Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
Florida Statute 116.35 | Lawyer Caselaw & Research
Link to State of Florida Official Statute
Statute is currently reporting as:
F.S. 116.35 Case Law from Google Scholar Google Search for Amendments to 116.35

The 2024 Florida Statutes

Title X
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, AND RECORDS
Chapter 116
POWERS AND DUTIES OF OFFICERS
View Entire Chapter
F.S. 116.35
116.35 Notary public commissions; employees of state and county agencies.—Each agency, board, commission or department of the state and of the several counties of the state is hereby authorized to pay the cost of securing a notary public commission for any employee of such agency, board, commission or department. Such cost is declared to be an expense of such agency, board, commission or department and shall be expended from the budget thereof. The chief administrative officer of each such agency, board, commission or department shall determine the number of notaries public necessary for the proper administration of such agency, board, commission or department. All fees collected by such notaries public as hereinafter provided shall become fee receipts of the state or the several counties and shall be deposited in the general fund from which the budget of such agency, board, commission or department is allocated.
History.—s. 1, ch. 67-282.

F.S. 116.35 on Google Scholar

F.S. 116.35 on Casetext

Amendments to 116.35


Arrestable Offenses / Crimes under Fla. Stat. 116.35
Level: Degree
Misdemeanor/Felony: First/Second/Third

Current data shows no reason an arrest or criminal charge should have occurred directly under Florida Statute 116.35.

Annotations, Discussions, Cases:

Cases Citing Statute 116.35

Total Results: 3

Brown v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2010-06-17T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 41 So. 3d 116, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 348, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 945, 2010 WL 2403348

Snippet: Perry, Quince, Pariente 17 June 2010 41 So. 3d 116, 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 348, 2010 Fla. LEXIS 945,

Confederation of Canada L. Ins. Co. v. Vega Y Arminan

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1961-12-19T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 135 So. 2d 867

Snippet: citing Simon v. Southern Railway Co., 236 U.S. 115, 116, 35 S.Ct. 255, 59 L.Ed. 492; Glazier v. Van Sant, W.D.Mo

Coleman v. City of St. Petersburg

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1953-01-09T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 62 So. 2d 409, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 2071

Snippet: Skinner v. City of Eustis, 147 Fla. 22, 2 So.2d 116, 35 A.L.R. 359, cannot be reconciled with its holding