Florida Statute 112.27 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS

Chapter 112
PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: GENERAL PROVISIONS

View Entire Chapter

F.S. 112.27

112.27 Authority to interchange employees.—

(1) Any department, agency, or instrumentality of the state is authorized to participate in a program of interchange of employees with departments, agencies, or instrumentalities of the state, the Federal Government, or another state, as a sending or receiving agency.

(2) The period of individual assignment or detail under an interchange program shall not exceed 12 months, nor shall any person be assigned or detailed for more than 12 months during any 36-month period. Details relating to any matter covered in this part may be the subject of an agreement between the sending and receiving agencies. Elected officials shall not be assigned from a sending agency nor detailed to a receiving agency.

History.—s. 3, ch. 65-524; s. 3, ch. 98-331.

F.S. 112.27 on Google Scholar

F.S. 112.27 on Casetext

Amendments to 112.27

Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 112.27

Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 112.27.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 112.27

Total Results: 7

Hlad v. State

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1990-07-19

Citation: 565 So. 2d 762, 1990 WL 98751

Snippet: and Laches, § 83 et seq; 30A C.J.S., Equity § 112; 27 Am.Jur.2d., Equity §§ 152, 153, 154. Laches is

State v. Rameriz

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1973-10-19

Citation: 284 So. 2d 241

Snippet: L.Ed.2d 559, writ dism'd 400 U.S. 23, 91 S.Ct. 112, 27 L.Ed.2d 122, reh. den. 400 U.S. 984, 91 S.Ct. 363

Markham v. Friedland

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1971-02-19

Citation: 245 So. 2d 645

Snippet: 88, 182 So. 417; Goodman v. Carter, 158 Fla. 112, 27 So.2d 748). Although the statutes seem to contemplate

Lacy v. Estes

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida | Date Filed: 1963-12-20

Citation: 158 So. 2d 794, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3011

Snippet: 793;8 Hymel v. Bing, 67 Ohio App. 432, 31 N.E.2d 112; 27 A. C. J.S. Discovery § 23, p. 54. See also, In

Wells v. Thomas

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1955-02-23

Citation: 78 So. 2d 378

Snippet: 15 So.2d 208. In Goodman v. Carter, 158 Fla. 112, 27 So.2d 748, this court held that Kester v. Bostwick

Reichert v. Appel

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1954-09-24

Citation: 74 So. 2d 674

Snippet: 1065, 55 So.2d 246; Rest.Confl. of Laws, Sec. 112; 27 C.J.S., Divorce, § 337; 19 C.J., Divorce, § 850;

Nichols v. Roy Brown

Court: Supreme Court of Florida | Date Filed: 1948-01-06

Citation: 33 So. 2d 161, 159 Fla. 897, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 1016

Snippet: 25 So.2d 200 and Goodman v. Carter, 158 Fla. 112, 27 So.2d 748. It is so ordered. TERRELL, BUFORD, SEBRING