105.011
Definitions.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
105.011 Definitions.—
(1) As used in this chapter, the term “judicial office” includes the office of:
(a) Justice of the Supreme Court.
(b) Judge of a district court of appeal.
(c) Judge of a circuit court.
(d) County court judge.
(2) A judicial office is a nonpartisan office, and a candidate for election or retention thereto is prohibited from campaigning or qualifying for such an office based on party affiliation.
History.—s. 1, ch. 71-49; s. 1, ch. 72-310; s. 36, ch. 77-175.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1994–2019 · leading case: Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc.
Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc. (2019)
“” § 105.011(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). Furthermore, section 105.”
Davis v. Chiles (1998)
“See Fla. Stat. § 105.011 (2) (distinguishing between an "election" and a "retention" in defining a "judicial office").”
Nipper v. Smith (1994)
“The statute, the contemporary counterpart of which is now codified as Fla.Stat.Ann. § 105.011(2) (West 1992), provided essentially that “[a] judicial office is a nonpartisan office, and a candidate for election or retention thereto is prohibited from campaigning or qualifying…”
Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc. (2019)
“” § 105.011(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). Furthermore, section 105.”
Davis v. Chiles (1998)
“See Fla. Stat. § 105.011 (2) (distinguishing between an “election” and a “retention” in defining a “judicial office”).”
— 105.011(2) — 3 cases
Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc. (2019)
“” § 105.011(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). Furthermore, section 105.”
Nipper v. Smith (1994)
“The statute, the contemporary counterpart of which is now codified as Fla.Stat.Ann. § 105.011(2) (West 1992), provided essentially that “[a] judicial office is a nonpartisan office, and a candidate for election or retention thereto is prohibited from campaigning or qualifying…”
Orange County, Florida v. Rick Singh, etc. (2019)
“” § 105.011(2), Fla. Stat. (2018). Furthermore, section 105.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.