Syfert Injury Law Firm

Austin Bates v. State of Florida

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2024-10-09T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: DCA 2020) (quoting Mendoza v. State, 964 So. 2d 121, 131 (Fla. 2007)). Although we recognize that collateral

ROBERT E. GREATHOUSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2023-09-27T00:00:00-07:00

Snippet: error.' " Mendoza v. State, 964 So. 2d 121, 131 (Fla. 2007) (quoting Kilgore v. State, 688 So.

Diaz v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-11-21T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 132 So. 3d 93, 2013 WL 6170645

Snippet: tactical decisions.” Lawrence v. State, 831 So.2d 121, 131 (Fla.2002). The applicability of the theory of

Bombardier Aerospace Corp. v. Signature Flight Support Corp.

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-10-11T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 123 So. 3d 128, 2013 WL 5575514, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16194

Snippet: , 58 (Tex.1981); Lairsen v. Slutzky, 80 S.W.3d 121, 131 (Tex.App.2002). The Texas doctrine of excessive

State v. Medina

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2013-08-07T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 118 So. 3d 944, 2013 WL 4007281, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12325

Snippet: voluntary waiver.4 See Lawrence v. State, 831 So.2d 121, 131-32 (Fla.2002) (concluding that counsel’s performance

Bell v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2013-02-07T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 108 So. 3d 639, 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 87, 2013 WL 452130, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 204

Snippet: fundamental error. Mendoza v. State, 964 So.2d 121, 131 (Fla.2007) (unpre-served challenge to voir dire

FLEURIMOND v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2009-05-27T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 10 So. 3d 1140, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 6236, 2009 WL 1456743

Snippet: receives a fair trial. Mendoza v. State, 964 So.2d 121, 131 (Fla.2007). Although taking each of the prosecutors

Morris v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 2006-04-20T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 931 So. 2d 821

Snippet: n. 3 (Fla.2003); Lawrence v. State, 831 So.2d 121, 131-32 (Fla. 2002); Deaton v. Dugger, 635 So.2d 4,

Prince v. State

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 2004-12-22T00:00:00-08:00

Citation: 889 So. 2d 976, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19656, 2004 WL 2952743

Snippet: included offense. Lawrence v. State, 831 So.2d 121, 131 (Fla.2002). Notwithstanding, “to avoid similar

Department of Administration v. Albritton

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1986-06-05T00:00:00-07:00

Citation: 489 So. 2d 228, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1288, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8165

Snippet: benefits are exempt from legal process under section 121.131, Florida Statutes (1983). We agree with the reasoning

McClung v. McClung

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1985-03-21T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 465 So. 2d 637

Snippet: benefits, which have accrued to date." Section 121.131, Florida Statutes (1983) prohibits these benefits

Buzzard v. Buzzard

Court: Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Date Filed: 1982-03-11T23:53:00-08:00

Citation: 412 So. 2d 388

Snippet: injunction on the ground, inter alia, that Section 121.131, Florida Statutes (1979) exempted the husband'…denied, and this appeal followed timely. Section 121.131, Florida Statutes (1979), the Florida Retirement…provides an exception to the exemption of Section 121.131 that would otherwise apply. Section 61.11 provides…intention to allow him to claim the benefit of section 121.131 against her is clearly demonstrated. Having done…done so, we reluctantly conclude that the section 121.131 exemption does apply here. In the first place,

Sandstrom v. State

Court: Fla. | Date Filed: 1976-06-30T00:53:00-07:00

Citation: 336 So. 2d 572

Snippet: L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Mayo, 103 Fla. 552, 139 So. 121, 131 (1932) (on rehearing). [22] Conyers v. Glenn,