81 F.3d 1056 (11th Cir. 1996).

Cited 14 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 9293, 1996 WL 167097

currency of more than $10,000. 31 C.F.R. § 103.22 (1995). Thus, although under § 5313(a) the Secretary

United States v. James J. Belcher, 927 F.2d 1182 (11th Cir. 1991).

Cited 12 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5137, 1991 WL 34601

transactions involving over $10,-000. 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a) (1990). In this case, a grand jury in the Southern

United States v. Carlos Lafaurie, 833 F.2d 1468 (11th Cir. 1987).

Cited 7 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16276

exceeding $10,000. 31 U.S.C.A. § 5313; 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a). An Offer of Proof (stipulated by the

United States v. Antoinette M. Frink and James Lon Callier, 912 F.2d 1413 (11th Cir. 1990).

Cited 6 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 16907, 1990 WL 129273

1990) and its implementing regulation, 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1) (1987). 2 . The government

United States v. $705,270.00 in United States Currency, 820 F. Supp. 1398 (S.D. Fla. 1993).

Cited 5 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6536, 1993 WL 164284

involving more than $10,000.00 in currency. 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1) (1992). a. Probable Cause The United States

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Huff, 745 F. Supp. 2d 1284 (S.D. Fla. 2010).

Cited 1 times | Published | District Court, S.D. Florida | 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142776, 2010 WL 3860721

in a single day. See 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 CFR § 103.22. During his testimony, Huff admitted some knowledge

United States v. $242,484.00, 389 F.3d 1149 (11th Cir. 2003).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

transaction report, see 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 C.F.R. § 103.22; United States v. Belcher, 927 F.2d 1182, 1183

United States v. Casey Lee Paul, 23 F.3d 365 (11th Cir. 1994).

Cited 1 times | Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit | 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15515, 1994 WL 242209

31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a)(1). According to Paul, in 1987, Treasury regulation § 103.22(a)(1) defined

Fulani v. Smith, 640 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994).

Published | District Court of Appeal of Florida | 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7518, 1994 WL 391329

members of the U.S. Taxpayers Party of Florida. Section 103.022, Florida Statutes (1991), provides as follows:

United States v. $9,980 Seized from Community Bank & Trust Account No. 067-0022713, 859 F. Supp. 2d 1281 (M.D. Fla. 2012).

Published | District Court, M.D. Florida | 2012 WL 1640505

exceeds $10,000. See 31 U.S.C. § 5313; 31 C.F.R. § 103.22(a). It is illegal to “structure” transactions

United States v. Phipps (11th Cir. 1996).

Published | Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

transaction in currency of more than $10,000. 31 C.F.R. § 103.22 (1995). Thus, although under § 5313(a)

This Florida statute resource is curated by Graham W. Syfert, Esq., a Jacksonville, Florida personal injury and workers' compensation attorney. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.