Florida Statutes
Fla. Stat. § 112.3241 (2025)
Judicial review.
✓ 2025 Florida Statutes — current through the 2025 Regular Session
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
FL-LEGleg.state.fl.us
JustiaFla. Statutes
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
112.3241 Judicial review.—Any final action by the commission taken pursuant to this part shall be subject to review in a district court of appeal upon the petition of the party against whom an adverse opinion, finding, or recommendation is made.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Latham v. Florida Com'n on Ethics, 694 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
Latham v. Florida Com'n on Ethics, 694 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). “" § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. Thus, court review of administrative action is only available at the point the Commission issues its Final Order and Public Report.”
Zerweck v. State Comm'n on Ethics, 409 So. 2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). “Section 112.3241, Florida Statutes (1979), provides in part: Any final action by the commission taken pursuant to this part shall be subject to review in a District Court of Appeal upon the petition of the party against whom an adverse opinion, finding, or recommendation is made.”
Robert K. Robinson v. Comm'n on Ethics, 242 So. 3d 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). “See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (“Any final action by the commission taken pursuant to [part III of chapter 112] shall be subject to judicial review in a district court of appeal upon the petition of the party against whom the adverse opinion, finding, or recommendation is made.”
DeBusk v. Smith, 390 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 1980). “Section 112.3241, Florida Statutes (1975), provides that "[a]ny final action by the commission taken pursuant to this part shall be subject to review in a District Court of Appeal upon the petition of the party against whom an adverse opinion, finding, or recommendation *329 is…”
Howard v. State Com'n on Ethics, 421 So. 2d 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). “[1] As such, it constituted final agency action appealable under Section 112.3241, Florida Statutes (1979) [2] which, in part, provides: Any final action by the commission taken pursuant to this part shall be subject to review in a District Court of Appeal upon the petition of…”
Bruner v. State Comm'n on Ethics, 384 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). “On motion of appellant for a su-persedeas order staying the power of the Governor to suspend appellant from office pending the disposition of the appellate proceedings, this Court, on June 27, 1980, granted the motion pursuant to § 112.3241, Florida Statutes (1979). That section…”
Kinzer v. State Com'n on Ethics, 654 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). “§ 112.3241. [3] The 1989 version of the statutory penalties is applicable to the 1990 appointment at issue here.”
Mulgado v. Diaz, 933 So. 2d 658 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). “See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. Admin.”
Mulgado v. Rodriguez, 933 So. 2d 657 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). “See § 112.3241, Fla. Stat. (2005); Fla. Admin.”
David Rivera v. Florida Comm'n on Ethics, 195 So. 3d 1177 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). “Although the Commission’s final report of its findings and recommendations is subject to judicial review, see § 112.3241, Fla. Stat., the disciplinary process in this case will not be complete until the Speaker acts on the Commission’s recommendation.”
Campen v. Jones, 376 So. 2d 456 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). “This appeal is dismissed because appellant is not a party authorized by Florida Statute § 112.3241 to appeal the Commission’s order.”
Honorable Rick Scott, individually & in etc. v. Donald Hinkle, 259 So. 3d 982 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). “In contrast with the explicit authority granted to the Commission over public trust-related complaints in the Florida Constitution and statutes, there is no secondary complaint- resolving authority granted to Florida’s circuit courts, or to any other entity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.