112.3241
Judicial review.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
112.3241 Judicial review.—Any final action by the commission taken pursuant to this part shall be subject to review in a district court of appeal upon the petition of the party against whom an adverse opinion, finding, or recommendation is made.
History.—s. 6, ch. 75-199; s. 4, ch. 84-318.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Latham v. FLORIDA COM'N ON ETHICS
Latham v. FLORIDA COM'N ON ETHICS (1997)
“" § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. Thus, court review of administrative action is only available at the point the Commission issues its Final Order and Public Report.”
Zerweck v. State Commission on Ethics (1982)
“Section 112.3241, Florida Statutes (1979), provides in part: Any final action by the commission taken pursuant to this part shall be subject to review in a District Court of Appeal upon the petition of the party against whom an adverse opinion, finding, or recommendation is made.”
Robert K. Robinson v. Commission on Ethics (2018)
“See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (“Any final action by the commission taken pursuant to [part III of chapter 112] shall be subject to judicial review in a district court of appeal upon the petition of the party against whom the adverse opinion, finding, or recommendation is made.”
DeBusk v. Smith (1980)
“Section 112.3241, Florida Statutes (1975), provides that "[a]ny final action by the commission taken pursuant to this part shall be subject to review in a District Court of Appeal upon the petition of the party against whom an adverse opinion, finding, or recommendation *329 is…”
Howard v. State Com'n on Ethics (1982)
“[1] As such, it constituted final agency action appealable under Section 112.3241, Florida Statutes (1979) [2] which, in part, provides: Any final action by the commission taken pursuant to this part shall be subject to review in a District Court of Appeal upon the petition of…”
Bruner v. State Commission on Ethics (1980)
“On motion of appellant for a su-persedeas order staying the power of the Governor to suspend appellant from office pending the disposition of the appellate proceedings, this Court, on June 27, 1980, granted the motion pursuant to § 112.3241, Florida Statutes (1979). That section…”
Kinzer v. STATE COM'N ON ETHICS (1995)
“§ 112.3241. [3] The 1989 version of the statutory penalties is applicable to the 1990 appointment at issue here.”
Mulgado v. Diaz (2006)
“See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. Admin.”
Mulgado v. Rodriguez (2006)
“See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. Admin.”
David Rivera v. Florida Commission on Ethics (2016)
“Although the Commission’s final report of its findings and recommendations is subject to judicial review, see § 112.3241, Fla. Stat., the disciplinary process in this case will not be complete until the Speaker acts on the Commission’s recommendation.”
Campen v. Jones (1979)
“This appeal is dismissed because appellant is not a party authorized by Florida Statute § 112.3241 to appeal the Commission’s order.”
Honorable Rick Scott, individually and in etc. v. Donald Hinkle (2018)
“In contrast with the explicit authority granted to the Commission over public trust-related complaints in the Florida Constitution and statutes, there is no secondary complaint- resolving authority granted to Florida’s circuit courts, or to any other entity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.